I see, so its mismanagement and greed? With relationship problem with his wife,and finally lead divorced his finances was affected that lead to devastation.What about this hacking incident (in cryptsy),its just a diversion?
I think its possible the "hack" was just a diversion. An excuse for why they were shutting down and why they had no money to return to customers (which was of course a lie. The wife has stated rather clearly in divorce proceedings that Vernon holds a significant amount in Crypto. This is almost certainly the Cryptsy funds). Vernon mentioned specifically in the divorce proceedings that income for the company had dried up weeks before any of the Cryptsy customers were notified, and that he expected the company to shut its doors. He even mentions he had no salary. The part about "economic conditions" I think was just to give the court an excuse.
What I think happened was Vernon knew his wife would go after everything non crypto because the court would really have no way to get Vernon to give up his crypto holdings. So he made claims that the company was failing and had no income, and therefore had nothing to offer. Which it was actually failing, except that he conveniently left the reasons out, instead stating "economic conditions" as the cause.
Personally I think this is a test of the American judicial system. Those holdings that are being fought over in court do not belong to either Vernon or his wife. They belong to Cryptsy customers. The fact that they're even allowed to have discussions about who gets assets that likely don't belong to either of them boggles my mind.