SIGNS OF SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN - page 2.

tigerclub

full member

Activity: 130

Merit: 100

Quote from: electronicash on September 19, 2016, 01:22:54 AM

the previous campaign that didn't pay that i know was the Opair signature campaign. the participants should know that the ICO was somewhat scammy so if he found out about it and get out before wasting a lot of time, he should have got out from the very start. one thing that a participant should do is to observe and read about them.

Yes, there was a scam accusation against opair, luptin should refused the offer, but he still offered the service. Some saw luptin is reputable so join it, but face the issue.

pcoin

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: electronicash on September 19, 2016, 01:22:54 AM

the previous campaign that didn't pay that i know was the Opair signature campaign. the participants should know that the ICO was somewhat scammy so if he found out about it and get out before wasting a lot of time, he should have got out from the very start. one thing that a participant should do is to observe and read about them.

There is also what i feel should be stopped and that is the issue of long awaiting time before payment, to me daily and weekly payments are better but can still go for monthly payments if the money are escrowed anything more than that should be avoided.

electronicash

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1055

the previous campaign that didn't pay that i know was the Opair signature campaign. the participants should know that the ICO was somewhat scammy so if he found out about it and get out before wasting a lot of time, he should have got out from the very start. one thing that a participant should do is to observe and read about them.

x4

hero member

Activity: 1106

Merit: 508

Quote from: nejibens on September 17, 2016, 07:58:22 AM

I think its better for the campaign's managers which havent good trust in this forum, to use escrow and hold the campaign's funds with him, otherwise its better for members to avoid joining it

People now in this community is aware of this by now from what had happened this two last signature campaigns that didn't use an escrow and didn't paid there participants. So much better is to avoid from this kind of campaign, and campaign must have an experienced manager to manage his campaign to avoid from running or simply cheating to deceive their members.

nejibens

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

I think its better for the campaign's managers which havent good trust in this forum, to use escrow and hold the campaign's funds with him, otherwise its better for members to avoid joining it

Hellacopter

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

I think members shouldn't join the signature campaigners runned by people without reputation, nor using the escrow services. The escrow is the better method to encourage members promoting the campaign safely.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: Sharma on September 17, 2016, 05:31:16 AM

Quote from: Cast12 on September 16, 2016, 06:32:17 PM

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Nobody wants to promote scam or ponzi sites but the problem is you dont know which site turn scam or ponzi.There are instanves where some so called reputed sites run away with members money.

You could make out ponzi sites by looking at their business model.Not a difficult task for an experienced bitcointalk member.Unfortunately not many are bothered about this forum or the newbies around,if they're getting paid for their signatures,they wouldn't mind advertising child porn.Harsh truth,digest it!

Fatanut

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1060

Quote from: Sharma on September 17, 2016, 05:31:16 AM

Quote from: Cast12 on September 16, 2016, 06:32:17 PM

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Nobody wants to promote scam or ponzi sites but the problem is you dont know which site turn scam or ponzi.There are instanves where some so called reputed sites run away with members money.

You can't actually that much about that. All you can do is trust them or leave them. Trust that they aren't like the other projects that have ran away right after they have solicited enough money. Leave them if you think they're going to run away from you. It's quite hard to identify which one's are going to run away especially if it's ran by a high ranked and trusted member of this forum.

Sharma

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

GATCOIN : The New Currency Of Digital Marketing

Quote from: Cast12 on September 16, 2016, 06:32:17 PM

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Nobody wants to promote scam or ponzi sites but the problem is you dont know which site turn scam or ponzi.There are instanves where some so called reputed sites run away with members money.

GregH37

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1037

Quote from: Cast12 on September 16, 2016, 06:32:17 PM

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

it is all up to the campaign manager. I would always go with a reputed campaign manager. because I believe a responsible campaign manager will never go with a ponzi site.
like SFR, Yahoo, Lutpin, Gianluca etc.

boyptc

hero member

Activity: 3024

Merit: 680

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: anama on September 16, 2016, 07:46:52 PM

its ok signature campaign is longterm and this enough good rate
and every time always accepted new particpant

Every signature campaign has their own fund for advertising their website and services by it. But there is a certain signature campaign that you are saying it is already running for a long time already and paying its participants always on time and there is no limitation for the maximum participants. And that would be secondstrade, but not all campaigns are not able to do the same like secondstrade.

altcoinrich

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 501

Quote from: JeffBrad12 on September 16, 2016, 09:28:37 PM

Quote from: Cast12 on September 16, 2016, 06:32:17 PM

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Well, according to from the opair I think not all the owner of the campaign having a trust although they're already using escrow. and seeing another fact like yobit, second and another is managing their own campaign without escrow and that is running with smoothly. and at the first time they are starting their campaign they're not having an enough reputable in this forum.

Opair is closed now, yobit doesn't hire more participants either. Yobit's reputation is very bad, since they run over 1 year campaign, yobit is 3rd biggest altcoin exchange, 1. polo, 2. bittrex and 3. yobit.

JeffBrad12

hero member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 536

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Cast12 on September 16, 2016, 06:32:17 PM

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Well, according to from the opair I think not all the owner of the campaign having a trust although they're already using escrow. and seeing another fact like yobit, second and another is managing their own campaign without escrow and that is running with smoothly. and at the first time they are starting their campaign they're not having an enough reputable in this forum.

anama

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

its ok signature campaign is longterm and this enough good rate
and every time always accepted new particpant

Cast12

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 251

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: Omegasun on September 15, 2016, 02:01:32 AM

Pay rate is the first common to be considered by all signature campaign participants, And i'm honest with that. But i always if the services providing that rate for signature campaign can handle that cost. You can easily predict it based on the days the site active and the amount totally wagered on them. But for new site that offer high rate, I totally ignore that.

People like you are the reason why this forum has turned to a shit posting place.You shouldn't be accepted in any of the signature campaigns with that mentality.What good does your posts do to this forum's anyway ? You're a shit poster mate,be happy you're getting a few satoshi's for that.If it was not for the scam casino you're advertizing,you'd rejected by all other campaign managers.Take my advice,stop shit posting.

European Central Bank

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1087

Quote from: Omegasun on September 15, 2016, 02:01:32 AM

Pay rate is the first common to be considered by all signature campaign participants, And i'm honest with that.

you'd be crazy to only base who you go with because of pay. there are campaigns that are totally dependable but may pay less, but they're hard to get into and anyone abandoning them for some site no one's ever heard of promising the earth is more than likely to regret it.

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3710

Merit: 1170

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

For a new signature campaign, as per my knowledge checking of escrow with a reputed member and nature of business which is being advertised through campaign are enough concerns. Less significant things are frequency of payments, excluded boards and special requirements like post requirements in board/thread, but these are nothing to do with getting scammed by new campaigns.

ricku

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

The situations with signature campaign should be approached with more concern because people that works deserves to be paid as at when due but there seems not to be such complain of late.

NorrisK

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1007

Common sense is a good one to start with. If it is a new campaign, always make sure they escrow atleast the first weeks payment, preferably with the campaign manager himself. This will make sure the first weeks gets handled smoothly.

After that, the service should basically refill the coins to the campaign manager in advance of the next week to ensure that there is always money to be paid when it is payment time.

Also, check the service. If it is a highly reputable service or a service with a lot to lose from negative press, they are not likely to scam a few campaigners for a couple of bitcoin. If it is an unknown service, they may not care and run with free advertisement.

Topic: SIGNS OF SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN - page 2. (Read 3794 times)