Of course when this happens. the error lies not only in the project developer team but also in investors. We know that plunging or participating in a new project is not as easy as we imagine. We need to understand if analysis and DYOR are very important to know how the project really is. And when we fall into a scam or phishing, we cannot blame others. Didn't we participate in analyzing it before participating?
Its sad to say that many investment are losing their investment in the end because they invested into scam. Most of the time we say that the investors failed to research and understand what the project really is. The reason behind arev investors is relying on what they read in their white paper that is well written script. but not in physical thing or it is truly work as what is written. The best thing to do is to know the people behind the team that you can rely. 
Topic: Sometimes its always the investors fault - page 4. (Read 1146 times)
Whether it's IEO or STO, which are the trending form of token sales now, investors should never rely completely on the fact that the exchange must have done verification of team, or the company doing the STO is approved by authorities, that's not enough. Have you made findings on the project and values it will add to crypto and the world at large? Have you checked their token economics and other relevant aspects?. We should be mindful of these vital aspects too, so that we don't blame ourselves when we lose money.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
we have always different kind of mindset in our life if some kind of problem is going on then we will say that the problem is not on us it is all about the situation that is the problem here if we feel that we made some mistakes then we realise how to change that into a good situation so everyone needs to accept their fault in their life. Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
I read there is a new crowdfunding investment that is a combination of both IEO and STO, this is to make investment profitable and safe but we have proven that ICO STO or even IEO is not 100% guaranty that you will get a good return of your money, the project looks good, the team are ok and it passed the exchange criterion but still couldn't get the support of many investors.
Of course when this happens. the error lies not only in the project developer team but also in investors. We know that plunging or participating in a new project is not as easy as we imagine. We need to understand if analysis and DYOR are very important to know how the project really is. And when we fall into a scam or phishing, we cannot blame others. Didn't we participate in analyzing it before participating?
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
definitely in sometimes everyone made the mistake but these things are not a huge problem for everyone because if your mistake is happening the reason for that will be misunderstanding in most of the time so I think if we made the proper decision after mistake correctly then it will be easily solved by anyone. Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
I agree with your point and the main cause of it is laziness on the part of the investors, because they fail to make research about the project and see whether it is good or not before they invest in it.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
I won’t blame the investors about this
I blame the project devs:
When you have a bonus round of 50% or 30% of tokens bought; that’s ridiculously high
Either at ieo price or ico price or above it; investors dump and get lots of returns; then abandon the project
How can it be sometimes and always in the same time? 
Despite the poorly constructed sentence I agree with OP. It's not the teams fault that the project failed and investors lost money. Sometimes things just don't work out and you have to be ready for it.
Despite the poorly constructed sentence I agree with OP. It's not the teams fault that the project failed and investors lost money. Sometimes things just don't work out and you have to be ready for it.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
The major problem is that a lot of these investors are looking out for a scheme to get rich quick without any due diligence, they get promised with unrealistic returns on ivestment and they do not bother to query if it's true, so they invest blindly. It's no one's fault but theirs.
Sometimes investing in projects is not always looking for profit, some do it because they like the purpose of the project for the future so they support through investing and for profit it might be a bonus. for investors who complain a lot because they feel disadvantaged, it is not 100% project error but indeed the risk of investing in cryptocurrency is greater
I don't think so if someone would just invest in a project because they don't want the profit, that would be a plain stupidity. No one is giving a free money to someone without making a profit, unless it's a newbie who doesn't know what they were doing with their money on other project because they just put their money somewhere without making a thorough research of the project.
People invest in coins expecting huge profits. But to get that huge amount of profit, you need to hold the coin for at least a year or more. I believe at that time, the team members would have reached a point where they can get a use for the project.
The major problem of all investors is that they are not doing enough research before investing in any new project. People just do not care about the project itself and their only goal is to achieve the best possible profit.
the fact is that when the investor invests money in the project, he is already confident in it and expects a profit. another point, if you do not study the project yourself, and listen to the "experts". investments are a big risk, and you need to study all the projects yourself, so that in the future you do not shift responsibility to third parties.
Sometimes investing in projects is not always looking for profit, some do it because they like the purpose of the project for the future so they support through investing and for profit it might be a bonus. for investors who complain a lot because they feel disadvantaged, it is not 100% project error but indeed the risk of investing in cryptocurrency is greater
Not looking for profit? Investing is always about profit dude, no one will risk their money if there's no advantage for him. Because finally after that project success, then they will getting profit.
Sometimes investing in projects is not always looking for profit, some do it because they like the purpose of the project for the future so they support through investing and for profit it might be a bonus. for investors who complain a lot because they feel disadvantaged, it is not 100% project error but indeed the risk of investing in cryptocurrency is greater
That's true! I think project success depends over developers mind, if they want real marketing and real business then they will develop their project perfect research and by perfect way! other then ieo just for show!
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
For me, I knew not all IEO are good. Just like whats your opinion is, I saw that when I found out that there are some project using IEO with the exchange in which I know that has no good volume in the market and some are making just a fake volume only in the platform. Just like what happened on La token where most frequently happened the coins turned into zero volume. I knew others observed and noticed this things also.
That's right. Investors must be careful and really do research on the project before deciding to invest their money. And when something is not in line with the expectations they will start complaining because they lose investment.
yes, we often see it on a number of successful projects this year. even though the sale is successful, but after being registered at the price exchange below the investor's purchase price and very far away. reasonable for investors to confuse it.
Personally, I don't believe in this blame game of who is at fault. If investors have done their scrutiny on a project and decide to invest, that's up to them; every investment comes with some degree of risk.
And for the project team, it is their primary responsibility to ensure the success of their project through any available means.
And for the project team, it is their primary responsibility to ensure the success of their project through any available means.
Jump to: