Pages:
Author

Topic: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web - page 13. (Read 136760 times)

sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
I did not compile it myself, I have it from
https://github.com/slimcoin-project/Slimcoin/releases/tag/SLMv0.6.0

The error message in german is: "Fehler: Transaktionserstellung fehlgeschlagen". It's something like "transaction failed".

Hm, it can be that the app you are using was compiled for a different setup or it's some bug of the beta version.
Would you give a try the older, but stable version?
The file can be downloaded from here.

jr. member
Activity: 81
Merit: 5
I did not compile it myself, I have it from
https://github.com/slimcoin-project/Slimcoin/releases/tag/SLMv0.6.0

The error message in german is: "Fehler: Transaktionserstellung fehlgeschlagen". It's something like "transaction failed".
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
I use slimcoin-qt

The debug.log line you mentioned is not helping us much in this case as it states basically that a block was accepted.

What error message are you receiving on slimcoin-qt wallet when you try to send funds?

You've compiled slimcoin-qt by yourself, right?
jr. member
Activity: 81
Merit: 5
I use slimcoin-qt
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
Hi PeterColumboFalk,

are you using slimcoin-qt or directly slimcoind?

I have a fully synced slimcoin wallet with 4 connections, version 0.6.0.0-g8e9fe2c-alpha on Windows 8.1. The block high is the same as for the cryptoID blockchain explorer. But I'm not able so send coins from my wallet, I get an meaningless error message. I'm a newby with slimcoin.

The debug.log shows the following messages, that I cannot interpret:
Quote
2020-11-23 17:17:55 UTC RandAddSeed() 159228 bytes
askfor block 000000150ed1d25985c9   0
sending getdata: block 000000150ed1d25985c9
received block 000000150ed1d25985c9
CBlock(hash=000000150ed1d25985c9, ver=1, hashPrevBlock=5e4cc8fa89da9cd1b4d2, hashMerkleRoot=60fc69b7a8, nTime=1606151872, nBits=1d58a62b, nNonce=1721947277, vtx=1, vchBlockSig=304402205b597224b6ed5a729dc8f5b2ebc84dbdc5ffb03031e368365e7b0949ccc68b69022067afe6773dfb629a7ced531aa1036e48fbb25a7e52f8312f6cbd7f7540b77913)
CBlock General PoB(nBurnBits=1c693118 nEffectiveBurnCoins=857531497179 (formatted 857531.2135367545257984))
  Coinbase(hash=60fc69b7a8, nTime=1606151398, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0)
    CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, -1), coinbase 04c0eebb5f02ba03062f503253482f)
    CTxOut(nValue=19.77309411328, scriptPubKey=0321e5cdae9a48670517536ea250c681dda0944fd570aebf677a70ee678a666730 OP_CHECKSIG)
  vMerkleTree:
SetBestChain: new best=000000150ed1d25985c9  height=2272474  trust=150301326849248  moneysupply=29806347.1706600960098304 nEffectiveBurnCoins=857531.2135367545257984
Refreshing inscription table.
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
connection timeout

Thanks for help.
jr. member
Activity: 81
Merit: 5
I have a fully synced slimcoin wallet with 4 connections, version 0.6.0.0-g8e9fe2c-alpha on Windows 8.1. The block high is the same as for the cryptoID blockchain explorer. But I'm not able so send coins from my wallet, I get an meaningless error message. I'm a newby with slimcoin.

The debug.log shows the following messages, that I cannot interpret:
Quote
2020-11-23 17:17:55 UTC RandAddSeed() 159228 bytes
askfor block 000000150ed1d25985c9   0
sending getdata: block 000000150ed1d25985c9
received block 000000150ed1d25985c9
CBlock(hash=000000150ed1d25985c9, ver=1, hashPrevBlock=5e4cc8fa89da9cd1b4d2, hashMerkleRoot=60fc69b7a8, nTime=1606151872, nBits=1d58a62b, nNonce=1721947277, vtx=1, vchBlockSig=304402205b597224b6ed5a729dc8f5b2ebc84dbdc5ffb03031e368365e7b0949ccc68b69022067afe6773dfb629a7ced531aa1036e48fbb25a7e52f8312f6cbd7f7540b77913)
CBlock General PoB(nBurnBits=1c693118 nEffectiveBurnCoins=857531497179 (formatted 857531.2135367545257984))
  Coinbase(hash=60fc69b7a8, nTime=1606151398, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0)
    CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, -1), coinbase 04c0eebb5f02ba03062f503253482f)
    CTxOut(nValue=19.77309411328, scriptPubKey=0321e5cdae9a48670517536ea250c681dda0944fd570aebf677a70ee678a666730 OP_CHECKSIG)
  vMerkleTree:
SetBestChain: new best=000000150ed1d25985c9  height=2272474  trust=150301326849248  moneysupply=29806347.1706600960098304 nEffectiveBurnCoins=857531.2135367545257984
Refreshing inscription table.
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
connection timeout

Thanks for help.
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
I see very nice distribution of SLM per wallets if explorer is accurate enough.

And there is some interesting movement on Freiexchange these days  Smiley

Well, hope the value of SLM will be recognized

The value of SLM is growing these days, probably someone has understood it.
hero member
Activity: 819
Merit: 502
I see very nice distribution of SLM per wallets if explorer is accurate enough.

And there is some interesting movement on Freiexchange these days  Smiley

Well, hope the value of SLM will be recognized
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
I see very nice distribution of SLM per wallets if explorer is accurate enough.

And there is some interesting movement on Freiexchange these days  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 819
Merit: 502
I see very nice distribution of SLM per wallets if explorer is accurate enough.
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
SLM Wallet is down on Freiexchange I've contacted their support and have spoken with @Fedde and he told me he'd have a look, but for the moment nothing has been solved.  Sad

It's a pity as we've had some nice movement there lately.

Update: The issue has been solved!
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
From here seems like Slimcoin has been listed on hoo.com, SLM/USDT pair, but if I go to the site I'm not seeing SLM there.

It is an old info. You can see price of SLM 3 dollars, it was once upon a time Smiley

Yep, seems like there used to be this page on their site: https://hoo.com/spot/slm-usdt, but it's not available anymore.
hero member
Activity: 819
Merit: 502
From here seems like Slimcoin has been listed on hoo.com, SLM/USDT pair, but if I go to the site I'm not seeing SLM there.

It is an old info. You can see price of SLM 3 dollars, it was once upon a time Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
From here seems like Slimcoin has been listed on hoo.com, SLM/USDT pair, but if I go to the site I'm not seeing SLM there.
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
All my seeding nodes are stuck at block 2197245, since yesterday. What is the most efficient way to get them on the track?

Edit: seems like I'm on the wrong blockchain, I'm seeing the following message about the last block
Code:
ERROR: CheckProofOfBurn() : INFO: prev block not in main chain

Downloading the blockchain requires weeks on my VPSs  - wouldn't really like to do it again.


Edit: solved by deleting .slimcoin folder on all my VPSs and copying a .slimcoin folder from another server that had a relatively recent blockchain version.

Seems like if the server is being shut down suddenly the last block remains corrupted and the synchronizing stops. It's just a guess, of course.  
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278
Because I suspect that folks believe that sticking, syncing wallets are a Slimcoin-only problem, it's not, it's in Slimcoin's Peercoin heritage. This from the peercoin forum back on April 15th this year in response to someone reporting a wallet sticking while syncing:

Quote
Make sure you don't unlock your wallet for minting until it has finished syncing. If that doesn't work, make sure you still have the wallet backup and delete the whole folder, open the client fresh and wait for it to sync from scratch, then replace the wallet.dat file and open with the -rescan tag.

And that's a Peercoin 0.8 Core 0.16 wallet that's sticking while syncing because of premature staking.

I came across the post when confirming that the upgrade from Peercoin 0.7 to 0.8 was a hard fork (0.8 Peercoin hardfork task list), something that I think might be a bit of an organisation problem for Slimcoin, given the relatively large number of active addresses of uncontactable SLM hodlers.

Cheers

Graham
sr. member
Activity: 697
Merit: 262
Slimcoin - the Proof of Donation inventors!
Some tard try to fake the Slimcoin ANN thread and inject a download link with malware. As I posted this, his thread is still up.

Fake ANN thread link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/slimcoin-first-proof-of-burn-currency-decentralized-web-5273887
His pathetic github in the link: https://github.com/Slim-coin/qt
Thank you for the info, reported to moderators.


edited: Thank god, it got deleted.
Yep  Smiley
full member
Activity: 480
Merit: 106
Some tard try to fake the Slimcoin ANN thread and inject a download link with malware. As I posted this, his thread is still up.

Fake ANN thread link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/slimcoin-first-proof-of-burn-currency-decentralized-web-5273887
His pathetic github in the link: https://github.com/Slim-coin/qt

edited: Thank god, it got deleted.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278
I have a question: how many testnet clients you are able to fit in a single VPS with 2GB? Does the resource need to run a testnet client is more power-hungry than when you just running it as a simple node.
Dunno for sure, don't have a 2Gb VPS to check it on, most of the RAM usage will be the db index which at 2.1 million blocks is probably a bit heavy, staking large bags is also compute-intensive and probably demands RAM to suit. Testnet otoh has 0 blocks (there isn't a legacy testnet chain to preserve atm) so will consume far fewer resources. I'll make a guess at two nodes at least, maybe the full four.

Cheers

Graham
full member
Activity: 360
Merit: 100
Because slimcoind is using almost all the RAM on my 1GB Ram VPSs.
On testnet? Something horribly wrong there. But be that as it may, in general a 1Gb VPS is too under-powered for altcoin development.

Cheers

Graham

I have a question: how many testnet clients you are able to fit in a single VPS with 2GB? Does the resource need to run a testnet client is more power-hungry than when you just running it as a simple node so 1GB RAM VPS is unstable to do it? As johnwhitestar said about his VPS with 1GB RAM is almost full...
Pages:
Jump to: