Of course, the expertise and reputation of a bounty manager counts very much especially when it comes to the success of a bounty program. Bounty managers are suppose to advocate for bounty hunters and as well serve as intermediaries between the project team and bounty hunters.
A good bounty manager is the one who does not side with the team of the project when the team decides to cheat bounty hunters by reducing rewards after a successful ICO or IEO. The good bounty manager must advocate for the bounty hunters and make sure the initial agreements are rewarded accordingly.
Topic: Some bounty managers have no experience (Read 774 times)
if I am more inclined to the bounty manager who is controlled by their team, because it is more transparent and clear. or if not, choose a bounty manager that is already known as hhampuz, arteezy and btcldigger.
Having a newbie bounty manager is not entirely bad. Those people can get experience in handling bounties whether it turns out good or bad. These people should always be careful of how they manage the project and be learning about their mistakes to be a better bounty manager in the future. Everyone starts as a newbie even the well known and trusted bounty managers.
I agree, Not all novice managers are bad. And there is also no guarantee that experienced managers will bring projects to be successful, in fact many Cryptocurrency Projects managed by professional managers have failed. Because the factors that influence the success or failure of the Cryptocurrency project, it does not only depend on who the Manager is. 
You are right, sometimes a project employs bounty managers without experience, which only complicate things later.
I think the reason is simple, such managers are worth less, if the project itself is a scam or simply bad, then it is obvious that the team of such a project will try to spend as little money as possible at the stage of the bounty.
I try to avoid projects with inexperienced bounty managers, too risky.
I think the reason is simple, such managers are worth less, if the project itself is a scam or simply bad, then it is obvious that the team of such a project will try to spend as little money as possible at the stage of the bounty.
I try to avoid projects with inexperienced bounty managers, too risky.
Before becoming a professional Bounty Manager, someone must be a beginner Bounty manager, If everyone doesn't believe in the new Bounty Manager, then what will happen to them ?! I don't think all the new Bounty managers are bad, there must be some among them who can bring the Bounty Project to Success!
I do not care much about bounty manager, I rather look for a good token with real value.
While reputable bounty managers manage a lot of bounty campaigns, they do not have time for every query that we have. Bounty managers that are members of the ICO team could more care about the quality of the bounty campaign - bad experience - bad advertisement for the project.
While reputable bounty managers manage a lot of bounty campaigns, they do not have time for every query that we have. Bounty managers that are members of the ICO team could more care about the quality of the bounty campaign - bad experience - bad advertisement for the project.
Maybe the goal of the project developers is to choose a new Bounty Manager because they pay a cheap rate, but actually it is very detrimental to the project itself. And I myself would prefer a Project managed by an experienced project manager or an official team of the project itself, rather than joining a Bounty program managed by a new manager.
if developers team do this strategy , in my opinion they make basic mistakes.bounty hunters always trying to find best bounty manager for each campaign.and if there is good campaign and managed by unreputable manager i am worry they will have less participants.no more hype in this campaign and less investors will know about its projects.
Maybe the goal of the project developers is to choose a new Bounty Manager because they pay a cheap rate, but actually it is very detrimental to the project itself. And I myself would prefer a Project managed by an experienced project manager or an official team of the project itself, rather than joining a Bounty program managed by a new manager.
Nowadays it is indeed very difficult to be able to determine a good bounty manager, because clearly the situation of crypto development also affects and it cannot be avoided. now many new bounty managers are growing and old ones are starting to disappear.
if you want to compare the old and new bounty managers, it is clear now that the new ones are very communicable, and can solve well. the biggest influence with no good communication, because many Bounty Managers hold many projects.
if you want to compare the old and new bounty managers, it is clear now that the new ones are very communicable, and can solve well. the biggest influence with no good communication, because many Bounty Managers hold many projects.
There are ton of bad managers, sometimes it is just plain stupid.
Common problems are, that they dont count stakes, they count them incorrectly, they do not answer to question for days, their rules are unclear . This in many cases promotes scammers , they see that manager does not know what he is doing and take advantage of the situation.
Common problems are, that they dont count stakes, they count them incorrectly, they do not answer to question for days, their rules are unclear . This in many cases promotes scammers , they see that manager does not know what he is doing and take advantage of the situation.
I don't even care about their inexperience but the fact that they always want to steal majority of the tokens to themselves and ban people for no reasons.
This is becoming something very bad in this community. They even go to the extend of letting devs reduce the pool instead of fighting for them when the devs are in a position to change their mind about the bounty pool.
This is becoming something very bad in this community. They even go to the extend of letting devs reduce the pool instead of fighting for them when the devs are in a position to change their mind about the bounty pool.
Many bounties currently managed by bounty managers do not have the experience, there is a bounty that has enough potential that has been running for one month but the spreadsheet has not been updated, if managed by a professional manager might be included as the most recommended bounty
It doesn't matter if the distribution is fair, the experienced bounty managers also initially had minimal experience. I think the most important thing is that the distribution of bounties must be fair and transparent
Developers and teams should always try not to give out their bounty program for their projects to awful bounty managers,many are average and some are newbies and they aren't not very good with their work,imagine having to teach bounty manager how compulsory 'Prove of authentication' posts are when bounty is already ongoing is ridiculous
Exactly!! It was frustrating to teach them how to grade. Sometimes they give bullshit reasons to eliminate the bounty hunter's efforts.
I know most projects require experience when employing bounty managers. It is better the bounty managers have experience because it motivates the bounty hunters if spreadsheets are updated all the time.
For bounty managers, what matters most is not experience in conducting bounty campaigns, but a good reputation. The better the reputation of the bounty manager, the more skilled bounty hunters will come to participate in the campaign. They will be sure that the project is not scammers.
I have another opinion and believe that there are still bounty manager that are very professional. I try to follow their campaigns, because they are doing their own research to protect community from getting scammed and I respect such a behaviour.
I agree, I also met such people. Everything is very individual. Each company has its own people and they can not always be professional with great experience. Because this technology is only developing. 
I also often see that their average bounty manager is a new member and does not have extensive experience about the project. I also wonder why the developer accepted the offer of a novice manager. related to their project, it's very high risk if their project is good but the manager is not good.
I always thought about this, all of experienced bounty manager were started from bottom, it means all of people should be given a chance if they want to become a bounty manager. I've seen some of new bounty manager tried to promoted their manage's fee, they were willing to get paid 50% cheaper, or even not get paid for 1st week of bounty. Reputable BM is indeed safer than the new one, but it's kinda not fair for other people who want to try become a BM (who knows maybe they could be better than known BM atm)
It’s true that bounty managers newbies can make mistakes, but I know several bounty managers who were newbies, but who previously participated as bounty hunters and thanks to this gained experience and knowledge of how bounty campaigns are conducted. By the way, often newcomers are more responsible in fulfilling their duties and more responsive. And do not forget that many of the old and famous bounty managers were once new too.
I have another opinion and believe that there are still bounty manager that are very professional. I try to follow their campaigns, because they are doing their own research to protect community from getting scammed and I respect such a behaviour.
Jump to: