I started on BitcoinTalk over a year ago, and when I first started here I asked a friend to use an account because there was an inherent difference between using a newbie account and a more well established account. A friend of mine at the time provided me with one for free and I started joining signature campaigns and using it prominently on the forums.
So now he admits it isn't his account, after having simply signed a bitcoin address from January when asked to, which implied he was claiming to be its original owner.
Trouble is this awfully convenient excuse that a 'friend' gave him the Phoenix1969 account. Because that is what trustworthy people do, isn't it? Take a high-ranking forum account to use for the latest shutupandtakemymoney ICO without considering the deception they are perpetrating by doing so.
I have no knowledge of the history of the account other than of when I started using it. I've not claimed to steal anyone's identity; Where have I claimed to be Eric Hansen?
I am Phoenix1969, an anonymous internet persona and what more would you expect from someone going into a a grey-area gambling project? Would you go in plastering your name all over the internet? Probably not.
No but then I wouldn't use somebody else's account and history to pretend that I was a legitimate long-term member of standing in order to conspire with others to launch the latest shutupandtakemymoney ICO. It is this which makes you untrustworthy
Here are the facts, I've done nothing other then help deliver for the LIR project since I've been here. The history of this account is irrelevant as to whether LIR is a scam or not. If it was, as many people have stated we would've taken the 450 BTC and left. Instead, we have stuck here building our product, reworking our site for a more professional look and the results are paying off. Just yesterday, we had almost 100 new users unique by IP address sign up and test the site out.
It is absolutely relevant to 'LIR' whether those behind it are deceiving people as to their forum standing and history in order to launch the latest shutupandtakemymoney ICO.
I don't get it, we've gone through two new designs, we've implemented various bug fixes and patches to our site, ran a tournament for which everyone was paid for, started running a second tournament, started marketing with a Twitter advertising firm, we've ran a signature campaign for which everyone who was suppose to get paid got paid and now Shogdite and Jigar are working on developing a plethora of new content - Where's the scam in all of this?
I ask that the red trust is removed immediately because it's completely uncalled for. You call this a scam for which you have absolutely no basis other then the origins of my account. On the contrary had you looked at our project you would see we've delivered and are continuing to develop a working product. It's a blatant misuse of a power.
Anyways, feel free to think whatever you want of me, but LIR is here to stay and so am I.
How is marking somebody as being demonstrably untrustworthy because of the proven nature of their deception a 'blatant misuse of power'?
