BTC-e is different story. Most big exchanges have are licensed, regulated and are more trustworthy. BTC-e was never "the cleanest" exchange and many knew it. Furthermore, there was normal occurrence to get your account "hacked" and find out that coins are gone.
However, everything connected to crypto must be done with high vigilance.
There is no difference. Eventhough some of exchanges are regulated, there are likely to or liable to suffer from hacks. Most of already knew that BTC-e was not "the cleanest" but we still take the risk of putting funds there.
Reputation becomes important because some exchangers eventually become a scam, this we must be aware that we are not exposed to a scam.
use a regulated exchanger and the possibility to be scammed is almost zero.
It's still prone to fraud (like regulated banks and investment companies e.g mutual funds) but the good thing here is, since it's regulated, chances are low to happened and we can sued them and can able to get back our funds.
Just take note that regulated exchanges requires verification which for me, I don't see any problem to that.
Exactly, That is why the goal of this oversight is to ensure that financial markets operate with a minimum of fraud and to provide a fair, transparent marketplace for investors and businesses alike. This approach has been proven to be effective and very efficient. I don't see a problem with requires verification, KYC/AML for some exchanges. This is a safety net for most of us.