new vesrion with 45 sols per gtx 1070 can be runned on windows(10 x64) ?
+1
Is it so hard to add windows support ?
Topic: SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070 - page 75. (Read 209286 times)
November 10, 2016, 04:17:28 AM
+1
Is it so hard to add windows support ?
November 10, 2016, 02:59:17 AM
so now we are on V4.1? the Nvidia optimizations have been included?
does those optimizations include AMD cards?
does those optimizations include AMD cards?
This is not a release. This is github update commit. Please read the wiki about it. Regarding the cards, you will see what you want to know, if you open the link marc provided.
marc,
How to get higher (like Claymore's ones) blake hashing speeds on linux box? Deep input.cl code refactoring?
November 10, 2016, 02:51:36 AM
Yes, you can reduce collisions from 5 to 1. I meant to do this but forgot about it :-P
Done: https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/commit/ba0dd191037dc3d26172faff8ca1067c08e60cf3
For me this gives a +7% speedup.
hey marc,
when you update github do you think you could put at the top of the description a version number and the most recent updates (and when you reupdate just move the notes down for the last update?)
so now we are on V4.1? the Nvidia optimizations have been included?
does those optimizations include AMD cards?
November 10, 2016, 01:56:13 AM
new vesrion with 45 sols per gtx 1070 can be runned on windows(10 x64) ?
anymienr??
November 10, 2016, 01:52:53 AM
Yes, you can reduce collisions from 5 to 1. I meant to do this but forgot about it :-P
Done: https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/commit/ba0dd191037dc3d26172faff8ca1067c08e60cf3
For me this gives a +7% speedup.
I do confirm seeing noticeable gains (about 5Sol/s per card on certain models such as rx 480 4gb)
Good job! Sticking with silentarmy's miner definitely. Hopefully further improvements can be made to gain even further hashrate!
November 10, 2016, 12:57:22 AM
new vesrion with 45 sols per gtx 1070 can be runned on windows(10 x64) ?
November 10, 2016, 12:45:51 AM
Yes, you can reduce collisions from 5 to 1. I meant to do this but forgot about it :-P
Done: https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/commit/ba0dd191037dc3d26172faff8ca1067c08e60cf3
For me this gives a +7% speedup.
November 10, 2016, 12:13:44 AM
RX480 with amdgpu-pro 16.30
I reduced number of collisions to found from 5 to 1, it seems 5 is too much, need mrb's comments.
Quote
Total 55.8 sol/s [dev0 54.0] 18 shares
Total 55.3 sol/s [dev0 52.4] 18 shares
Total 55.6 sol/s [dev0 54.7] 18 shares
Total 55.9 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.0 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.5 sol/s [dev0 56.2] 18 shares
Total 55.2 sol/s [dev0 56.1] 19 shares
Total 54.6 sol/s [dev0 54.8] 19 shares
Total 54.9 sol/s [dev0 55.3] 19 shares
Total 55.1 sol/s [dev0 53.1] 19 shares
Total 54.4 sol/s [dev0 52.6] 19 shares
Kernel: http://coinsforall.io/distr/input.cl.coll1 NVidia also have speedup.Total 55.3 sol/s [dev0 52.4] 18 shares
Total 55.6 sol/s [dev0 54.7] 18 shares
Total 55.9 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.0 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.5 sol/s [dev0 56.2] 18 shares
Total 55.2 sol/s [dev0 56.1] 19 shares
Total 54.6 sol/s [dev0 54.8] 19 shares
Total 54.9 sol/s [dev0 55.3] 19 shares
Total 55.1 sol/s [dev0 53.1] 19 shares
Total 54.4 sol/s [dev0 52.6] 19 shares
I reduced number of collisions to found from 5 to 1, it seems 5 is too much, need mrb's comments.
Yes, you can reduce collisions from 5 to 1. I meant to do this but forgot about it :-P
For the record your input.cl.coll1 on my RX 480 with amdgpu-pro 16.40:
Total 40.7 sol/s [dev0 41.9] 3 shares
Total 40.7 sol/s [dev0 40.8] 3 shares
Total 40.7 sol/s [dev0 40.4] 3 shares
Total 41.4 sol/s [dev0 42.8] 3 shares
Total 41.6 sol/s [dev0 43.3] 3 shares
Total 41.8 sol/s [dev0 45.9] 3 shares
Total 42.1 sol/s [dev0 47.7] 3 shares
Total 41.8 sol/s [dev0 45.5] 3 shares
Total 41.1 sol/s [dev0 44.9] 3 shares
Total 41.2 sol/s [dev0 43.5] 4 shares
Total 41.1 sol/s [dev0 44.3] 4 shares
Total 41.4 sol/s [dev0 44.5] 4 shares
Total 41.3 sol/s [dev0 44.7] 4 shares
You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40.
November 09, 2016, 08:00:35 PM
Someone has same issue as I getting lower hashrate with 4.0 than with older?
I am not linux expert, but it compiles without error although hashrate is lower as I said.. could making without deleting old files be a reason? I am using another directory
I am not linux expert, but it compiles without error although hashrate is lower as I said.. could making without deleting old files be a reason? I am using another directory
November 09, 2016, 07:58:53 PM
Where did you read that?
Some bullshit from the Claymore thread with theories. Nothing tested, nothing proven, just talk.People are greedy by nature...some more...some less...it would be nice if Claymore shares his kernel(or at least point some directions) with other developers as he took advantage of mrb's work...
I sure won't boot windows again for mining, ubuntu serves me very well for now.
still is i'm being nice i won't label, my theory how he still is i won't say i don't want backlash from it
. ill keep it to my self. 
November 09, 2016, 07:49:01 PM
Where did you read that?
Some bullshit from the Claymore thread with theories. Nothing tested, nothing proven, just talk.People are greedy by nature...some more...some less...it would be nice if Claymore shares his kernel(or at least point some directions) with other developers as he took advantage of mrb's work...
I sure won't boot windows again for mining, ubuntu serves me very well for now.
November 09, 2016, 07:44:50 PM
Where did you read that?
Some bullshit from the Claymore thread with theories. Nothing tested, nothing proven, just talk. 
November 09, 2016, 07:43:01 PM
His rx 480 8gb, mod bios, 1200/2160 70h/s
Intel Celeron G1840 2.8GHz
win 10, Crimson 16.11.1
Thanks Claymore
Intel Celeron G1840 2.8GHz
win 10, Crimson 16.11.1
Thanks Claymore
How to mod bios of Sapphire Nitro+ Rx 480 8gb oc for 70+ h/s
share pls or should i overclock?
if yes then how to over clock with stock wattman feature in crimson
would anyone mind to share his setting for Sapphire Nitro+ Rx 480 8gb oc for 70+ h/s because i did increase mem but nothing happened with h/s
Pls any one can help to set over clock with stock wattman feature in crimson for Sapphire Nitro+ Rx 480 8gb oc
thnx
You need to modify the memory timings.
My RX480's are only getting 60 h/s but i'm happy with that.
Clock speed 1125, memory 2000, voltage 900mv pulling 65w per card.
you can get 160 sols with RX470 8GB check this :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666489.280
November 09, 2016, 07:40:45 PM
Hey guys just want to confirm if this is true please?
Genoil is getting 160 - 170 sol/s with 1 rx470 8gb card?
Windows or linux version?
Thanks
Where did you read that? Genoil is getting 160 - 170 sol/s with 1 rx470 8gb card?
Windows or linux version?
Thanks
November 09, 2016, 07:39:19 PM
Hey guys just want to confirm if this is true please?
Genoil is getting 160 - 170 sol/s with 1 rx470 8gb card?
Windows or linux version?
Thanks
Genoil is getting 160 - 170 sol/s with 1 rx470 8gb card?
Windows or linux version?
Thanks
November 09, 2016, 07:21:51 PM
0.6.2 already avail.. since 4 hrs... tomorrow morning
No updated kernel in 0.6.2.
November 09, 2016, 07:18:19 PM
0.6.2 already avail.. since 4 hrs... tomorrow morning
November 09, 2016, 06:48:17 PM
I think we must wait ...
November 09, 2016, 06:43:04 PM
sorry last one was a day ago for SA if you mean that one ...
November 09, 2016, 06:29:31 PM
@toptek
Unfortunately, there's no updated kernel in 0.6.2 ...
Unfortunately, there's no updated kernel in 0.6.2 ...
Jump to: