Exclusions have nothing to do with me considering people a scammer, that's what the feedback system is for. I do not consider you a scammer but the fact that you publically post PMs makes me think that you are not trustworthy. Simple as that.
I don't think TECSHARE is a thief at all. In fact, if he wasn't such a cocksucker and didn't think the same of me, I would have no problem doing a bitcoin deal with him in which I sent bitcoin first. I don't think he'd run away with my money.
The reasons he's excluded from my trust list are that he's shown poor judgement in his feedback-leaving history, which is the whole reason why he got booted off DT a few years ago, and that he's way too emotional (to the point of being unstable) when I've had disagreements with him. I had to block his PMs because be wanted to continue an argument in a thread that I didn't wish to continue, and he kept sending aggressive-toned PMs to me. And look at the neutral feedback he left me, and tell me it isn't aggressive:
Just because you can't argue your points without personally attacking me is not my fault. You tell yourself whatever you like and block my messages. It doesn't change the fact that you are just a child throwing a fit because I hurt your frail little feelings by pointing out the flaws in your arguments. Of course if you simply just debated the subject none of this would be an issue now would it?
P.S. if I was threatening you, you would know it.
That was in 2016, and here he is, still arguing with people the exact same way. Meanwhile, I think I've mellowed a lot since then (occasional outbursts aside). In any case, this is probably why a lot of other DT members have excluded TECSHARE from their trust lists.
Oh I left you a neutral! HOW ABUSIVE! Please stop pretending this is about my judgment and not just your personal panties in a bunch over your inability to have a debate about a subject concerning the entire forum, and you being butt hurt I left you a neutral rating over it. I don't think you are a cocksucker, and even if I did frankly you probably suck the least cock of all the cocksuckers I consider cocksuckers. IMO your behavior has improved and you are starting to see the big picture here, but you are still a little confused as to who the real enemies are. Currently I think you have good intentions but are simply misguided. You are right, that was in 2016, and you still have your panties in a bunch over it? Who is unstable here?
The freedom I am referring to is being able to be critical of the default trust priest class without the punitive punishment of exclusion as punishment for doing so. No one is free to speak or be critical of the Default Trust Stazi here any more, your continual slander of me for doing nothing more than speaking critically is just further evidence of it. All of those retards are just convenient tools for you to dismiss legitimate criticisms and pretend it is all the same. The primary difference between myself and them is you don't have the convenient option of just labeling me as a scammer so you have to try to lump me in with "trolls".
That is simply not true. I don't need to label you in any way or even justify my exclusion of you. It's just that you don't like being excluded and you're trying to come up with all sorts of conspiracy theories to make it seem like the reason is not your own behavior.
If anything, being
constructively critical of the trust system would be a good reason for me to include someone, and I've done so on a couple of occasions. I would consider including you if you weren't such an unstable hypocritical knucklehead.
You throw lots of labels at me, funny no one ever is able to point at any specific circumstances where I went too far. If they do it always seems to be a standard that they are willing to apply to me but not their special pals. It is always some nebulous label, they wave their hands, say abracadabra and call it justified.
~snip~
Is that so? Maybe some one should tell that to the 13 cult members excluding me because they don't like my criticism of their pals. I am sure the long list of people on the list no one has ever heard of are far more trustworthy. My crimes are too numerous to count after all.
Have you at least considered the possibility that all exclusions in their trust list are all from individual encounters and from different reasons? Like from what @TheNewAnon135246 is telling us he has a different reason why you have been removed from his trust list he didn't plan with anybody else to exclude you he has his own reason why he did it and not one of it is to gang up on you.
Have you ever considered that these people are simply taking signals from The Default Trust Stazi Squad, consciously or otherwise, and are influenced to do things like this over minor issues because they have collectively crafted a false narrative? They do it all the time. Watch any time one of the chosen gets into trouble, the whole team rolls in to defend them from criticism attempting to burn anyone down that points the issue out at any cost.
You should move to Canada .
