We was so proud that Satoshi was probably from the UK. But it seems not.
The hard truth is that Satoshi is "North American, " if that's still in question.
We took some time to analyse, simple grammatical structures used, in his various 575 variants of informal posts. Here what we found.
'"-disablesafemode",' - post 1. English (UK) version - "-disablesafemode, "
"realized" - post 15. English (UK) version - "realised"
"criticized" - post 20. English (UK) version - "criticised"
"minimized" - post 525. English (UK) version - "minimised"
I'm certain we could use this same trick to triangulate his location, but, that task is for someone else to accomplish - if at all necessary.
Edit...
From bitcoin.pdf at bitcoin. org
"realizes" — English (UK) version — "realises"
"characterized"— English (UK) version — "characterised"
'"tape",' — English (UK) version — "tape,"
"we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributed" - use of we (group of people)
"we propose begins with a timestamp server" - use of we (group of people)
"we will need to use a proof-of-work system similar to Adam Back's Hashcash [6]," - use of we (group of people)
"we don't care about later attempts to double-spend" - use of we (group of people)
"We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures." - use of we (group of people)
We did not find any evidence of the letter I; The final references on the white paper suggests someone else "we, " was involved in the research and documentation of this paper — at least someone that seems to be from UK.
this still can not be made as a reference someone comes from where, many things are made into consideration, The hard truth is that Satoshi is "North American, " if that's still in question.
We took some time to analyse, simple grammatical structures used, in his various 575 variants of informal posts. Here what we found.
'"-disablesafemode",' - post 1. English (UK) version - "-disablesafemode, "
"realized" - post 15. English (UK) version - "realised"
"criticized" - post 20. English (UK) version - "criticised"
"minimized" - post 525. English (UK) version - "minimised"
I'm certain we could use this same trick to triangulate his location, but, that task is for someone else to accomplish - if at all necessary.
Edit...
if you check his white paper that is not confined to the crappy web browser racist spellchecker.. where it gives us UK folk more freedom to talk how we brits want. then you will see that he writes like a brit.
From bitcoin.pdf at bitcoin. org
"realizes" — English (UK) version — "realises"
"characterized"— English (UK) version — "characterised"
'"tape",' — English (UK) version — "tape,"
"we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributed" - use of we (group of people)
"we propose begins with a timestamp server" - use of we (group of people)
"we will need to use a proof-of-work system similar to Adam Back's Hashcash [6]," - use of we (group of people)
"we don't care about later attempts to double-spend" - use of we (group of people)
"We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures." - use of we (group of people)
We did not find any evidence of the letter I; The final references on the white paper suggests someone else "we, " was involved in the research and documentation of this paper — at least someone that seems to be from UK.
what if he uses tools such as Google translator
