SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070 - page 30.

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

Quote from: reb0rn21 on November 17, 2016, 05:40:57 PM

@zawawa

Works here but still some CPU usage with 2x instances (2x 1070 30% from i5)
Win10 x64 375.57
1070 gives ~112sol/s

I guess I need to take a look at the new patch for the CPU usage...
Thanks for letting me know!

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

Quote from: sp_ on November 17, 2016, 05:34:20 PM

Quote from: zawawa on November 17, 2016, 05:24:04 PM

I would always appreciate your feedback, and it would be most helpful for everybody if you could mention your OS, video card(s), and hopefully driver version. Otherwise, I have to rely on my crystal ball, which is of rather questionable quality. Thanks!

sp-mod silent army cuda #1 vs zawawawa-r6 (4 gtx 970 rig) (sp-mod #1 +13.3%)

Quote from: antantti on November 17, 2016, 03:05:48 PM

4x970 went from ~300 (zawawawa-r6) to ~340, oc + p0, tdp 85-95%, W7 + i5. Cpu usage max 3%.

Glad your CUDA port is working well! OpenCL implementations for NVIDIA cards are interim solutions anyway.
If your port runs faster across the board, I can finally focus on my Polaris farm...

reb0rn21

legendary

Activity: 1898

Merit: 1024

@zawawa

Works here but still some CPU usage with 2x instances (2x 1070 30% from i5)
Win10 x64 375.57
1070 gives ~112sol/s

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: zawawa on November 17, 2016, 05:24:04 PM

I would always appreciate your feedback, and it would be most helpful for everybody if you could mention your OS, video card(s), and hopefully driver version. Otherwise, I have to rely on my crystal ball, which is of rather questionable quality. Thanks!

sp-mod silent army cuda #1 vs zawawawa-r6 (4 gtx 970 rig) (sp-mod #1 +13.3%)

Quote from: antantti on November 17, 2016, 03:05:48 PM

4x970 went from ~300 (zawawawa-r6) to ~340, oc + p0, tdp 85-95%, W7 + i5. Cpu usage max 3%.

sp-mod silent army cuda #1 vs zawawawa-r6 (6 gtx 1070 rig) 630@800watt(sp-mod #1 +8% more hash with 15% less power )

Quote from: Amph on November 17, 2016, 01:14:15 PM

your version is good, getting less wattage but higher hash
only 681 wattage and hashrate 680(peak 690), ratio 1:1, better than any other build
also very stable and no throttling

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

I just uploaded new Windows binaries:

https://github.com/zawawawa/silentarmy

I am still experimenting with WIN32 threading. In the meantime, I replaced the random number generator to address the duplicate shares issue. I also tweaked process priorities. Let me know how that goes.

I would always appreciate your feedback, and it would be most helpful for everybody if you could mention your OS, video card(s), and hopefully driver version. Otherwise, I have to rely on my crystal ball, which is of rather questionable quality. Thanks!

marvykkio

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

tnx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: marvykkio on November 17, 2016, 04:15:06 PM

impossible start program , VCRUNTIME140.Dll It is not on the computer

Huh

windows 10

Install visual studio 64bit 2015 runtime

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145

marvykkio

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

impossible start program , VCRUNTIME140.Dll It is not on the computer

Huh

windows 10

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: nerdralph on November 17, 2016, 04:09:59 PM

Quote from: bensam1231 on November 17, 2016, 12:26:18 PM

Do you also know if you want to check if a algo is memory limited, you can go into GPUZ and check out the MCU (memory controller unit) and see the load on it?

I think this is wrong. Although I primarily mine using Linux, I have a Windoze box that I use for testing cards. GPU-z appears to show only external bus bandwidth use (to the GDDR), and not the utilization of the bandwidth between the controller and core. In practical terms, a miner kernel may be using 200GB/s of memory bandwidth, but a significant percentage of it can be from the L2 cache. The collision counter tables in SA5 would be an example of this.

Any news about sa6?

nerdralph

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 251

Quote from: bensam1231 on November 17, 2016, 12:26:18 PM

Do you also know if you want to check if a algo is memory limited, you can go into GPUZ and check out the MCU (memory controller unit) and see the load on it?

I think this is wrong. Although I primarily mine using Linux, I have a Windoze box that I use for testing cards. GPU-z appears to show only external bus bandwidth use (to the GDDR), and not the utilization of the bandwidth between the controller and core. In practical terms, a miner kernel may be using 200GB/s of memory bandwidth, but a significant percentage of it can be from the L2 cache. The collision counter tables in SA5 would be an example of this.

suggsy89

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 100

Quote from: marvykkio on November 17, 2016, 04:03:30 PM

access denied ?

2 x gtx 1070

nheqminer.exe -t 4 -cv 1 -cd 0 1 -cs -l eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -u t1J3PN1dCWicm5LST7P593SfYNnkMJW9Ko4.marvy
pause

This is fine, just tested. Authorised worker.

marvykkio

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

access denied ?

2 x gtx 1070

nheqminer.exe -t 4 -cv 1 -cd 0 1 -cs -l eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -u t1J3PN1dCWicm5LST7P593SfYNnkMJW9Ko4.marvy
pause

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

You got it SP ..mining to you now...thanks again

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: hackmyl1fe on November 17, 2016, 03:46:17 PM

Hey SP_,
how do you build and run this on linux? The read me isnt clear to me

Just a beta windows build for now. I think I can push it to 140++ sol/s on the 1070 with some more work. We don't want Claymore to have all the network hash do we?

suggsy89

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on November 17, 2016, 02:15:05 PM

Just a windows binary and it's a nheqminer fork.

It's beautiful.. Thanks! Grin

750ti

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: tc61 on November 17, 2016, 03:46:42 PM

thanks much..

1070-113
750ti - 33 ea
i7-4770 21

thank you for the help

give me your zclassic address and ill mine to you for some time ...

t1X4ghuK74TfmJeij9YxxEm6QQuJq5sEmsE

Thanks

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

thanks much..

1070-113
750ti - 33 ea
i7-4770 21

thank you for the help

give me your zclassic address and ill mine to you for some time ...

hackmyl1fe

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on November 17, 2016, 01:54:01 PM

Quote from: induktor on November 17, 2016, 11:26:34 AM

Quote from: sp_ on November 17, 2016, 10:22:29 AM

what do you get with the memory underclocked. (-500?)

Hi SP_ , i cannot test that because i didn't do the screen mod to allow OC on linux (I should do that, it is not hard, i'm just being lazy Grin

)
can you tested it newmz?
it should be better than 88 Sol/s in my case but it seems that my processor is not fast enough (low gpu utilization, 88%)

I have made a version of the cuda port of the SA kernel.

Zcash sp-mod #1

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/zcash-spmod1

Low power more hash.

Hey SP_,
how do you build and run this on linux? The read me isnt clear to me

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: tc61 on November 17, 2016, 03:33:49 PM

would a i7-4770 be consider slow?

use -t 8

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

would a i7-4770 be consider slow?

Topic: SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070 - page 30. (Read 209263 times)