Pages:
Author

Topic: stake.com and Casino.guru coverup. - page 3. (Read 660 times)

newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 4
September 29, 2023, 10:17:39 AM
#23
dvdx



i am at certainity that hiw the games of mines work. but can you proof read the difference between the first and the ssecond iteration also explain me why is it two iterations are so much having difference.
and also how come second iteration has 2 mines , in it . so how come so many tiles opened for bombs it clearly specifies over there.
also https://onlinephp.io/ can you migrate the program here ans give us a link , so that i can verify if its working or not


Will try to explain this to you one more time like to 5 year old.


Let's assume i go to mines and wanted to play mine game with 3 mines

At the beggining i known HASHED SERVER SEED , MY SECRET AND NONCE

Lets say it's

HASHED SERVER SEED = 'e7f3006651ac9fa2252cb6db7de2cfa50e8fb9ff479fd16afd45e9f5fa52c24b';
MY SECRET = 'J8ziLyE0L5';
NONCE = 1;

I Started to open mines at position
1st Click "field" : 0,
2nd Click "field" : 6,
3rd Click "field": 12,
4th Click "field": 18,
5th Click "field": 24,
6th Click "field": 21,
7th Click "field": 17,

On the 7th Click i busted as mine was uncovered/clicked.

Now i want to verify if actually MINE WAS AT THAT POSITION at that game with NONCE 1.

So i have rotated the seed to get the output for SERVER SEED , stake output for that string in
SERVER SEED UNHASHED = '8935bff6600c9ebb504505757ca881131e5f4a2766e8b0debd687100be6e17c4';

Okay move on now to verify the outcome of the mines for that particular game

For that instance I've used the code which i wrote yesterday to verify the mine bet

Output of my code (link for you to verify https://onlinephp.io/c/b9616 )

Code:
lets verify if my unhashedServerSeed is actually sha256 hashedServerSeed , Result: => bool(true)
Mines postions
Game Nonce:1
0 = 13
1 = 17
2 = 5
3 = 8
4 = 10
5 = 24
6 = 15
7 = 7
8 = 6
9 = 22
10 = 19
11 = 0
12 = 21
13 = 1
14 = 3
15 = 20
16 = 4
17 = 16
18 = 2
19 = 23
20 = 11
21 = 12
22 = 18
23 = 14


Okay so i know that i have played with 3 mines that particular game

It means in my game mines positions are

0 = 13 (1st mine position field)
1 = 17 (2nd mine position field)
2 = 5 (3rd mine position field)

Okay it clearly shows a mine at position field 17 which i uncovered and busted (as explained above)

NOW ASSUME BY SOME REASON STAKE PUT THAT BET TO THE ARCHIVE WITH THE REST OF THE FIELD WHICH I DID NOT OPENED/CLICKED

SO IN MY LOGS I SEE

Code:
"state": {
                "mines": [
                    13,
                    17,
                    5
                ],
                "minesCount": 3,
                "rounds": [
                    {
                        "field": 0,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 1.125
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 6,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 1.2857142857142856
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 12,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 1.4785714285714282
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 18,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 1.7120300751879696
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 24,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 1.9973684210526312
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 21,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 2.3498452012383897
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 17,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 1,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 2,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 3,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 4,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 5,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 7,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 8,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 9,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },                    
                    {
                        "field": 10,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 11,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 13,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },                    
                    {
                        "field": 14,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },
                    {
                        "field": 15,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    },                    
                    {
                        "field": 16,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    }
                    {
                        "field": 19,
                        "payoutMultiplier": 0
                    }
                ]
            }

Does that log format affect anyhow the result of the game ?

NO IT DID NOT

1st .
1. Mines position -> IN THE LOG MINES ARE IN THE SAME ORDER AS IN MY CODE OUTPUT (AFTER VERIFICATION OF BET)

2. ORDER OF FIELDS OPENED IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS MY MANUALL CLICKS TILL I BUSTED ON FIELD 17

the EXTRA DATA FOR OPENED FIELDS DOEST NOT AFFECT ANYTHING AS AT THAT POINT I ALREADY LOST THAT GAME ( WHEN CLICKED MINE AT FIELD 17)

So it means even if for some reason the output for fields opened have some EXTRA additional fields which were not clicked, BUT the ORDER OF that which we clicked is OK, it means there is no any manipulation.

I don't know how STAKE store the logs for best, but if the ORDER OF THE FIELDS OPENED TILL BUST IS EQUAL TO ACTUALLY CLICKED FIELDS IN GAME AND MINES POSITIONS IS IN THE SAME ORDER
IT MEAN THE RESULT IS FAIR.

newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 10:17:18 AM
#22
that email was sent. it was not fabricated mate.

Mmm...hhmmm...

so you accept the fact there is something to bury for the, , hence you sre quoting this point to me , bringing in guilt. CG lied to me about provablyfair. CG lied about the lawsuit of 580 $ by cristopher freeman on stake.com so basically they were trying to coverup for stake.com.

Where exactly did I say what you said I said? Kindly re-read.

The post is about showing proof [as that's how this board operates] of you asking for a sum of money the first time they granted your wish to talk with their supervisor, while, on CG and many other occasions, you insisted that you were just asking to either bring the manager or pay you.

So, yeah, not a rumor.

the problem with some people and CG they dont investigate they just specualte.
and when talked abut basics, they go in loops . in point 3 iteration 2 there were 2 iteration for the archives mines game.
the first ine had 2 mines and game ended when i clicked the bomb.
in second iteration it shiws 2 mines and i opened more than 11 bombs, hows that even possible on a mines game of 2 bombs.

clearly its manipualting hence they archive the bets. but still clearly some people and CG fail the basic common sense just to compare the iteration.

holydarkness. i welcome all your question, but it should be only post releated and infact the topiccof concern should be stake.com registering the bets in backend with manipulated odds , a part from that concern you will bring all the stupidest concern , then you should be thinking of qualitative reasoning skill adpat this in your life style.


FYI , those two iterations were picked up CG and stake.com when i send them the archive file. i am just explaning how two iteration of same odds of a mine game are different. if you cant compare the difference between the two iteration let me know

No, the problem here is you being too stubborn to see that you made mistake and misunderstand things. Many, way too many people tried to help contributing to this case, allocating their time to inform you what exactly happened, how to verify bets, etc. and yet you still insist to stick to what you believe, despite all of the facts.

My friend the problem is not the OP's topic, it's his narrative. No one came out and said no this this this you are wrong. Stake and CG are father and child companies. I have and had every proof and stake didn't even bother to give an answer because they don't need to. They have a fan base of spastic people who don't even know how to earn a living, won from crypto; childs. I hate that no one blames stake but only players; this is how payroll works i believe.(I'm not talking about you.)

ok i am just putting my point. no hard love mate
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Peace without Borders
September 29, 2023, 10:07:39 AM
#21
that email was sent. it was not fabricated mate.

Mmm...hhmmm...

so you accept the fact there is something to bury for the, , hence you sre quoting this point to me , bringing in guilt. CG lied to me about provablyfair. CG lied about the lawsuit of 580 $ by cristopher freeman on stake.com so basically they were trying to coverup for stake.com.

Where exactly did I say what you said I said? Kindly re-read.

The post is about showing proof [as that's how this board operates] of you asking for a sum of money the first time they granted your wish to talk with their supervisor, while, on CG and many other occasions, you insisted that you were just asking to either bring the manager or pay you.

So, yeah, not a rumor.

the problem with some people and CG they dont investigate they just specualte.
and when talked abut basics, they go in loops . in point 3 iteration 2 there were 2 iteration for the archives mines game.
the first ine had 2 mines and game ended when i clicked the bomb.
in second iteration it shiws 2 mines and i opened more than 11 bombs, hows that even possible on a mines game of 2 bombs.

clearly its manipualting hence they archive the bets. but still clearly some people and CG fail the basic common sense just to compare the iteration.

holydarkness. i welcome all your question, but it should be only post releated and infact the topiccof concern should be stake.com registering the bets in backend with manipulated odds , a part from that concern you will bring all the stupidest concern , then you should be thinking of qualitative reasoning skill adpat this in your life style.


FYI , those two iterations were picked up CG and stake.com when i send them the archive file. i am just explaning how two iteration of same odds of a mine game are different. if you cant compare the difference between the two iteration let me know

No, the problem here is you being too stubborn to see that you made mistake and misunderstand things. Many, way too many people tried to help contributing to this case, allocating their time to inform you what exactly happened, how to verify bets, etc. and yet you still insist to stick to what you believe, despite all of the facts.

My friend the problem is not the OP's topic, it's his narrative. No one came out and said no this this this you are wrong. Stake and CG are father and child companies. I have and had every proof and stake didn't even bother to give an answer because they don't need to. They have a fan base of spastic people who don't even know how to earn a living, won from crypto; childs. I hate that no one blames stake but only players; this is how payroll works i believe.(I'm not talking about you.)
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 09:42:39 AM
#20
i never asked compensation as 1 million, you read english and check the screenshot. i asked either to bring supervisor on chat or give me a million dollar.


however my deposit loss claim till date is 30,000,000 INR.

This statement of yours contradicts on the screenshot you provided and as @holydarkness pointed out to you. You are clearly asking them for money in exchange for burying this fabricated story that you created.

This lie post of yours clearly shown what’s your real intention for escalating this case. Now you are accusing casino guru colluding with Stake just because they review your case not in favor to you.



so the fact of stake.com manipulating the bet at back end is nothing and me asking casini money is something different. get your facts straight instead of acknowledging  that stake.coma nd CG lied upfrontly by provablyfair.me being third party verifier and lying about the case . also unable to compare manipulated iteration it comes down to me asking money frim casino.


i am platinium 3 member , they are at fault they must pay. also if you go to their community you will find iut people saying stakeoriginals is a scam , and i prove it through the iterations , then there is a problem for you.

newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 09:38:40 AM
#19
dvdx



i am at certainity that hiw the games of mines work. but can you proof read the difference between the first and the ssecond iteration also explain me why is it two iterations are so much having difference.
and also how come second iteration has 2 mines , in it . so how come so many tiles opened for bombs it clearly specifies over there.
also https://onlinephp.io/ can you migrate the program here ans give us a link , so that i can verify if its working or not
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 29, 2023, 09:19:57 AM
#18
i never asked compensation as 1 million, you read english and check the screenshot. i asked either to bring supervisor on chat or give me a million dollar.


however my deposit loss claim till date is 30,000,000 INR.

This statement of yours contradicts on the screenshot you provided and as @holydarkness pointed out to you. You are clearly asking them for money in exchange for burying this fabricated story that you created.

This lie post of yours clearly shown what’s your real intention for escalating this case. Now you are accusing casino guru colluding with Stake just because they review your case not in favor to you.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 4
September 29, 2023, 09:16:39 AM
#17
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
September 29, 2023, 09:09:58 AM
#16
that email was sent. it was not fabricated mate.

Mmm...hhmmm...

so you accept the fact there is something to bury for the, , hence you sre quoting this point to me , bringing in guilt. CG lied to me about provablyfair. CG lied about the lawsuit of 580 $ by cristopher freeman on stake.com so basically they were trying to coverup for stake.com.

Where exactly did I say what you said I said? Kindly re-read.

The post is about showing proof [as that's how this board operates] of you asking for a sum of money the first time they granted your wish to talk with their supervisor, while, on CG and many other occasions, you insisted that you were just asking to either bring the manager or pay you.

So, yeah, not a rumor.

the problem with some people and CG they dont investigate they just specualte.
and when talked abut basics, they go in loops . in point 3 iteration 2 there were 2 iteration for the archives mines game.
the first ine had 2 mines and game ended when i clicked the bomb.
in second iteration it shiws 2 mines and i opened more than 11 bombs, hows that even possible on a mines game of 2 bombs.

clearly its manipualting hence they archive the bets. but still clearly some people and CG fail the basic common sense just to compare the iteration.

holydarkness. i welcome all your question, but it should be only post releated and infact the topiccof concern should be stake.com registering the bets in backend with manipulated odds , a part from that concern you will bring all the stupidest concern , then you should be thinking of qualitative reasoning skill adpat this in your life style.


FYI , those two iterations were picked up CG and stake.com when i send them the archive file. i am just explaning how two iteration of same odds of a mine game are different. if you cant compare the difference between the two iteration let me know

No, the problem here is you being too stubborn to see that you made mistake and misunderstand things. Many, way too many people tried to help contributing to this case, allocating their time to inform you what exactly happened, how to verify bets, etc. and yet you still insist to stick to what you believe, despite all of the facts.
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 08:47:04 AM
#15
I haven't read all of the texts you gave on your opening post, but I've know this thread will eventually come when CG close your topic with a verdict not favoring you.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/07/29/Q5G13.png

Above is the image that supposed to be your reference for the "$1,000,000 allegation. Then I'll just quietly drop this screenshot of your video here, showing you ask to bury the case

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/08/07/GkZto.jpeg.

Shall we also talk about how you fabricated an email from interpol regarding stake? And weren't you a lawyer? Couldn't they get their license revoked for falsifying evidence? Or were the laywer statement is also just a... means to threaten them?

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/29/P3aUP.jpeg



so you accept the fact there is something to bury for the, , hence you sre quoting this point to me , bringing in guilt. CG lied to me about provablyfair. CG lied about the lawsuit of 580 $ by cristopher freeman on stake.com so basically they were trying to coverup for stake.com.
the problem with some people and CG they dont investigate they just specualte.
and when talked abut basics, they go in loops . in point 3 iteration 2 there were 2 iteration for the archives mines game.
the first ine had 2 mines and game ended when i clicked the bomb.
in second iteration it shiws 2 mines and i opened more than 11 bombs, hows that even possible on a mines game of 2 bombs.

clearly its manipualting hence they archive the bets. but still clearly some people and CG fail the basic common sense just to compare the iteration.

holydarkness. i welcome all your question, but it should be only post releated and infact the topiccof concern should be stake.com registering the bets in backend with manipulated odds , a part from that concern you will bring all the stupidest concern , then you should be thinking of qualitative reasoning skill adpat this in your life style.


FYI , those two iterations were picked up CG and stake.com when i send them the archive file. i am just explaning how two iteration of same odds of a mine game are different. if you cant compare the difference between the two iteration let me know
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 08:36:06 AM
#14
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 08:33:52 AM
#13
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 29, 2023, 08:31:23 AM
#12
I haven't read all of the texts you gave on your opening post, but I've know this thread will eventually come when CG close your topic with a verdict not favoring you.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/07/29/Q5G13.png

Above is the image that supposed to be your reference for the "$1,000,000 allegation. Then I'll just quietly drop this screenshot of your video here, showing you ask to bury the case

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/08/07/GkZto.jpeg.

Shall we also talk about how you fabricated an email from interpol regarding stake? And weren't you a lawyer? Couldn't they get their license revoked for falsifying evidence? Or were the laywer statement is also just a... means to threaten them?

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/29/P3aUP.jpeg


that email was sent. it was not fabricated mate.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Peace without Borders
September 29, 2023, 06:37:50 AM
#11
I haven't read all of the texts you gave on your opening post, but I've know this thread will eventually come when CG close your topic with a verdict not favoring you.



Above is the image that supposed to be your reference for the "$1,000,000 allegation. Then I'll just quietly drop this screenshot of your video here, showing you ask to bury the case

.

Shall we also talk about how you fabricated an email from interpol regarding stake? And weren't you a lawyer? Couldn't they get their license revoked for falsifying evidence? Or were the laywer statement is also just a... means to threaten them?



Are you talking about Interpol-GPT mail 😂
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
September 29, 2023, 06:30:15 AM
#10
I haven't read all of the texts you gave on your opening post, but I've know this thread will eventually come when CG close your topic with a verdict not favoring you.



Above is the image that supposed to be your reference for the "$1,000,000 allegation. Then I'll just quietly drop this screenshot of your video here, showing you ask to bury the case

.

Shall we also talk about how you fabricated an email from interpol regarding stake? And weren't you a lawyer? Couldn't they get their license revoked for falsifying evidence? Or were the laywer statement is also just a... means to threaten them?

newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 4
September 29, 2023, 04:10:25 AM
#9
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 28, 2023, 11:55:50 PM
#8
I have read it all, I don't understand more than half of the things you said, you should be talking with a more clear language to the forum so that we understand, your post have the same lyrical as messaging a kid. You should change that. Secondly, I also believe CG works for stake.com . They ran my case to downhill where I was %100 right with proof. I don't believe CG is an honest source on cases against stake. Good luck on your mission, however I see you got no supporters here, maybe it's time to stop swearing at people and change your tone? Who knows, maybe you will get more help. I don't even understand why are you disputing?



how do you want me to explain you this.
stake.com deletes the bet id in daily basis and therby stores them in a archive file in a text format if you play regularly citing issues related to storage these dynamic bets are translated into single iteration code and stored in the system. you can check under transactions > betarchive download the text.

this is something which is automated system, and the iteration in the system registered gives a different explanation to that. please read the Point number 3 from above , where i compared and explain the two iteration.
the first iteration gives the correct response, while the second iteration shows the odds of 2 mines , clearly have entry if having more than 2 odds.

under point 2 , 3 agent from chat support informed me about the odds registered in backend for a game i played with 2 mines registered as 11. from here i got to know the system how they manipulate.
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 28, 2023, 11:48:19 PM
#7
Am I reading this correctly, are you asking for 1 million $  compensation for a 0.25 Trx bet ?



they are deleting the bets , and citing is due to storage place they are archviving bets.

if you go under transactions > bet archive you will find daily 40 percent of your bets archive if you playing regularly.
archiving means removing the existense of the bet and archiving them in text format.
like this i found out itertion two different registered in the same for same odds.

i had submitted a chunk load of files to CG to infestigate but then kater i realised that they are working for casino.

i never asked compensation as 1 million, you read english and check the screenshot. i asked either to bring supervisor on chat or give me a million dollar.


however my deposit loss claim till date is 30,000,000 INR.
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
September 28, 2023, 11:44:15 PM
#6
member
Activity: 131
Merit: 18
September 28, 2023, 11:42:46 PM
#5
Am I reading this correctly, are you asking for 1 million $  compensation for a 0.25 Trx bet ?
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Peace without Borders
September 28, 2023, 07:03:03 PM
#4
I have read it all, I don't understand more than half of the things you said, you should be talking with a more clear language to the forum so that we understand, your post have the same lyrical as messaging a kid. You should change that. Secondly, I also believe CG works for stake.com . They ran my case to downhill where I was %100 right with proof. I don't believe CG is an honest source on cases against stake. Good luck on your mission, however I see you got no supporters here, maybe it's time to stop swearing at people and change your tone? Who knows, maybe you will get more help. I don't even understand why are you disputing?
Pages:
Jump to: