@bbc.reporter
BULLSHIT it is not "good tech"
And it's pointed out out WHY millions of times so how the hell did you not see it ?
Blind or are you being deceitful ?
And this goes for fraud boy too..
Good tech ? that is rich LOL
Thanks for the laugh i needed that today hahhahaha
It was
hacked exploited for fuck sake's
Then it was a lazy attempt an an ICO scam.
Did they TRY and make something revolutionary with it's launch ?
Hell nooooo...
All they did was hobble some gimmick scheme idea together with the same old classic ICO.
Good tech would be actually improving over the concept of an ICO.
Did they try ? fuck no.
All they did was side step all that by launching an ICO then tacking on Mining later.
Then they did what people always do with ICO's.. they exploited the living fucking shit out of it
..in 2014 on Launch day.
Then paid each other a small fortune in coins.
Which was WORSE than bitching about a coin having a 2% premine.
Because the 2% coin would actually have to fulfill it's intended purpose right at launch.
Where ETH never did have to nor any other ICO.. they can spew verbal diarrhea an keep their hand out ..forever.
"Good Tech" ?
For what ?
All of you here would not shut up about "APP's"
Then you all at once dropped that for some mysterious reason
then reinforced the words "smart contract" for some weird reason.
Almost like your leader ordered you too ROFL
"Good Tech" ?
What smart contracts ? Like DAO ? and the NOW fork drama.. yeah that was a GREEEEEAT idea
And what was DAO ?
A Pyramid scheme built within another Pyramid Scheme.. FOR PROFIT !
But ok then what about the other "smart contracts" ?
What about them ?
I never heard anyone ever talk about them yet that *IS* the intended purpose now isn't it ?
What *DO* we hear about non stop ? Profits on centralized exchanges.
So what does that ell us about the actual real world use of this "Good Tech" ?
It's sooooooooo "GOOD" ..it's not even used HHAHHAHAHAHHA
Gimmme a fucking break.
The launch had a million signs that it was setup for a massive profit scheme.
So the intention is stained right there ..right from the start of ETH.
Reinfocred by the Pump / Manipulation bullshit in 2016 that sealed the deal on bad intent.
Otherwise i would have said to you all here & now that..
Maybe the original dev's intention was honest but it ended up not being "used" as intended
and instead diverted into nothing but a "Fuel Tokens" money making thing.
Which would give Butters plausible deniability to play dumb.. but he knew damn well how it would play out.
Which is why he was caught on launch day with his team paying them selves millions in coins
they later dumped in 2016 on you all.
The "Tech" is a fucking failure.
If you make a new revolutionary Bicycle that is say electric powered but..
still has pedals on it to manually pedal around and NOBODY ever uses the electrical part.
Then the tech is a god damn failure.
And what is the fucking point with ETH ?
A currency ? ..noooope
If it was wouldn't it have to be used as such ?
And if it is not then what is it then ?
What would you HAVE to call it ?
A digital profit token for centralized exchanges ?
Sounds to me a lot like a Digital Pyramid Scheme token to me.