That user can keep his scam accusation thread bumping or if he wants, he can bump it in [LIST] Scam Accusation Cases Against Betting Platform on The Forum. holydarkness can help the user to follow up this case if he has time, that I believe he has good interest of following up scam accusation cases.
I agree with AHOY's recommendation, to keep things on his scam accusation threads [emphasized on the "s", the plural] and not here, but I have to disagree with your recommendation of him bumping it on that list thread, as,
Please note that it is intended as a summary of the accusations against gambling platforms that have ANN and representative on this forum. As it is intended to be a summary, it will be very much appreciated if discussion, debate, or any other things related to a case pointed out on this thread to be carried out on their respective thread to keep this one clean and tidy. [...]
besides, I've already put his latest complaint on the list,
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/09/bsZj2.jpeg
Now, for me helping the user... unfortunately that's something that I can't do. He's one of three [I think it's actually only two, so just him and someone else] user that I have to put on ignore.
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/09/bsnDc.jpeg
Reason? I helped his case once, and next time I heard from him [for other case, though still with Stake], I apparently twisted his words.
So yeah, to be sure that I will not accidentally perceived [in any way] as twisting his words, I am removing myself from all of his present and future cases, with a belief that other overseer will be more capable than me to cater his needs.
We can rest assured that I am still fulfilling my obligation of keeping the status of his cases on my list updated, though, as I frequently click the show/hide his posts to see if there anything that worth changing the status of the cases.
Edit: completing the thread with images, as talkimg is back and fully running
Why hasn’t my case been added to the list of scam accusations against Stake.com?
Here’s the link to my thread: Stake.com’s Rigged House Games - Unmasking the Flawed Math Behind Their “Fair”.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5517523
If you believe it’s invalid, I’d appreciate a direct explanation. Otherwise, please add it properly, as it raises significant concerns backed by statistical evidence and personal experiences.
It’s disappointing to see some individuals (holydarkness and others) actively downplaying legitimate issues while attempting to control the narrative. Ignoring valid concerns doesn’t erase the fact that Stake operates with questionable practices, such as promoting illegal deposit methods, rigging games, and retaliating against users.
This isn’t about personal disputes—it’s about accountability for their actions.