Topic: Stake.com - The Good, the bad, the ugly... - page 2. (Read 573 times)
Seems like OP is a little rough on Stake. It’s hard to knock them just because you didn’t hit a max win on one of their games. Luck could have easily sent that the other way. Also, I think there are a lot of great things about Stake other than just their withdrawals. They have a huge selection of games to play and a wide range of sporting events always available. I think that is more important than the speed of a withdrawal.
Weldon on your personal review about stake you indeed took the time to give an indebt analysis on the good the bad and the ugly side of the world leading cryptocurrency casino.
What is missing in your review is some fact evidence of your experience, you should include screenshots of all the basic features of stake that you used and mentioned above, at least, that will give your review some level of credibility from all side.
What is missing in your review is some fact evidence of your experience, you should include screenshots of all the basic features of stake that you used and mentioned above, at least, that will give your review some level of credibility from all side.
Yeah I agree. What's bad about this kind of review that has no screenshots or absent of evidence is they are going to add and will overlook some point and most of the time they will add based on other players' experience.
Even a screenshot of his claim that he is a gold member is good start to make us believe that some part of what he is saying is true.
Your review makes a lot of sense op. Stake is definitely not as amazing as it once was, but it's still a great site to gamble in thanks to their quick deposit and withdrawal speeds along with minimal fees.
However, I disagree with your opinion about their originals being rigged since I have observed some players win big in plinko etc. Only some gamblers around the world get lucky enough to win humongous amounts through casino games.
However, I disagree with your opinion about their originals being rigged since I have observed some players win big in plinko etc. Only some gamblers around the world get lucky enough to win humongous amounts through casino games.
honestly the negative parts are not so negative...
their originals games are technically verifiable and not modifiable by the gambling house. the fact that in 3 years OP has not won has no statistical value and makes me wonder if he/She understand how difficult it really is to win a large share.
on the part of the bonus, as much as the lack of transparency is questionable, they are not violating any law. in fact, many other bookmakers do not have any type of similar reward.
and if they did not offer these bonus?
of course everyone would complain again...
their originals games are technically verifiable and not modifiable by the gambling house. the fact that in 3 years OP has not won has no statistical value and makes me wonder if he/She understand how difficult it really is to win a large share.
on the part of the bonus, as much as the lack of transparency is questionable, they are not violating any law. in fact, many other bookmakers do not have any type of similar reward.
and if they did not offer these bonus?
of course everyone would complain again...
First of all, OP, thank you, and you gave reviews or insight according to your experience of playing at stakes casino for a couple of years. The sides that you gave a view from good, bad, and ugly are good.
And all of what you said may or may not be true. Then maybe all casinos have their weak points that can really be said. Now, based on your story, the only thing missing is that you didn't show proof that those experiences of yours are real. You are the one I see lacking.
And all of what you said may or may not be true. Then maybe all casinos have their weak points that can really be said. Now, based on your story, the only thing missing is that you didn't show proof that those experiences of yours are real. You are the one I see lacking.
I have quit playing massively at Stake which I used to play almost everyday because I also think that things has changed a lot internally. I used to win huge amounts there from time to time and the losing sessions were not as consecutive as 6 months without a single win in any slot, I mean a decent amount and therefore unless they don't show a good audit report from an independent party regarding slot machines I will not be playing there anymore slots, only poker and sport betting. There is no need to lose money in the most worthless of ways.
You do the right move on quitting the casino if you already feel that you are not winning anything. I’m not suggesting that Stake has rigged games which is the reason for your losses rather you are not enjoying the game in there since you already have bad speculation on the casino which always make you frustrated to play on that casino anymore.
We have different preferences and it’s normal to experience losing streak since you experience to have huge win before. The RTP of the casino games dictates that you will win less to your original bankroll in the long run which means all your previous winning will surely loss if you keep playing since that’s how RTP works on game that has negative EV.
Most important on gambling is you enjoy that’s why I said that you do the right thing so that you can move on.
I have quit playing massively at Stake which I used to play almost everyday because I also think that things has changed a lot internally. I used to win huge amounts there from time to time and the losing sessions were not as consecutive as 6 months without a single win in any slot, I mean a decent amount and therefore unless they don't show a good audit report from an independent party regarding slot machines I will not be playing there anymore slots, only poker and sport betting. There is no need to lose money in the most worthless of ways.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The ugly:
The ugliest thing about Stake is their non transparency.
This non transparency leaks into their bonus formulas, release dates,
How come this feature makes the ugliest thing on Stake. I also ask about the formula computation of bonuses in the past but it’s not a big deal anymore since I consistently receiving bonus. You can speculate on what is the formula consideration if you are a regular player.
The hidden formula and release date add to the element of surprise on playing at Stake.
Quote
and reasoning behind randomly closing accounts and keeping funds.
Stake only keep the funds that accumulated through the due to the violation. The deposit amount always being refunded to affected user besides all casino doesn’t fully disclose the detail of the violation aside from the general terms that being violate.
You in this casino world, when some or a gambler is not favoured because of his or her cheating and got nuked then they would come to the public and create article on the casino company. And when you look into those cases, you will discover that they are even at fault.
I agree to disagree because it's a 50-50 situation tbh, sometimes players could cook up stories just to try and dent the casino's name in trying to get even with the casino when they are actually in the wrong, and sometimes these reputation damaging articles are from real players that haven't had a fair hearing because some of these casino's/sportsbooks just don't give a **** about what the public thinks of them as they have a good customer base and think they are invisible.Sometimes such reviews just don't follow from cheating customers; there are also some real customers that some casinos don't treat very well, and out of the frustration they get from the casino service, they pure it all in long reviews to express how disappointed they are on that casino and earn others of such.
Agreed!!Business 101, it's not always about the 99% positive reviews...as a business you need to take interest in what the 1% are saying because sooner or later that 1% grows to become the 99% and it will be too late for turning a deaf ear on genuine concern's.
Any type of complaint that is voiced must still be accommodated to be reviewed for its truth and a conclusion can be drawn if both parties confirm and state all their respective arguments. The 1% is always bombarded by supporters who hold the 99% so that it is considered weak and finally even though the 1% can backfire on the opposing party.
Talking about the Stake originals spilled by OP is actually difficult to prove, but based on personal experience it is indeed not according to what is watched but I will not judge the casino considering that gambling is our own responsibility when determining where to play.
Exactly since its every opinion must be heard since we cannot erase the certain facts that there are people will write their experience on the casino they mentioned. Even though they are reputable there are really things or actions that discourage people that's why some people here posting their disappointment towards them.
Although we really need to verify each complaint but we should not get blinded with long years and reputation display since there are reputable casino turn into a scam. But in case of Stake I think everything still fine with their end. This case is maybe made up because OP is just frustrated with the result he encountered with Stake. So for now if there's no other information to validate or back up his claims that statement will remain unproven and for sure lots of people will not validate any accusation with no good supporting documents posted.
I have seen non stop stretches where there losses that are not normal especially at games where the odds are supposed to be 50/50 ie.
No, the house edge of Dice at Stake is 1% which translates as 99% Return To Player but the odds are 49/51 in favour of Casino. The bonus structure on stake also is highly confusing. They hand out a weekly reward where it seems the formula changes from week to week. There could be some weeks where you wager 30k and get a 70$ rest and others where you wager 60k but only get 50$. It confuses players a lot. The monthly reward they give out is also give it at random times within the month so it also leaves players confused.
The ugly:
The ugliest thing about Stake is their non transparency.
This non transparency leaks into their bonus formulas, release dates, and reasoning behind randomly closing accounts and keeping funds. Despite having an array of different games (one of their pluses) to choose from, they never seem to win... ever. Stake's interface is pleasant on the eyes and easy to navigate, however there are times it experiences glitches, such as balance not being displayed properly or slow down during a slot. As stake has gotten bigger and bigger it seems like will all things, the quality has gone down. This once top notch site has slowly been on the decline in players eyes and has such is just a former shell of itself.
If you want to get rewarded for your high wagers, then join the Metawin. I'm not saying this because I promote the website, no, just try it yourself and thank me later The ugly:
The ugliest thing about Stake is their non transparency.
This non transparency leaks into their bonus formulas, release dates, and reasoning behind randomly closing accounts and keeping funds. Despite having an array of different games (one of their pluses) to choose from, they never seem to win... ever. Stake's interface is pleasant on the eyes and easy to navigate, however there are times it experiences glitches, such as balance not being displayed properly or slow down during a slot. As stake has gotten bigger and bigger it seems like will all things, the quality has gone down. This once top notch site has slowly been on the decline in players eyes and has such is just a former shell of itself.
They have a VIP transfer available and special Salon Lounge for VIP members. They also have Web3 wallet support and claim that you are able to deposit and withdraw up to 30 ETH per day in less than 60 seconds, without a pesky human interaction.Btw the quality goes down because they generate enormous money and doesn't seem to hire many new employees. They are investing lots of money in streamers and marketing overall.
This seems like an honest review of someone who is active on Stake regularly. In terms of transparency (as this was your ugly about Stake), I think you need to join some of their social media channels or forum. I am not a regular customer however I have seen so much of promotions of their events and release dates etc. that you are talking about in my social media feed. Not sure how you can miss it by being a regular player.
Nice write up though, try it for other platforms too.
Nice write up though, try it for other platforms too.
This is my honest review of Stake. I am a Gold member and play usually everyday.
If your Stake username is same as your Bitcointalk forum username, then you have already become a Platinum 1 ranked user on Stake. Your lifetime wager is $110k, where $250k wagering is required to reach platinum 1 rank. Looks like your sports betting wagering has boosted your VIP rank.
Quote
The bonus structure on stake also is highly confusing. They hand out a weekly reward where it seems the formula changes from week to week. There could be some weeks where you wager 30k and get a 70$ rest and others where you wager 60k but only get 50$. It confuses players a lot.
Different games have different contributions towards the bonuses at Stake. They also consider the wagering activity from deposits, and users weekly or monthly PnL stats. Still, the bonus parameters of Stake is indeed mysterious. I have similar experience like you about Stake bonuses. Anyway, Stake in-house games aren't rigged. 
You in this casino world, when some or a gambler is not favoured because of his or her cheating and got nuked then they would come to the public and create article on the casino company. And when you look into those cases, you will discover that they are even at fault.
I agree to disagree because it's a 50-50 situation tbh, sometimes players could cook up stories just to try and dent the casino's name in trying to get even with the casino when they are actually in the wrong, and sometimes these reputation damaging articles are from real players that haven't had a fair hearing because some of these casino's/sportsbooks just don't give a **** about what the public thinks of them as they have a good customer base and think they are invisible.Sometimes such reviews just don't follow from cheating customers; there are also some real customers that some casinos don't treat very well, and out of the frustration they get from the casino service, they pure it all in long reviews to express how disappointed they are on that casino and earn others of such.
Agreed!!Business 101, it's not always about the 99% positive reviews...as a business you need to take interest in what the 1% are saying because sooner or later that 1% grows to become the 99% and it will be too late for turning a deaf ear on genuine concern's.
Any type of complaint that is voiced must still be accommodated to be reviewed for its truth and a conclusion can be drawn if both parties confirm and state all their respective arguments. The 1% is always bombarded by supporters who hold the 99% so that it is considered weak and finally even though the 1% can backfire on the opposing party.
Talking about the Stake originals spilled by OP is actually difficult to prove, but based on personal experience it is indeed not according to what is watched but I will not judge the casino considering that gambling is our own responsibility when determining where to play.
This is a nice write-up, but why should I believe everything you say using a brand-new account? With the way you wrote this up, it looks like you are not a newbie at all, what are you hiding anyway?
Your "randomly closing account" accusations are something I've never witnessed from Stake as I am a strong user of the platform, too; this has never happened to me once; I guess you have done some things wrongly.
The only part that sounds true is how often you win on Stake and this isn't that different from other online casinos too, it got to a stage where I thought something was wrong and I abandoned Stake for a few weeks and moved into another casino but the result isn't that big, I later went back to keep using Stake.
Your "randomly closing account" accusations are something I've never witnessed from Stake as I am a strong user of the platform, too; this has never happened to me once; I guess you have done some things wrongly.
The only part that sounds true is how often you win on Stake and this isn't that different from other online casinos too, it got to a stage where I thought something was wrong and I abandoned Stake for a few weeks and moved into another casino but the result isn't that big, I later went back to keep using Stake.
So what Casino do you now recommend as the best?
The one that ticks all your good Box.
I'm quite surprised how people find this place to do their reviews and most of the time
They never make a review to praise except it's a Casino people barely know.
You could just state this in their thread since you were able to locate this board
And see their response and response of other user
That would help know how concrete your facts are.
Why are people still using it.
Is it that stake loves them more than you
Or they just that smart.
The one that ticks all your good Box.
I'm quite surprised how people find this place to do their reviews and most of the time
They never make a review to praise except it's a Casino people barely know.
You could just state this in their thread since you were able to locate this board
And see their response and response of other user
That would help know how concrete your facts are.
Quote
Despite having an array of different games (one of their pluses) to choose from, they never seem to win... ever
if all these are so true Why are people still using it.
Is it that stake loves them more than you
Or they just that smart.
So in short, you are saying stake is bad, but for the sake of gaining attention, you also made a section about the “good” things stake offers. In that section also, you have mentioned how rudely stake freezes your winnings sometimes. I feel that if you win the games legitimately without exploiting any bugs, if you do deposit from legitimate sources, then no matter what you do in the stake account, your withdrawals will never be blocked. I have been playing at Stake for more than 5-6 years and till now not faced any single issue with them. Yes, the games might be slow, but there are always options to try the other games, right?
I can only agree that you may be blocked from your account and require additional verification in case of a large gain, and this is not accurate. In any casino, absolutely.
And as for the rest, I'm not sure, can you somehow back up everything you said? Or is it just a purely subjective opinion?
And as for the rest, I'm not sure, can you somehow back up everything you said? Or is it just a purely subjective opinion?
The Bad:
Stake originals! Stake originals! Stake originals! I wrote that three times to emphasize how terrible and rigged these games are. I have never had a big win in any of these games. I have played them pretty consistently for the last 3 years. Not once have I seen a max win like you see in those YouTube videos or streamers videos, instead I've seen quite the opposite. I have seen non stop stretches where there losses that are not normal especially at games where the odds are supposed to be 50/50 ie. Dice or limbo 1.2. In addition to this the max shot wins are few and far between. It seems those are reserved only for the streamers. The bonus structure on stake also is highly confusing. They hand out a weekly reward where it seems the formula changes from week to week. There could be some weeks where you wager 30k and get a 70$ rest and others where you wager 60k but only get 50$. It confuses players a lot. The monthly reward they give out is also give it at random times within the month so it also leaves players confused.
Stake originals! Stake originals! Stake originals! I wrote that three times to emphasize how terrible and rigged these games are. I have never had a big win in any of these games. I have played them pretty consistently for the last 3 years. Not once have I seen a max win like you see in those YouTube videos or streamers videos, instead I've seen quite the opposite. I have seen non stop stretches where there losses that are not normal especially at games where the odds are supposed to be 50/50 ie. Dice or limbo 1.2. In addition to this the max shot wins are few and far between. It seems those are reserved only for the streamers. The bonus structure on stake also is highly confusing. They hand out a weekly reward where it seems the formula changes from week to week. There could be some weeks where you wager 30k and get a 70$ rest and others where you wager 60k but only get 50$. It confuses players a lot. The monthly reward they give out is also give it at random times within the month so it also leaves players confused.
Those games aren't rigged, and they are provably fair, but getting big multipliers is complex, a good example of this is Plinko in the hard mode, getting the x999 has odds of 1/32000 or something like that, and getting the max multiplied on limbo or dice still complex as hell, you need to have a lot of luck to chase those multipliers.
And you can verify each of those bets and you can change the user seed to avoid the manipulation from the house side.
Weldon on your personal review about stake you indeed took the time to give an indebt analysis on the good the bad and the ugly side of the world leading cryptocurrency casino.
What is missing in your review is some fact evidence of your experience, you should include screenshots of all the basic features of stake that you used and mentioned above, at least, that will give your review some level of credibility from all side.
What is missing in your review is some fact evidence of your experience, you should include screenshots of all the basic features of stake that you used and mentioned above, at least, that will give your review some level of credibility from all side.
True, if you give a bad or good review, you should provide real evidence such as screenshots that show cheating or disappointment, because without evidence it can be said to be a lie that only wants to bring down the stake.
You in this casino world, when some or a gambler is not favoured because of his or her cheating and got nuked then they would come to the public and create article on the casino company. And when you look into those cases, you will discover that they are even at fault.
I agree to disagree because it's a 50-50 situation tbh, sometimes players could cook up stories just to try and dent the casino's name in trying to get even with the casino when they are actually in the wrong, and sometimes these reputation damaging articles are from real players that haven't had a fair hearing because some of these casino's/sportsbooks just don't give a **** about what the public thinks of them as they have a good customer base and think they are invisible.Sometimes such reviews just don't follow from cheating customers; there are also some real customers that some casinos don't treat very well, and out of the frustration they get from the casino service, they pure it all in long reviews to express how disappointed they are on that casino and earn others of such.
Agreed!!Business 101, it's not always about the 99% positive reviews...as a business you need to take interest in what the 1% are saying because sooner or later that 1% grows to become the 99% and it will be too late for turning a deaf ear on genuine concern's.
Jump to: