Topic: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Alfa Romeo F1 Team - page 69. (Read 277838 times)

-snip-

No bots are not 100% fool proof and simply flaging words, will not help. We are dealing with humans and they find innovative ways to evade bots. (Example : People can say things like, "Can someone t1p me or Please bl3$$ me... etc.. and bots will not pick that up)

If you give some validated community members the ability to spot beggars, they will be 100% fool proof, because you need 10 or 20 people to flag it and then to auto mute the beggar.

This is good idea and suggestion, as this made me remember just now that there was a time I wanted to bet on shot on Target for a football club match I was watching, I rushed down to stake which actually is one of my favorite casinos, and going to that match betting page, I could neither find shots on Target or shots in goal in the list of all available props to bet on.
So, personally, I also support this suggestion, adding this would be nice, gamblers have different reasons or aspect to which they choose to bet on a game, and different ways to, making things like this available to gamblers is always cool since it can attract players who like to bet on such type of props and so on.

Anways, let's hope that someone who is a top member of the stake board will comes across this suggestion, like it and take it up to the developers so that this can be implemented into qualifying games.

Well, his idea is a very good one but I feel his wordings made the idea a bit too complicated or confusing to understand.
In a more simple terms, I would say the Stake team introduce a bot, the same way it is done on telegram, they assign some words to the bot that the bot should detect as a ban word, when ever any user in the chat used any word that is in the list of the ban word, the bot can automatically warn that user to desist from using such word, and also list out all the words that are banned, this warning can be two or three times per user, and after the third time, if the user still makes use of any word that is a ban word, then the bit can automatically mute such for let's say, 3 hours, and if after 3 hours the user is unmuted, if the user uses a ban word again, the bot will again mute him or her for 6 hours, and if after that, the same user offend again, the bot will mute the user for 9 hours, next - 12 hours, next again - 15 hours and so on until the user can be muted for even 1 whole year if he or she continues to offend.

I think implementing such chat security feature will help the clean the stake community off every begger..
But on the other, Stake is really a big casino, and one thing about casinos that have become this big is that, it's always difficult for them to listen and implement ideas from their community, pretty hard and I don't think it has anything to do with laziness.

-snip-

-snip-

Also, don't forget to claim this month's monthly bonus link through their telegram channel or email. I've reduced my wagering and deposit in the last couple of weeks, but i'm still surprised that the bonus they gave went up from $14 to $22. 

Any policy from the casino may lead into complaints from those who are not agree with the policy.
I suggest it as an alternative to reduce the number of beggars in the chat room which I think more effective that muting users later.
Wagering $1000 or even $5000 is not that much, it can be achieved easily even for small players.
No one is forced to wager just for chat, if the main purpose is to have fun in gambling, they wont really care about the requirement to be able to participate in chat.

And don't you think that increasing the wager requirement for eligibility to participate in the chat room will also arouse another set of complaints? I am not an active player on stake, but I've sure played there a couple of times, if I am not mistaken, the current wager amount required for players to be able to participate in the chat is $1000 I think, or $500 dollars (not sure), there are many of stake users who are still struggling to achieve this wager requirement, and as a casino that wants more and more users, increasing the wager amount required to participate in the chat will only shut out the small gamblers completely, and this may also cause the to mover over to another casino where they are treated better.

Anyways, it's not in our hands to decide, I trust that if stake really wants to deal with the begging on the chat, they know whats best for them to do.
For me, I will still prefer muting a user for a certain amount of time.

I have been playing casino/slots for years and I think the provider that offers the highest multiplier is No limit City with multipliers up to x300000 but in fact I was wrong, I just realized that Stake.com with inhouse games offers crazy multipliers over 2,000,000 multipliers on the Mines game. last week one of the users in the chat room posted it and he won a multiplier x2,022,545 and I was even more surprised to find out that this was not the highest record because the highest record is x5,148,300 yeah maybe this is the max win because 3 users got it.

Valid argument. Increasing wagering requirements is definitely not the solution to this particular problem since it would amplify some other issues that you stated yourself. Someone suggested an AI solution which could be feasible.

AI is taking over the world these days in so many ways which is why a proper Stake AI designed to deal with beggars and other sitewide issues would help them greatly.

And don't you think that increasing the wager requirement for eligibility to participate in the chat room will also arouse another set of complaints? I am not an active player on stake, but I've sure played there a couple of times, if I am not mistaken, the current wager amount required for players to be able to participate in the chat is $1000 I think, or $500 dollars (not sure), there are many of stake users who are still struggling to achieve this wager requirement, and as a casino that wants more and more users, increasing the wager amount required to participate in the chat will only shut out the small gamblers completely, and this may also cause the to mover over to another casino where they are treated better.

...
I don't know why my monthly bonus is lower compared to my last weekly bonus.

Congrats on getting that x5000 max win in Lab of Lunacy. I've never had one in any slot game, but the potential winnings from a good bonus round can always be surprising.

Also, don't forget to claim this month's monthly bonus link through their telegram channel or email. I've reduced my wagering and deposit in the last couple of weeks, but i'm still surprised that the bonus they gave went up from $14 to $22. 

-snip-

Max Win Baby!!! Thank you Stake.com.

Does anyone else have issues with autobet on Stake Originals?
Their ddos protection always gets triggered just by using autobet.

The idea is basically good but I dont think it will work or I dont think Stake will implement it because I think is something complicated.
When it comes to "muting" users in chat, it is always become something debatable and there will be much complaints about it IMO.
When there are more than 70k users online at the same time, the chat goes like lightning and I'm sure no one can even monitor every single message on the chatroom.
Not quite sure how to control those beggars but I think they need to increase the wagering requirement to be able to chat in the global room as an alternative option.