I thought of another question for btc365partners: who has the 20 m
BTC now? Is it you, who couldn't even verify BTi's claim, or is it BTi, who doesn't want to provide any evidence?
This is how you can make sure you can't ever be accused of confiscating funds for your own benefit:
I'm happy to donate at minimum the funds involved in this claim to a charity of the community's choosing.
@loyceV , we took a leaf out from your book where you suggested donating the involved funds to charity to avoid accusation of confiscating funds for our own benefits. Perhaps you can clarify why you no longer support this idea
The missing part here is that in your
last post, it sounded like from your side there were no evidence to accuse oz.kashi. It was like your provider told you to confiscate the accuser's fund, and you just followed what they said.
When I and some other users were dealing with neymarjr12 case, SB provided us data to analyze. And their decision was backed by data.
Anyway, I see there are intention of resolving the case and even intentions to go further like donating some matched sum to charity. I am still not supporting the flag, giving the time to rearrange your thought process and find a better solution. It's good to see that you are taking suggestions from community and learning.
We also have reached a mutual agreement with out sports vendor BTi that we will release the involved funds (20 mBTC) should ozkashi provide the required KYC from our side. Please email to
[email protected] with the subject header ozkashi - KYC request.
Not only oz.kashi but also the other suspected accounts that you think were involving with arbitrage betting. Do KYC for all the suspected accounts so that next time the same ID do not give you hard time.
