You will be surprised that these people are buying Bitcoin in the back, they want your Bitcoin at a cheap price and they have wanted people to sell.
Exactly, all they now want is to buy bitcoin at cheap, people like them always talk against anything but they are also the ones who take the most benefits from that. 
Topic: Silence is Golden But... - page 2. (Read 246 times)
Critics always have their way of enjoying arguments over the reality of anything. You cannot stop them or do anything to stop them, you have to be silent until the critics agrees or in some matter, they don't.
These people are like the so called experts back in the nineties that called the internet a fad yet are enjoying its benefits now. Many years from now, they will be enjoying the benefits of bitcoin but until then, we shouldn't remain silent for our silence will not be golden. We should speak up and speak boldly, we should educate, enlighten them and we should do so from a place of empathy not anger. However, if we have nothing other than hate words to throw at them then silence is golden.
What do you say?
Keeping silent without trying to change or challenge the bad narratives about bitcoin means you are conforming and allowing it to continue, and that is putting speedbumps on the progress of bitcoins. What do you say?
Being in this forum gives you a personal responsibility to promote bitcoins as much as you can so as much as silent is golden, It is for some situations and not this kind of situation.
Fooled are those who listen to such people, if you see a successful personal talking shit about a new innovation it doesn't mean they hate the innovation.
You will be surprised that these people are buying Bitcoin in the back, they want your Bitcoin at a cheap price and they have wanted people to sell.
As much as JP Morgan failed to understand that Bitcoin will forever be maxed at 21 Million it doesn't mean he isn't buying, he is not even sure of himself lol.
You will be surprised that these people are buying Bitcoin in the back, they want your Bitcoin at a cheap price and they have wanted people to sell.
As much as JP Morgan failed to understand that Bitcoin will forever be maxed at 21 Million it doesn't mean he isn't buying, he is not even sure of himself lol.
"Do not throw pearls before swine." The more you argue with such people, the more you become like them. Bitcoin does not need such protection; time puts everything in its place.
On the contrary, make your silence golden by not disseminating your wallets and maintaining your privacy. All that Satoshi conceived was anonymity and decentralization, that is, independence from everything. No need to go to the barricades to protect your freedom; just allow all people to express their attitude towards bitcoin as they want. Nothing will ever be accepted voluntarily by people if force is used. Therefore, use what you have and do not put pressure on others.
On the contrary, make your silence golden by not disseminating your wallets and maintaining your privacy. All that Satoshi conceived was anonymity and decentralization, that is, independence from everything. No need to go to the barricades to protect your freedom; just allow all people to express their attitude towards bitcoin as they want. Nothing will ever be accepted voluntarily by people if force is used. Therefore, use what you have and do not put pressure on others.
Correcting misinformation in a well thought out way is the only good way to go about improving the reputation of the technology. Bringing beliefs into misinformation (eg emotioned arguments) can often spread more misinformation.
Free advice from wealthy people normally isn't free and that's a point you have to consider. Almost everyone has a self serving motive behind it - particularly if they're hoarding wealth.
Even if some of those people enjoy using the Internet and make a profit from it in a lot of cases, that doesn't mean they understand it. They probably have entire teams ensuring they're not attacked while using it and only access trusted sources without making themselves more anonymous/getting someone else to do it.
Free advice from wealthy people normally isn't free and that's a point you have to consider. Almost everyone has a self serving motive behind it - particularly if they're hoarding wealth.
Even if some of those people enjoy using the Internet and make a profit from it in a lot of cases, that doesn't mean they understand it. They probably have entire teams ensuring they're not attacked while using it and only access trusted sources without making themselves more anonymous/getting someone else to do it.
We should speak up and speak boldly, we should educate, enlighten them and we should do so from a place of empathy not anger.
You don't need to educate critics, that are aware of how it works and the flaws in their comments but spread fud regardless to attempt to limit the growth of Bitcoin either cause they don't hold any or want it to get cheaper so they can buy more.Rather than trying to educate them, point out their misinformation to the public so they are not swayed by misleading articles and publications. Ignore them and don't give them more publicity if their posts is not malicious, but if it is then be aggressive with pointing out their contradictions.
Silence is golden is a idiom used to say that, it is often better to remain silent than to speak. But silence is not golden when people like the CEO of J.P. Morgan Chase, Jamie Dimon say, "Bitcoin itself is a hyped-up fraud" or that "Crypto is a decentralized Ponzi scheme". Silence is not golden when people like the Geopolitical economist Peter Zeihan makes comment saying that BTC is intrinsically worthless and would ultimately go to zero. Silence is not golden when someone like Warren Buffet described bitcoin as “probably rat poison squared”. Silence is not golden when bitcoin critics like Paul Krugman, Peter Schiff and others starts spewing venomous comments or narratives about bitcoin.
These people are like the so called experts back in the nineties that called the internet a fad yet are enjoying its benefits now. Many years from now, they will be enjoying the benefits of bitcoin but until then, we shouldn't remain silent for our silence will not be golden. We should speak up and speak boldly, we should educate, enlighten them and we should do so from a place of empathy not anger. However, if we have nothing other than hate words to throw at them then silence is golden.
What do you say?
These people are like the so called experts back in the nineties that called the internet a fad yet are enjoying its benefits now. Many years from now, they will be enjoying the benefits of bitcoin but until then, we shouldn't remain silent for our silence will not be golden. We should speak up and speak boldly, we should educate, enlighten them and we should do so from a place of empathy not anger. However, if we have nothing other than hate words to throw at them then silence is golden.
What do you say?
Jump to: