Topic: Some bounty managers have no experience - page 4. (Read 774 times)
Repotated bounty managers have also a new bounty manager when they start managing bounties and with their experience. They have now a good reputation so it is not a matter that a bounty manager is new or old.
If they already run a few bounties in the past, they should have enough experiences handling these concern, if the particular bounty manager you don't want to mention, do not listen to your concern which is to ask bounty participants to do a proof of authentication, then both manager and bounty hunters will face issues of double submission and scammers exploiting the spreadsheets.
I will not participate in a campaign that has no verification, because scammers are on a look for spreadsheets to exploit.
I will not participate in a campaign that has no verification, because scammers are on a look for spreadsheets to exploit.
Developers and teams should always try not to give out their bounty program for their projects to awful bounty managers,many are average and some are newbies and they aren't not very good with their work,imagine having to teach bounty manager how compulsory 'Prove of authentication' posts are when bounty is already ongoing is ridiculous
You did drop names of these bounty managers we do have a lot of bounty managers in the ICO campaign, but the majority of them re part of the team and not independent bounty managers, I have complete trust in independent bounty managers, because they have a lot of experiences handling bounty campaign. 
I agree. There are still many bounty managers with no experience. They even updated the spreadsheet for a long time. Especially for signatures. They don't update according to the date. And it has an impact on the participant's signature. Especially when their posts are deleted. And they don't get a stake. Supposedly, we must provide action for bounty managers like that.
this kind of bounty managers must warned.we loss our stakes that influecend to our final token.they have to update spreadsheet each week regularly so there is no one harmed while there is massive deleting post in forum.
That's exactly want to say .. Same question.. Require all bountyanager have an experience to do soo in bounty posting on that project in exact order and shcedule of that project he/she work...
I agree. There are still many bounty managers with no experience. They even updated the spreadsheet for a long time. Especially for signatures. They don't update according to the date. And it has an impact on the participant's signature. Especially when their posts are deleted. And they don't get a stake. Supposedly, we must provide action for bounty managers like that.
Perhaps those managers you're pertaining are handling several ongoing bounty campaigns. It's highly recommended to always join in a bounty campaigns who are reputable enough to avoid this kind of problems. Most commonly those reputable active bounty managers are limiting themselves in handling multiple bounty campaigns at the same time.
I agree. There are still many bounty managers with no experience. They even updated the spreadsheet for a long time. Especially for signatures. They don't update according to the date. And it has an impact on the participant's signature. Especially when their posts are deleted. And they don't get a stake. Supposedly, we must provide action for bounty managers like that.
That's right. Bounty Manager, though not related to the team, but he also creates certain opinions about the project. If a bad bounty Manager, it can ruin the reputation of the project. Therefore it is necessary to appoint the checked people to this position. But what about the newcomers, there's nothing wrong. Them, too, when the need to same to start. Therefore, I believe that if the bounty Manager, though new, but it normally does its job, then it is quite possible to rely on.
Somebody needs to start from somewhere, right? But even if you are a newbie, you should at least educate yourself from the basic rules and regulations here in the forum. Give time to read those basic rules. At least you know what items your participants are violating and so you can advise them also. Being a bounty manager is not all about the compensation that you can get. As time goes by, you are building your portfolio, so you should be a good example as a user also.
The competence of the bounty Manager is also important, so choosing the right candidate may not be so easy. Don't forget that successful bounty managers have their own conditions for work and if the team does not agree with them that they will not be able to work with him. So probably many are looking for managers with more favorable conditions, but it is not always a good idea.
That's right. Bounty Manager, though not related to the team, but he also creates certain opinions about the project. If a bad bounty Manager, it can ruin the reputation of the project. Therefore it is necessary to appoint the checked people to this position. But what about the newcomers, there's nothing wrong. Them, too, when the need to same to start. Therefore, I believe that if the bounty Manager, though new, but it normally does its job, then it is quite possible to rely on.
Absolutely true it is, some of bounty managers totally worst ypu have ever seen, they are totally worst about their behave and they uses unexpected behave over bounty campaigners and also blackmail bounty participants!
Developers and teams should always try not to give out their bounty program for their projects to awful bounty managers,many are average and some are newbies and they aren't not very good with their work,imagine having to teach bounty manager how compulsory 'Prove of authentication' posts are when bounty is already ongoing is ridiculous
Totally agree with you for that. It's really is a very important step for any project. If project want a good advertisement then they have to chose a good bounty manager. Now days we see some manager who have no idea how to manage bounty. I have no sense how they have been chosen. A good bounty management proof how much quality carry that project.
With a bounty manager who is less loyal and inexperienced, it will certainly have a negative impact on bounty participants. The simplest thing is the number of spammers and cheaters that always appear in every project. There are people who want to cheat, such as joining multiple accounts, etc. Bounty managers must be really careful in that regard, proof of authentication post is one of the solutions.
I most don't like bounty managers who are unresponsive and don't care about the bounty participants. Letting spammers get the same token as participants who actually provide original content, is not fair. So I tend to avoid bounty managers like that.
I most don't like bounty managers who are unresponsive and don't care about the bounty participants. Letting spammers get the same token as participants who actually provide original content, is not fair. So I tend to avoid bounty managers like that.
Developers and teams should always try not to give out their bounty program for their projects to awful bounty managers,many are average and some are newbies and they aren't not very good with their work,imagine having to teach bounty manager how compulsory 'Prove of authentication' posts are when bounty is already ongoing is ridiculous
There is no proper explanation from the team members when bounty hunters ask about hiring an experienced bounty manager. They prefer to ignore this question and choose someone who has no idea about the ongoing bounty programs form the marketing team. The lack of experience by the bounty manger is not good for projects which aim to achieve the same position with the competitor projects. Professional teams always check the market before planning the details of the marketing. Only small projects find the undisciplined bounty manager who can't manage the campaign accurately.
Participated in a particular bounty that the manager made a lot of blunder in computing stakes with equivalent tokens, happened that those with higher takes eventually ended up with lower token while those with lower had higher. Currently it is difficult to note the strength and experience of the manager when some bounties create new accounts for the bounty purpose
Hahaha.. I just ignore most bounties I see in the forum as soon as I learn the bounty manager handling the bounty. They are so inexperienced and judging, most of them do not have experience in bounty management and just take up jobs as long as it fetches them some cash.
Experience comes from practice or training so how would someone gonna do it if they are not allowed to become a manager first? I haven't seen any training grounds for being a qualified bounty manager yet. I think it is the team's fault that they chose some incompetent manager for their campaign.
So true, many of them are inexperienced and still not ready to learn. They end up making a lot of mistakes in detriment of the bounty hunters.
I didn't know that there's an incident like that. Yeah it's odd to see a bounty manager forgetting about the authentication post which most of the bounties have and required.
Those bounty managers that lack of experience might forget it but I agree that if there's a bounty that's legit and has a trustworthy team, they should also entrust their bounty to trustworthy bounty managers.
Those bounty managers that lack of experience might forget it but I agree that if there's a bounty that's legit and has a trustworthy team, they should also entrust their bounty to trustworthy bounty managers.
All it takes to have experience is being in the game. What you should say is projects should not give their bounty campaign to managers who are not deligent. That some bounty managers catch scammer doesn't qualify them as being good. Moreover the manual method involved in bounty tasks calculation is difficult bounty managers needs support as well.
Jump to: