...snip...
He also introduced the fraud Craig Wright as Satoshi. Why?
Information - not mis - information, u just missed that, now you re biased and ad hominem idiot anyway - again, what 'good' are you doing here? Tellin ppl ad hominem is the thing in Bitcoin ?
Gavin 'visited' the CIA to 'talk' about Bitcoin ...
Topic: Gavin will visit the CIA-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gavin-will-visit-the-cia-66521. He is either complicit in participating in a failed 'takeover' / 'hijack' of the Bitcoin (BTC) project.
or
2. He was genuinely 'bamboozled' by CSW - which would happen to be extreemly 'convenient' given the now hard evidence presented to the court ...
Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54513860... i.e. perhaps Gavin is/was 'complicate' in supporting the CSW / BSV
'fraud' !?
Either way it is still a total clown show! ...
Dan Kaminsky's Blog - Validating Satoshi (Or Not)-
https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/"SUMMARY:
Yes, this is a scam. Not maybe. Not possibly."
...
Proof-of-beats - Signal - To - Noise Ratio -- Vitalik Mic Drop-
https://soundcloud.com/proofofbeats/signal-to-noise-ratio-vitalik-mic-drop ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
...
The funniest part (for me) is I'm now actually 99.9% certain I know who the real Satoshi Nakamoto is. They genuinely went onto work on 'other things' and from what I've been able to research thus far, I'm both impressed and reassured.
If Gavin and some other folks don't actually know who the real Satoshi likely is then I'm afraid to say that a lot of people in the Bitcoin / crypto space that I once thought were very smart are in fact quite the opposite, and/or were simply following others 'agendas' or, like I said above ... fully complicate.
Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.The BSV 'metanet' is an insecure joke, 'built' on quick sand ...
-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54518146Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is also NOT Bitcoin. It is a minority fork ... the real satoshi told us what happens to minority (chain) forks here ...
...snip...
Satoshi did anticipate forks and the likely outcome ...
A second version would be a massive development and maintenance hassle for me. It's hard enough maintaining backward compatibility while upgrading the network without a second version locking things in. If the second version screwed up, the user experience would reflect badly on both, although it would at least reinforce to users the importance of staying with the official version. If someone was getting ready to fork a second version, I would have to air a lot of disclaimers about the risks of using a minority version. This is a design where the majority version wins if there's any disagreement, and that can be pretty ugly for the minority version and I'd rather not go into it, and I don't have to as long as there's only one version.
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
Satoshi warned us alright.
...snip...
Bitcoin = BTC which is the official and original version of the software ...
-
https://web.archive.org/web/20090303195936/http://bitcoin.org/...
You also mentioned Jon Matonis earlier in this thread @hv_ ...
Who was on nChain's payroll at one time ... and seemingly likes to try and 'backdoor' cryptography 'products' for the 'highest bidder' ...
Hushmail To Warn Users of Law Enforcement Backdoor-
https://www.wired.com/2007/11/hushmail-to-war/-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hushmail-
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Jon_MatonisJon Matonis Joins Blockchain Pioneer nChain as Vice President of Corporate Strategy-
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jon-matonis-joins-blockchain-pioneer-nchain-as-vice-president-of-corporate-strategy-300449153.html ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
Anymore for anymore ?