Pages:
Author

Topic: Stake.com Censors Users, Blocks Withdrawals, and Now Steals Monthly VIP Bonuses (Read 1192 times)

newbie
Activity: 119
Merit: 0

OP and my cases are a lot different than each other. Like comparing apple to orange.

I believe OP should serve more evidence (documented) to get support here. Even if he does, you can see from my case that even if you provide every evidence that back up your claims; there are people who will oppose no matter what; because our oppositions are big fish in this forum.

@tetaeridanus, you claim to be a victim, yet you undermine another victim's case by saying "not enough evidence"? Let me make this crystal clear: this isn’t about comparing scars—it’s about addressing a collective problem.

Here’s the reality of my case:

Stake refuses to provide my data under GDPR, blatantly violating legal obligations.
Censorship: They’ve silenced me across platforms to hide their fraudulent practices.
Stolen bonuses and missing wagers: My rightful earnings and transactions have been conveniently erased without explanation.
What more "evidence" do you expect? A signed confession from Stake? Stop dismissing my efforts to expose these wrongdoings—it’s insulting to everyone trying to shed light on this corrupt empire.

To Stake and their enablers: Accountability isn’t optional. The cracks in your empire are widening, and no amount of spin will stop the truth from coming out.

@tetaeridanus, if you’re not here to stand in solidarity or contribute meaningfully, kindly refrain from spouting unhelpful commentary. Stick to your own case and let this thread focus on what matters.

The fight for transparency and justice continues—whether Stake likes it or not.


Hello kingbj,

I am not comparing scars; you understood me wrongly.

I believe you should create a thread with everything together and images as evidence; to back up allegations.

None of my words claim your accusation is false. I know stake and their actions from past. They are filthy.

Please for your own sake, understand before attacking. We are not friends from ‘nam; solidarity comes with the cause; I believe your cause as I also believe stake and rollbit type of sites rig their games %100. I wanted tell you to gather a more together thread.

Hello tetaeridanus,  

Let’s not waste time sugarcoating this. Stake.com is not just a casino; it’s a meticulously constructed empire of fraud, built on the shattered lives of vulnerable players. You cannot compare this monstrosity to any other gambling site—it stands alone as a blueprint for corporate exploitation masked as “crypto innovation.”  

Let me lay it all out—no filters, no corporate jargon.  



Stake.com: The Empire of Rigged Games and Stolen Lives  

Syztmz: Eddie’s “Friend” Playing with Player Data  

Why is Eddie’s buddy Syztmz handling sensitive player data? What credentials does he have? None. This is data mismanagement at its worst, and it’s terrifying. Players’ personal information—everything from deposits to withdrawals—is in the hands of unqualified cronies with zero accountability. This isn’t a slip-up; it’s a deliberate tactic to keep everything in-house, away from regulatory scrutiny.  




Ask yourself: Would you trust your data with someone whose only qualification is being “Eddie’s friend”?  



The Myth of “Provably Fair”  
Stake shouts from the rooftops about their “provably fair” games, but let’s be real—it’s smoke and mirrors. The algorithms controlling their games are rigged to favor the house, period. They sell a fantasy of fairness while secretly tweaking the odds. Ever wonder why the house never truly loses? Because the system decides who wins and who gets bled dry.  



Begging for Promos: The Exploitation Cycle  
Here’s Stake’s real strategy:  
1. Lure players with shiny promo codes and offers.  
2. Dangle bonuses in front of them like carrots on a stick.  
3. Make them lose more than they’ll ever get back.  

It’s a psychological trap. They’ve turned gambling into a circus where players are the clowns, forced to grovel for scraps while the house sits back and laughs.  

Here’s the kicker: Even those lucky enough to cash out find themselves cornered in Stake’s rigged system.  



Unmasking the Stake Machine: The True Crimes  

1. Data Mismanagement  
Sensitive player data is handled like pocket change by unqualified individuals. Imagine the potential for blackmail, misuse, and manipulation—this is beyond unethical; it’s criminal.  

2. Illegal Transactions  
Stake openly violates jurisdictional laws by exploiting systems like UPI. Deposits through shady, third-party vendors lead to frozen bank accounts for players while Stake walks away scot-free.  

3. Corporate Whitewashing  
From F1 sponsorships to Premier League partnerships, Stake uses legitimate platforms to cover their tracks. They’re not legitimizing crypto gambling; they’re laundering blood money.  

4. Influencer Puppets  
Drake, Xposed, Trainwreck—big names used as bait to glorify gambling. Their job? To normalize the chaos and lure in more victims. It’s a well-oiled manipulation machine.  



A Rigged Empire: The Playbook  

1. From Runescape to Ruination  
   - Eddie and Bijan started as kids scamming on Runescape. Fast-forward, and they’ve scaled their hustle to global proportions. Their roots in deceit were never abandoned—they just got better at hiding it.  
2. Ruthless Algorithms  
   - Rigged games, controlled outcomes, and player favoritism. The only randomness in Stake’s “provably fair” system is who they decide to exploit next.  
3. Public Image vs. Private Greed  
   - Stake’s flashy giveaways and sponsorships distract from the truth: they’ve built an empire off the backs of vulnerable people.  



The Virus That Must Be Eliminated  

Stake isn’t just a gambling site; it’s a virus infecting society. Every dollar they flaunt in their marketing campaigns is stained with the blood of their victims. From data misuse to rigged games, from illegal transactions to fake promises of fairness, Stake represents everything that’s wrong with unregulated crypto gambling.  

Let’s call it what it is: A criminal enterprise. Eddie, Bijan, and their cronies are not visionaries—they’re predators.  



The Path Forward: Join the Fight  

This fight isn’t just about Stake. It’s about exposing a system that allows parasites like Eddie and Bijan to thrive. Their assets must be seized, their licenses revoked, and their operations dismantled.  

The call to action is simple:  
1. Spread the truth. Share this thread and make noise about their crimes.  
2. Hold them accountable. Report them to regulatory bodies, financial institutions, and the media.  
3. Demand justice. If we don’t fight back, they’ll keep preying on others.  

This is not a game—it’s a war. And it’s time to bring the fight to their doorstep.  

Let’s take them down.  


Quote
Conversation with Syztmz Support: Proof of Irresponsibility  

Below is a conversation between me and Maria from Syztmz, dated January 2, 2025, at 2:09 AM (Muscat Time). This exchange sheds light on the dismissive and shady practices of Syztmz, the very entity trusted with managing player data:  

Quote
 
[Conversation with Syztmz]  
Started on January 2, 2025, at 02:09 AM Muscat time (GMT+0400)  

02:09 AM | kingbj: hi  
02:09 AM | Fin: You’ll get replies here and in your email:  
Our usual reply time:  
🕒 under 1 minute  

02:09 AM | Maria from Syztmz: Hey!  
02:09 AM | kingbj: hi  
02:10 AM | Maria from Syztmz: How can I help you??  

02:11 AM | kingbj: kyc failed  
02:11 AM | Maria from Syztmz: There’s not much we can help in that situation? We can’t help KYC existing accounts but if you needed a new account we can assist with that.  

02:13 AM | kingbj: Then won’t that be counted as multi-accounting?  
02:14 AM | Maria from Syztmz: As long as you don’t abuse codes or rain, and since you won’t be able to use your other account, no, you will be fine.  

02:14 AM | kingbj: Really? Any guarantee?  
02:15 AM | Maria from Syztmz: I will not guarantee anything since I don’t know how you will use the account.  

02:16 AM | kingbj: Hey, all my accounts were in net negative… lmao  
02:17 AM | Maria from Syztmz: That doesn’t really have anything to do with what I’m saying, though. You want a guarantee you won’t get caught for multi-accounting. All we can do is help provide a working, legit account for you. What happens after that is pretty much in your hands.  

02:17 AM | kingbj: How are you doing it? May I ask?  
02:17 AM | Maria from Syztmz: If you are interested, I will have a member of the affiliate team reach out to you through Discord or Telegram.  

02:18 AM | kingbj: Who? Sony?  
02:19 AM | Maria from Syztmz: Either him or one of the others.  
02:19 AM | kingbj: Sony won’t reply; he gaslighted me.  
02:19 AM | kingbj: MF.  
02:20 AM | Maria from Syztmz: Ok, well, you can leave me with the Discord or Telegram if you are interested in an account. I will have someone get back to you.  

02:20 AM | Maria from Syztmz: Did you speak to Sony about getting an account, or was it something else?  
02:20 AM | kingbj: Something personal. Stake limited my account with $500,000.  
02:21 AM | Maria from Syztmz: Ok, you can leave the Discord or Telegram with me if you want, and I will have them help you with an account.  
02:22 AM | kingbj: Sure. Stakeexposedmfers009  

[Exported from Syztmz on January 2, 2025, at 02:22 AM Muscat time +04 (GMT+0400)]  
 

---

What This Conversation Proves  

1. A Casual Attitude Toward Multi-Accounting  
   Syztmz representatives openly suggest creating a new account after KYC failure, brushing aside concerns about multi-accounting. Their response of “you will be fine” is not just unprofessional—it’s blatantly encouraging rule-breaking while denying any responsibility.  

2. No Guarantees, No Accountability  
   When asked for a guarantee, Maria dismisses the question with an “it’s in your hands” attitude. This showcases Syztmz’s unwillingness to take responsibility for any issues players might face after following their advice.  

3. Opaque and Shady Practices  
   The representative redirects the conversation to affiliates, indicating that the real dealings happen behind closed doors via Discord or Telegram. This adds another layer of secrecy to an already dubious operation.  

4. A System Designed to Exploit  
   Despite knowing that the user’s accounts are in a net negative and that Stake has already frozen $500,000 in one account, Syztmz shows no interest in resolving issues or addressing the player's concerns. Instead, they push for creating new accounts to keep the cycle going.  

---

Conclusion: Syztmz’s Role in Stake’s Corruption  

This conversation exemplifies the systemic corruption at Stake. The involvement of Syztmz—a so-called “partner”—in these shady dealings raises critical questions about data management, ethical standards, and regulatory compliance. Eddie and Bijan have built a machine that thrives on exploitation, and Syztmz is a key cog in that machine.  

Let’s not just question them—let’s dismantle their empire.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33

OP and my cases are a lot different than each other. Like comparing apple to orange.

I believe OP should serve more evidence (documented) to get support here. Even if he does, you can see from my case that even if you provide every evidence that back up your claims; there are people who will oppose no matter what; because our oppositions are big fish in this forum.

@tetaeridanus, you claim to be a victim, yet you undermine another victim's case by saying "not enough evidence"? Let me make this crystal clear: this isn’t about comparing scars—it’s about addressing a collective problem.

Here’s the reality of my case:

Stake refuses to provide my data under GDPR, blatantly violating legal obligations.
Censorship: They’ve silenced me across platforms to hide their fraudulent practices.
Stolen bonuses and missing wagers: My rightful earnings and transactions have been conveniently erased without explanation.
What more "evidence" do you expect? A signed confession from Stake? Stop dismissing my efforts to expose these wrongdoings—it’s insulting to everyone trying to shed light on this corrupt empire.

To Stake and their enablers: Accountability isn’t optional. The cracks in your empire are widening, and no amount of spin will stop the truth from coming out.

@tetaeridanus, if you’re not here to stand in solidarity or contribute meaningfully, kindly refrain from spouting unhelpful commentary. Stick to your own case and let this thread focus on what matters.

The fight for transparency and justice continues—whether Stake likes it or not.


Hello kingbj,

I am not comparing scars; you understood me wrongly.

I believe you should create a thread with everything together and images as evidence; to back up allegations.

None of my words claim your accusation is false. I know stake and their actions from past. They are filthy.

Please for your own sake, understand before attacking. We are not friends from ‘nam; solidarity comes with the cause; I believe your cause as I also believe stake and rollbit type of sites rig their games %100. I wanted tell you to gather a more together thread.
newbie
Activity: 119
Merit: 0

OP and my cases are a lot different than each other. Like comparing apple to orange.

I believe OP should serve more evidence (documented) to get support here. Even if he does, you can see from my case that even if you provide every evidence that back up your claims; there are people who will oppose no matter what; because our oppositions are big fish in this forum.

@tetaeridanus, you claim to be a victim, yet you undermine another victim's case by saying "not enough evidence"? Let me make this crystal clear: this isn’t about comparing scars—it’s about addressing a collective problem.

Here’s the reality of my case:

Stake refuses to provide my data under GDPR, blatantly violating legal obligations.
Censorship: They’ve silenced me across platforms to hide their fraudulent practices.
Stolen bonuses and missing wagers: My rightful earnings and transactions have been conveniently erased without explanation.
What more "evidence" do you expect? A signed confession from Stake? Stop dismissing my efforts to expose these wrongdoings—it’s insulting to everyone trying to shed light on this corrupt empire.

To Stake and their enablers: Accountability isn’t optional. The cracks in your empire are widening, and no amount of spin will stop the truth from coming out.

@tetaeridanus, if you’re not here to stand in solidarity or contribute meaningfully, kindly refrain from spouting unhelpful commentary. Stick to your own case and let this thread focus on what matters.

The fight for transparency and justice continues—whether Stake likes it or not.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Many people abstained from showing their opinion, I thank for your actions. I hope nutildah looks at my case in his/her free time and sees the reality of my situation.

I don't think he/she did, because they believe it is invalid; seen from the comments above.

Actually I said the opposite:

My thoughts are it seems like you have a valid argument based on the information you have provided, but we're not going to be able to help you here. Your best bet was holydarkness and it seems he did everything he could. He does this kind of thing on behalf of complainants out of kindness, and isn't paid for it, BTW, and doesn't hold a special title or capacity on the forum.

Unfortunately not much has changed between now and then. However, if you strongly believe that you have been wronged, I wouldn't let it go, seeing as how its a pretty large amount of money. To bring things back on topic, your case seems much more reasonable than OP's.

Hello nutildah,

Since there are many topics I am writing on, I mixed it a bit; my bad. I remember your comment now. Apologies.

Thanks for your verbal support and opinion on my case.

OP and my cases are a lot different than each other. Like comparing apple to orange.

I believe OP should serve more evidence (documented) to get support here. Even if he does, you can see from my case that even if you provide every evidence that back up your claims; there are people who will oppose no matter what; because our oppositions are big fish in this forum.
newbie
Activity: 119
Merit: 0
I originally posted this on Stake’s own community forum, but—surprise, surprise—it was deleted without explanation.

That shows that they are actively monitoring on their community platforms and following up with what everyone is posting, another way of saying they are well moderated, but that is not where am going by the way, they need no explanation to why they are deleting any post against their policies.

Stake clearly doesn’t want users to know what’s really happening behind the scenes, so I’m sharing it here instead.

Am very sure there are numbers of forum reputed members using the platform and have nothing to complain about, while some like you will always have reasons for not being satisfied by their actions after been far gone against their rules and standards, I use to advise people, if you don't get well with any platform, try out others.

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/121230-stake-scam-day-by-day%F0%9F%93%88-writing-it-again/

Go and read on the forums and reddit, the real posts are getting deleted.

Even a post made on our forum was deleted.



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/stakecom-destroyed-my-life-seeking-for-a-solution-5523721 [Original thread now removed/moved]

Stake’s True Face Exposed Yet Again:

It’s no surprise that a thread exposing Stake’s unethical practices and illegal operations got removed from the forum. The post shared a heartbreaking story of a user from an illegal country who lost an astronomical 32.87 BTC and 623.92 ETH (valued at approximately $2,083,474.67) while wagering over $30 million. Stake allowed deposits from a restricted region—breaking their own rules—only to let the user lose everything.

What does this tell us? Stake’s RTP (Return to Player) claims and "provably fair" facade are nothing more than bait. The reality is clear: the games are rigged and heavily stacked against players, no matter the "proof" they parade.

Censorship at Its Best:
The removal of that thread speaks volumes about Stake’s influence and their attempts to silence criticism. This isn’t the first time Stake has used its power to manipulate forums, remove evidence, and drown out legitimate complaints with their army of puppets.

Quote
Stake’s so-called fairness has always been under question, but stories like these reveal the larger pattern of exploitation and deception. Let’s ensure their tactics don’t go unnoticed.


Stake twitter scam thread still live on their site, they forget to delete (https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-28-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/) highlights glaring irregularities:
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 437
I originally posted this on Stake’s own community forum, but—surprise, surprise—it was deleted without explanation.

That shows that they are actively monitoring on their community platforms and following up with what everyone is posting, another way of saying they are well moderated, but that is not where am going by the way, they need no explanation to why they are deleting any post against their policies.

Stake clearly doesn’t want users to know what’s really happening behind the scenes, so I’m sharing it here instead.

Am very sure there are numbers of forum reputed members using the platform and have nothing to complain about, while some like you will always have reasons for not being satisfied by their actions after been far gone against their rules and standards, I use to advise people, if you don't get well with any platform, try out others.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Many people abstained from showing their opinion, I thank for your actions. I hope nutildah looks at my case in his/her free time and sees the reality of my situation.

I don't think he/she did, because they believe it is invalid; seen from the comments above.

Actually I said the opposite:

My thoughts are it seems like you have a valid argument based on the information you have provided, but we're not going to be able to help you here. Your best bet was holydarkness and it seems he did everything he could. He does this kind of thing on behalf of complainants out of kindness, and isn't paid for it, BTW, and doesn't hold a special title or capacity on the forum.

Unfortunately not much has changed between now and then. However, if you strongly believe that you have been wronged, I wouldn't let it go, seeing as how its a pretty large amount of money. To bring things back on topic, your case seems much more reasonable than OP's.
newbie
Activity: 119
Merit: 0
My Challenge to Stake’s Defenders: If you’re so confident in Stake’s integrity, prove me wrong. Meet me at the blackjack tables, or better yet, have Stake release my full betting and transaction history. I dare you.
May I ask you if you count cards when you play Blackjack games, because I'm not sure you can overcome the house edge of the games by counting cards at online casino thanks to the small portion of the shoe they deal in reality but if you get large bonuses, you can certainly make some profits in the long run from them. It could be the hidden reason why they have revoked your VIP bonuses in the same way as they limit stakes (and/or lock withdrawals) of good sport bettors actually, no?



Clarification on Card Counting and Gameplay

To address your question about card counting:  

1. Live Blackjack:
   Stake's live blackjack games are played with 8 decks, shuffled regularly, making traditional card counting ineffective.  

2. Original Blackjack:  
   The originals blackjack game uses an infinite deck, which resets after every hand. This setup eliminates any possibility of employing card counting strategies.  

Given these mechanics, card counting could never have influenced my gameplay or outcomes. My concerns are rooted in irregularities I observed, including rigged outcomes and discrepancies in wager tracking, not in any attempt to “beat the house” through prohibited strategies.  

Evidence and Exposure:  
I have substantial video evidence proving that Stake’s original blackjack is rigged, and I will provide this evidence in court if necessary. It’s time to shed light on these practices, and I welcome scrutiny.  

Message to Other Parties:  
To those engaging in side discussions, please move them to your own threads. This thread is dedicated to exposing Stake’s deceptive practices and highlighting the roles of individuals like holydarkness in defending these actions. Let’s stay focused.  

👑  
KingBJ21
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.

I feel like this member barely cares about his forum position. A person who can open a $44K position in a casino must have some hefty amount in their wallet and they barely care about a few hundred bucks which they can earn if they spend time on forums. I mean, the point is, if someone can earn a few thousand dollars a day by doing trade, why they would waste their time on a crypto forum and try to build up their account?

I have supported this guy's case and I expect you to visit his case again if you have some free time. Rollbit is at fault and I believe they should work with this guy to solve it. I understand they had no intention to scam, but they are responsible for this user's loss.


Thanks for your well input and belief in my case Shishir99, I really am. As you can see, it will be seen as resolved soon if it goes like this.

I have talked nothing but the truth, with every word with evidence.

Many people abstained from showing their opinion, I thank for your actions. I hope nutildah looks at my case in his/her free time and sees the reality of my situation.

I don't think he/she did, because they believe it is invalid; seen from the comments above.

I wish I had 10 smerits, I would send all of them to your comment; which summarizes the whole situation.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 530
What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.

I feel like this member barely cares about his forum position. A person who can open a $44K position in a casino must have some hefty amount in their wallet and they barely care about a few hundred bucks which they can earn if they spend time on forums. I mean, the point is, if someone can earn a few thousand dollars a day by doing trade, why they would waste their time on a crypto forum and try to build up their account?

I have supported this guy's case and I expect you to visit his case again if you have some free time. Rollbit is at fault and I believe they should work with this guy to solve it. I understand they had no intention to scam, but they are responsible for this user's loss.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have carreer here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.

What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.

I am not here for sig campaigns or anything; I am here to show people truth.

I engage and participated discussions prior to this incident as well, and will hopefully continue. However, some events here are making me reconsider my involvement in this forum. These events incl. accusations and foul speech. I am getting mobbed for speaking the truth.

Thanks for your advice, and hopefully see you in non-foul topics!
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have carreer here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.

What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Quote

Dude. Nobody, and I mean 100% nobody knows me, or even cares about anything I ever have had to do with casinos. I don't gamble online. My signature may signify otherwise, but that's called a signature campaign. I'm not required to gamble to earn BTC from posting here.

BTW, it doesn't even matter that I'm on DT2. I would be on DT1, but I self-excluded myself long ago to make my life here easier without constant pms and such from whiny little fcks like you about any kind of ratings or opinions etc etc. I never asked anyone to promote me to DT2, it just happened. So that said, https://www.reddit.com/r/trailerparkboys/comments/13s0w1x/fuck_off_i_got_work_to_do/

I replied to nutildah, not you owlcatz.

I never said you gamble or not and it is not even something that matters; you abused your DT power by not even reading the thread and just gave your opinion that ‘I oppose, because you hate money’. Look who is next to you on opposers, all of rollbit clownteam? Does this tell you what you look like from outside? You call me a whiny little fck? You act like a irresponsible 15 yo kid. Trailer Pak Boys, huh?

If you can’t add merit to a argument you might as well not tell your opinion or engage in a conversation. Just my 2 cents.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Quote
While I don't think your case will reach some sort of resolution based on discussion on this forum (same goes with OP's situation, to bring things back on topic), you can still go one to have some sort of career here. There's probably more discussion about bitcoin gambling and casinos here than any other single website.

Hello nutildah,

First, the reason why it is not going to be resolved (in your words) is not because the case isn’t solid or worthy; it is because of how sold out some people are in this forum. Plus the soldiers of Rollbit Razer attacking me and de railing my topic. I will keep on pushing, don’t worry about it.

Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have career here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.

Dude. Nobody, and I mean 100% nobody knows me, or even cares about anything I ever have had to do with casinos. I don't gamble online. My signature may signify otherwise, but that's called a signature campaign. I'm not required to gamble to earn BTC from posting here.

BTW, it doesn't even matter that I'm on DT2. I would be on DT1, but I self-excluded myself long ago to make my life here easier without constant pms and such from whiny little fcks like you about any kind of ratings or opinions etc etc. I never asked anyone to promote me to DT2, it just happened. So that said, https://www.reddit.com/r/trailerparkboys/comments/13s0w1x/fuck_off_i_got_work_to_do/
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Quote
While I don't think your case will reach some sort of resolution based on discussion on this forum (same goes with OP's situation, to bring things back on topic), you can still go one to have some sort of career here. There's probably more discussion about bitcoin gambling and casinos here than any other single website.

Hello nutildah,

First, the reason why it is not going to be resolved (in your words) is not because the case isn’t solid or worthy; it is because of how sold out some people are in this forum. Plus the soldiers of Rollbit Razer attacking me and de railing my topic. I will keep on pushing, don’t worry about it.

Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have carreer here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
If... by some miracle, or as fate will it, a new evidence or incriminating situation arise or other case happen that make the DTs reconsider the old flag that you raised in the past, that they did not support because they couldn't at that time but can at that future time due to the development of the situation, you can always nudge me.

You're extremely good at this... To be honest with you, I hope a good casino offers you a job working as some sort of customer mediator, given you'd want to do that sort of thing professionally.

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

While I don't think your case will reach some sort of resolution based on discussion on this forum (same goes with OP's situation, to bring things back on topic), you can still go one to have some sort of career here. There's probably more discussion about bitcoin gambling and casinos here than any other single website.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1603
Yes, I'm an asshole
Hello holydarkness,

Two adress your two things;

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

Secondly, DaveF gave examples from ToS which Rollbit already ‘accepted the terms ’ by compansating players which falsifies his whole argument of ToS which Rollbit lacks any responsibility.

My case is far from over, even if Razer admits or not.

You say 1 month rule is put by you; for what? To pressurise me to silence?

THIRDLY, you are taking everything personal; please don’t. My message is to the whole forum who went silent for my case. I have and had no intention to disrespect your actions in this forum and won’t have one.

Flag has nothing to do with a case being resolved or not. That flag was opened by me to spread awareness on my case and rollbit. If you deem to act on it, you should demand every accuser to open flag and wait for it to solve; to finalize a case as resolved or unresolved. I have seen a few flags here. Please go ahead to my threads and count the supporters and a few ‘fake’ opposers.

Altough we had our differences, your friend AHOYBRAUSE said;

Quote
Hmm, not a fan of this user (sorry, but I am honest) but these words are actually on point and describe this whole dilemma perfectly.
If you offer something like trading an so on you simply can't make a short notice maintenance and strip the user of their ability to actually trade, there is no excuse for that. You either announce it before hand (not just 10min) or you simply stop the possibility to trade a fixed time before the maintenance starts so that no user has a disadvantage.
Of course he is asking for a reimbursement, I don't understand why there is even a discussion about that. Ignoring him is such a bad example and not acceptable. I hope this gets resolved but looking at the history of replies from Razor in this forum I wouldn't count on it.

He was talking about Blossom15’s comment. This summarizes everything perfectly.

I thank AHOYBRAUSE for his genuine comment, I have found in my original Maintenance Scam thread.

That’s why I opened a new thread about it. To summarize. As Shirshir99 said in my last post; No one is reading long texts.

People can oppose or not support the flag and still believe I deserve compansation. If you make my case unresolved due to the flag, you will silence me; which makes Saint-Loup’s opinion valid.


As we are on an agreement that the discussion about your situation should be keep in your own thread and away from other topic, I hope we can reach a mutual understanding that this is [hopefully] the last time I address your matter here or other threads about other matters [of someone else's, just to be clear] and will continue the topic on your own thread, as I have to say that though this is where we should end our talk about your issue, some matters are indeed interesting and need to be addressed. So, I'll jump to your thread right after this, only finishing out one or two matter here, as they do belong to this thread, to clear the air.

The thing I want to dissect here to leave no room for any doubt or other people to twist into a different narrative is the one month "rule", as it is actually not a rule and I am not "placing" it as a means like you perceived; to pressurize you. I've covered the reason of this "timer" on previous post, if I may quote myself,

[...]
Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.[...]

To further emphasize, DT are usually quick [yet thoughtful] in taking action against or in favor to a flag. Especially when that flag has been announced on Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!, as yours did.

Given you've also create your own thread on repu to announce the flag and request for support, I think it's safe to say most of the DT are already aware of your flag. The low traction [as I've mentioned somewhere in the past] is probably because they choose to abstain, because --like me-- they can see from both perspective for this case, and they can't support or oppose the flag as it'll violate the clause they entered upon taking action for that flag.

With this in mind, would it not be valid to question what is the proper timeline to wait for other DT to notice, to decide, and to take action? One month? One year? One week? Thus, the safest period that crossed my mind was one month [one and a half month, give or take couple of days, to be exact]. And that is not to pressurize you, it is simply because I am failed to see what would two or three months or one semester would do, if most of the DTs have already made their decision.

It'll just put you in a misery of waiting and hoping for more support [suppose the flag does not go active].

So, why do we need to inflict that while one month is "enough"? And we can close it, for your sake, so you can start taking a path of closure.

Hopefully you can see what I had in my mind when I proposed it.

If... by some miracle, or as fate will it, a new evidence or incriminating situation arise or other case happen that make the DTs reconsider the old flag that you raised in the past, that they did not support because they couldn't at that time but can at that future time due to the development of the situation, you can always nudge me.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
I've seen your other post on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

Two things: one, it would be advisable to keep a discussion about your thread in your thread, we're going OOT here.

Two, I can understand that you're trying to get a support from someone who currently questioning how status are made on my list. Though IMHO you, accidentally or not, put me in a bad place and add more seasoning to the pot during your attempt, I would appreciate if you tell the current situation of your case as what really and currently happens.

holydarkness does not and will not count your case as resolved as per his sole decision, as what your paragraph seemingly try to depict. And yes, it isn't resolved, that's why he refused to comply to your original demand to mark it as unresolved because Rollbit's final call is not what you preferred it to be, despite my attempt to get it retried second time by contacting Razer about it, and third time while I once again reach him and wrote to ask for his re-re-reconsideration.

During this time, while we wait for Razer's reply, you wrote and asked for your case to be marked as unresolved because you believe that is the appropriate status, and I explained why I can't do that as well as --and this is the most important point-- I'll leave it to the DT to make the call. DT, through the flag. holydarkness is not the one who "count" it as resolved, he let the DT use their voting power through your flag.

Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.

But, just in case that some are busy and wasn't able to read your whole situation yet or needed time to decide... end of January.

Rather different than what your post conveyed, isn't it?

[...]
[...]

Holydarkness, I have PM’d you.

Since you left my thread, what will be your update about this situation? My situation shouldn’t be “in progress” it should be unresolved.

Best regards.

And why should it be marked as unresolved? Because the case didn't end well from your side? If we may turn the situation, shouldn't the case be marked as "resolved", given they've gave you explanation, got it retried, gave you an even longer explanation that justify their action?

I am still with "in progress" due to what I show you on my last post on your thread. Depending on Razer's reply [or no reply], I'll wait for a month [suppose he stand firm with both of his feet] to see the general consensus of the DTs on your flag. And will mark the case according to their ruling. As I said, this thread is not authoritarian, it is not up to me to decide what status is on what case, nor the accuser's. It follows the forum's decision.

So, to make things simple, by January 31st, if the case is still open due to no-response from Razer, and your flag is active, which tell us that the DTs think you're the one being wronged here, I'll mark it as unresolved.

[...]

Hello holydarkness,

Two adress your two things;

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

Secondly, DaveF gave examples from ToS which Rollbit already ‘accepted the terms ’ by compansating players which falsifies his whole argument of ToS which Rollbit lacks any responsibility.

My case is far from over, even if Razer admits or not.

You say 1 month rule is put by you; for what? To pressurise me to silence?

THIRDLY, you are taking everything personal; please don’t. My message is to the whole forum who went silent for my case. I have and had no intention to disrespect your actions in this forum and won’t have one.

Flag has nothing to do with a case being resolved or not. That flag was opened by me to spread awareness on my case and rollbit. If you deem to act on it, you should demand every accuser to open flag and wait for it to solve; to finalize a case as resolved or unresolved. I have seen a few flags here. Please go ahead to my threads and count the supporters and a few ‘fake’ opposers.

Altough we had our differences, your friend AHOYBRAUSE said;

Quote
Hmm, not a fan of this user (sorry, but I am honest) but these words are actually on point and describe this whole dilemma perfectly.
If you offer something like trading an so on you simply can't make a short notice maintenance and strip the user of their ability to actually trade, there is no excuse for that. You either announce it before hand (not just 10min) or you simply stop the possibility to trade a fixed time before the maintenance starts so that no user has a disadvantage.
Of course he is asking for a reimbursement, I don't understand why there is even a discussion about that. Ignoring him is such a bad example and not acceptable. I hope this gets resolved but looking at the history of replies from Razor in this forum I wouldn't count on it.

He was talking about Blossom15’s comment. This summarizes everything perfectly.

I thank AHOYBRAUSE for his genuine comment, I have found in my original Maintenance Scam thread.

That’s why I opened a new thread about it. To summarize. As Shirshir99 said in my last post; No one is reading long texts.

People can oppose or not support the flag and still believe I deserve compansation. If you make my case unresolved due to the flag, you will silence me; which makes Saint-Loup’s opinion valid.
newbie
Activity: 357
Merit: 0
My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

Problem with HolyDarkness is that he is an incompetent self-proclaimed legal adviser clown!

What our self-proclaimed legal adviser clown forgot to do is to take a look at Art. 3 GDPR Territorial scope of the articles he quoted to "justifiy" that a Stake victim has to submit personal documents to an illegal and criminal online casino operation to get the data he is entitled to get!

Quote from: Art. 3 GDPR Territorial scope
1. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the (European) Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not.

2. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to:

(a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or
    
(b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.

Point 1)

An illegal and criminal online casino operation can not have a legal establishment by law and the European Union GDPR articles are not applicable here!

Point 2)

A victim of an illegal and criminal online casino operation is not obligated by law to submit personal documents to the offender!

Point 3)

Even if you hallucinate that Stake is a legal establishment (quote non), the quoted GDPR articles are still not applicable, because:

1) The processor or controller is in Australia and Serbia, which are not part of the European Union.

2) The subject is in India, which is not part of the European Union.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1603
Yes, I'm an asshole
I've seen your other post on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

Two things: one, it would be advisable to keep a discussion about your thread in your thread, we're going OOT here.

Two, I can understand that you're trying to get a support from someone who currently questioning how status are made on my list. Though IMHO you, accidentally or not, put me in a bad place and add more seasoning to the pot during your attempt, I would appreciate if you tell the current situation of your case as what really and currently happens.

holydarkness does not and will not count your case as resolved as per his sole decision, as what your paragraph seemingly try to depict. And yes, it isn't resolved, that's why he refused to comply to your original demand to mark it as unresolved because Rollbit's final call is not what you preferred it to be, despite my attempt to get it retried second time by contacting Razer about it, and third time while I once again reach him and wrote to ask for his re-re-reconsideration.

During this time, while we wait for Razer's reply, you wrote and asked for your case to be marked as unresolved because you believe that is the appropriate status, and I explained why I can't do that as well as --and this is the most important point-- I'll leave it to the DT to make the call. DT, through the flag. holydarkness is not the one who "count" it as resolved, he let the DT use their voting power through your flag.

Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.

But, just in case that some are busy and wasn't able to read your whole situation yet or needed time to decide... end of January.

Rather different than what your post conveyed, isn't it?

[...]
[...]

Holydarkness, I have PM’d you.

Since you left my thread, what will be your update about this situation? My situation shouldn’t be “in progress” it should be unresolved.

Best regards.

And why should it be marked as unresolved? Because the case didn't end well from your side? If we may turn the situation, shouldn't the case be marked as "resolved", given they've gave you explanation, got it retried, gave you an even longer explanation that justify their action?

I am still with "in progress" due to what I show you on my last post on your thread. Depending on Razer's reply [or no reply], I'll wait for a month [suppose he stand firm with both of his feet] to see the general consensus of the DTs on your flag. And will mark the case according to their ruling. As I said, this thread is not authoritarian, it is not up to me to decide what status is on what case, nor the accuser's. It follows the forum's decision.

So, to make things simple, by January 31st, if the case is still open due to no-response from Razer, and your flag is active, which tell us that the DTs think you're the one being wronged here, I'll mark it as unresolved.

[...]
Pages:
Jump to: