SolidCoin 1.10 Preview | Bitcointalksearch.org

freequant

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Improvements designed to improve network efficiency btw is not some absurd statement like you are making it seem like, if you understood software at all you would never have stated that and it could be any number of things, sending and receiving fewer messages, bundling communications by time or size, changes in how updates are broadcast/requested.

Who said improving networking is absurd?
You are a very first-degree person aren't you?
If you had even an ounce of critical thinking, you would understand that what I am mocking is not what he claims he did, but the way he is padding his changelog with hollow marketing bullshit to make it look like he did a lot of big changes, without ever citing anything concrete.

sd

hero member

Activity: 730

Merit: 500

Quote from: johnj on September 08, 2011, 02:50:57 PM

Quote from: smoothie on September 08, 2011, 02:46:16 PM

Looks like the current version of this trash is breaking already:

http://solidcointalk.org/topic/177-transaction-creation-failed/

Hey, that's a new record for CH.

Maybe 1.11 will last a whole TWENTY minutes!

Well he does code like a retarded drunken macaque. Has he even heard of testing?

It's amazing he has the front to complain about the slow pace of BitCoin development when anyone can see the mess you get when you rush these things.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: ArtForz on September 08, 2011, 02:59:48 PM

Quote from: smoothie on September 08, 2011, 02:46:16 PM

Looks like the current version of this trash is breaking already:

http://solidcointalk.org/topic/177-transaction-creation-failed/

Nah, 1st one is probably someone discovering the "joy" of a hard 4kB tx size limit (*way* more convenient than those EVIL variable tx fees, eh?)
2nd seems to be for some reason stuck downloading the chain and keeps DCing his peers thanks to the "disconnect peer if he sends us more than 9 orphan tx" "improvement".

This reminds me of computer science days in college when my prof said sometimes fixing something breaks more things than it fixes. That statement applies oh so clearly here.

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: smoothie on September 08, 2011, 02:46:16 PM

Looks like the current version of this trash is breaking already:

http://solidcointalk.org/topic/177-transaction-creation-failed/

Nah, 1st one is probably someone discovering the "joy" of a hard 4kB tx size limit (*way* more convenient than those EVIL variable tx fees, eh?)
2nd seems to be for some reason stuck downloading the chain and keeps DCing his peers thanks to the "disconnect peer if he sends us more than 9 orphan tx" "improvement".

johnj

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: smoothie on September 08, 2011, 02:46:16 PM

Looks like the current version of this trash is breaking already:

http://solidcointalk.org/topic/177-transaction-creation-failed/

Hey, that's a new record for CH.

Maybe 1.11 will last a whole TWENTY minutes!

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Looks like the current version of this trash is breaking already:

http://solidcointalk.org/topic/177-transaction-creation-failed/

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Well, just compare previous releases claims with actual changes.
doublec was nice enough to break em out into nice logical units: https://github.com/doublec/solidcoin/commits/master
There's quite a few WTF candidates in there.

Spacy

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: freequant on September 08, 2011, 12:50:37 PM

I've never seen that much shameless bullshit in a release changelog.

If you want to add some facts to your smart observations you should wait for the source code and mention the relevant code blocks ;-) Otherwise this is just trolling...

Detritus

member

Activity: 295

Merit: 98

Why waste the time making improvements on the client?

It's far too late for this fork to ever be accepted by the community.

The Electric Monk

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Placement of the balance makes more sense where you moved it to.

The Electric Monk

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: freequant on September 08, 2011, 12:50:37 PM

I've never seen that much shameless bullshit in a release changelog.

At least he's working on it.

freequant

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

I've never seen that much shameless bullshit in a release changelog.

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 02:13:29 AM

*) Networking improvements designed to improve efficiency of the connected nodes

Improvements that improves efficiency?
Sounds awesome...
Is it more networking than before?

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 02:13:29 AM

*) Multithreaded rewrite. Hundreds of lines have been rewritten to provide a much smoother multithreaded experiece.

After functional programming, object oriented programming and procedural programming, CoinHunter invents the line-oriented programming, a powerful new paradigm where the organizational unit is the line and the developer can safely disregard side effects on other lines. It is also a software development method based on the empirical evidence that any modification longer than one line increases entropy in the program in a totally unsustainable fashion. Focusing on a single line at a time allows the programmer to successfully understand each line individually and achieve to produce something that compiles.
Line-oriented programming is also totally cloud ready and spawns multiple threads on bitcointalk.org for a much lamer experience.

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 02:13:29 AM

*) Cleanup of the code. Restructured parts of it to allow it be extended more easily in the future

Are you aware that people are going to look at your code and laught at your ridiculous claims?

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 02:13:29 AM

*) 64bit support on Windows

A whooping 1-line change in the makefile...

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 02:13:29 AM

*) More GUI enhancements and features.

More features suggests that you already mentionned features.
But I fail to see where...

Spacy

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Guidelines from freenode.net (http://freenode.net/channel_guidelines.shtml)

"If you just want to publish a single conversation, be careful to get permission from each participant. Provide as much context as you can. Avoid the temptation to publish or distribute logs without permission in order to portray someone in a bad light. The reputation you save will most likely be your own. "

sd

hero member

Activity: 730

Merit: 500

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 10:28:46 AM

Updated main post with newer screenshot.

Quote from: OneMINER on September 08, 2011, 09:28:27 AM

Maybe you could fill me in on what I did exactly that warrants a ban.

Subtle trolling? If you think it's wrong give me a PM.

Your ShittyCoin is a troll on BitCoin. Can we ban you too?

CoinHunter

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 251

Updated main post with newer screenshot.

Quote from: OneMINER on September 08, 2011, 09:28:27 AM

Maybe you could fill me in on what I did exactly that warrants a ban.

Subtle trolling? If you think it's wrong give me a PM.

OneMINER

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 13

HA! I got banned from #solidcoin on freenode for asking a question. All I did was mention the client and got booted. Hang on let me check my logs...... Wait a sec! IT WAS YOU!! Take a look at this:

[12:17] Hey I'm trying to get my coins in order and I hear theres some problem with the solidcoin client. I was wondering if anybody knew of an open source client that has no compatibility issues. I found this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announce-new-solidcoin-client-fully-open-source-41345 and was hoping someone could comment on it.
[12:18] lol kick him O.o
[12:18] THE MAIN ONE IS OPEN SOURCE
[12:18] JESUS
[12:18] lol whatever gets said here gets immediately cross posted to #btcguild and vice versa, sad
[12:18] * kish (~rr@unaffiliated/spice) has joined #solidcoin
[12:18] Ohh. What was the problem I was reading about though? Was the author of the site mistaken?
[12:19] * RealSolid sets mode +b *!*@bas13-toronto12-1167984130.dsl.bell.ca for #solidcoin

So that happened on 2011-09-05 if anybody wants to check. Maybe you could fill me in on what I did exactly that warrants a ban.

sd

hero member

Activity: 730

Merit: 500

Quote from: CoinHunter on September 08, 2011, 02:13:29 AM

So as everyone should know work has been going on with the new 1.10 client.
...

But you are a wanker who keeps introducing bugs. Why would we want to use a buggy cryptocurrency developed by a wanker?

Didn't you say on twitter that you were trying to sell 'shit from your toilet'? Keep your ShitCoin.

CoinHunter

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 251