Topic: Stake.com - The Good, the bad, the ugly... - page 2. (Read 644 times)

That is the reason we have many other alternatives we can choose from at anytime because most of this reputable casinos could easily get carried away with the level of success attained and be led to act in arbitrary to the code of conducts, and also not being fair on some of the games and how the House edge are calculated on some game's.


I accept the truth that there is need for an independent audit on slot machine to assertain the accurate calibration of the the slot machine to offer gamblers a more Fair outcome or a conviction that everything is ok with the present alot machine.

What is the meaning of +1, because I have seen it on few comments around the Forum?

Back to topic of discussion.

The validity of any argument is based on the prevailing facts and evidence that is presented by the both parties and if the accuser failed in backing his point with evidence to prove his case, his argument may be discarded untill he is able to prove that Indeed he has a point to prove at any point, against that we have to be careful in our analysis of cases that comes up and let it not be as if we are too quick to support or make a judgement too fast that is why we always take time before making a stands against or for any case.

Our judgement should not be based on wether or not stake is guilty or not or even because stake is a well known casino here, but our judgement should be based of evidence presented by the ops to back up his claims.
Because that very important since the stake team won't be sharing any of such information because of their privacy policy.

This is on purpose, casinos like any other business want to increase their profits and one easy way to do this is by giving those seemingly random bonuses, as then gamblers will try to figure out the way to max it out, and during that process they will gamble more in order to do so, this is why I often recommend gamblers to not care about those bonuses, as in your desire to get them, you will spend way more money that whatever bonus any casino may give you.

I have to reply to this post three times as you classified them into the good, the bad and the ugly. Let's start with the good but I will not cover the ones you did not add any fault.

First, it would have been more relevant if you were an established member of the forum, but for you to have a single post on this account, I will not be fooled to believe this, the world is ugly enough to know that a big name like Stake would have rivalry attacks and I wonder why you even mixed bad review with what you called good part of your review, why not wait for the bad and the ugly? I wonder what to expect later when I read the bad and the ugly reviews in the coming days.

As for the verification, it's a standard procedure that is even backed by law to ask for an additional one. The only case I can blame Stake is when you provided them with all the documents but still rejected them, thankfully, you never mentioned that. Just provide the needed document and you will be fine.

You will do well by adding proofs to back this up. If your account was locked a second time, that means you are insensitive, did you think they would not detect you were the first locked account? I know you won't state the true reason why the account was locked the first time, but it's easy for you to make it look bad.

OP I have no choice but to disagree.

1. If you have said that Stake have slow withdrawal or deposit you would have been bursted, this is the best part of Stake casino.

2. Coming from a new forum account, hell no.

3. There is no single evidence to back up your claim, not even a single screenshot.

How do you want people to take this very seriously?

---

If you are out of luck it is not the casino's fault, people do blame the casino if they start winning less and losing more but they forget that this is mathematical, here is a tip, if you don't like what you are getting you should stop using the casino and find another.

Seems like OP is a little rough on Stake. It’s hard to knock them just because you didn’t hit a max win on one of their games. Luck could have easily sent that the other way. Also, I think there are a lot of great things about Stake other than just their withdrawals. They have a huge selection of games to play and a wide range of sporting events always available. I think that is more important than the speed of a withdrawal.

Yeah I agree. What's bad about this kind of review that has no screenshots or absent of evidence is they are going to add and will overlook some point and most of the time they will add based on other players' experience.

Even a screenshot of his claim that he is a gold member is good start to make us believe that some part of what he is saying is true.

Your review makes a lot of sense op. Stake is definitely not as amazing as it once was, but it's still a great site to gamble in thanks to their quick deposit and withdrawal speeds along with minimal fees.

However, I disagree with your opinion about their originals being rigged since I have observed some players win big in plinko etc. Only some gamblers around the world get lucky enough to win humongous amounts through casino games.

honestly the negative parts are not so negative...

their originals games are technically verifiable and not modifiable by the gambling house. the fact that in 3 years OP has not won has no statistical value and makes me wonder if he/She understand how difficult it really is to win a large share.

on the part of the bonus, as much as the lack of transparency is questionable, they are not violating any law. in fact, many other bookmakers do not have any type of similar reward.

and if they did not offer these bonus?
of course everyone would complain again...

First of all, OP, thank you, and you gave reviews or insight according to your experience of playing at stakes casino for a couple of years. The sides that you gave a view from good, bad, and ugly are good.

And all of what you said may or may not be true. Then maybe all casinos have their weak points that can really be said. Now, based on your story, the only thing missing is that you didn't show proof that those experiences of yours are real. You are the one I see lacking.

You do the right move on quitting the casino if you already feel that you are not winning anything. I’m not suggesting that Stake has rigged games which is the reason for your losses rather you are not enjoying the game in there since you already have bad speculation on the casino which always make you frustrated to play on that casino anymore.

We have different preferences and it’s normal to experience losing streak since you experience to have huge win before. The RTP of the casino games dictates that you will win less to your original bankroll in the long run which means all your previous winning will surely loss if you keep playing since that’s how RTP works on game that has negative EV.

Most important on gambling is you enjoy that’s why I said that you do the right thing so that you can move on.

I have quit playing massively at Stake which I used to play almost everyday because I also think that things has changed a lot internally. I used to win huge amounts there from time to time and the losing sessions were not as consecutive as 6 months without a single win in any slot, I mean a decent amount and therefore unless they don't show a good audit report from an independent party regarding slot machines I will not be playing there anymore slots, only poker and sport betting. There is no need to lose money in the most worthless of ways.

How come this feature makes the ugliest thing on Stake. I also ask about the formula computation of bonuses in the past but it’s not a big deal anymore since I consistently receiving bonus. You can speculate on what is the formula consideration if you are a regular player.

The hidden formula and release date add to the element of surprise on playing at Stake.


Stake only keep the funds that accumulated through the due to the violation. The deposit amount always being refunded to affected user besides all casino doesn’t fully disclose the detail of the violation aside from the general terms that being violate.

Exactly since its every opinion must be heard since we cannot erase the certain facts that there are people will write their experience on the casino they mentioned. Even though they are reputable there are really things or actions that discourage people that's why some people here posting their disappointment towards them.

Although we really need to verify each complaint but we should not get blinded with long years and reputation display since there are reputable casino turn into a scam. But in case of Stake I think everything still fine with their end. This case is maybe made up because OP is just frustrated with the result he encountered with Stake. So for now if there's no other information to validate or back up his claims that statement will remain unproven and for sure lots of people will not validate any accusation with no good supporting documents posted.

No, the house edge of Dice at Stake is 1% which translates as 99% Return To Player but the odds are 49/51 in favour of Casino.

If you want to get rewarded for your high wagers, then join the Metawin. I'm not saying this because I promote the website, no, just try it yourself and thank me later They have a VIP transfer available and special Salon Lounge for VIP members. They also have Web3 wallet support and claim that you are able to deposit and withdraw up to 30 ETH per day in less than 60 seconds, without a pesky human interaction.

Btw the quality goes down because they generate enormous money and doesn't seem to hire many new employees. They are investing lots of money in streamers and marketing overall.

This seems like an honest review of someone who is active on Stake regularly. In terms of transparency (as this was your ugly about Stake), I think you need to join some of their social media channels or forum. I am not a regular customer however I have seen so much of promotions of their events and release dates etc. that you are talking about in my social media feed. Not sure how you can miss it by being a regular player.

Nice write up though, try it for other platforms too.

If your Stake username is same as your Bitcointalk forum username, then you have already become a Platinum 1 ranked user on Stake. Your lifetime wager is $110k, where $250k wagering is required to reach platinum 1 rank. Looks like your sports betting wagering has boosted your VIP rank.



Different games have different contributions towards the bonuses at Stake. They also consider the wagering activity from deposits, and users weekly or monthly PnL stats. Still, the bonus parameters of Stake is indeed mysterious. I have similar experience like you about Stake bonuses. Anyway, Stake in-house games aren't rigged.

+1

Any type of complaint that is voiced must still be accommodated to be reviewed for its truth and a conclusion can be drawn if both parties confirm and state all their respective arguments. The 1% is always bombarded by supporters who hold the 99% so that it is considered weak and finally even though the 1% can backfire on the opposing party.

Talking about the Stake originals spilled by OP is actually difficult to prove, but based on personal experience it is indeed not according to what is watched but I will not judge the casino considering that gambling is our own responsibility when determining where to play.

This is a nice write-up, but why should I believe everything you say using a brand-new account? With the way you wrote this up, it looks like you are not a newbie at all, what are you hiding anyway?

Your "randomly closing account" accusations are something I've never witnessed from Stake as I am a strong user of the platform, too; this has never happened to me once; I guess you have done some things wrongly.

The only part that sounds true is how often you win on Stake and this isn't that different from other online casinos too, it got to a stage where I thought something was wrong and I abandoned Stake for a few weeks and moved into another casino but the result isn't that big, I later went back to keep using Stake.

So what Casino do you now recommend as the best?
The one that ticks all your good Box.

I'm quite surprised how people find this place to do their reviews and most of the time
They never make a review to praise except it's a Casino people barely know.
You could just state this in their thread since you were able to locate this board
And see their response and response of other user
That would help know how concrete your facts are.


if all these are so true
Why are people still using it.
Is it that stake loves them more than you
Or they just that smart.