Topic: Stake.com Censors Users, Blocks Withdrawals, and Now Steals Monthly VIP Bonuses (Read 1192 times)

Hello tetaeridanus,  

Let’s not waste time sugarcoating this. Stake.com is not just a casino; it’s a meticulously constructed empire of fraud, built on the shattered lives of vulnerable players. You cannot compare this monstrosity to any other gambling site—it stands alone as a blueprint for corporate exploitation masked as “crypto innovation.”  

Let me lay it all out—no filters, no corporate jargon.  



Stake.com: The Empire of Rigged Games and Stolen Lives  

Syztmz: Eddie’s “Friend” Playing with Player Data  

Why is Eddie’s buddy Syztmz handling sensitive player data? What credentials does he have? None. This is data mismanagement at its worst, and it’s terrifying. Players’ personal information—everything from deposits to withdrawals—is in the hands of unqualified cronies with zero accountability. This isn’t a slip-up; it’s a deliberate tactic to keep everything in-house, away from regulatory scrutiny.  




Ask yourself: Would you trust your data with someone whose only qualification is being “Eddie’s friend”?  



The Myth of “Provably Fair”  
Stake shouts from the rooftops about their “provably fair” games, but let’s be real—it’s smoke and mirrors. The algorithms controlling their games are rigged to favor the house, period. They sell a fantasy of fairness while secretly tweaking the odds. Ever wonder why the house never truly loses? Because the system decides who wins and who gets bled dry.  



Begging for Promos: The Exploitation Cycle  
Here’s Stake’s real strategy:  
1. Lure players with shiny promo codes and offers.  
2. Dangle bonuses in front of them like carrots on a stick.  
3. Make them lose more than they’ll ever get back.  

It’s a psychological trap. They’ve turned gambling into a circus where players are the clowns, forced to grovel for scraps while the house sits back and laughs.  

Here’s the kicker: Even those lucky enough to cash out find themselves cornered in Stake’s rigged system.  



Unmasking the Stake Machine: The True Crimes  

1. Data Mismanagement  
Sensitive player data is handled like pocket change by unqualified individuals. Imagine the potential for blackmail, misuse, and manipulation—this is beyond unethical; it’s criminal.  

2. Illegal Transactions  
Stake openly violates jurisdictional laws by exploiting systems like UPI. Deposits through shady, third-party vendors lead to frozen bank accounts for players while Stake walks away scot-free.  

3. Corporate Whitewashing  
From F1 sponsorships to Premier League partnerships, Stake uses legitimate platforms to cover their tracks. They’re not legitimizing crypto gambling; they’re laundering blood money.  

4. Influencer Puppets  
Drake, Xposed, Trainwreck—big names used as bait to glorify gambling. Their job? To normalize the chaos and lure in more victims. It’s a well-oiled manipulation machine.  



A Rigged Empire: The Playbook  

1. From Runescape to Ruination  
   - Eddie and Bijan started as kids scamming on Runescape. Fast-forward, and they’ve scaled their hustle to global proportions. Their roots in deceit were never abandoned—they just got better at hiding it.  
2. Ruthless Algorithms  
   - Rigged games, controlled outcomes, and player favoritism. The only randomness in Stake’s “provably fair” system is who they decide to exploit next.  
3. Public Image vs. Private Greed  
   - Stake’s flashy giveaways and sponsorships distract from the truth: they’ve built an empire off the backs of vulnerable people.  



The Virus That Must Be Eliminated  

Stake isn’t just a gambling site; it’s a virus infecting society. Every dollar they flaunt in their marketing campaigns is stained with the blood of their victims. From data misuse to rigged games, from illegal transactions to fake promises of fairness, Stake represents everything that’s wrong with unregulated crypto gambling.  

Let’s call it what it is: A criminal enterprise. Eddie, Bijan, and their cronies are not visionaries—they’re predators.  



The Path Forward: Join the Fight  

This fight isn’t just about Stake. It’s about exposing a system that allows parasites like Eddie and Bijan to thrive. Their assets must be seized, their licenses revoked, and their operations dismantled.  

The call to action is simple:  
1. Spread the truth. Share this thread and make noise about their crimes.  
2. Hold them accountable. Report them to regulatory bodies, financial institutions, and the media.  
3. Demand justice. If we don’t fight back, they’ll keep preying on others.  

This is not a game—it’s a war. And it’s time to bring the fight to their doorstep.  

Let’s take them down.  

Hello kingbj,

I am not comparing scars; you understood me wrongly.

I believe you should create a thread with everything together and images as evidence; to back up allegations.

None of my words claim your accusation is false. I know stake and their actions from past. They are filthy.

Please for your own sake, understand before attacking. We are not friends from ‘nam; solidarity comes with the cause; I believe your cause as I also believe stake and rollbit type of sites rig their games %100. I wanted tell you to gather a more together thread.

@tetaeridanus, you claim to be a victim, yet you undermine another victim's case by saying "not enough evidence"? Let me make this crystal clear: this isn’t about comparing scars—it’s about addressing a collective problem.

Here’s the reality of my case:

Stake refuses to provide my data under GDPR, blatantly violating legal obligations.
Censorship: They’ve silenced me across platforms to hide their fraudulent practices.
Stolen bonuses and missing wagers: My rightful earnings and transactions have been conveniently erased without explanation.
What more "evidence" do you expect? A signed confession from Stake? Stop dismissing my efforts to expose these wrongdoings—it’s insulting to everyone trying to shed light on this corrupt empire.

To Stake and their enablers: Accountability isn’t optional. The cracks in your empire are widening, and no amount of spin will stop the truth from coming out.

@tetaeridanus, if you’re not here to stand in solidarity or contribute meaningfully, kindly refrain from spouting unhelpful commentary. Stick to your own case and let this thread focus on what matters.

The fight for transparency and justice continues—whether Stake likes it or not.

Hello nutildah,

Since there are many topics I am writing on, I mixed it a bit; my bad. I remember your comment now. Apologies.

Thanks for your verbal support and opinion on my case.

OP and my cases are a lot different than each other. Like comparing apple to orange.

I believe OP should serve more evidence (documented) to get support here. Even if he does, you can see from my case that even if you provide every evidence that back up your claims; there are people who will oppose no matter what; because our oppositions are big fish in this forum.

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/121230-stake-scam-day-by-day%F0%9F%93%88-writing-it-again/

Go and read on the forums and reddit, the real posts are getting deleted.

Even a post made on our forum was deleted.

That shows that they are actively monitoring on their community platforms and following up with what everyone is posting, another way of saying they are well moderated, but that is not where am going by the way, they need no explanation to why they are deleting any post against their policies.


Am very sure there are numbers of forum reputed members using the platform and have nothing to complain about, while some like you will always have reasons for not being satisfied by their actions after been far gone against their rules and standards, I use to advise people, if you don't get well with any platform, try out others.

Actually I said the opposite:


Unfortunately not much has changed between now and then. However, if you strongly believe that you have been wronged, I wouldn't let it go, seeing as how its a pretty large amount of money. To bring things back on topic, your case seems much more reasonable than OP's.

Clarification on Card Counting and Gameplay

To address your question about card counting:  

1. Live Blackjack:
   Stake's live blackjack games are played with 8 decks, shuffled regularly, making traditional card counting ineffective.  

2. Original Blackjack:  
   The originals blackjack game uses an infinite deck, which resets after every hand. This setup eliminates any possibility of employing card counting strategies.  

Given these mechanics, card counting could never have influenced my gameplay or outcomes. My concerns are rooted in irregularities I observed, including rigged outcomes and discrepancies in wager tracking, not in any attempt to “beat the house” through prohibited strategies.  

Evidence and Exposure:  
I have substantial video evidence proving that Stake’s original blackjack is rigged, and I will provide this evidence in court if necessary. It’s time to shed light on these practices, and I welcome scrutiny.  

Message to Other Parties:  
To those engaging in side discussions, please move them to your own threads. This thread is dedicated to exposing Stake’s deceptive practices and highlighting the roles of individuals like holydarkness in defending these actions. Let’s stay focused.  

👑  
KingBJ21

Thanks for your well input and belief in my case Shishir99, I really am. As you can see, it will be seen as resolved soon if it goes like this.

I have talked nothing but the truth, with every word with evidence.

Many people abstained from showing their opinion, I thank for your actions. I hope nutildah looks at my case in his/her free time and sees the reality of my situation.

I don't think he/she did, because they believe it is invalid; seen from the comments above.

I wish I had 10 smerits, I would send all of them to your comment; which summarizes the whole situation.

I feel like this member barely cares about his forum position. A person who can open a $44K position in a casino must have some hefty amount in their wallet and they barely care about a few hundred bucks which they can earn if they spend time on forums. I mean, the point is, if someone can earn a few thousand dollars a day by doing trade, why they would waste their time on a crypto forum and try to build up their account?

I have supported this guy's case and I expect you to visit his case again if you have some free time. Rollbit is at fault and I believe they should work with this guy to solve it. I understand they had no intention to scam, but they are responsible for this user's loss.

I am not here for sig campaigns or anything; I am here to show people truth.

I engage and participated discussions prior to this incident as well, and will hopefully continue. However, some events here are making me reconsider my involvement in this forum. These events incl. accusations and foul speech. I am getting mobbed for speaking the truth.

Thanks for your advice, and hopefully see you in non-foul topics!

What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.

I replied to nutildah, not you owlcatz.

I never said you gamble or not and it is not even something that matters; you abused your DT power by not even reading the thread and just gave your opinion that ‘I oppose, because you hate money’. Look who is next to you on opposers, all of rollbit clownteam? Does this tell you what you look like from outside? You call me a whiny little fck? You act like a irresponsible 15 yo kid. Trailer Pak Boys, huh?

If you can’t add merit to a argument you might as well not tell your opinion or engage in a conversation. Just my 2 cents.

Dude. Nobody, and I mean 100% nobody knows me, or even cares about anything I ever have had to do with casinos. I don't gamble online. My signature may signify otherwise, but that's called a signature campaign. I'm not required to gamble to earn BTC from posting here.

BTW, it doesn't even matter that I'm on DT2. I would be on DT1, but I self-excluded myself long ago to make my life here easier without constant pms and such from whiny little fcks like you about any kind of ratings or opinions etc etc. I never asked anyone to promote me to DT2, it just happened. So that said, https://www.reddit.com/r/trailerparkboys/comments/13s0w1x/fuck_off_i_got_work_to_do/

Hello nutildah,

First, the reason why it is not going to be resolved (in your words) is not because the case isn’t solid or worthy; it is because of how sold out some people are in this forum. Plus the soldiers of Rollbit Razer attacking me and de railing my topic. I will keep on pushing, don’t worry about it.

Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have carreer here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.

You're extremely good at this... To be honest with you, I hope a good casino offers you a job working as some sort of customer mediator, given you'd want to do that sort of thing professionally.


While I don't think your case will reach some sort of resolution based on discussion on this forum (same goes with OP's situation, to bring things back on topic), you can still go one to have some sort of career here. There's probably more discussion about bitcoin gambling and casinos here than any other single website.

As we are on an agreement that the discussion about your situation should be keep in your own thread and away from other topic, I hope we can reach a mutual understanding that this is [hopefully] the last time I address your matter here or other threads about other matters [of someone else's, just to be clear] and will continue the topic on your own thread, as I have to say that though this is where we should end our talk about your issue, some matters are indeed interesting and need to be addressed. So, I'll jump to your thread right after this, only finishing out one or two matter here, as they do belong to this thread, to clear the air.

The thing I want to dissect here to leave no room for any doubt or other people to twist into a different narrative is the one month "rule", as it is actually not a rule and I am not "placing" it as a means like you perceived; to pressurize you. I've covered the reason of this "timer" on previous post, if I may quote myself,


To further emphasize, DT are usually quick [yet thoughtful] in taking action against or in favor to a flag. Especially when that flag has been announced on Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!, as yours did.

Given you've also create your own thread on repu to announce the flag and request for support, I think it's safe to say most of the DT are already aware of your flag. The low traction [as I've mentioned somewhere in the past] is probably because they choose to abstain, because --like me-- they can see from both perspective for this case, and they can't support or oppose the flag as it'll violate the clause they entered upon taking action for that flag.

With this in mind, would it not be valid to question what is the proper timeline to wait for other DT to notice, to decide, and to take action? One month? One year? One week? Thus, the safest period that crossed my mind was one month [one and a half month, give or take couple of days, to be exact]. And that is not to pressurize you, it is simply because I am failed to see what would two or three months or one semester would do, if most of the DTs have already made their decision.

It'll just put you in a misery of waiting and hoping for more support [suppose the flag does not go active].

So, why do we need to inflict that while one month is "enough"? And we can close it, for your sake, so you can start taking a path of closure.

Hopefully you can see what I had in my mind when I proposed it.

If... by some miracle, or as fate will it, a new evidence or incriminating situation arise or other case happen that make the DTs reconsider the old flag that you raised in the past, that they did not support because they couldn't at that time but can at that future time due to the development of the situation, you can always nudge me.

Hello holydarkness,

Two adress your two things;

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

Secondly, DaveF gave examples from ToS which Rollbit already ‘accepted the terms ’ by compansating players which falsifies his whole argument of ToS which Rollbit lacks any responsibility.

My case is far from over, even if Razer admits or not.

You say 1 month rule is put by you; for what? To pressurise me to silence?

THIRDLY, you are taking everything personal; please don’t. My message is to the whole forum who went silent for my case. I have and had no intention to disrespect your actions in this forum and won’t have one.

Flag has nothing to do with a case being resolved or not. That flag was opened by me to spread awareness on my case and rollbit. If you deem to act on it, you should demand every accuser to open flag and wait for it to solve; to finalize a case as resolved or unresolved. I have seen a few flags here. Please go ahead to my threads and count the supporters and a few ‘fake’ opposers.

Altough we had our differences, your friend AHOYBRAUSE said;


He was talking about Blossom15’s comment. This summarizes everything perfectly.

I thank AHOYBRAUSE for his genuine comment, I have found in my original Maintenance Scam thread.

That’s why I opened a new thread about it. To summarize. As Shirshir99 said in my last post; No one is reading long texts.

People can oppose or not support the flag and still believe I deserve compansation. If you make my case unresolved due to the flag, you will silence me; which makes Saint-Loup’s opinion valid.

Problem with HolyDarkness is that he is an incompetent self-proclaimed legal adviser clown!

What our self-proclaimed legal adviser clown forgot to do is to take a look at Art. 3 GDPR Territorial scope of the articles he quoted to "justifiy" that a Stake victim has to submit personal documents to an illegal and criminal online casino operation to get the data he is entitled to get!


Point 1)

An illegal and criminal online casino operation can not have a legal establishment by law and the European Union GDPR articles are not applicable here!

Point 2)

A victim of an illegal and criminal online casino operation is not obligated by law to submit personal documents to the offender!

Point 3)

Even if you hallucinate that Stake is a legal establishment (quote non), the quoted GDPR articles are still not applicable, because:

1) The processor or controller is in Australia and Serbia, which are not part of the European Union.

2) The subject is in India, which is not part of the European Union.

Two things: one, it would be advisable to keep a discussion about your thread in your thread, we're going OOT here.

Two, I can understand that you're trying to get a support from someone who currently questioning how status are made on my list. Though IMHO you, accidentally or not, put me in a bad place and add more seasoning to the pot during your attempt, I would appreciate if you tell the current situation of your case as what really and currently happens.

holydarkness does not and will not count your case as resolved as per his sole decision, as what your paragraph seemingly try to depict. And yes, it isn't resolved, that's why he refused to comply to your original demand to mark it as unresolved because Rollbit's final call is not what you preferred it to be, despite my attempt to get it retried second time by contacting Razer about it, and third time while I once again reach him and wrote to ask for his re-re-reconsideration.

During this time, while we wait for Razer's reply, you wrote and asked for your case to be marked as unresolved because you believe that is the appropriate status, and I explained why I can't do that as well as --and this is the most important point-- I'll leave it to the DT to make the call. DT, through the flag. holydarkness is not the one who "count" it as resolved, he let the DT use their voting power through your flag.

Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.

But, just in case that some are busy and wasn't able to read your whole situation yet or needed time to decide... end of January.

Rather different than what your post conveyed, isn't it?

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

May I ask you if you count cards when you play Blackjack games, because I'm not sure you can overcome the house edge of the games by counting cards at online casino thanks to the small portion of the shoe they deal in reality but if you get large bonuses, you can certainly make some profits in the long run from them. It could be the hidden reason why they have revoked your VIP bonuses in the same way as they limit stakes (and/or lock withdrawals) of good sport bettors actually, no?

Stake’s Clown Circus: The Saga Continues

After months of silence, the Stake Complaints Department finally decided to respond—only after HolyDarkness jumped into the conversation. Coincidence? I think not. This clearly indicates the close ties between HolyDarkness and Stake, as his intervention magically unlocked a reply.

Here’s what they sent me:

“You can access and download the requested information by visiting the following link: https://fake.com/casino/my-bets?type=casino and https://fake.com/transactions/archive.”

What did I ask for? A

GDPR-compliant summary of ALL my deposits, betting, and withdrawals.

What did they provide?

A daily archive of bets, with many moved to .json space.

Translation: Obfuscated data that’s incomplete, useless, and noncompliant.

Stake, if you think this is fulfilling your legal obligations, think again. The GDPR mandates full access to personal data in a readable format—not breadcrumbs leading to partial archives.

Enter the Clowns: AHOYBRAUSE and the "Alt Account" Delusion

And now, we have AHOYBRAUSE playing the part of Stake’s cheerleader, calling me a "clown" and accusing me of running an alt account. For someone with zero evidence, you sure have a lot of confidence. Prove Black Jacky is my alt, or admit you’re throwing baseless accusations.

As for your comment about my $0.08 bonus—keep laughing. It’s a perfect representation of Stake’s exploitative practices. After wagering over $1M, I get a bonus that’s less than a pack of gum. Stake’s mockery of its players is evident in every action they take.

Stake’s Clown Circus: The Saga Continues

After months of silence, the Stake Complaints Department finally decided to respond—only after HolyDarkness jumped into the conversation. Coincidence? I think not. This clearly indicates the close ties between HolyDarkness and Stake, as his intervention magically unlocked a reply.

Here’s what they sent me:
“Visit stake.com/casino/my-bets and stake.com/transactions/archive.”

What did I ask for? A GDPR-compliant summary of ALL my deposits, betting, and withdrawals.
What did they provide? A daily archive of bets, with many moved to .json space. Translation: Obfuscated data that’s incomplete, useless, and noncompliant.

Stake, if you think this is fulfilling your legal obligations, think again. The GDPR mandates full access to personal data in a readable format—not breadcrumbs leading to partial archives.

Enter the Clowns: AHOYBRAUSE and the "Alt Account" Delusion

And now, we have AHOYBRAUSE playing the part of Stake’s cheerleader, calling me a "clown" and accusing me of running an alt account. For someone with zero evidence, you sure have a lot of confidence. Prove Black Jacky is my alt, or admit you’re throwing baseless accusations.

As for your comment about my $0.08 bonus—keep laughing. It’s a perfect representation of Stake’s exploitative practices. After wagering over $1M, I get a bonus that’s less than a pack of gum. Stake’s mockery of its players is evident in every action they take.

To the Forum Readers

Let’s not lose sight of what’s happening here:

Stake’s Noncompliance: They’ve failed to provide GDPR-compliant data despite repeated requests.

Deflect and Distract: Instead of addressing their illegal practices, Stake’s defenders focus on personal attacks and conspiracy theories.

Connections Exposed: HolyDarkness intervenes, and suddenly, Stake responds. This level of coordination raises serious questions about neutrality.

My Challenge to Stake’s Defenders: If you’re so confident in Stake’s integrity, prove me wrong. Meet me at the blackjack tables, or better yet, have Stake release my full betting and transaction history. I dare you.

To Stake: Your attempts to evade accountability won’t work. Every incomplete response, every defender’s distraction, only strengthens the case against you. Transparency isn’t optional—it’s a legal requirement.

Stay vigilant, friends. The truth is on our side.

🎭👑
KingBJ21

@holydarkness, I can only advise you to ignore this clown and his alt account, every word you post here is basically a waste of your valuable time. You could help other people instead of speaking to a wall that doesn't want to face reality.
This individual and his alt account is basically insulting you in every 2nd post and you still take your time trying to understand the situation. And yet the next reply you get from him just is straight up garbage and rude again, not even addressing what you have asked of advised to do.

And at OP, tomorrow you will get you 0.08$ monthly bonus, any plans what you gonna do with it? 

Nutildah: The Knight in Shining Nitropolis 

Oh, look! Nutildah swooping in like a hero in a gritty kitty slot, trying to save HolyDarkness from the scorching flames of this discussion. What’s the rescue mission here? Stake failing to respond? AI content? Or the nitty-gritty—wait, is that Nitropolis? Let’s break this circus act down. 



1. "Nitty-Gritty"? More Like Kitty-Litter 

First off, Nutildah, you’re accusing me of using AI to write “gotcha” pieces? That’s rich. Where’s your proof? Because my evidence against Stake is as real as the withdrawals they conveniently froze. Unlike their shady practices, my points are backed by facts, not fiction. 

And if you’re diving into the “nitty-gritty,” I hope you’re bringing the Gritty Kitty vibes of Nitropolis—maybe ELK Studios will sponsor you. Just make sure you don’t confuse “feline sass” with “Stake apologist claptrap.” 



2. Roleplay Circus: Meet the Cast 

Let’s take a moment to applaud the cast of Stake’s circus: 
- Eddie as the mastermind ringmaster, pulling strings behind the scenes. 
- HolyDarkness as the ever-faithful acrobat, spinning narratives tighter than their KYC demands. 
- Ryaz and Abhyo as the juggling defenders, trying (and failing) to keep up with Stake’s ever-shifting defenses. 
- And, of course, Bijan Tehrani, whose role as Stake’s silent accomplice in the shadows brings this show full circle. 

If Stake were a slot game, they’d be titled: “Circus of Compliance: Rigged for the House.” 



3. Why So Defensive? 

Nutildah, you say you’re not a Stake fan. Cool story, bro. Then why the urge to jump into their defense, throwing around baseless accusations of “dishonest hit pieces”? Could it be that the truth hurts? Stake’s silence is evidence enough of their guilt. They can’t respond because they have no leg to stand on. 

Pro Tip: Next time you want to accuse someone of dishonesty, make sure your side isn’t guilty of, oh, I don’t know, rigged games, illegal payment methods, GDPR violations, and exploiting gamblers. 



4. Stake’s Empire of Cards is Crumbling 

This isn’t about “smear campaigns.” It’s about justice. It’s about holding Stake accountable for their predatory practices, their illegal UPI transactions, their rigged blackjack, and their deliberate refusal to comply with GDPR. 

Every attack from defenders like you only strengthens the case against Stake. Why? Because your focus isn’t on addressing the facts—it’s on trying to discredit those exposing the truth. 

The Takeaway 

Nutildah, if you’re here to defend the indefensible, you’re just another clown in the circus. Stake’s silence speaks volumes. The evidence against them is overwhelming. And no amount of theatrics or slot-themed references will change that. 

To everyone else: Stay focused. Stay united. Stake’s empire is crumbling under the weight of its own greed and deceit. Let’s make sure we’re the ones to bring it down. 

Sincerely, 
🎭👑 
KingBJ21 

Kudos to you for looking into the nitty gritty of these situations and making it clear what's going on here. Sometimes I get the impression that people really are on a smear mission and could care less about the outcome of their dispute, or the reason why it didn't go in their favor. This would explain the theatrical effect of using AI to write these "gotcha" tabloid-esque summaries which don't appear to be based in anything factual.

BTW, I'm not even a fan of Stake, I just hate dishonest hit pieces.

🎆 Stake’s Silence: The Ultimate Admission of Guilt 🎆

Let’s start with a fact Stake cannot escape: Stake has stopped communicating.Their complaints department has ignored my grievances, refusing to cooperate or provide the data I’ve lawfully requested under GDPR. Let me make one thing clear: Stake has no right to blame me when their actions—or lack thereof—are the root cause of this mess. Their silence is damning and deliberate.



1. Stake’s Silence = Stake’s Guilt 

Stake defenders, take note: Silence isn’t compliance. Silence is avoidance. 

• Ghosting Complaints: Stake’s refusal to respond isn’t just negligence—it’s a blatant strategy to dodge accountability. No clarifications, no cooperation, just radio silence. 

• GDPR Breach by Design: GDPR mandates compliance, but Stake turns it into a mockery. If they’re confident in their operations, why the delay? Why the silence? 

Stake’s playbook: ignore, deflect, and hope the storm blows over. Unfortunately for them, the storm is here to stay. 



2. The “Identity Confirmation” Circus 

Let’s call out this charade for what it is: Stake weaponizing GDPR’s Article 12(6) as a stalling tactic. 

• Verified, Yet Ignored: I’ve completed KYC3. My email and documents are verified. Their demands for selfies with “Stake Rules” scribbled on paper? That’s not confirmation—it’s an excuse to delay compliance. 

• A Law Unto Themselves: GDPR isn’t a buffet where Stake can cherry-pick clauses. Compliance isn’t optional, no matter how many hoops they try to create. 

Bottom Line: Stake’s intent is clear—they’re hiding something. If they were aboveboard, compliance wouldn’t be this hard. 



3. The Global Fraud Empire 

Stake’s silence isn’t just a GDPR violation—it’s the hallmark of a company built on exploitation and deceit. 

• Rigged Games: Stake Originals? More like Stake Fraud. The evidence is overwhelming, from rigged blackjack to manipulated odds. 

• Illegal UPI Payments: Stake gleefully violates Indian banking laws, exposing users to legal risks. 

• Exploitation at Scale: Vulnerable gamblers, misled newbies, even minors—Stake’s greed knows no bounds. 

This is Eddie’s empire of lies: a house of cards waiting to collapse. 



4. A Call to Arms: Join the Revolution 

To every victim of Stake’s fraud, this is your moment. This isn’t just my fight—it’s ours. 

• Share Your Stories: Every voice matters. Post your experiences, expose their tactics, and demand accountability. 

• Demand Action: Regulators and watchdogs are already circling. With enough pressure, we can force Stake to answer for their crimes. 

To Stake defenders like HolyDarkness: The evidence is clear, the fraud undeniable. By defending them, you’re standing on the wrong side of history. 



5. The Final Warning 

Stake, the clock is ticking. Your silence, your stalling tactics, your outright refusal to comply with GDPR—it all points to one thing: guilt. No PR spin can save you now. 

To the community: The time for action is now. Stake’s empire of deceit is crumbling, but it needs one final push. Let’s bring it down together. 

Stand up. Speak out. Join the fight. 

Sincerely, 
🎭👑 
KingBJ21 

Throughout the long words you gave as reply, I believe we all can safely assume that the answer is "no, I have not provide the verification they asked." So I'll try to make it as clear and redundant as I can to explain, and hope that you'll understand.

[Screenshots of the clauses being mentioned here will be provided at the bottom of the post, for reference as well to make it easier for reader to read without having to go back and forth between pages. Links are there to prove that the snippets are indeed from a real article and not fabricated.]

What they asked is not a verification in sense of re-performing KYC. You've done your KYC3 [I'll take your words for it] and they most likely know about it, as they said that they can locate the account through the email address. I also believe they are more than happy to provide the data you requested. If not happily, then at least they are compelled to provide the copy of it to you by the GDPR "bylaws", that you dilligently mentioned and bring to their attention without fail, Article 15(3), "Right of access by the data subject", as well as article 12(3), "Transparent Information [...]" specifying the maximum time of data being handed to the Data Subject.

However, if you're willing to read just a tad bit more below what you cited to them, on 12(6), I would sincerely hope that after reading that, you can easily understand that that is the situation that applied here, that  they counter you with "the controller may request the provision of additional information necessary to confirm the identity of the data subject."

You did not give the additional information that can help them confirm the identity of the Data Subject, so they can't provide the documents being requested.

Thus, day 0.

Provide them with necessary identification as they requested to eradicate any reasonable doubt they have, and the timer will start, we'll be on day 0 hour 0 minute 0 second 1.

It is not me being confused, it is you being confused... or deliberately pretend you don't understand, but I'll choose to give a benefit of doubts and think that you simply misunderstood the situation.

It is not a GDPR violation, it is not a comedy, it is not a clown... well, at least, we are not the clown here. It's either [1] you simply misunderstood their instruction and request, thinking they wanted you to re-perform KYC while you've done it, while what they asked and enacting is GDPR 12(6), confirmation of the data subject, or [2] you understand things completely, you simply refused to do it and take this path.

If this excessive words still failed to help you understand, then I raise my hands in the air and declare that I can not help you further with understanding your situation with GDPR data request.

---

15(3)


12(3)


12(6)

@HolyDarkness  

Ah, HolyDarkness, the self-appointed defender of Stake’s crumbling empire. It’s almost admirable how tirelessly you perform, but let’s add some clarity to your confusion:  


1. Stake’s GDPR Comedy Routine  
You’re here trying to sell the idea that Stake’s GDPR violations aren’t violations because they’ve invented extra hurdles for users. Spoiler alert:  
GDPR isn’t a Suggestion: It’s the law. Stake doesn’t get to “personalize” compliance by adding selfie requests to delay requests.  
Already Verified, Still Ignored: I’ve done KYC3, but now they want a selfie with “Stake Rules” scribbled on a Post-it? That’s not verification—it’s a gimmick to buy time.  
Reality Check: Stake isn’t a bank—it’s a gambling platform known for cutting corners. Your bank analogy is as solid as Eddie’s promise of fair play.  

No matter how you spin it, Stake has had over 100 days to comply and failed. That’s not my fault, nor does it absolve them of legal liability.  


2. The Eddie Playbook: Lies, Loopholes, and Larceny  
Let’s not kid ourselves—this is classic Eddie Hearn management:  
Fraudulent Reloads: Promises of loyalty rewards that vanish faster than a gambler’s bankroll.  
Rigged Games: Stake Originals? More like live theft. The evidence speaks for itself.  
Illegal UPI Transactions: Stake’s gleeful disregard for Indian banking laws is just the cherry on top of their compliance failures.  

Eddie’s built an empire on deception, and the cracks are showing. Stake is one regulatory investigation away from a full collapse.  


3. Clowns in the Audience (Yes, That’s You)  
HolyDarkness, your attempts to distract from the real issues are as transparent as Stake’s rigged odds. Let’s break down your role in this farce:  
Loyal to a Fault: You’ve hitched your wagon to a company that’s burning bridges with customers, regulators, and anyone with common sense.  
Ignoring Evidence: Both my case and BlackJacky’s are publicly documented, independently verifiable, and damning. Yet you cling to your denial like it’s a life raft.  
PR in Disguise: Let’s be honest—you’re doing more damage control for Stake than their actual team. If you’re not on Eddie’s payroll, you should demand back pay.  


4. The Bigger Picture  
This isn’t just about me or BlackJacky. Stake’s fraud impacts thousands, if not millions, of users worldwide. Their shady practices:  
Exploit Vulnerable Gamblers: Stake doesn’t just profit from addiction—they actively fuel it.  
Mislead New Users: Glossy ads and influencer promotions hide the reality of rigged games and nonexistent support.  
Dodge Accountability: From Curacao to the UK, regulators are catching on. The clock is ticking.  

By defending Stake, you’re aligning yourself with a sinking ship. Don’t say we didn’t warn you when it finally goes under.  


5. The Last Act  
HolyDarkness, you’re playing the fool in Stake’s theater, but the audience is no longer amused. The evidence against Stake is overwhelming, and your attempts to deflect only amplify the noise.  
- Stake’s GDPR violations? Documented.  
- Their fraudulent practices? Exposed.  
- Your role as their cheerleader? Embarrassing.  

The regulators are circling, and Eddie’s show is running out of acts. You can keep juggling excuses, but when the curtain falls, you’ll be left holding the bag.  

So enjoy your clown shoes while they last. The spotlight is shifting, and when it lands on Stake (and you), there’ll be no escape.  

Sincerely,  🎪👑
KingBJ21  

Are you sure about that? Because if you're right it shows they are not asking the same things to every customers, and they are freely discriminating some of them without justification or notice.



@kingbj21
It's not good to mix your topics like that, users won't understand what you're talking about and will think your issues about censorship, locked withdrawals and VIP Monthly bonuses have been resolved. In addition if a moderator thinks you are now talking about a new subject he can lock or archive your thread.
Besides that, if your request has been sent from the email address registered on your account or if you have initially made it from the chat feature of your account I agree that seems unnecessary and time-wasting to ask those KYC proofs. But TBH I wouldn't say it's the worst thing we've ever seen from them, if they don't ask anything else afterwards.

In other words, no, you have not provide them with the proof of ownership like they asked? The photo, govt ID, and a piece of paper with info of the account details which data you asked? On that case, then the narrative where they refuse to give your and breached GDPR policy, exceeding the 30 days timeline as mandated by GDPR, and withholding information for 90+ days is not true, simply because you are on day 0.

The process itself is yet to be initiated, because you have not provide them with the requirement they ask to give you the data.

This is not about you have had your KYC before and now them asking for some selfie and govt. ID as redundant. It's two whole different things. You asked for the data of the person who --somewhere in the past-- passed KYC3 on their platform, and they asked you to prove the ownership of the account before they can release the data.

I believe it is not hard to understand at all. Like... at all.

If it is, though, allow me to try to explain in other scenario: suppose you opened an account in a bank. You provided identification like govt ID, phone number, email address, home address, some forms, they perhaps even take your photo and fingerprints [my banks do] for their database. Let's say that's KYC3-equivalent of your Stake account.

Three months later, you called the bank, wanting to know your balance or a transaction, or whatever reason you reached them.

Yes, you're entitled to get that info, but the bank are also under obligation and/or entitled to ask for proof of ownership. Thus they'll ask for verification that usually about your DoB, mother's maiden name, home address, billing address, last three transactions, or other. That is the equivalent of them asking you those info prior to providing you a copy of your betting data.

Is it easier to understand now?

So yeah, to repeat, if you have not provide any of the document they asked to prove your credibility, that thread is completely invalid, Stake did and does not withheld information and violated GDPR and mismanage data, as you have not provide the information they need to verify ownership.

So, I'll ask again, in case it's actually already provided in other correspondencies you had with them, but not shown here: have you?



I am initially happy with ignoring you, but then you mentioned as above quoted about the GDPR non-compliance issue and how "By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire.", and now when I address the issue and explain what actually transpires, you suggest that I might want to step off the stage before the spotlight turns in my role in this farce, whatever that "spotlight" imply and signify?

So which one is it? Silence so "the spotlight wont turn on me" or my silence is aligning myself with fraudulent empire?

KYC Requirements Already Fulfilled: My identity is confirmed through your system. Asking for redundant proof undermines the entire purpose of KYC.

Privacy Risks: Stake has already demonstrated a lack of transparency, so why should I trust you with even more personal data?
Legal Compliance: Under GDPR, data subjects are entitled to their data without excessive hurdles. Additional proof is unnecessary when my identity is verified.

This is yet another delay tactic. If Stake was serious about compliance, it wouldn’t use frivolous verification demands to withhold data from users.


Stake’s Circus Act: The Final Showdown 🎭 

Stake’s endless excuses and its defenders’ feeble justifications are no longer entertaining. Here’s the harsh reality: 

1. Stake’s Circus is Falling Apart: No amount of deflection can hide the facts—GDPR violations, fraudulent reloads, and rigged games are not anomalies; they are Stake’s standard operating procedure. Your empire of deceit is unraveling, Eddie. 

2. The Fanboys Keep Dancing: 
   - Abhyrosse, you’re just another performer in Eddie’s circus, doing mental gymnastics to defend the indefensible. Your loyalty is amusing, but it won’t stop the truth from surfacing. 
   - HolyDarkness, you might want to step off the stage before the spotlight turns on your role in this farce. 

3. The Puppet Masters: 
   Eddie: The self-appointed ringmaster who thinks he can spin a web of lies and go unnoticed. Your "provably fair" claim is as transparent as your reload bonuses. 
   HolyDarkness & AHOYBRAUSE: The sidekicks juggling excuses, trying to keep the audience distracted while the house of cards collapses. 

4. The Facts Speak for Themselves: 
   Both my case and BlackJacky’s are independently verifiable. The evidence is damning, and no amount of gaslighting or insults will change that. 

5. Pulling Eddie to the Party: 
   Eddie, let’s get one thing straight—you’ve orchestrated this entire show. You’ve built an empire on deceit, but the curtain is closing, and the audience is no longer fooled. You and your crew have dodged accountability for far too long, but 2025 will be the year the players rise, regulators act, and your circus collapses. 

So, Eddie, HolyDarkness, AHOYBRAUSE, and all your loyal fanboys—enjoy the last act of your circus. The storm is here, and it’s going to be spectacular. 🌪️ 

🎪 Your clown shoes fit perfectly. Wear them proudly. 🤡 

Obviously you aren't smart enough the differentiate between normal stake account KYC and what the support asked for. At KYC you send a picture of your ID for level 2, that's it. They clearly ask for a picture of him with the ID in his hand and the stake username on a letter. It's not so hard to understand this simple question they asked. But yeah, of course for you it is.
Why do you even bother to answer holy when he didn't even spoke to "you"? Oh wait, of course he spoke to you since blackyjacky and kingbj are operated by the same person, yet another proof. 

The answer to your question is in the screenshots, are you not able to see it?

And have you provided them with the verification they asked; a photo of yourself holding your govt. issued ID as well as a piece of paper proving the ownership of the account which data you requested in the manner that they specified?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-alert-stakecoms-gdpr-violations-and-data-mismanagement-5524433

This is the thread about GDPR, that you're talking about, amongst other [plenty of] threads you have against Stake? Do you mind to substantiate the thread with supporting evidences to validate the situation? Screenshots of your request and them denying or withholding it, perhaps?

@holydarkness, 

Your repeated attempts to deflect and trivialize the seriousness of Stake’s unethical practices only expose your alignment with their tactics. Let me set the record straight, because your narrative is misleading at best and complicit at worst. 

1. 100 Days of GDPR Violations – Stake’s Complete Disregard for Law

It’s been 100 days since I submitted a formal GDPR data request as a fully KYC3-verified customer. The law is clear: 
- Maximum Deadline: 30 days, extendable to 90 in “exceptional circumstances.” Stake has exceeded this without providing any valid justification or update. 
- Data Access is a Right, Not a Privilege: Stake’s delays and obfuscation show contempt for GDPR, transparency, and its own customers. 

For 100 days, Stake has: 
- Ignored my legal rights. 
- Closed over 30 support tickets without meaningful resolution. 
- Claimed endless “escalations” to phantom departments that produce zero results. 

This is a textbook example of GDPR non-compliance, and I’m escalating this with regulators. By downplaying this issue, you’re defending clear violations of international law. 

2. Mislabeling My Case as Resolved 

You falsely marked my case as “resolved,” using my reflective post on awareness and peace as justification. Let me be unequivocal: 
- That post was about moving forward personally, NOT about Stake addressing my grievances. 
- My accusations against Stake remain valid, unresolved, and pressing. 

Here’s the ongoing list of unresolved issues: 
- Fraudulent VIP Bonuses: Platinum 1 members receiving $0.10 reloads after wagering millions? This is both insulting and fraudulent. 
- Withdrawal Blocks: Arbitrary restrictions without explanations or timelines. 
- Illegal Operations in India: Stake uses unlawful UPI payment systems to target users in jurisdictions where online gambling is banned. 
- Rigged Games: Evidence of predatory practices across their platform, especially in blackjack and other casino games. 

Your claim that personal conflicts don’t affect your decisions doesn’t hold up. By misrepresenting my case as resolved, you’ve misled others and undermined the purpose of your list. If you care about fairness, update my case to “in progress” or “unresolved” immediately. 

3. The Stake Circus Crew 🎪 

Let’s talk about the cast of characters enabling this circus: 
- Eddie: The master manipulator, building his empire on deception and stolen funds. 
- AHOYBRAUSE: The sycophantic fanboy, more invested in defending Stake’s reload crumbs than addressing systemic fraud. 
- You, holydarkness: The so-called overseer, selectively blind to the mountain of evidence against Stake while silencing dissent with bureaucratic maneuvers. 

Instead of holding Stake accountable, you’re performing damage control for a company that flouts the law, mocks its customers, and rigs its systems for profit. 



@Saint-loup, 

I appreciate your objective observations. You’re absolutely correct that my case being marked as resolved misrepresents the truth and risks misleading other users into thinking these issues have been addressed. For clarity: 
- Nothing has been resolved. Stake’s GDPR violations, fraudulent practices, and predatory systems remain unaddressed. 
- Transparency is vital. Mislabeling my case damages the integrity of dispute-tracking systems and leaves other victims without recourse. 

Your suggestion that I clarify my case’s status is appreciated, but the responsibility ultimately lies with those maintaining these lists to ensure accuracy. 



To Stake’s Fan Club and Defenders 

To the die-hard apologists clinging to Stake’s narrative: 
- Stop gaslighting users who bring forward valid concerns. 
- Recognize that defending a platform built on deceit makes you complicit in its actions. 

Special shout-out to: 
- AHOYBRAUSE: Your blind loyalty is as laughable as Stake’s “provably fair” claims. 
- HolyDarkness: By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire. 



Call to Action 

To the broader community: 
1. File Complaints with Regulators: Stake’s GDPR violations alone warrant severe penalties. 
2. Expose Their Practices: Share your experiences and evidence of their fraud. 
3. Demand Accountability: Don’t let Stake and its enablers continue unchecked. 

To @holydarkness and @Saint-loup: This isn’t just about my case—it’s about exposing the systemic issues with Stake and holding them accountable. You can either stand for transparency and fairness or remain part of the problem. 

The storm is here, and Stake’s house of cards is coming down. 

Thank you for the honest explanation and POV. I can understand that from others' shoes, who only read briefly [as we have to admit that reading all of OP's post, all of them, across threads, boards, topics, and theories, and follow what transpires in full is almost impossible] can perhaps lead to a confusion on why the case is marked as resolved while the OP still... that.

I can assure you and I will really appreciate if you would be so kind to bear in mind for future cases and reference that any conflict or heated argument I have with a casino player or fellow overseers during a resolution attempt will not affect their status on my list in a sense that I will one-sidedly mark it as resolved out of spite or other reason. I'll most likely just leave my device, "walk it off" by chilling and handling other issues and calmed myself and return only when I am sure I am not influenced by anything that agitate me in the past.

One case-on-point will be the case of Rollbit v. tetaeridanus where circumstances kinda stacked in an unfavorable situation, with him being in a bad state and I had a situation myself that his several jabs annoyed me, so I walked away and take the spectator seat, and returned to the case when I think it's time to return to it and re-try to get his situation resolved, all while the status of the case is "in progress" instead of marked as "resolved".

Now, moving to OP's situation itself themselves, I will honestly appreciate your input: do you think the status should be rewritten as "in progress" or perhaps other status? With reference to what OP said as quoted above, as well as the nature of OP's post in general [achieved by reading his entire post history] and the likelihood of Stake addressing it formally and officially is next to the birth of velociraptor within this year?

For added reference and to answer what probably bewildering your mind, if I may speak what's on my mind freely [though I am sure it'll offend OP, but pretty much anything I said at this point is an offense for him, so... [shrug]], the lack of enthusiasm and response to OP's thread is, IMO, not due to the status on the list, but it's because most of the overseer who frequently come to this board already read OP's threads and the messages he tried to convey, with some overseer even tried to explain patiently, and it came to a deaf ear. So they leave. Another come, did the same, ended up with similar result, and they too leave. Ultimately, the low traction of his threads.

I've seen your other post on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.

Thanks for bringing this up, but let's clarify a few things.

“Case is closed”: The case is far from closed, despite the tag in the scam accusation listing. This isn’t about personal conflicts; this is about Stake using its defenders, puppets, and influence to muddy the waters and make serious accusations disappear. Anyone looking at the evidence will see that these issues—rigged games, illegal payments, unethical practices—are still unresolved.

Misleading Users: If anything, Stake and its defenders have been the ones misleading users. I will update my threads to make it clear this case is ongoing, but let's not pretend the tagging system wasn’t manipulated in Stake’s favor.

Your Suggestion: I appreciate the example you provided with the Rollbit scam case. That said, if the community was as vigilant about holding Stake accountable as it seems to be about smalle


To holydarkness and others discussing the "resolved" status:


Let’s clarify the situation regarding my post on Stake’s ANN thread:

A Change in Tone Does Not Equal Resolution:
My statement about focusing on "peace and understanding" does not mean that the accusations against Stake were resolved. It reflects a personal decision to move forward and focus on broader issues, but it does not retract or negate the evidence and concerns raised.

Manipulation of Context by Stake Supporters:
Stake’s defenders are attempting to spin this as a victory or resolution in their favor. Let’s not forget the pattern here—Stake and its associates often use such narratives to manipulate the perception of unresolved issues and mislead the community.

Focus on Facts:
The evidence against Stake still stands, including the allegations of rigged games, unethical practices, and user exploitation. No official resolution or acknowledgment has come from Stake. The post you referred to is being taken out of context to suit their agenda.

To Those Supporting Stake or Downplaying the Issue:
If you believe the case is resolved, I invite you to provide evidence of any concrete actions or changes made by Stake to address the allegations. Otherwise, this looks like yet another attempt to silence critics and protect a fraudulent operation.

Let’s keep the focus where it belongs—on holding platforms like Stake accountable for their actions, not on twisting personal reflections into false resolutions.

Are... we talking about me and my list here in place of "the thread listing the scam accusation" and "the owner of the listing"? If so, then rest assured that [once again] that thread is not authoritarian, I will not abuse the list to my own agenda simply because [borrowing your words], "a conflict between you and the owner of the listing".

It was marked as resolved due to the OP's own written statement, on Stake's ANN thread


Was it a wrong interpretation that the case can be marked as resolved by OP wanting to focus on peace and understanding? Move forward? And, though his path let him away from these platforms, he wish everyone the best in their journey. I'll more than happy to change it given an insight from other party.

One thing that I think I need to say though, is that I find myself really surprised that you thought I will do such action, that I will abuse the list for a personal annoyance toward someone.

IMO they just think your case is closed because your topic has been tagged as resolved in the thread listing the scam accusation cases along with your other threads regarding this platform. I don't really understand why but I guess the reason belongs to a personal conflict between you and the owner of the listing. But in order to avoid misleading the users you should clearly mention in the OP of the thread or in its title that the case is still unresolved or ongoing as clinexrino did for his own IMO [UNRESOLVED]Rollbit SCAMS money from restricted players with 0% chance of lose

I honestly don't mind getting banned if that’s what it takes—they should just refund my money. It’s not just about being treated unfairly; there are serious allegations that this casino is involved in funding terrorism, especially in North Korea.

The level of unethical behavior is beyond comprehension. I hope Eddie and all his staff will face justice soon for their actions.

For those who want to know more about what’s really going on, visit https://www.stakeexposed.com

To be honest I don't think any regulated fiat casino would do something like that, they would prefer ban you from using their platform than applying specific discriminatory measures indicating that they treat their customers unfairly or with favoritism whenever they want. But despite its success this casino obviously doesn't care of its reputation. IMO it's because of the public they target : young people that don't know anything about casinos and sportsbooks, who won't complain and do anything if they get scammed or treated unfairly. I think it will change when team or people they sponsor will hear about unprofessional or dishonest behaviors from them, and will want to stop working with them or when regulators from the countries where they compete will prohibit their advertising.

Where did all the Stake defenders go? It’s awfully quiet now. Shame on you for supporting such a deceitful company, one that actively engages in unethical practices and tries to silence anyone who speaks out. Defending a company like Stake only shows complicity with their behavior. The truth is coming out, and Stake won’t be able to hide behind its deceit much longer.

I just wanted to address this ridiculous response: "Please bear in mind that post-monthly bonuses are not mandatory bonuses and are not in any way related to your statistics but are rather a token of appreciation that we provide our players with."

Really? Is this how Stake treats its players? I received $0.30 as my post-monthly bonus for being a Platinum III VIP, despite my recent activity on the platform. Prior to that, my monthly bonus for October was just $6.57, which is unreasonably low given my deposits and wagering activity.

To make matters worse, my account on the Stake community has been restricted for one year, and my threads have been deleted without any explanation.

If Stake’s idea of appreciation is to single out players who raise legitimate concerns and essentially silence them, it speaks volumes about their practices. Users deserve better than this.


https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/29/K74kG.jpeg



Bonus Summary

Date	Type of Bonus	Amount
10/29/2024	Post-Monthly Bonus	$0.30
10/26/2024	Weekly Bonus	$3.00
10/19/2024	Weekly Bonus	$4.50
10/15/2024	Monthly Bonus	$6.57

September Deposits

Date	Amount
09/24/2024	$571.55
09/12/2024	$212.13
09/12/2024	$1,065.19
09/12/2024	$840.36
09/06/2024	$1,059.24
09/06/2024	$1,061.64
09/06/2024	$320.05

@AHOYBRAUSE,

Thank you for your insight, and I appreciate you sharing your experience.

Stake singled out me on my bonus, because I exposed their fraud practices.

Since I have a LOT of experience with stake I want to add one thing. 70k wager and a loss of 2600$ would NEVER EVER pay 474$, and I mean EVER.
Trust me, I am sure about this. Loss has an impact but not THAT big of an impact. I have had 300k-900k wager months (900k 1 time only) and even with a loss and 900k wager and I barely 300-400$ monthly. That like 13x your wager by the way, and still only 400$. And wager is still a much bigger factor than loss.
So thinking you could get 474$ monthly with such a small wager is actually out of this world. That would mean a 15-20% loss back actually, stake doesn't do that.
Even an absolute nonsense site like https://stakebonus.com/monthly-bonus/calculator/ when entering your numbers says 362$, and this site is so wrong. I just entered some of my numbers and this site gives amounts that are 2x or 3x of what I got.
So I think an appropriate number for your 70k wager and 2600$ loss month would be around 200$ (and only because of the high loss). Obviously this is still much more than 7$ but also considerably less than the numbers mentioned here.

@Shishir99,

You seem to have misunderstood from the start. I never received $474—that was an estimated bonus based on my activity, which Stake failed to provide. What I actually got was a mere $6.57, which is a fraction of what was expected. Stake has literally stolen the money I rightfully earned by not providing the proper bonus, and it’s disappointing that you missed this key point from the very beginning.

This isn't about personal attacks; it's about raising awareness of unethical practices. If you’ve now come to understand the seriousness of the situation, that’s a start. But make no mistake—Stake's actions here are not acceptable, and it’s crucial to continue pointing out these issues until they’re addressed fairly.

You came to the point now. You are just a frustrated kid who started the personal attack at first saying I am writing for my signature quota and you know I make living with that. LOL. All I said is, your monthly bonus depend on your monthly statistics and not on your overall stats. You could simply say that you have wagered a hefty amount last month and show the monthly stats. But you never pointed out that, you started attacking me instead.

I had to check your screenshots twice to understand that you actually wagered 70K in a month and got $474 in bonus which is not a small amount of money. Now it is up to you and stake and I have to agree that if someone get $6 as a monthly bonus, this is something stake should look at.

@Shishir99,

You seem to be confusing a genuine concern with personal grievances. If I were defending Stake, I certainly wouldn't be wearing their signature or promoting them. The fact remains that you are still ignoring the key issue: I had a significant deposit and wagering activity last month, which entitled me to more than just a $6.57 monthly bonus.

This isn’t about receiving "free money" as you call it. The monthly bonus is simply another form of rakeback—a reward for the activity I’ve already generated for Stake. For the record, I received the exact same amount for my weekly bonus—$6.57—just before the monthly bonus of $6.57. This points to a deliberate reduction in what I should have rightfully received, and other users have agreed and pointed this out, even on Stake's own forum.

And just to be clear, I don’t own any website, so stop running your mouth in unnecessary places. If you don’t want to engage constructively, that’s up to you, but dismissing my concerns without acknowledging the facts shows a lack of understanding about what’s happening here. I suggest you check the discussion on Stake’s own forum before jumping to conclusions: Stake Community Forum Discussion.


I appreciate your acknowledgment that there must be something wrong with the bonus calculation. It’s crucial that Stake addresses these discrepancies, especially for loyal players like myself who expect fair treatment based on our activity.

While I’m hopeful for a resolution, the lack of transparency and the arbitrary nature of the bonuses raises serious concerns about Stake's practices. It's vital for all users to hold the platform accountable, and I intend to continue bringing attention to these issues until they are resolved.

Thank you for your input, but let's not lose sight of the real problems at hand.

You started the personal attack while I was sharing my point of view after reading the whole thread. But you came up with a dirty idea to play with me and say something like I am not contributing anything and writing here because of my signature campaign post quota. When you expect respect from someone, you should do the same thing. I am not wearing a stake signature, and I am not their employee. Why do I have to defend them? You should have respected my opinion and think what I wrote. I still believe that the casino bonus does not depend on your overall stats (lifetime stats). If you are looking for a monthly bonus, It depends on your monthly stats. Nothing is wrong when they see a VIP member holding his rank, but they do not wager much anymore. Giving out free money to less active users won't benefit their business. This is not charity. They are here to do business. I do not bother to check your fucking website after your personal attack. Keep that in your pocket and move forward.

You confuse defending with explaining. I simply explained to you what the chat confusion might have caused, that's why I quoted you because you got the wrong idea about what happened there when he accidentally was told he would have another account.
Also, being platinum 6 in a 4 year span doesn't make anyone a highroller, I am far from that. I am not concerned because I did nothing wrong actually. that's just how it is. I also obviously hope OP gets this resolved since I repeatedly stated as well that there must be something wrong with the calculation.

I appreciate your wish for me to understand why my bonus has been reduced, but unfortunately, Stake’s lack of transparency has made it impossible to get a straightforward answer. This isn’t about one-off errors or agents "sending a reply to the wrong person." It’s about a pattern of obfuscation, minimizing rewards, and silencing users who raise legitimate complaints. I have seen this pattern with most of these crypto casinos.

Thanks again for your balanced input. It’s clear that we need more voices here that aren’t afraid to hold these platforms accountable.

Honestly, I wouldn't have talked about that if you didn't quote me to defend the casino while wearing its signature (with ref link) and while I wasn't even talking to you. I personally think people should stay cautious with what they do and they say when there could be a conflict of interest in their position, even if they are very fair and honest but it's just my personal ethic and I don't ask anyone to share it. If you are platinum 6 (ie 10+ millions wagered afaik) you are a high roller, so you should be concerned about all those issues reported here because one day you might face them too, and it's nice to tell us here how Stake normally handles multi-accounts according to what you've seen around you but it would have been interesting to tell it on other threads where people are not treated this way IMO. Anyway I hope kingbj21 will be able to know why his bonus has been decreased.

I see that you've resorted to personal attacks instead of actually addressing the issues at hand. Calling me a "frustrated kid" or assuming that I'm just trying to blackmail Stake for a bonus only reveals your ignorance about the situation. This isn't about losing money I couldn't afford or trying to blackmail a casino—it's about holding a company accountable for their unethical and illegal practices.

Stake has been deceiving users with unclear bonus structures, illegal UPI deposits in India, and a lack of transparency. You seem to think that defending them makes you some kind of hero, but the reality is that people like you are part of the problem. Blindly defending a company, regardless of the evidence of their wrongdoing, doesn’t make you informed—it makes you complicit.

If you can't understand the seriousness of my claims, or if you’re too busy throwing around insults to actually engage in a constructive discussion, then you're not contributing anything meaningful here. I recommend that you take a moment to actually educate yourself on the broader issues with Stake, which are well-documented on platforms like Stakeexposed.com.

You think it's funny that I'm exposing these practices? Fine, laugh all you want. But one thing is clear: I won't stop exposing fraud and standing up for what's right. If you have nothing constructive to add, then perhaps it’s time for you to move on.

You feel a bit confused to be honest. I can voice my opinion (regardless of my campaign) and I also said that it's true the bonus amounts decreased over time. I am a 4 year player on stake, have platinum 6 level and I know what I am talking about.
And about the "withdraw only mode" I actually know 3 persons personally that had this happen and they have withdrawn, just so you know. Also on the stake forum you can read about cases like that. Do yourself a favor and check it out.

And, I didn't "promptly" ask the OP of a different case to lock it, I just did because that's what people here are supposed to do. If your case is resolved you are supposed to update and lock to avoid further spamming, that's how things are handled here. You are in no place to judge me about my signature. I am nobody to blindly defend sites, never was never will. I said that in the case we are talking about there is definitely something wrong with the calculation, didn't I? Also it's a fact the support agents have several chats open, sending a reply to the wrong person happens and it happened to me so often actually. That's why I reacted to your reply, because you didn't take this into consideration. Cheers

I am sure you would call me a stake promoter if I were there wearing a stake signature at this moment. But, I am sorry that you did not get that chance. You just tried to prove that I am spamming here for my signature quota. Nah? Whatever you try to say does not actually help your case. You are just a frustrated kid who is addicted to gambling and lost some money that you cannot afford to lose. So, you tried to find a way to blackmail the casino and get some bonus. But, don't think nobody knows how this casino bonus works.

Haha. LOL. You just proved how desperate you are to prove that Stake isn't giving you a bonus. Grow up, kid. That's not how it works. I understand you are trying to make a living by doing this, but I am sorry for you. 

IMO you shouldn't intervene in cases regarding the casino you're promoting with a referral link into your signature because you're not objective, and even look a bit biased actually. Could you point out a case where this casino as just put the account in "withraw only mode" and kindly let the customer withdrawing all his funds without asking anything else after being accused of multi-accounting? I am very curious about that tbh. In the last case we've seen here(the one where you've asked the OP to promptly lock his thread before giving more informations), the customer had to threaten them to sue the big bosses in Australia, to be able to get his funds back.
Here it's the same with this customer agent, right after talking about his boss, the agent poorly apologized and claimed to have confused him with another customer while what he said was apparently in line with previous Eddie's statements according to you.

To everyone involved in this discussion:

It's quite clear that Stake and its defenders have been doing everything possible to justify their shady practices. The "opacity" of bonus calculations is not a coincidence; it's a deliberate tactic to ensure that Stake can manipulate and reduce payouts as they see fit, without any transparency or accountability. The claim that users can just "deal with it" because bonuses are discretionary is laughable when legitimate users are being deprived of what they are promised. This is not about getting "free money"; it's about being treated fairly based on our activity and the terms that Stake itself has promoted.

To those trying to downplay the issue or shift the focus to multi-accounting accusations, it’s clear these are just excuses Stake uses to keep users' funds or minimize bonuses. If Stake genuinely believed I had multiple accounts, they would have locked my funds and subjected me to endless KYC procedures, as many users here have experienced. Instead, my account has been placed in withdrawal-only mode, which is a common tactic to limit user access without providing any real justification.


I hope your reading comprehension is better than your last post suggests, because frankly, it seems like you're just spewing whatever you think fits the narrative you want to push. Have you even invested a single dollar in a casino? Because you’re speaking like someone who’s completely disconnected from the actual experience. No offense, but your past comments show a clear pattern of defending Stake without reading or understanding the facts, which makes your contributions sound like the ramblings of someone more concerned with boosting their post count than contributing anything of value.

Let’s not kid ourselves – there are users who make a living by posting on forums and defending these companies, regardless of how unethical their practices are. It’s no surprise that you’re downplaying the real issues and dismissing valid concerns raised by users like me. Your comments about "recent stats" and how bonuses work are just another weak attempt to discredit those of us who are exposing Stake for what it truly is.

For anyone actually interested in the truth, I recommend checking out Stakeexposed.com. Stake, and particularly Eddie and his team, won’t be able to get away with their fraudulent practices for much longer. Eddie and his crew are headed to prison – that’s the inevitable outcome for their scamming and exploitation of users.

The days of hiding behind opaque practices and fake defenses are coming to an end. I’m not here to play nice with Stake’s defenders. I’m here to expose the truth. And believe me, the truth will prevail.

Even though the casino says they have a base bonus amount for each rank, it can even lower when you do not meet some criteria. No matter how much you wagered overall in a lifetime. The lifetime wager only increases your rank level and nothing else. What matters is how much you have wagered in the last month and the last week. The bonus depends on your latest performance and not on your overall stats.

I am not surprised because if it is possible to make massive money from casinos just by ranking up and getting free money every month, then people will start selling accounts, which is already happening with the updated system. I don't think Stake is a stupid platform that will give free money to everyone. You got your bonus based on your recent stats. I don't want to see what you did in the past. Your recent stats speak for you.

You are lucky that there are no negative merit system.

True that they are changing the bonuses, they actually did that a lot over the last 2 years. Still the bonuses normally are quite good and if the calculation is right then there is nothing to complain about. What exactly is going on in OP's case, nobody knows. It's always hard to get insights. But obvious there must be something wrong.
Also, I don't know what you mean by "his picture seems to confirm it". The agent just made a mistake because normally they have several support chats open at the same time. So whatever he told him was meant to be for somebody else, he obviously said that himself. About multi account accusations, normally they don't just keep your money but but the account in "withdraw only mode", and one the withdrawal was made you can't use the account anymore. Sure, we never know if the multi account things are true, but that's for any casino since not 1 single casino would show their ways of detecting such accounts, for obvious reasons.

The calculation rules of their bonuses are very opaque afaik, and they change them whenever they want without noticing users because as it is one bonus they consider they don't owe anything towards customers about it and they can give it as they wish, to whoever they want. What Eddie has said according to the post above is quite suprising because usually when they suspect a customer to have several accounts they lock all his funds and they ask him to fulfill an endless KYC procedure as we've seen in many cases here. So if he's true, and one of your picture seems to confirm it, it would mean their multi-account accusations are just excuses used to try to keep funds of those customers actually, it would be serious.

I understand where you’re coming from, and I appreciate the direct question. Let me make it very clear: I have never had any issues or accusations regarding multi-accounting on Stake. I only operate a single account, and any insinuation otherwise is simply not true.

Clarification from Stake Support Itself.



The issue here is not about multi-accounting; it’s about fairness and transparency regarding the bonus system. Stake has been vague and inconsistent about how bonuses are calculated, and users like myself, who have maintained legitimate accounts, are receiving much lower bonuses than expected. The claim that reduced bonuses are tied to multi-account activity is a convenient explanation, but it doesn’t hold up when legitimate users are affected.



If Stake believes there is any irregularity with my account, they should be transparent and provide evidence rather than silently reducing my bonus and censoring my posts. I have no reason to remain silent—I’m here precisely because I want transparency and fair treatment, not just for myself but for everyone affected by these practices.

I believe it's important to scrutinize these issues rather than simply accepting the narrative that anyone receiving a low bonus must have been "found out" for wrongdoing. Let’s focus on holding platforms accountable to treat their users fairly and with transparency.

Short question, have you ever had problem with some sort of multi account accusation on stake? Not accusing you of anything, just asking because some months ago there were some complaints in the stake forum that weekly/monthly bonus has been super low despite high wager/loss and when being asked this on the stake stream as well Eddie said this was supposed to happen to accounts that have been a found out to be multiple accounts.
Some players obviously said stuff like "I only have 1 account" but others became quite silent after that info.

It’s clear now that Stake has no intention of addressing the core issues here, despite the publicity effort made by Symphonized. This feels more like a PR move rather than an actual attempt to resolve the concerns I’ve raised.

As you can see from Aleksandar's response, Stake is refusing to provide any additional amount for my monthly VIP bonus, which contradicts what others have received at similar VIP levels. Even though they claim the bonuses are automatically calculated and “fair,” the disparity in payouts and lack of transparency indicates otherwise.

I appreciate Symphonized notifying the staff team, but without Stake admitting their mistake and addressing these inconsistencies, it looks like nothing will change. This is not about demanding special treatment; it’s about fairness and being treated equally compared to other users.

I've already notified the staff team to review this case

I understand that you're not part of Stake's team, but suggesting that I just "play elsewhere" isn't a solution. I earned Platinum III VIP status through $70,000 in wagers and $2,688 in deposits. I didn't stop wagering, and the $6.57 bonus is nowhere near the base that should be provided. Stake’s failure to honor their VIP program isn’t just about this one incident—it's about a pattern of behavior where they try to avoid accountability. And as for contacting reps, I’ve done that countless times, only to be censored or ignored.


 It’s easy to dismiss my concerns and assume I "got censored" because I was disrespectful. However, I’ve always approached the support team with respect, raising legitimate issues. The truth is, Stake is censoring anyone who dares to call them out. If you take a look at the evidence, you’d see that my allegations about their fraudulent behavior aren't baseless—they’re backed by facts. Stake is involved in promoting UPI deposits in India while not informing users of the legal risks. They've partnered with streamers to promote illegal deposit methods, and minors are also affected. If this isn't enough to raise concerns, I don't know what is.

I get your point, and yes, the bonus is unjustifiably low—I appreciate you acknowledging that. As for why I keep playing, it’s not because I enjoy these issues—it’s because Stake owes me my dues. Ignoring their shady practices and simply walking away would mean letting them get away with it. The censorship, the bonus reduction, and blocking my account without notice are unacceptable, and I have every right to hold them accountable. If Stake expects loyalty, they should provide it in return.


Thanks for sharing your bonus as a Platinum I member—your experience highlights the inconsistency in how they treat players. You’re right; the bonus I received is nowhere near what’s fair for my level. The claim that my VIP level was downgraded or that I was restricted for raising concerns is just another excuse for them to punish players who speak up.


es, I made those deposits after the last monthly bonus, but if Stake's system "didn't calculate them," that’s a systemic issue on their end, and they should rectify it. Instead, they've chosen to nerf my bonus and ignore me because I called out their shady practices. This isn’t just about one bonus—it’s about a billion-dollar company acting cheaply and unethically toward loyal players.

If Stake truly wants to resolve these issues, they need to address the inconsistencies in how they handle player bonuses, stop censoring those who raise legitimate complaints, and ensure transparency in their dealings with users.

$6.57 is indeed inconsistent compared to your wagering and PnL statistics. How much you had received from the 14th September weekly bonus amount after losing those big deposits? According to your statistics, you have received almost $500 as bonuses within last 30 days. Which is a bit reasonable with your statistics.

Stake had given the September monthly bonus on the 12th day of the month. Most of your deposits were made on that day in the last month. You have only one deposits after the previous monthly bonus date. I guess Stake system haven't considered those deposits and wager which you have made on the same day after receiving the monthly bonus. That's why your October monthly bonus was too low.

There’s really something wrong for a Platinum 3 VIP received only that bonus considering the 70K wager and -2.6K loss. I’m just a Platinum 1 yet I received 15$ bonus this month for just below 20K wager and minimal loss compared to yours.

However, your account might be subjected to restrictions due to your activity in the casino. IIRC you are the same user that accuse Stake house blackjack for being rigged.

Maybe your account VIP level was downloaded due to your previous actions that degrading the casino.

First things first, yes your monthly is surely too small for this wager and loss, no doubt about that. Something is wrong there, what it is exactly obviously we don't know, but it's not right.

On the other hand, you have so many complaints about stake, made a long scam accusation thread about some missing bet ID and so on, also warning about the Indian bank account problems, so why oh why would you keep playing at stake if you encounter so many problems? I mean you basically use this forum only to post scam accusations and complaints about stake, duelbits and so on.
Don't get me wrong, you have the right to do so but wouldn't it be smarter to find a new place to gamble if you don't feel safe? That safes you and us the time to see new complaints over and over again.

From the look of things and how ops sound, it speaks volumes to why he got censored on stake chat forum, and also before I dive into the reason why you receiving such an amount as monthly VIP bonus let clarify something very important about your accusations of stake getting involved in a crypto fraud as you mentioned, it will very wrong of you to come up with such accusation without any prove to back it up and at this point this may be the reason why you are facing alot of issues with your account activities on stake.

I guess you have spilled out alot of things that hot the support pissed up with you and have to limit your access to safe they community, and on some of the bonus conditions, you should have to read the part that stated that the casino have the right to limit how much bonus you get for the month depending on your activities.

Yea I  cannot really say what exactly the issue is with your bonus as I am not a part of the team or the site. Was just speculating in my 1st post which as you see is now edited.

All I can really say is if you are unhappy with Stake, nobody forces you to play there. Maybe play elsewhere for a bit? I personally have never had any issues with them, but I realize that users will have issues from time to time. I do see you have another thread about duelbits as well.

You can try to pm their reps or post in their announcement thread and see if someone can or will help you.

Stunna
Symphonized
Ann thread

I appreciate your update, but let’s clarify a few things. I haven’t stopped wagering, and my activity level is more than enough to justify the base VIP bonus for Platinum III, which is clearly stated to be $30. What I received—$6.57—isn’t just a "reduction," it’s blatantly unfair given the wagers and deposits I’ve made. If there were changes to the terms or calculations, they’ve never been communicated to me, and that’s on Stake.

Now, regarding your point about censorship, I’ve always treated support staff with respect. My posts were deleted, my account was restricted, and my voice was silenced because I raised legitimate concerns—not because I was rude. Stake’s reaction to criticism has been consistently evasive, especially when users like me start asking tough questions about their practices.

As for Eddie’s comments on streams, those don’t change the fact that there are written terms that users rely on. If Stake wants to operate in a transparent and fair manner, they need to honor their commitments or clearly communicate any changes—not just on streams, but in their official policies.

The real issue here is Stake’s failure to honor its promises and silencing users who speak out. I’m simply holding them accountable for actions that don’t align with their own policies.

Ok, so I wear the stake signature and don't want to be accused of sticking up for them for commenting, but come on. It sounds like you got your account to your VIP level and have stopped wagering. If you watch the Saturday stream, Ed has mentioned many times that there is a base for each level, but if you're not an active bettor your bonus will start going down.

Making a VIP level does not mean free money for life. Stake has the right to change the terms unless you can show us in the terms where it says you can collect free money for life.

As far as censoring you goes, I am sure that has to do with how you have treated support or staff. If you were rude, they probably blocked you. Whether you're mad or whatever, you still have to treat people with respect. I may be wrong here, just my speculation on what happened. Either way, I hope this help you to understand a little better.

Just saw your images, maybe my whole opinion is off here.

Hey everyone,

I originally posted this on Stake’s own community forum, but—surprise, surprise—it was deleted without explanation.

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/109701-stake-censors-users-blocks-withdrawals-and-now-stealing-monthly-vip/

Stake clearly doesn’t want users to know what’s really happening behind the scenes, so I’m sharing it here instead.

As a Platinum III VIP player, I’ve had $70,000 in wagers and $2,688 in deposits, but my monthly VIP bonus was shockingly only $6.57, when the base for Platinum III is supposed to be $30. This isn’t just a one-off mistake—Stake is withholding rewards from its loyal players.

On top of this, Stake has:

• Put my account in withdrawal-only mode without any notice or reason.
• Censored my posts in their chat and deleted my threads on their forums.
• Banned me from Reddit after I started exposing their shady practices.
• Despite reaching out to their support and complaints teams multiple times, my issues remain unresolved. It’s clear that Stake is going out of their way to silence anyone who raises valid concerns. I’ve even filed a formal complaint with the FBI due to the seriousness of these issues.
  

I’m also genuinely worried about my safety since I’ve reported Stake’s founders, including Eddie, and their involvement in a fraudulent crypto empire. If anything happens to me, Stake should be held responsible.

If you’re a Stake user, especially a VIP, be aware that they may block your account, censor your voice, and steal your bonuses without hesitation. Has anyone else faced similar treatment with Stake? It’s time to hold them accountable for their unethical practices and ensure this doesn’t go unnoticed.