All things are relative. Dogmatism is always proved to failure.(And even this sentence proves itself as false and is self-contradictory.
)
When i talk about centralisation, it often concerns centralisation of power.
When you delegate power and centralise it in to the hands of one person, it
often happens and happened that this person uses the power to do bad things.
When you centralise money supply and the issuer can legally force the people to
use his money as legal-money, you create a dangerous monopole. Dangerous for
the wealth of those who use this money. How long are governments printing money to decrease their dept and for reasons of "economic stimulation"?
Think of something named "Cantillon-effect".
Centralisation often makes that you depend on a monopole. That is simply not good! In this context you can speak of decentralisation as free market-competition.
Everything has it's pros and contras. So has decentralisation.
But when it comes to terms or issues like money and power, centralisation leads to a unreasonable hierachy that very often "makes some more equal than others"!
