Pages:
Author

Topic: SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070 - page 36. (Read 209309 times)

sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250
It's not a final SA6 version, it's only +10% for all GPUs (85 sols/s for GTX1070 and 100-105 sols/s for modded RX480):
http://coinsforall.io/distr/input.cl
for AMD: http://coinsforall.io/distr/param.h.amd
for NVidia: http://coinsforall.io/distr/param.h.nvidia

good work , but in this implementation need to reduce cpu usage
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
thanks Extremal, gonna try it  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 2106
Merit: 282
👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc
It's not a final SA6 version, it's only +10% for all GPUs (85 sols/s for GTX1070 and 100-105 sols/s for modded RX480):
http://coinsforall.io/distr/input.cl
for AMD: http://coinsforall.io/distr/param.h.amd
for NVidia: http://coinsforall.io/distr/param.h.nvidia
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
Zawawawa, i had to add
#pragma comment(lib, "winmm.lib")
in main.c on top to be able to compile in VS 2015 you version (https://github.com/zawawawa/silentarmy)
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Like Quint said, nVidia is way better at F@H than AMD. A GTX 1070 can get at least 600K PPD while folding, which equates to about 25 CURE and 2250 FLDC per day...which in turn equates to about 0.0038BTC per day for a single 1070 at current prices. Looking at whattomine.com I am seeing that for 150 Sol/s (about what a 480 or 290 can do) you net the equivalent of 0.003 - 0.0032 BTC per day. So nVidia has things it is better at and can be more profitable. You just need to mine (or fold for) a coin that is more suited to the hardware. It's not the devs' fault that most algos are better suited to AMD.

i'm curious what altcoin you are folding exactly, the old gridcoin, or foldingcoin? i don't remember such profit for folding since a very long time, also folding is very cpu dependent, you have an hevay load there

CURE and FLDC merge folding. FLDC also pays out MAGICFLDC as well as PEPECASH, but those are not worth much. Folding is not CPU intensive at all (unless you are CPU folding) With a decent CPU though you can get another 100k+ PPD if you want to fold on it as well.

And there goes profitability down the toilet...

Payouts are only once per month so you will have to wait your btc a while. Payday dumps happen too.
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 254
Like Quint said, nVidia is way better at F@H than AMD. A GTX 1070 can get at least 600K PPD while folding, which equates to about 25 CURE and 2250 FLDC per day...which in turn equates to about 0.0038BTC per day for a single 1070 at current prices. Looking at whattomine.com I am seeing that for 150 Sol/s (about what a 480 or 290 can do) you net the equivalent of 0.003 - 0.0032 BTC per day. So nVidia has things it is better at and can be more profitable. You just need to mine (or fold for) a coin that is more suited to the hardware. It's not the devs' fault that most algos are better suited to AMD.

i'm curious what altcoin you are folding exactly, the old gridcoin, or foldingcoin? i don't remember such profit for folding since a very long time, also folding is very cpu dependent, you have an hevay load there

CURE and FLDC merge folding. FLDC also pays out MAGICFLDC as well as PEPECASH, but those are not worth much. Folding is not CPU intensive at all (unless you are CPU folding) With a decent CPU though you can get another 100k+ PPD if you want to fold on it as well.
sr. member
Activity: 652
Merit: 266
can somone please release a version for windows for NVidia ?
https://github.com/zawawawa/silentarmy
This should work for nvidia...must be Maxwell and upper.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
can somone please release a version for windows for NVidia ?
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070

this isn't standalone, still require python to be installed, tried it, but it does not work right, with 6 gpu it mine at almost 0% usage on all of them
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
yep

where? on that link there is only a v.3 that is too old and not compiled
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Genoil Lastest Windows Port
GTX 1070+960
instances=2
OC:
1070 +700 MEM
960 Stock
Processor Core i3 2100 Load 7-12% - Low CPU Usage confirmed!


can you point me the genoil windows version?
https://github.com/Genoil/silentarmy/tree/windows
[/quote]

there is a compiled version out there?
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250
Genoil Lastest Windows Port
GTX 1070+960
instances=2
OC:
1070 +700 MEM
960 Stock
Processor Core i3 2100 Load 7-12% - Low CPU Usage confirmed!


can you point me the genoil windows version?
[/quote]
https://github.com/Genoil/silentarmy/tree/windows
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 505
Like Quint said, nVidia is way better at F@H than AMD. A GTX 1070 can get at least 600K PPD while folding, which equates to about 25 CURE and 2250 FLDC per day...which in turn equates to about 0.0038BTC per day for a single 1070 at current prices. Looking at whattomine.com I am seeing that for 150 Sol/s (about what a 480 or 290 can do) you net the equivalent of 0.003 - 0.0032 BTC per day. So nVidia has things it is better at and can be more profitable. You just need to mine (or fold for) a coin that is more suited to the hardware. It's not the devs' fault that most algos are better suited to AMD.

True about needing to do proper workload for profit, but by your calculations, 1070 is 22% more profit per day, which is good until you factor in you can get a 480 for $200 on a good sale, and it is hard to find a 1070 much below $400.  480 per day has been between ~0.0030 BTC and ~0.0042, so it is best for mining right now.

Also true about up-front costs. However, ppl complaining that zec miners need to be more optimized for nVidia are barking up the wrong tree. Even if a miner was optimized for nVidia, how much better do you think it's going to be? It's still not going to outperform a 480 in a memory-hard algorithm. Best to find a different coin to mine.
This.  It's silly I keep seeing people want an optimized Nvidia miner, when in the end, it wouldn't be a good choice going with Nvidia.  Best case 1070 is similar speed to 480, like on Ethereum.

yup, like I said, just go back to gaming, find another coin, or sell for AMD gpu
nvidia has higher upfront cost, give you longer time for ROI.
even if there are coin dev (and yes there was) that create algorithm that suit and optimized for nvidia, and launch optimized miner before coin launch, AMD still beat it on performance/cost (atleast upfront cost and time to ROI)
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Like Quint said, nVidia is way better at F@H than AMD. A GTX 1070 can get at least 600K PPD while folding, which equates to about 25 CURE and 2250 FLDC per day...which in turn equates to about 0.0038BTC per day for a single 1070 at current prices. Looking at whattomine.com I am seeing that for 150 Sol/s (about what a 480 or 290 can do) you net the equivalent of 0.003 - 0.0032 BTC per day. So nVidia has things it is better at and can be more profitable. You just need to mine (or fold for) a coin that is more suited to the hardware. It's not the devs' fault that most algos are better suited to AMD.

i'm curious what altcoin you are folding exactly, the old gridcoin, or foldingcoin? i don't remember such profit for folding since a very long time, also folding is very cpu dependent, you have an hevay load there

Genoil Lastest Windows Port
GTX 1070+960
instances=2
OC:
1070 +700 MEM
960 Stock
Processor Core i3 2100 Load 7-12% - Low CPU Usage confirmed!


can you point me the genoil windows version?
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250
Genoil Lastest Windows Port
GTX 1070+960
instances=2
OC:
1070 +700 MEM
960 Stock
Processor Core i3 2100 Load 7-12% - Low CPU Usage confirmed!
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 251
Like Quint said, nVidia is way better at F@H than AMD. A GTX 1070 can get at least 600K PPD while folding, which equates to about 25 CURE and 2250 FLDC per day...which in turn equates to about 0.0038BTC per day for a single 1070 at current prices. Looking at whattomine.com I am seeing that for 150 Sol/s (about what a 480 or 290 can do) you net the equivalent of 0.003 - 0.0032 BTC per day. So nVidia has things it is better at and can be more profitable. You just need to mine (or fold for) a coin that is more suited to the hardware. It's not the devs' fault that most algos are better suited to AMD.

True about needing to do proper workload for profit, but by your calculations, 1070 is 22% more profit per day, which is good until you factor in you can get a 480 for $200 on a good sale, and it is hard to find a 1070 much below $400.  480 per day has been between ~0.0030 BTC and ~0.0042, so it is best for mining right now.

Also true about up-front costs. However, ppl complaining that zec miners need to be more optimized for nVidia are barking up the wrong tree. Even if a miner was optimized for nVidia, how much better do you think it's going to be? It's still not going to outperform a 480 in a memory-hard algorithm. Best to find a different coin to mine.
This.  It's silly I keep seeing people want an optimized Nvidia miner, when in the end, it wouldn't be a good choice going with Nvidia.  Best case 1070 is similar speed to 480, like on Ethereum.
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 254
Like Quint said, nVidia is way better at F@H than AMD. A GTX 1070 can get at least 600K PPD while folding, which equates to about 25 CURE and 2250 FLDC per day...which in turn equates to about 0.0038BTC per day for a single 1070 at current prices. Looking at whattomine.com I am seeing that for 150 Sol/s (about what a 480 or 290 can do) you net the equivalent of 0.003 - 0.0032 BTC per day. So nVidia has things it is better at and can be more profitable. You just need to mine (or fold for) a coin that is more suited to the hardware. It's not the devs' fault that most algos are better suited to AMD.

True about needing to do proper workload for profit, but by your calculations, 1070 is 22% more profit per day, which is good until you factor in you can get a 480 for $200 on a good sale, and it is hard to find a 1070 much below $400.  480 per day has been between ~0.0030 BTC and ~0.0042, so it is best for mining right now.

Also true about up-front costs. However, ppl complaining that zec miners need to be more optimized for nVidia are barking up the wrong tree. Even if a miner was optimized for nVidia, how much better do you think it's going to be? It's still not going to outperform a 480 in a memory-hard algorithm. Best to find a different coin to mine.
Pages:
Jump to: