Pages:
Author

Topic: SIGNS OF SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN (Read 3769 times)

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
October 03, 2016, 12:22:03 AM
#95
yes , you are right but here problem is that how can we sure that the signature campaign that is new to offer to join new member is truely honest . here i am asking about the signature campaign omicron . think about it .
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 03, 2016, 12:00:57 AM
#94
The signs of signature campaign that will make scam to their users usualy they give much payment every weeks, they are new service without escrow service while run signature campaign on this forum.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
October 02, 2016, 11:50:33 PM
#93
Ya users must be aware of these signature campaigns where there is no reputed campaign manager available.People must learn before applying in signature campaign that weather a reputed member is announcing that or if the funds are escrow otherwise no need to waste time there.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
October 02, 2016, 11:50:20 PM
#92
I think i am lucky, because i never say any bad campaign are here, Even now i am still in a very good campaign, Actually when i started than i joined the different campaigns but i like only one campaign where now i am here Bitcoin.ag , So that's why i have no any bad experience about different campaigns. 
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
October 02, 2016, 08:58:11 PM
#91
Escrow isn't a terrible idea, but it adds some complication for the admins,
and unless they are being compensated, it may not be worth their time.
It would do a bit to allow only companies that are reputable to post on this site, which would be a good thing,
but it would be a lot of work to verify and keep track of all of these websites.

Allowing people to earn from a signature campaign is a privilege,
and it's up to each user to make sure they join a campaign that is trusted and will pay them what they are promised.


The majority of the people don't care about for what service they are advertising in their signature space as they just want to earn some quick and easy dollars.

It actually surprises me that a few times an obvious scam was hosting a signature campaign, and that so many people were applying for it.

These people don't care whether or not they are advertising a scam service that will have a lot victims as result. It's a shame. Pure greed.

Yeah I also noticed that some times we see a ponzi comes and start a signature campaign and everyone rush towards that campaign and start to apply to there without reading even the rules and the details of the campaign.
People should have to study about the company that for it will they be able to advertise or not and they have to confirm that at the campaign for which we are applying is legit or not.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179
October 02, 2016, 05:06:37 PM
#90
Escrow isn't a terrible idea, but it adds some complication for the admins,
and unless they are being compensated, it may not be worth their time.
It would do a bit to allow only companies that are reputable to post on this site, which would be a good thing,
but it would be a lot of work to verify and keep track of all of these websites.

Allowing people to earn from a signature campaign is a privilege,
and it's up to each user to make sure they join a campaign that is trusted and will pay them what they are promised.


The majority of the people don't care about for what service they are advertising in their signature space as they just want to earn some quick and easy dollars.

It actually surprises me that a few times an obvious scam was hosting a signature campaign, and that so many people were applying for it.

These people don't care whether or not they are advertising a scam service that will have a lot victims as result. It's a shame. Pure greed.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
October 02, 2016, 09:32:08 AM
#89
Escrow isn't a terrible idea, but it adds some complication for the admins,
and unless they are being compensated, it may not be worth their time.
It would do a bit to allow only companies that are reputable to post on this site, which would be a good thing,
but it would be a lot of work to verify and keep track of all of these websites.

Allowing people to earn from a signature campaign is a privilege,
and it's up to each user to make sure they join a campaign that is trusted and will pay them what they are promised.

sr. member
Activity: 1002
Merit: 254
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
October 02, 2016, 01:30:55 AM
#88
However, using one private key, you can weekly send to the ten addresses on the list.  The list is also controlled by both hilariousandco and the Company, but that is not a Crypto issue, most likely using a third party document control or something.
sr. member
Activity: 1002
Merit: 254
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
October 02, 2016, 01:25:30 AM
#87
So, say that hilariousandco and Company X start a campaign.  Ten people are hired.  Their addresses go unto a CSV or database.  A BTC address is set up to pay the people, weekly payouts.  Anyone can obviously add funds to the address, but without both private keys, one from hilariousandco and one from Company X, funds cannot be taken out
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 533
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 29, 2016, 08:33:38 PM
#86
There should be a rule that every campaign will have its escrow to secure the hard work of the participants. If it become the rule of this forum then the trusted companies will without any hesitation keep their funds in escrow for the campaigns.
This is just like a public storage for all of the participant, for making guarantee if the campaign is real, and for preventing a lot of people is get a scam, right? but I can't say if all of the campaigns is not having a manager is always a scam.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Hire me for your campaign management.
September 29, 2016, 05:24:58 PM
#85
There should be a rule that every campaign will have its escrow to secure the hard work of the participants. If it become the rule of this forum then the trusted companies will without any hesitation keep their funds in escrow for the campaigns.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
September 29, 2016, 09:11:18 AM
#84
Escow will safe you from scammer not only on signatures campaign but also on your online transactions, and the campaign manager should beheld responsible.  the bitcointalk member from my experience any offer that is too good to be truth avoid it. This three suggestions will safe you from scammers.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 502
CTO & Spokesman
September 29, 2016, 02:55:52 AM
#83
After series of scam signature campaign that fails to pay its member at the end of their programme or as agreed in their T.O.S, i feel that it is necessary for us to discuss series of factors to be considered before joining a campaign though i understand clearly that all campaign their rules to get you accepted but the participants does not have any rule in order to join any signature programme making us to be a prey to some scam stars.
What are the things to watch for in a campaign before we can certify it legit or not?
The best thing you do before joining signature campaign .you need to know if the funds if the campaign already escrow to trusted people here in this forum. I actually do not join to campaign that don't have escrow I dont want campaign will not pay me for I work.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
September 28, 2016, 11:06:21 AM
#82
Yes must do so in weekly payment just because most of the campaign now especially with ICO and altcoins the payment need to wait for the participants after the ICO before wages and the other a few weeks or months before they release the wages of participant . To avoid a delayed wage would make weekly payments to the participants in the sig .

Lets Suppose If three weeks go by and no one has touched the account, then one person can release the funds, but at that point it goes to the forum itself.
If three weeks go by and the company hasn't paid in and hasn't initiated payouts, Staff Members can send the last of the funds to the list or, if they simply are not there, then he can release the funds to the forum.



Sig campaign companies are not forced to use the system or escrow , but it is suggested and the forum is advised of any that do not.  The company cannot steal and run and even Mod or whomever is managing the campaign cannot.  Nothing against them, but even the most trusted people can surprise you, plus, by protecting everyone it is more likely that people will participate.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
September 21, 2016, 09:45:24 AM
#81
Yes must do so in weekly payment just because most of the campaign now especially with ICO and altcoins the payment need to wait for the participants after the ICO before wages and the other a few weeks or months before they release the wages of participant . To avoid a delayed wage would make weekly payments to the participants in the sig .

Lets Suppose If three weeks go by and no one has touched the account, then one person can release the funds, but at that point it goes to the forum itself.
If three weeks go by and the company hasn't paid in and hasn't initiated payouts, Staff Members can send the last of the funds to the list or, if they simply are not there, then he can release the funds to the forum.

legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1105
September 21, 2016, 07:31:34 AM
#80
If they opt for signature campaign managers or escrows to hold their funds who were already in such business, then I think that we may join the campaign without any hassle. Still, that would only be good till the funds are used and after that, it all depends on the admin whether they want to run it and send more funds to escrow or not. Unless this gets revealed, they get some more advertising for free because posters will post.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Cryptocurrency Wallet - Denaro.io
September 21, 2016, 06:35:11 AM
#79
Yes must do so in weekly payment just because most of the campaign now especially with ICO and altcoins the payment need to wait for the participants after the ICO before wages and the other a few weeks or months before they release the wages of participant . To avoid a delayed wage would make weekly payments to the participants in the sig .
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 503
👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc
September 20, 2016, 10:35:44 AM
#78
its ok signature campaign is longterm and this enough good rate
and every time always accepted new particpant

The weekly payments can be prearranged, so that those funds can be moved with just one Priv Key, but only to the list of clients.
hero member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 645
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
September 19, 2016, 11:23:56 AM
#77
If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Simply use a trusted campaign manager and a funded account.  Require two Private Keys to move money out of the fund, unless X period of days has gone by with inactivity and then one person can do so. 
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 503
September 19, 2016, 03:39:17 AM
#76
we simply need to build a system, either through the forum or on another site, that controls the money of a campaign.  figure that an easy way to make money is to find a ad revenue service.  Let's say that there is even a pay-per-visit around these days, lol.  so, you calculate that each time the ad is seen, you make 2 pennies.  So, you set up the sig campaign and pay them 1 penny per post.  if it all evened out, then the end of the week the ads pay you $20 and you split $10 of it among the sig participants. that is a perfect system. 

but, try to make that happen.  the first thing you find out is that those ad providers never pay pay visit anymore, either per click or per sign up.  so you run them on your own posts to get an average amount of revenue per post and then find your ads kicked out because of how you displayed them, some companies hate their ads in forum posts.  three weeks later, you finally found the right ads and you have made 0.001 cents per your posts through average clicking.  you set up the campaign, find the tracking software, split the revenue average with the people and after thirty days the revenue slows and drops, this is because there are only so many of these people that are going to click and they have already done it in the past thirty days.  new people are not as frequent as the initial blast of revenue and......the camp dies with people unpaid for their last week.

the same thing happens when promoting your own website or service.  revenue generated changes, plateaus and is rarely of the level that you think it should be.  to properly and ethically do this, whether for your site or another person's, have the funds ready for week 1 and in the amount of three times what you think you need.  set maximum posts numbers and monitor the new people coming in.  pay them on time and never make them think it is not going to happen.  keep twice the average weekly payout in cold storage and never touch it.  things go belly up, announce it, and pay the people.

any company, service or person that fails should always make the first priority of the last week paying the employees.  make sure that you have those funds and never touch them.  you think you are gone for good, who cares what these people think and then two months down the road you are back with a new business and those people and the forum remember.
Pages:
Jump to: