Like I said, the fact that he was using an obviously purchased account played zero in the scam being successful. He directed people to a website that directed people to other fake websites that appeared to be trustworthy. I don't think anyone investigated how trustworthy the person running it was.
>advertised on the forum
Sure. Smoking is bad for you. So is sucking on a shotgun, and absentmindedly pulling the trigger. One is simpler to avoid than the other.
Start by not allowing account sales and sig campaigns. Then we can see what could be done about thermos promoting scams.
Baby steps.
>played zero in the scam being successful.
False. Sure, it could have been accomplished differently, just as
@Blazed: Then why ban links to phishing sites? Since linking to phishing sites is not allowed, clooless noobs are lulled into thinking that phishing links don't exist, a sense of false security [& all the rest of the bullshit rationale for allowing account sales].
@Pattart re "I don't think that any Bitcoin has been returned to scam victims ever really": Never happened in 6+ years, so irrelevant.