cause right now, i need to keep counting the amount to set each time when the balance is change..
Topic: [SHUTTING DOWN] [DiceBitco.in | BE THE BANK ! | 1% House Edge] - page 95. (Read 102257 times)
August 04, 2014, 09:15:49 AM
is it possible to change the "Stop at" refer to the amount bet rather then balance remain?
cause right now, i need to keep counting the amount to set each time when the balance is change..
cause right now, i need to keep counting the amount to set each time when the balance is change..
August 04, 2014, 09:04:07 AM
remember me function dosent work
you have added it but it dosent work!!
you have added it but it dosent work!!
August 04, 2014, 06:56:37 AM
Please understand that dooglus is just simply a user here, he is not related to the site in anyway other than being an investor of the bank roll and a player on the site like you and I.
August 04, 2014, 06:41:35 AM
That would make sense, thank you. Although the difference is now ~0.5 BTC, which would imply 5 BTC of profits was divested. I can't quite connect the dots here yet. The site was up ~15 BTC earlier (from the low point of ~ -3 to ~ +12), so even assuming those who divested started at the low point and bailed at the high point, ONE THIRD of the investment would have to be divested to get the 5 BTC, right? I wish there was more stats available about investment/divestment/commission.
Yes, I saw that 0.5 BTC gap too.
So here's another guess:
The site is kind of odd in how it treats the "invested amount". If you invest 10 and earn 1 in profit, it shows your invested amount as "10" and your profit as "1". There's no way of seeing the "11" without first clicking "divest" which then shows you how much is actually available to divest.
I think if you divest that 11 and reinvest the 10.9 that's left (you pay 0.1 in commission when you divest the 1 BTC profit), your investment will then show 10.9 and your profit will show 0. I think. So the "profit" is shows is "profit that you didn't pay commission on yet" or something like that.
If that is the case (and I'm mostly guessing based on how things look) then the 0.5 difference is 0.5 of profit that was divested, not 10% of 5 BTC of profit that was divested.
That sounds more plausible, right?
I expect we'll get the real story soon...
Sorry for the late response
Dooglus is exactly right. The profit you see under Investments is bankroll - total_invested but you have to take into account that when a user Divests the amount (together with profits made) is subtracted from the bankroll thus this 0.5BTC gap there. FYI dooglus is mostly to blame for this 
He had a ~ 0.5BTC profit from investing!! I can understand that most people are having difficulties on differentiating the total amount invested with the "how much my total invested amount is worth?" and I am working on presenting these statistics on a more user-friendly way. Sorry for that. I think it is a weak point that we have to address.
August 04, 2014, 04:56:23 AM
sad to say.. it's not 
August 04, 2014, 04:51:45 AM
Dooglus's new project? woot
August 04, 2014, 04:43:13 AM
hmm... PD3 coming out on 9 aug.. fierce competition coming with new feature.. hold this site can hold with the investment option that PD3 dont have
August 03, 2014, 09:58:06 PM
That would make sense, thank you. Although the difference is now ~0.5 BTC, which would imply 5 BTC of profits was divested. I can't quite connect the dots here yet. The site was up ~15 BTC earlier (from the low point of ~ -3 to ~ +12), so even assuming those who divested started at the low point and bailed at the high point, ONE THIRD of the investment would have to be divested to get the 5 BTC, right? I wish there was more stats available about investment/divestment/commission.
Yes, I saw that 0.5 BTC gap too.
So here's another guess:
The site is kind of odd in how it treats the "invested amount". If you invest 10 and earn 1 in profit, it shows your invested amount as "10" and your profit as "1". There's no way of seeing the "11" without first clicking "divest" which then shows you how much is actually available to divest.
I think if you divest that 11 and reinvest the 10.9 that's left (you pay 0.1 in commission when you divest the 1 BTC profit), your investment will then show 10.9 and your profit will show 0. I think. So the "profit" is shows is "profit that you didn't pay commission on yet" or something like that.
If that is the case (and I'm mostly guessing based on how things look) then the 0.5 difference is 0.5 of profit that was divested, not 10% of 5 BTC of profit that was divested.
That sounds more plausible, right?
I expect we'll get the real story soon...
August 03, 2014, 09:36:01 PM
Shouldn't it be the same amount?
Could the difference be due to some investors having already paid commission?
That's just a guess. But if you invest, make a profit, then divest, you pay commission immediately.
Total investor profit in that case (net of commission) would be less than total losses by players.
That would make sense, thank you. Although the difference is now ~0.5 BTC, which would imply 5 BTC of profits was divested. I can't quite connect the dots here yet. The site was up ~15 BTC earlier (from the low point of ~ -3 to ~ +12), so even assuming those who divested started at the low point and bailed at the high point, ONE THIRD of the investment would have to be divested to get the 5 BTC, right? I wish there was more stats available about investment/divestment/commission.
August 03, 2014, 07:43:46 PM
I lost count of my nit-picks, but here's another:
N+1) the 'login' page asks for 'OTP' but elsewhere you call it '2FA'. Lots of people don't know the term 'OTP' and don't realise you're asking for their 2FA code. It's probably best to just call it '2FA' everywhere.
N+1) the 'login' page asks for 'OTP' but elsewhere you call it '2FA'. Lots of people don't know the term 'OTP' and don't realise you're asking for their 2FA code. It's probably best to just call it '2FA' everywhere.
August 03, 2014, 07:42:17 PM
Shouldn't it be the same amount?
Could the difference be due to some investors having already paid commission?
That's just a guess. But if you invest, make a profit, then divest, you pay commission immediately.
Total investor profit in that case (net of commission) would be less than total losses by players.
August 03, 2014, 04:05:21 PM
It doesn't get slower with time (and how could it possibly get slower if it runs only for 800 cycles at max).
I guess I misunderstand this:
it starts fast but then slows down dramatically in a few dozen of rolls so that it becomes unbearable to see it rolling
I'm not sure what you're saying about it being impossible for something to get slower over time if it only happens a maximum of 800 times. And I guess it doesn't matter either. We're guessing about what's causing the problem without really knowing. We should just wait and the developers will fix it I expect.
I meant to say that it didn't get slower gradually, the slow-down happened within 2-3 rolls. It seems to be somehow related with the overall load of the computer. But don't say that it is overloaded, it is not, and everything else runs pretty fast. Live stats are updating with the same rate, and I would even say a way too often. If I don't do anything at all, the rolls are running fast.
And yes, that Javascript Robot Roll code loads CPU 100%.
August 03, 2014, 04:04:55 PM
Very funny
Let me rephrase, shouldn't site_profit == user_profit * -1
Oooh. I see. That is one stupid mistake, hahaha. Well, no idea then. Sorry. Let me rephrase, shouldn't site_profit == user_profit * -1
August 03, 2014, 04:01:28 PM
One of the numbers (I forget which) updates much less often than the other. Stare at it for a couple seconds and you will easily tell.
I was staring at it for quite a while, didn't help much. Maybe my stare is not powerful enough
Aha well that's my best guess, and I think it's right. When manI gets on chat, or online here, you can ask him directly via PM. He always responds promptly.
August 03, 2014, 04:00:32 PM
One of the numbers (I forget which) updates much less often than the other. Stare at it for a couple seconds and you will easily tell.
I was staring at it for quite a while, didn't help much. Maybe my stare is not powerful enough
August 03, 2014, 03:58:16 PM
-snip-
Shouldn't it be the same amount?
No. One is the Site profit and the other one is the User profit. If the user wins, the site loses profit and the other way around. Shouldn't it be the same amount?
Very funny
Let me rephrase, shouldn't site_profit == user_profit * -1
August 03, 2014, 03:54:07 PM
Shouldn't it be the same amount?
One of the numbers (I forget which) updates much less often than the other. Stare at it for a couple seconds and you will easily tell.
August 03, 2014, 03:53:48 PM
-snip-
Shouldn't it be the same amount?
No. One is the Site profit and the other one is the User profit. If the user wins, the site loses profit and the other way around. Shouldn't it be the same amount?
August 03, 2014, 03:52:55 PM
Shouldn't it be the same amount?
August 03, 2014, 03:35:33 PM
It doesn't get slower with time (and how could it possibly get slower if it runs only for 800 cycles at max).
I guess I misunderstand this:
it starts fast but then slows down dramatically in a few dozen of rolls so that it becomes unbearable to see it rolling
I'm not sure what you're saying about it being impossible for something to get slower over time if it only happens a maximum of 800 times. And I guess it doesn't matter either. We're guessing about what's causing the problem without really knowing. We should just wait and the developers will fix it I expect.
Jump to: