Topic: Sometimes its always the investors fault - page 7. (Read 1146 times)
And I think luck still plays a role in every project you try to invest on. I've been on different projects and I see them as something that is going to be good for the future but it ends up as something bad. There are also times that because of failure of marketing strategies, things go bad and the project does not get enough recognition it deserves.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
You can't blame them with their actions because they take the risk and definitely they know how dangerous with this kind of works. There's no assurance of success and it takes guts for them to gamble their investment. Everyday there is always new which I prefer they probably doesn't knows how to deal with it. There's nothing we can do about it because we can't control people who participated in that kind of investment. So it's always been expected that there's always been a victim and it will continue to happen.
You can't just blame investors for it. No one would want to throw away there money. The amount of time investor spent on researching about the project may be different but they do look into it. And even though they did, it would mostly depend on the project itself. Some promising looking project may become scam while a less flashy one gets a high price in exchange.
right on point! i had an experience investing in a very promising ICO but turned out to be a disappointment. though they are not considered to be scammers, but the development is so slow after their token sale, their coin is almost worthless right now. lesson learned = not all great, promising projects with mvp will become successful in the market.
and most of the time, once the token sale ended, expect that progress updates will be slow as compared when they are raising funds from the public.
it really depends on the team. how aggressive, motivated and dedicated they are in realising their objectives. not only the money that they can get from the investors but how far they can go with the trusted funds.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
You've said it all. Investors off late are lazy and some have the notion that since it is not an ICO, either IEO or STO is perfect for investing but that is wrong. Making your own enquiries and researching, I mean a good research on projects before will surely let you whether to go in or not. Don't be led astray by doing your own research. Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
you can think that's investors fault if they lose in crypto investment but it so hard to study or do research in this so don't blame investors
Then in different investment here the wise move to do is invest first in trusted already like Bitcoin,Ethereum and more then if you earn in this then do invest again that in your new investment or find new investment
Then in different investment here the wise move to do is invest first in trusted already like Bitcoin,Ethereum and more then if you earn in this then do invest again that in your new investment or find new investment
YES YOU CAN BLAME THE INVESTORS, ITS CALLED SELF RESPONSIBILITY.
Anything else just provides an excuse for a bloated paternalistic state to undermine risk taking and ultimately competition for the benefit of a established cartel. Do you not realise the greatest fraud was enabled by so called regulators that have duty to protect the public. Check out the SEC's response to Harry Markoupolous who uncovered Madoff's fraud. So far the largest crypto investment scams have been in the low millions, compared to inestment fruad in in industries under the purviewof regulators, which generally amount to hundreds of millions to billions. Examples, include Libor fixing Madoff, credit default swaps, toxic CMOs and ABS's.
The lack of regulation was key to the growth of crypto and the ease at which private companies could bypass investment banks and raise capital directly without parasitic investment baking fees.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Sometimes? Always? These two words shouldn't be in same sentence
But I agree all fault belong to investor mostly. Because they are buying tokens cheaply from ICO or IEO and they are sellint it 1/10 mostly!
Surely, investors are the people who have full responsibility about their investments. IEOs are the current trend, But that doesn't means investment is safe. investors should do more and more researches before choose any project to investing. As well as considering the exchange that launching IEO, investor should have good idea about project also.
You can't just blame the investors because no one would like what is happening to them. It is just they know the risk already yet they still gamble because they know it's worth it if it succeeds. But sometimes things aren't always the same when you imagine the outcome and turns out that the reality will just gonna slap you with disappointment. Some projects may look too promising but lots of factors that would change the outcome of every project.
Regulators are using the notion of investor protection to undermine ICO's buy placing burdensome compliance and kyc requirements ICO issuers. They are treating small ico issuers as large multi mullion or billion cap companies undertaking a full fledged IPO. The regulators are in the pocket of investment banks, who fear that ICO's may undermine their monopoly over access to the capital markets.
Against the backdrop of growing government excess and regulatory capture, anonymous ownership is the only way to protect ones assets, whether, fiat or crypto.
For solutions check out our project,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/proposal-100-anonymous-accounts-no-limits-or-kyc-fiatpaypal-accepted-5159944
Against the backdrop of growing government excess and regulatory capture, anonymous ownership is the only way to protect ones assets, whether, fiat or crypto.
For solutions check out our project,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/proposal-100-anonymous-accounts-no-limits-or-kyc-fiatpaypal-accepted-5159944
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
We all know that IEO and ICO are same. The only advantage IEO gives is to ensure the security of your money that you will not be scammed unlike ICO. So, investors must have kept it in their mind and only act on the project base type.
If an investor is a newbie then it is might their fault.
By just investing of a project but there are so many good and best investors who knows what to do.
there are so many SCAM issue in ICO and i am thankful that IEO is here!
By just investing of a project but there are so many good and best investors who knows what to do.
there are so many SCAM issue in ICO and i am thankful that IEO is here!
WHat is the fault of investors? it is just that they trust the project without knowin the real score.
that will also comes with bounty hunters. if you want to be productive then you should investigate and study.
That is the first rule in cryptocurrency.
that will also comes with bounty hunters. if you want to be productive then you should investigate and study.
That is the first rule in cryptocurrency.
This is very alarming ,any newbies that just come on here hoping to be lead by ranked members might actually be mislead ,this means that not all up ranked members knows what's right from what's wrong so my message to newbies is not to depend on any one on here either up ranked members or not ,let your first priority be to learn how cryptocurrency works them you will find your way
You can't just blame investors for it. No one would want to throw away there money. The amount of time investor spent on researching about the project may be different but they do look into it. And even though they did, it would mostly depend on the project itself. Some promising looking project may become scam while a less flashy one gets a high price in exchange.
I agree.Perhaps most investors do not do a quality research. Some do not do this because of laziness and misunderstanding how to do it. Others see no point in this after the experience of 2018 - no matter how good the project, it was a dump. And vice versa. During the big hype, any shitcoin will make X's.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Reading through this post, I was trying to feast my eyes to any solution or at least what best ways or a particular item to watch out for that investors should be looking at as a red or as a positive but unfortunately, no one was provided by Op. Maybe, op thinks that investors don't do research, they do but that doesn't stop a scam project to achieve their wicked motive.
I wouldn't have merited this post because it is not the fault of investors who have actually researched before investing to be blamed for being scam.
You can't just blame investors for it. No one would want to throw away there money. The amount of time investor spent on researching about the project may be different but they do look into it. And even though they did, it would mostly depend on the project itself. Some promising looking project may become scam while a less flashy one gets a high price in exchange.
Actually, from the start, there is certainly no guarantee that when we invest in the IEO or ICO it can benefit. Because the project's features are good, the development is also good. And that will have an impact on the profits you have when investing. So don't ever say investing in the IEO or ICO "must be profitable"
If we will look on the team members record then there will be no chance for the game changer whose into cryptocurrency for the first time.
Though they intend to have a great project that will develop and add more great in this community.
What we should look is a team who are willing to give great future and not their past!
Though they intend to have a great project that will develop and add more great in this community.
What we should look is a team who are willing to give great future and not their past!
Well to be honest, research does not provide any guarantee too but i agree with you to the extent that due diligence about the project is important and each and every aspect of the project should be examined before investing into a new project.
Either ICO IEO or STO, this shouldn't be what you will rely upon to get great benefits from new projects,what makes a difference is the thing that the teams are attempting to construct ,the inquiries you should begin posing to yourselves is what innovative idea will the new project offer crypto space ? Also, how great are teams records.
Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Sometimes even good project you invested will not give what you are expected and the reasons can be not enough exposure of the project or bad market condition so we have to find that project is good and also their strategy of getting many investors or else we are the person needs to be blamed. Many investors are complaining that they are at lose investing in some IEO projects ,these investors believe that all IEO projects are good and should be able to double or triple their ROI which is not possible unless they actually do good research on the projects first ,lack of research will always leads investors astray
Jump to: