SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070 - page 74.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: hypercrypto on November 10, 2016, 11:36:16 AM

I think you should keep improving speed rather than support windows for now, because they have claymore miner already with decent speeds

while as myself on linux we stuck with the half of their speed on windows with claymore miner i just got around 45~49 per card for modded rx 470....

I hope to consider this in the roadmap....

Just booted windows disk and tested newer Claymore 4.0
//
GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 135.354 H/s, Total Shares: 151, Rejected: 1, Time: 00:05
ZEC: GPU0 68.841 H/s, GPU1 66.452 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x0025d4c3 (diff: 1732H)
GPU1 t=49C fan=62%, GPU2 t=60C fan=65%
//
This is with intensity set to 2 and my quad amd APU A8-7600 is 50% loaded. Using -i 0 I get almost equal results with silentarmy's miner. Until someone finds different approach for gaining more Sol/s results will not be much different...I would love to help but me myself not coder at all ... I can otherwise help with packing and better newbies support. I also don't think that windows should be considered priority...if you have 1/2 rigs...OK but headless rigs are on the other hand preferred and easily monitored.

hypercrypto

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

I think you should keep improving speed rather than support windows for now, because they have claymore miner already with decent speeds

while as myself on linux we stuck with the half of their speed on windows with claymore miner i just got around 45~49 per card for modded rx 470....

I hope to consider this in the roadmap....

hacko.bg

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: laik2 on November 10, 2016, 10:28:48 AM

Quote from: hacko.bg on November 10, 2016, 10:25:13 AM

Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so?

Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get:

Code:

user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127

apt-get install build-essential

Got through this and still looking for OpenCL during build.

Code:


edit: Installing Intel OpenCL did do the trick, I've manage to build sa-solver. But now I do see the only one processor and there are 2 on this server. 
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:20: recipe for target 'sa-solver' failed
make: *** [sa-solver] Error 1

nerdralph

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 251

Quote from: krnlx on November 10, 2016, 06:38:11 AM

!!!!!

PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.

This 1070 card

Code:

LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us

is faster then this

Code:

LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us

by 15-20%

First card with one silentarmy thread loads by 89%, second one - 76%

You can check pci-e speed with this command

Code:

sudo lspci -vv

I've already pointed out that you can improve performance by reducing MAX_SOLS. I use 500 instead of 2000 on my fork.

Also, you want to look at link status (LnkSta), not link capabilities. A port may be capable of x16, but may only run at x2 or x4 when you have more than one x16 card plugged in.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: hacko.bg on November 10, 2016, 10:25:13 AM

Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so?

Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get:

Code:

user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127

apt-get install build-essential

hacko.bg

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so?

Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get:

Code:

user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: Genoil on November 10, 2016, 09:41:52 AM

Quote from: enerbyte on November 10, 2016, 09:38:24 AM

Quote from: Nikolaj on November 10, 2016, 08:54:15 AM

Quote from: marvykkio on November 10, 2016, 08:52:03 AM

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
Cry

+1 windows please

Support windows please

https://github.com/Genoil/silentarmy/tree/windows

WHOA!

Thanks man

EDIT: I see there is no binary there yet. You got me all excited.

Genoil

sr. member

Activity: 438

Merit: 250

Quote from: enerbyte on November 10, 2016, 09:38:24 AM

Quote from: Nikolaj on November 10, 2016, 08:54:15 AM

Quote from: marvykkio on November 10, 2016, 08:52:03 AM

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
Cry

+1 windows please

Support windows please

https://github.com/Genoil/silentarmy/tree/windows

enerbyte

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 501

Quote from: Nikolaj on November 10, 2016, 08:54:15 AM

Quote from: marvykkio on November 10, 2016, 08:52:03 AM

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
Cry

+1 windows please

Support windows please

Dr_Victor

sr. member

Activity: 954

Merit: 250

What can we get now from one gtx 1070?

Nikolaj

sr. member

Activity: 445

Merit: 255

Quote from: marvykkio on November 10, 2016, 08:52:03 AM

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
Cry

+1 windows please

marvykkio

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
Cry

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: eXtremal on November 10, 2016, 07:29:04 AM

I have another idea for optimize equihash round kernel, results will be in next 12-24h

Quote

You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40.

Only memory, 1100/2160 and low DRAM timings preset (modded ROM).

Excellent! We believe in you!

eXtremal

sr. member

Activity: 2106

Merit: 282

👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc

I have another idea for optimize equihash round kernel, results will be in next 12-24h

Quote

You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40.

Only memory, 1100/2160 and low DRAM timings preset (modded ROM).

antantti

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: krnlx on November 10, 2016, 06:38:11 AM

!!!!!
PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.

I noticed this too. You get better speeds if you connect your card to x16 slot without riser.

krnlx

full member

Activity: 243

Merit: 105

!!!!!

PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.

This 1070 card

Code:

LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us

is faster then this

Code:

LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us

by 15-20%

First card with one silentarmy thread loads by 89%, second one - 76%

You can check pci-e speed with this command

Code:

sudo lspci -vv

malefactor

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: liksagen on November 10, 2016, 04:20:07 AM

Quote from: isamamin on November 09, 2016, 01:51:33 PM

I see some peoples get about 165 sols/s +- using genoil miner with driver 16.10.3
but the card should be [8GB] ( he test with RX 470 ).
kernel : zec-sa.cl
comand :

Code:

genoil.exe -k zec zec zec zec -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u user.x1222 -p xnxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -f 2 -z 0

give it try!

how about screenshot?

ok, I'm going to say this - and I'm probably wasting my time - but please, all, if you're not a programmer, and you don't understand what is being talked about, please just be patient and wait for the developers to release stuff. These posts asking for these things are just not going to be answered. All they do is clutter the discussion.

There is not a public miner available that deliver 165 sol/s on a single rx470. And if you think there is, go bother people in that thread. It's obvious that what is meant is "a rig of 6 or 7 RX470 cards". Seriously, use your brain here; have you seen an explosion in hash rate at a point in time and a corresponding drop in price? No? Then probably there is no 6x improvement via a public miner.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

What S/s do you get from 750ti?
I have 760Ti collecting dust somewhere...If it can mine with good speed I'll have to revive it

Also we need solution for higher S/s on newer boards ...50S/s for RX480 vs 60S/s for 7970 seems a bit harsh...

malefactor

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: eXtremal on November 09, 2016, 07:24:04 AM

RX480 with amdgpu-pro 16.30

Quote

Total 55.8 sol/s [dev0 54.0] 18 shares
Total 55.3 sol/s [dev0 52.4] 18 shares
Total 55.6 sol/s [dev0 54.7] 18 shares
Total 55.9 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.0 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.5 sol/s [dev0 56.2] 18 shares
Total 55.2 sol/s [dev0 56.1] 19 shares
Total 54.6 sol/s [dev0 54.8] 19 shares
Total 54.9 sol/s [dev0 55.3] 19 shares
Total 55.1 sol/s [dev0 53.1] 19 shares
Total 54.4 sol/s [dev0 52.6] 19 shares

Kernel: http://coinsforall.io/distr/input.cl.coll1 NVidia also have speedup.
I reduced number of collisions to found from 5 to 1, it seems 5 is too much, need mrb's comments.

Tested on 750ti - for me I see a few % reduction in performance.

liksagen

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: isamamin on November 09, 2016, 01:51:33 PM

I see some peoples get about 165 sols/s +- using genoil miner with driver 16.10.3
but the card should be [8GB] ( he test with RX 470 ).
kernel : zec-sa.cl
comand :

Code:

genoil.exe -k zec zec zec zec -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u user.x1222 -p xnxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -f 2 -z 0

give it try!

how about screenshot?

Topic: SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070 - page 74. (Read 209309 times)