you called people who criticizing your group suckpuppets and you called yourself good ones.hHmmmm?
Sockpuppet detected!
Topic: sockpuppets in meta lately - page 2. (Read 15166 times)
Sockpuppet detected!
obviously cryptohunters alts. good thing they seem to be as verbose as he is. need some posts more and tspacepilot's scripts can be used to validate this claim: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059
That was an epic thread.
I agree 100%. Some of them he's doing a better job at pretending not to be himself than others. I'm setting a policy of ignoring all of them from here on out.
obviously cryptohunters alts. good thing they seem to be as verbose as he is. need some posts more and tspacepilot's scripts can be used to validate this claim: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059
you called people who criticizing your group suckpuppets and you called yourself good ones.hHmmmm?
Is this proof of your sig spamming?
Just to inform you that my previous post doesn't count as signature spam as it has less than 100 characters. You have one "spam card" less. I see no proof that any accounts here accused are alts?
Video evidence
Ok, here you go: https://youtu.be/f5HX67WqUSY?t=17 Video evidence
Please mute video, I swear they look like they are ranting about something.
>..<
I bow to your judgment.
Now back to trying to understand penetration testing with Kali Linux.
I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.
Sure, no problem: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/the-one-above-all-2580400.Is this proof of your sig spamming?
I see no proof that any accounts here accused are alts?
Video evidence as required by yourself when operating your alt account zorroback.?
Was cryptohunter actually banned? He's not currently so must have been given a short one if so.
Is it possible that a direct ban from the theymos won't show in whatever dashboard you moderators have?
Or he is just playing with us to have our hopes destroyed tomorrow morning?
I'm a gnat's wedding-tackle away from giving the guy another 20 merits for the post just to piss off the whingers. Would that count as merit abuse, or would it be frock puppet abuse?
Seeing how his attitude has changed in the past few weeks I'm not sure if he will be pissed off about this.
In his twisted mind, he might see it as a victory where he has made you do something through his well-planned schemes ....
The only way to deal with a nut is to use a hammer, nothing else works...
I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.
Sure, no problem: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/the-one-above-all-2580400.
I'm a gnat's wedding-tackle away from giving the guy another 20 merits for the post just to piss off the whingers. Would that count as merit abuse, or would it be frock puppet abuse?
He did not explain why he decided to give his pal merits just because he asked for them.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49692389
I see merits given to this initial post. I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.
It is the double standards of you and your friends here which there is clear proof of.
I don't know why you are quoting my post and asking me to post proof of something, I am not the OP of this thread.https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49692389
I see merits given to this initial post. I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.
It is the double standards of you and your friends here which there is clear proof of.
The post you linked is not the post we were talking about, it was this one:
Hello Everyone
I have been mining for almost 6 months but I didn’t build it nor did it program it. I had a friend who helped me out but since then I have been interested in building my own and programming it myself. I have learnt to build it but just need to learn the programmingt, maintaining and upgrading part of the miner.
I have been looking but things seem very confusing with most people giving their opinions rather than actual knowledge. Can anyone please help me by providing me certain links as a newbie in this and other areas once I am able to increase my knowledge I can move up and keep learning.
Thank you
This is the post you had problems with because it received 10 merits and JetCash explained how that happened. I have been mining for almost 6 months but I didn’t build it nor did it program it. I had a friend who helped me out but since then I have been interested in building my own and programming it myself. I have learnt to build it but just need to learn the programmingt, maintaining and upgrading part of the miner.
I have been looking but things seem very confusing with most people giving their opinions rather than actual knowledge. Can anyone please help me by providing me certain links as a newbie in this and other areas once I am able to increase my knowledge I can move up and keep learning.
Thank you
My initial reply is based on you accusing JetCash for whatever it is you think he is guilty of for the post I quoted.
Also there is one that starts out with a f in this very post.
I still maintain that the one that starts with v was better.I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again
In that case, I will not ask you again how you knew cryptohunter was banned when nobody other than himself could know that. occam's razor informed me
Also there is one that starts out with a f in this very post.
I still maintain that the one that starts with v was better.I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again
In that case, I will not ask you again how you knew cryptohunter was banned when nobody other than himself could know that. 
I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again before I make another reputation thread asking why persons are permitted to continue accusing persons, casting them in a negative light with no proof at all. I hope persons realize this is unfair and ridiculous.
So you have been lurking around Bitcointalk for quite sometime, becoming quite familiar with the current forum politics and just a couple of days ago decided to create an account? I suppose that is possible, but doesn't pass the occam's razor test. Perhaps you are not a CH alt; especially since a moderator already confirmed that if CH was banned, it's already over. However, it's quite likely you are someone's alt here.
I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.
Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.
This is fun. I wonder if anyone else noticed that snippet, after I indicated it was the words of my inspiration cryptohunter?
Agent foxpoop.
You missed notildah? Also there is one that starts out with a f in this very post.
This is not a proofen fact, you need video evidence of cryptohunter typing on this very keyboard. Ask moronbozo.
I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again before I make another reputation thread asking why persons are permitted to continue accusing persons, casting them in a negative light with no proof at all. I hope persons realize this is unfair and ridiculous.
I will just leave this here...
I do find the multiple newbie accounts posting here to be annoying. I suspect there is one person behind the multiple newbie accounts trying to create an illusion that a single person is complaining about what the OP is saying, and to create an illusion that the problem described in the OP is exaggerated. Sort of a false flag type thing. Or an attempt to prevent anyone from using an anon newbie account from being taken seriously so anyone who wants to criticize must do so openly, risking their reputation.
I do find the multiple newbie accounts posting here to be annoying. I suspect there is one person behind the multiple newbie accounts trying to create an illusion that a single person is complaining about what the OP is saying, and to create an illusion that the problem described in the OP is exaggerated. Sort of a false flag type thing. Or an attempt to prevent anyone from using an anon newbie account from being taken seriously so anyone who wants to criticize must do so openly, risking their reputation.
global moderator
Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Teamsters Internet SEctor, Big Boobies talkinDoubleD and Nigerian CocoPalm Farmer are probably the same user.
People need to stop feeding trolls. Maybe any Newbie account spouting the same old nonsense should just be given the silent treatment. I'm sure we could get themerit mafia regulars to agree to it but there's too many sig spamming shitposters who are more than happy to chime in for it to be truly effective. Shadowbanning works wonders for trolls though. When their bait doesn't catch they soon realise they're wasting their time.
I laughed out loud at moronbozo. Was cryptohunter actually banned? He's not currently so must have been given a short one if so.
People need to stop feeding trolls. Maybe any Newbie account spouting the same old nonsense should just be given the silent treatment. I'm sure we could get the
I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.
Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.
I laughed out loud at moronbozo. Was cryptohunter actually banned? He's not currently so must have been given a short one if so.
I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.
Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.
It is a shame that cryptohunter was banned. I want to confirm that he was a great inspiration to myself, that said I am not crytohunter. Let's
keep to the things we can prove.
keep to the things we can prove.
I just choked laughing.
You are not notildah as cryptohunter would say. You bought his account. This is likely since you are begging for 0.02 btc loans very recently. You are notildah as cryptohunter correctly mentioned. He was a fantastic member and a sad loss to this community. A true legend.
Well uh, thanks?
Don't worry, I'm done here. If I see Nutildah I'll tell him Not Cryptohunter said "Hi".
Definitely CH, uses too many words/terms that nobody (rarely anybody) else does.
(dozens of usages of whilst, if not hundreds)
(both posts are about sig campaigns using the term cream off)
(shadiest of escrows)
This was also a giveaway:
It was funny to see CH try their hardest to keep their words to a minimum but ultimately fail in their last post.
In addition, the new name is entirely fitting for how they see themselves.
This will be the first of many threads started to examine the possible actions of campaign managers and their projects and their sponsorship of perhaps some of the most shady people on this entire board whilst refusing honest members merely on some red marks actual scammers and liars wish to put on their accounts.
Theymos can you explain your reasoning on honest meriting of merit worthy posts by those that clearly announce their intentions vs those that are sneaky about it and report others whilst clearly doing it themselves?
(dozens of usages of whilst, if not hundreds)
whilst they cream off the best deals for them selves and their friends? Perhaps anyone that has been banned for simply whistle blowing or under some false pretense should be reinstated immediately?
....whilst ensuring they cream off the best sig campaigns via their pals campaign managers projects and mods seem to be joined to the same projects are backing them and their foul deeds against honest members.
(both posts are about sig campaigns using the term cream off)
Does Hhampuz knowingly chose to employ and sponsor people that are Liars, Scam pushers, trust abusers and those implicated in extortion schemes and other shady escrow deals ?
mention facts that there are thread accusing lauda of shady escrow practices and that senior senior members agree that he is shady and the fact that lauda is also implicated in an extortion scheme.
(shadiest of escrows)
This was also a giveaway:
Posts will be deleted if not accompanied by evidence, off topic or deemed irrelevant by myself.
It was funny to see CH try their hardest to keep their words to a minimum but ultimately fail in their last post.
In addition, the new name is entirely fitting for how they see themselves.
That's a very compelling case for a sub 80 iq.
It is a shame that cryptohunter was banned. I want to confirm that he was a great inspiration to myself, that said I am not crytohunter. Let's
keep to the things we can prove.
You are not notildah as cryptohunter would say. You bought his account. This is likely since you are begging for 0.02 btc loans very recently. You are notildah as cryptohunter correctly mentioned. He was a fantastic member and a sad loss to this community. A true legend.
I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.
Jump to: