Topic: [ANNOUNCE] New Solidcoin Client Fully Open-Source! (Read 23754 times)
So is there any further development being done with this? I liked the original SolidCoin and wouldn't mind seeing it stage a comeback.
I opened an old solidcoin client te other day. After 1 month it still hasnt downloaded the block chain. Fail.
Not having a functioning client won't effect your profitabilty with Solidcoin in the slightest!
~BCX~
I think the reason theres no Mac client is because you work there lol.
Elementary school bit you hard.
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/affect-versus-effect.aspx
LOL, the desperation of the Solidcoin sockies is amusing at best. FYI English isn't my primary language moron. 哈 哈
I opened an old solidcoin client te other day. After 1 month it still hasnt downloaded the block chain. Fail.
Not having a functioning client won't effect your profitabilty with Solidcoin in the slightest!
~BCX~
Elementary school bit you hard.
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/affect-versus-effect.aspx
I opened an old solidcoin client te other day. After 1 month it still hasnt downloaded the block chain. Fail.
I suggest "Solidcoin v3.0" as the name for the project.
Is this project continuing, or is it dead in the water?
Is this project continuing, or is it dead in the water?
This fork uses SolidCoin 1.03 and fixes all the recent problems in the code
Here's Soldcoin (SLC) 1.04:
https://github.com/jackjack-jj/soldcoin
Here's Soldcoin (SLC) 1.04:
https://github.com/jackjack-jj/soldcoin
JackJack, can you use this fix for solidcoin?
The timetraveller eviction fix can be trivially copypasted from Geist Geld git.
I've created a thread on the SolidCoin forum that you "open source" client people may want to vote "no" on .
Why not put the poll here?
Let's have this poll in a neutral site: Please vote here: Do you want RealSolid to be lead developer
Have fun and don't be a cheating asshole! Vote only once. Ego's depend on it!
I've created a thread on the SolidCoin forum that you "open source" client people may want to vote "no" on .
Why not put the poll here?
The slow processing? Can't be fixed for now (not unless you pull in some rather... experimental... bitcoin changes).
The txindex journal bloat? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/491
Yep. I'd do a build with that for Windows and Linux using my new-found gitian powers, but RealSolid monkeyed around with the build process a lot and it looks like fixing gitian support again would be quite hard. The txindex journal bloat? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/491
I've created a thread on the SolidCoin forum that you "open source" client people may want to vote "no" on .
http://solidcointalk.org/topic/186-do-you-want-realsolid-to-be-lead-developer/
http://solidcointalk.org/topic/186-do-you-want-realsolid-to-be-lead-developer/
Does your client download those huge blocks very slow too? Can it be cured somehow?
Oh, the *downloading* is as fast as everything else
. It's the processing what takes its time. It's worth to keep a backup of blk*.dat!
The slow processing? Can't be fixed for now (not unless you pull in some rather... experimental... bitcoin changes).
The txindex journal bloat? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/491
The txindex journal bloat? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/491
Does your client download those huge blocks very slow too? Can it be cured somehow?
Nope. Once you download them and close the client it'll go back to a more 'managable' size, but that first time downloading it is going to be multiple gb of space.
Does your client download those huge blocks very slow too? Can it be cured somehow?
1.04 crashes every time if: select address book> select address> edit> add name> OK > crash and burn
After restart, account has the added comment.
After restart, account has the added comment.
One bug regarding the address book is already fixed in the code, so this should probably fine in the next release.
1.04 crashes every time if: select address book> select address> edit> add name> OK > crash and burn
After restart, account has the added comment.
After restart, account has the added comment.
Little bump for you 
Code:
[quote author=EskimoBob link=topic=41345.msg510468#msg510468 date=1315347039]
[quote author=jackjack link=topic=41345.msg504115#msg504115 date=1315157431]
This fork uses SolidCoin 1.03 and fixes all the recent problems in the code
Here's Soldcoin (SLC) 1.04:
https://github.com/jackjack-jj/soldcoin
...
[/quote][quote author=jackjack link=topic=41345.msg504115#msg504115 date=1315157431]
This fork uses SolidCoin 1.03 and fixes all the recent problems in the code
Here's Soldcoin (SLC) 1.04:
https://github.com/jackjack-jj/soldcoin
...
I like the new name "soldcoin". It's probably just a typo but so what.
BTW, lots of people are asking (in freenode ) for the windows version. I have no Windows so I can not help them.
Can someone please help those good people, who do not like the evil mad monkey license, and push the compiled exe's to git or something.
One more thing. I started a #solidcoin-fos channel in freenode for chitchat so this forum thread can have more useful content and less of that 0 value blaa blaa blaa
Edit: added the missing 'i'
[/quote]
Any news on windows version? I have no Windows so I can not help those poor souls
Never forget, Art still did a dick move.
Not disagreeing with you here. Though I do regret not noticing the massive txdb journal growth earlier, or I would have stopped the "attack" a lot sooner than I did.Shouldn't have done it in the first place, you didn't get vengeance against Coinhunter even, you took it out on the end users and that is worse than EVERYTHING you all have accused Coinhunter of.... If you were a decent human being you should be ashamed of yourself, and if the rest of these clowns cared about this technology (Cryptocurrency in general) they should cast you out from here.
If instead of ART someone to GAIN PROFIT had done what ART did then who can u blame?
ART did huge that too ONLY ONE tx that clearly showed the bug.
What if some one came to know this & secretly did some 100 tx & gained profit & totally brought down all the crytocurrencies, then no one will be here scolding each other. Most will be crying for loosing all their coins & some even life.
ART did one thing which showed a vulnerability in the client.
A REAL DEVELOPER MUST take whatever feedback from his client users & if some negative feedback comes then he MUST solve it, instead of calling others fuck off.
If no one gave feedback abt how fucking shit was Windows Vista & M$ never took feedback & scold, insulted those who gave feedback, then Windows 7 wouldn't be released at all.
DEVELOPERS job is to DEVELOP & give error free software. Not to scold who gives feedback.
+1 for ArtForz' actions and making them public
it was all according to the codex
Anybody attacking him has not thought about how a bad guy would have done it. ArtForz did a service and a favor to everybody associated with solidcoin and whole the cryptocurrency community.
it was all according to the codex
Anybody attacking him has not thought about how a bad guy would have done it. ArtForz did a service and a favor to everybody associated with solidcoin and whole the cryptocurrency community.
Jump to: