This will be the first of many threads started to examine the possible actions of campaign managers and their projects and their sponsorship of perhaps some of the most shady people on this entire board whilst refusing honest members merely on some red marks actual scammers and liars wish to put on their accounts.
Theymos can you explain your reasoning on honest meriting of merit worthy posts by those that clearly announce their intentions vs those that are sneaky about it and report others whilst clearly doing it themselves?
(dozens of usages of whilst, if not hundreds)
whilst they cream off the best deals for them selves and their friends? Perhaps anyone that has been banned for simply whistle blowing or under some false pretense should be reinstated immediately?
....whilst ensuring they cream off the best sig campaigns via their pals campaign managers projects and mods seem to be joined to the same projects are backing them and their foul deeds against honest members.
(both posts are about sig campaigns using the term cream off)
Does Hhampuz knowingly chose to employ and sponsor people that are Liars, Scam pushers, trust abusers and those implicated in extortion schemes and other shady escrow deals ?
mention facts that there are thread accusing lauda of shady escrow practices and that senior senior members agree that he is shady and the fact that lauda is also implicated in an extortion scheme.
(shadiest of escrows)
This was also a giveaway:
Posts will be deleted if not accompanied by evidence, off topic or deemed irrelevant by myself.
It was funny to see CH try their hardest to keep their words to a minimum but ultimately fail in their last post.
In addition, the new name is entirely fitting for how they see themselves.
Edit:
Holy crap CH is banned!(?)!
Which member did not posted in couple past days?
The one whom you knew was banned even though his ban isn't public and therefore there's no way you could have known he was banned unless you are him. That member.Quoted for future posterity:
I believe cryptohunter already detailed this in full here. He correctly stated [editors note: said no one ever] that the subjective and practically meaningless merit scores and sources should be far removed from the other control system trust. It is quite terrible how they had him banned for posting the truth [ed: among other things] in response generally to their own viscous attacks upon him, that consisted of nothing other than lies and fabrications, then traced through his post history to find some 1 word posts, to provide excuse to finally get rid of him.
