As you can see, the new mining options in SolidCoin show parts of the new block header format and the ability for SolidCoin v2.0 to act as a minipool.
Topic: SolidCoin Now officially most secure p2p currency - page 2. (Read 9435 times)
The 12 million coins cannot be used on the network, the CPF or tax yes some people won't like it. I didn't centralize SolidCoin much at all, it's 5% economic centralized, the network is still very decentralized because I believe that is the most secure way to protect against large corporations and governments. Unlike you I'm not living in a fantasy land where I don't understand the problems and inefficiencies with this technology.
You want people to take your word that there are 12 million magic coins that can't be spent in your network? Maybe there are 12 Googolplex coins and maybe they can all be spent by you. We only have your word that they can't be spent because you won't release the source code. And in case you have not got the message we don't trust your word over the facts in the source code. It seems pretty likely there are all kinds of other nasty surprises in there.
You don't seem to know what you are doing and posting pretty graphics isn't going to change that.
I understand that, but part of the problem of cryptocurencies to this point is their complete lack of usability.
And you have fixed that by making bigger problems. Wonderful! Now the biggest problem with SolidCoin isn't the lack of usability but the unstable network design, the tax, and the 12 million premined coins. That's real progress!
You took a peer to peer network, centralized it, and added tax, broke the transaction fee setup, and got your blockchain dosed in the process. You are a moron and could be easily replaced with the bottom grade of code money from Infosys or Wipro.
The 12 million coins cannot be used on the network, the CPF or tax yes some people won't like it. I didn't centralize SolidCoin much at all, it's 5% economic centralized, the network is still very decentralized because I believe that is the most secure way to protect against large corporations and governments. Unlike you I'm not living in a fantasy land where I don't understand the problems and inefficiencies with this technology.
As you can see, the new mining options in SolidCoin show parts of the new block header format and the ability for SolidCoin v2.0 to act as a minipool.
People look out, I have heard there is a keylogger/wallet-stealer in the SC2 client!
Hang on, I'll check the source. Oh I can't because I don't have it.
Maybe you are right and this whole SolidCoin thing is an excuse to get code on people's machines to steal wallet.dat's.
I understand that, but part of the problem of cryptocurencies to this point is their complete lack of usability.
And you have fixed that by making bigger problems. Wonderful! Now the biggest problem with SolidCoin isn't the lack of usability but the unstable network design, the tax, and the 12 million premined coins. That's real progress!
You took a peer to peer network, centralized it, and added tax, broke the transaction fee setup, and got your blockchain dosed in the process. You are a moron and could be easily replaced with the bottom grade of code money from Infosys or Wipro.
People look out, I have heard there is a keylogger/wallet-stealer in the SC2 client!
We are a little more interested in how the thing functions than how pretty the client is. Only that lemon party moron would trust your secret network because of Oh! Look! Shiny!
I understand that, but part of the problem of cryptocurrencies to this point is their complete lack of usability. So it's important to make things easy to use for everyone, combined with like you said, having a secure and fast network protocol.
Being able to just install and be 2 clicks from making or sending SolidCoin's is obviously a big deal to a lot of people, don't gloss over it.
You're a bit jealous aren't you. Have you seen the new client? It has mining built right into it, now everyone can just easily mine SolidCoin's and become part of the network. It's probably why the network is so large now. Let me show you what actual development looks like.
Neat eh.
Neat eh.
We are a little more interested in how the thing functions than how pretty the client is. Only that lemon party moron would trust your secret network because of Oh! Look! Shiny!
Haha. Can you be any more scared of SolidCoin? Probably not. Welcome to the future and the current best cryptocurrency going around. Jump on before it's too late.
The funny thing is that a scam of any kind always includes language like this. The need for immediacy is important. Convince people they have so much to lose by not acting to force an action.
So you say ScamCoin 2.0 isn't a scam yet you keep it as closed source and then use scam baiting language in your communications. The use of sock puppets to create a "consensus" among multiple "people" (all yourself) that it can be trusted is just icing on the cake.
You're a bit jealous aren't you. Have you seen the new client? It has mining built right into it, now everyone can just easily mine SolidCoin's and become part of the network. It's probably why the network is so large now. Let me show you what actual development looks like.
Neat eh.
Haha. Can you be any more scared of SolidCoin? Probably not. Welcome to the future and the current best cryptocurrency going around. Jump on before it's too late.
The funny thing is that a scam of any kind always includes language like this. The need for immediacy is important. Convince people they have so much to lose by not acting to force an action.
So you say ScamCoin 2.0 isn't a scam yet you keep it as closed source and then use scam baiting language in your communications. The use of sock puppets to create a "consensus" among multiple "people" (all yourself) that it can be trusted is just icing on the cake.
Haha. Can you be any more scared of SolidCoin? Probably not. Welcome to the future and the current best cryptocurrency going around. Jump on before it's too late.
You know that time you were looking for evidence of your own lies? Well look above and you will find a whopper.
When you say "I have continually lied" I do not know where you get that impression. If I asked you to explain why you think I'm a liar you will probably just say "it's a feeling" , because if you actually had evidence of me lying it would be "big news". So please provide evidence of these "lies" and show everyone how I'm a big old liar. 
It's not a feeling. It's a fact that you lie practically non-stop on your website. It's a fact you have been spreading lies about how insecure BitCoin is and how secure SolidCoin is since SolidCoin first appeared. No-one believes anything you say anymore and conversations like this just serve to ensure even more people know you are a compulsive lier.
Maybe you have some kind of memory problem..
P.S. Just admit you don't want to show us the code because it's a patched together mess.
Haha. Can you be any more scared of SolidCoin? Probably not. Welcome to the future and the current best cryptocurrency going around. Jump on before it's too late.
When you say "I have continually lied" I do not know where you get that impression. If I asked you to explain why you think I'm a liar you will probably just say "it's a feeling" , because if you actually had evidence of me lying it would be "big news". So please provide evidence of these "lies" and show everyone how I'm a big old liar.
It's not a feeling. It's a fact that you lie practically non-stop on your website. It's a fact you have been spreading lies about how insecure BitCoin is and how secure SolidCoin is since SolidCoin first appeared. No-one believes anything you say anymore and conversations like this just serve to ensure even more people know you are a compulsive lier.
Maybe you have some kind of memory problem..
P.S. Just admit you don't want to show us the code because it's a patched together mess.
The code is still there in compiled form, you can disassemble and verify it.
Disassembly is tedius and time consuming. The source code it produces can be difficulty to follow conceptually. Eventually given enough time, money, and resources one can break the binary down and reconstruct it but ScamCoin has only been available for what a week? Hardly enough time for an exhaustive dissassembly, analysis and recompilation.Interesting you have gone from "I will release the source code" to " it can't be a scam, just dissassmble it and verify it yourself".
Quote
So please don't go saying anything is possible. I understand some people don't want to run software that doesn't have source available, and no one is forcing them to run it until that point. Just don't go around making up fairy tails about what is or isn't happening, if you don't know then don't pretend to know.
ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. Say you 100% can nullify accounts is a fairy tale as it can't be proven or disproven at this point. However with closed source ANYTHING (including account nullification) IS possible.
Quote
If accounts could be flagged as nulled or void then the entire premise of what I personally want, a secure p2p cryptocurrency would be invalid.
That is what you claim to want but maybe what you really want is to be in control. This is the entire problem w/ scamcoin 2.0. It requires complete and implicit trust in a central authority (you). Even if you are 100% above board that is a critical flaw in your entire system. Crypto-currency should have no central authority and shouldn't require implicit trust.
Hey CH
Why don't you move along, you've already made your announcement
Why don't you move along, you've already made your announcement
You don't think a bigger story here is "CoinHunter zaps coins" ? Seriously, he could damage SolidCoin more by moving his 250K coins and me "zapping" them than just pretending it can all happen. If he wants to damage SC2.0, move the coins and let me "zap them", and then we can see how "centralized" SolidCoin is.
Given you haven't released the source we have no idea what you can or can't do. We do know you have continually lied, obfuscated, and mislead people about various aspects of ScamCoin 2.0 so anything is possible.
BCE is likely full of shit BUT there are ways you *could* using closed source nullify accounts. You could flag accounts as "nulled" and mining clients would exclude them from all blocks. So while the coins would exist they would never be able to be transfered anywhere without you personal express permission (possibly available for a %).
RELEASE THE SOURCE CODE.
Without it the entire ScamCoin network relies on complete implicit trust in you.
Of course we both know you will never release the source code so my request is more to continually remind the crypto community that you haven't.
The code is still there in compiled form, you can disassemble and verify it. So please don't go saying anything is possible. I understand some people don't want to run software that doesn't have source available, and no one is forcing them to run it until that point. Just don't go around making up fairy tails about what is or isn't happening, if you don't know then don't pretend to know.
If accounts could be flagged as nulled or void then the entire premise of what I personally want, a secure p2p cryptocurrency would be invalid. As much as I dislike some people in the world, they should be free to use a currency for whatever purpose they want. I couldn't really care less about bitcoinexpress using SolidCoin or mining it. I have a problem with him lying about SolidCoin and claiming to have a lot of coins when he doesn't though.
When you say "I have continually lied" I do not know where you get that impression. If I asked you to explain why you think I'm a liar you will probably just say "it's a feeling" , because if you actually had evidence of me lying it would be "big news". So please provide evidence of these "lies" and show everyone how I'm a big old liar.
According to BitcoinEXpress, he can't move his coins without attracting attention and CH/RS and his trusted nodes can remotely zap his client and render his transactions void. So when he tried to move large amounts of coins, that's what happens. If it's true, it's seriously wrong.
And the whole thing with CoinHunter asking BitcoinEXpress to move a large amount of coins to prove himself is interesting. CoinHunter may be just baiting BitcoinEXpress to move those coins so that they can remotely nullify them.
I think the truth will come out eventually...
And the whole thing with CoinHunter asking BitcoinEXpress to move a large amount of coins to prove himself is interesting. CoinHunter may be just baiting BitcoinEXpress to move those coins so that they can remotely nullify them.
I think the truth will come out eventually...
Coinhunter can't zap coins. If the network allowed it, it would be an insecure network able to be controlled by people I don't like. Only reason I asked him to move it is so everyone would know he couldn't. Instead he makes up some more bs about why he can't do it and gullible people eat it up. Haha, this forum is comedy gold.
You don't think a bigger story here is "CoinHunter zaps coins" ? Seriously, he could damage SolidCoin more by moving his 250K coins and me "zapping" them than just pretending it can all happen. If he wants to damage SC2.0, move the coins and let me "zap them", and then we can see how "centralized" SolidCoin is.
You replied with the wrong clone or you just got hacked
Bwuahahaha, I wonder how many other accounts are CH sockpuppets. BTW I grabbed a screencap, incase he notices his folly lol
This needs a topic on its own, can you create one, with the screencap?
I'm at a Xubuntu miner right now, so can't do much
edit: never mind: I'll do it, found out how to do it
According to BitcoinEXpress, he can't move his coins without attracting attention and CH/RS and his trusted nodes can remotely zap his client and render his transactions void. So when he tried to move large amounts of coins, that's what happens. If it's true, it's seriously wrong.
And the whole thing with CoinHunter asking BitcoinEXpress to move a large amount of coins to prove himself is interesting. CoinHunter may be just baiting BitcoinEXpress to move those coins so that they can remotely nullify them.
I think the truth will come out eventually...
And the whole thing with CoinHunter asking BitcoinEXpress to move a large amount of coins to prove himself is interesting. CoinHunter may be just baiting BitcoinEXpress to move those coins so that they can remotely nullify them.
I think the truth will come out eventually...
Coinhunter can't zap coins. If the network allowed it, it would be an insecure network able to be controlled by people I don't like. Only reason I asked him to move it is so everyone would know he couldn't. Instead he makes up some more bs about why he can't do it and gullible people eat it up. Haha, this forum is comedy gold.
You don't think a bigger story here is "CoinHunter zaps coins" ? Seriously, he could damage SolidCoin more by moving his 250K coins and me "zapping" them than just pretending it can all happen. If he wants to damage SC2.0, move the coins and let me "zap them", and then we can see how "centralized" SolidCoin is.
You replied with the wrong clone or you just got hacked
Bwuahahaha, I wonder how many other accounts are CH sockpuppets. BTW I grabbed a screencap, incase he notices his folly lol
You don't think a bigger story here is "CoinHunter zaps coins" ? Seriously, he could damage SolidCoin more by moving his 250K coins and me "zapping" them than just pretending it can all happen. If he wants to damage SC2.0, move the coins and let me "zap them", and then we can see how "centralized" SolidCoin is.
Given you haven't released the source we have no idea what you can or can't do. We do know you have continually lied, obfuscated, and mislead people about various aspects of ScamCoin 2.0 so anything is possible.
BCE is likely full of shit BUT there are ways you *could* using closed source nullify accounts. You could flag accounts as "nulled" and mining clients would exclude them from all blocks. So while the coins would exist they would never be able to be transfered anywhere without you personal express permission (possibly available for a %).
RELEASE THE SOURCE CODE.
Without it the entire ScamCoin network relies on complete implicit trust in you.
Of course we both know you will never release the source code so my request is more to continually remind the crypto community that you haven't.
According to BitcoinEXpress, he can't move his coins without attracting attention and CH/RS and his trusted nodes can remotely zap his client and render his transactions void. So when he tried to move large amounts of coins, that's what happens. If it's true, it's seriously wrong.
And the whole thing with CoinHunter asking BitcoinEXpress to move a large amount of coins to prove himself is interesting. CoinHunter may be just baiting BitcoinEXpress to move those coins so that they can remotely nullify them.
I think the truth will come out eventually...
And the whole thing with CoinHunter asking BitcoinEXpress to move a large amount of coins to prove himself is interesting. CoinHunter may be just baiting BitcoinEXpress to move those coins so that they can remotely nullify them.
I think the truth will come out eventually...
Coinhunter can't zap coins. If the network allowed it, it would be an insecure network able to be controlled by people I don't like. Only reason I asked him to move it is so everyone would know he couldn't. Instead he makes up some more bs about why he can't do it and gullible people eat it up. Haha, this forum is comedy gold.
You don't think a bigger story here is "CoinHunter zaps coins" ? Seriously, he could damage SolidCoin more by moving his 250K coins and me "zapping" them than just pretending it can all happen. If he wants to damage SC2.0, move the coins and let me "zap them", and then we can see how "centralized" SolidCoin is.
You replied with the wrong clone or you just got hacked
Jump to: