So what we have is:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
------BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This message is to verify that I, DarkStar_ (u=507936) own the address 1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
------BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
HGQVJuqVpBJcMvOw/6BoWH62cb1dYGlof2rENV4U4erhMmfmX7AeSMBJKRs8BaCEpkE/CIehTi3M2CoHgja2EAA=
------END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.56
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto
wsBcBAABCgAGBQJX2dVjAAoJEIZVviH1IAytAewH/jVzTlElqDVCiK4fwI/9H8BC
B5L8aOkXjCSAcHLHMpnrSFj/DlVg8FDUHp7aKmtiGEnzmkZBTjCopBrjlvN3HgRS
bZGLpCHpcVtfG/sqp1IMXj/WLY2cIYC/734l3MkJZ2bLQb/Zq+l88XdUSUNg566P
w/Bm4oRFV7mmj3HlR4T8Q6f1TwINli9NYwwI9rXu2z7sfattStkk2qXaJliP0XWS
AjYVsORDkrLElEsYLGxt9yRsfoR729DacvF18Tth4oQuZ8vnrP6QRoQPPUi5xLxo
DuWvM6nv91HBlLa+kICbgDM9DP92dWnwQfH25RJdZstO6pXk/YUeF1W33Qc1uCI=
=MjI3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
which gives us
Signed with unknown certificate 0x8655BE21F5200CAD.
The signature is bad.
What we should have is:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This message is to verify that I, DarkStar_ (u=507936) own the address 1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
- -----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
HGQVJuqVpBJcMvOw/6BoWH62cb1dYGlof2rENV4U4erhMmfmX7AeSMBJKRs8BaCEpkE/CIehTi3M2CoHgja2EAA=
- -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.56
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto
wsBcBAABCgAGBQJX2dVjAAoJEIZVviH1IAytAewH/jVzTlElqDVCiK4fwI/9H8BC
B5L8aOkXjCSAcHLHMpnrSFj/DlVg8FDUHp7aKmtiGEnzmkZBTjCopBrjlvN3HgRS
bZGLpCHpcVtfG/sqp1IMXj/WLY2cIYC/734l3MkJZ2bLQb/Zq+l88XdUSUNg566P
w/Bm4oRFV7mmj3HlR4T8Q6f1TwINli9NYwwI9rXu2z7sfattStkk2qXaJliP0XWS
AjYVsORDkrLElEsYLGxt9yRsfoR729DacvF18Tth4oQuZ8vnrP6QRoQPPUi5xLxo
DuWvM6nv91HBlLa+kICbgDM9DP92dWnwQfH25RJdZstO6pXk/YUeF1W33Qc1uCI=
=MjI3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Which gives us:
Signed on 2016-09-15 08:55 with unknown certificate 0x8655BE21F5200CAD.
The signature is invalid: No public certificate to verify the signature
DarkStar_ has posted the PGP key
58AB AEE9 0659 EEE5 2F32 1FBA 96BF FCB0 D6CC EE10 / 0xD6CCEE10here
https://keybase.io/darkness/key.asc and here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14636070However, that is not the PGP / GPG he used to sign this message with (ie 0x8655BE21F5200CAD ).
Somewhere in the copy / paste process, DARKSTAR_ has tweeked the message to remove a space between the first and second dashes three times. So although the BitCoin signings are able to be confirmed, DarkStar_ needs to sign with the already posted PGP / GPG key OR post the new PGP / GPG key and sign that with his/her BitCoin Wallets...