Stake.com explosive rise includes significant success in 2020 and 2021 to be precise during the pandemic. Referring to Stake.com which is referred to as a subsidiary of Primedice which was founded by Craven and Tehrani, of course when Stake.com was founded there was no longer any Freeman intervention.
The problem with the lawsuit is that it focuses on Primedice revenue. Initially, Freeman got a 20% stake in Primedice. I think when a business is big and has grown, it's no wonder Freeman demands to take part. Unfortunately, the lawsuit does not apply to Stake.com. there is a fairly clear dividing line in how Freeman
does not have the right to be involved in the earnings of Stake.com.
Under the pretext in the article,
Freeman claims that in 2016, he discussed the concept of a cryptocurrency casino with his business partners, but Tehrani and Craven allegedly rejected it due to potential regulatory issues.At this time the concept is not validated and not having a patent is a problem. So when these ideas are imitated, Freeman must prove the validity of the data, proof of official statements, documents, and validation. If there is no incriminating evidence, I think Stake.com is clear of accusations.
This is an internal problem that I think does not have an impact on players, even though the claim is true, Stake.com reputation is still safe
Except for the problem between stake and players, maybe it will be a little disturbing because the player is the most sensitive problem.
From this case, I know who the owner Stake.com is and how this company was launched
Players won't be bothered and for those who can play, make deposits/withdraws, and have no issues with their accounts, it's still going well. I agree that Sake.com reputation is still secure.
does this have anything to do with the Everton match yesterday? 
