Pages:
Author

Topic: StakeMiners: restricted withdrawals, falsified stats, insolvent. Do not invest! - page 9. (Read 12215 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Do you have access to the see what addresses the coins are being staked in so you can see the proof that staking is happening since you lit your $1 on fire.

Addresses are not posted on the website but they did post them a while ago on the GH forum. I did some digging and yes, they are staking but the total balance is less than the 107 BTC claimed on the site. Waiting for cyberpinoy to explain it.

https://forum.gethashing.com/t/pos-mining-stakeminers/3925/1232

Quote
Here are approximate current balances. I'm not familiar with any of these coins so please don't take this as a fact, feel free to double-check. Perhaps I googled up the wrong explorer or misplaced a zero after the decimal point or something.

Netcoin
19 million NET
40 BTC (Cryptsy 212 sat)
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/NET/address.php?address=nRAWBySK7wAm57biV9uNGASzWPZhsMPsQC1

OKCash
122k OK
0.2 BTC (Bittrex 150 sat)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ok/address.dws?PNffkgFynsUhzq7MJP2yXCpWh5HqNY5Yas.htm

HyperStake
1.6 million HYP
3.4 BTC (Cryptsy 216 sat)
http://hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address?address=p7vC2g61JMvguY5Pj9DtZJS6NK6Q5B5q4F

TEKcoin
226k TEK
5.7 BTC (Cryptsy 2500 sat)
https://www.blockexperts.com/tek/address/BjSZyef8BbVgdGCGViKJ6R3CEWfRMSn9tv

PayCon
408k CON
4.1 BTC (Cryptsy 1000 sat)
https://www.blockexperts.com/con/address/PVKVPfVB3yijNaL2jRPx9NPF2TjbwLAiTk

BitBean
7 million BITB
2.1 BTC (Cryptsy 30 sat)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/address.dws?2X8bqUvaSRkbkQ2MCnkjnoK2qWMLUNEpFj.htm

BottleCaps
252k CAP
3 BTC (Cryptsy 1175 sat)
http://cap.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address?address=Ev8nEYQaDMzKWd1WNvTVPcFmymVbEdrYWM

Diamonds
4.8k DMD
5.1 BTC (Cryptsy 107000 sat)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?dY4RBAxdyxycfFXXCRUgByta5oKio7zEV2.htm

Hyper
35k HYPER
10.5 BTC (Bittrex 30000 sat)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/hyper/address.dws?HLiszCKnW5fXPMp2VzizmDQTT1xiob46Jt.htm

Hobonickels
70k HBN
2.8 BTC (Cryptsy 4000 sat)
http://hbn.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address?address=F5Vcy6RZxHz1JVtSLZzsRsx2iMKFY2VMRw

Not sure about Ratecoin. StakeMiners website says "♦ WE WILL BE ADDING RATECOIN VERY SOON. ♦" and I couldn't find an address for it. I would assume it's not being staked yet unless @cyberpinoy would like to give us the staking address.

Ratecoin
805k XRA
4.8 BTC
(from wallet screenshot)

So the total is...
~ 77 BTC (added Ratecoin) ~ 82 BTC

Just a bit shy of 107 BTC displayed on the website. @cyberpinoy you're up. WOT is fine if you like.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
Do you have access to the see what addresses the coins are being staked in so you can see the proof that staking is happening since you lit your $1 on fire.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Meet the BOI. I don't think this part of the website is available without logging in:
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Well, I gave up on questioning and had to put some money into StakeMiners to try to figure out how it works.

Here are some interesting numbers. I put 0.005 BTC in a while ago and it still shows my invested amount as 0.005 BTC. I find it hard to believe that the value of altcoins has been so amazingly stable, so I have to assume that the invested amount shows the original investment and not the current value.

Which raises a few questions (likely rhetorical ones because @cyberpinoy doesn't care to respond whether you're a paying customer or not).

1) Does the total amount invested (~ 107 BTC currently) reflect the sum of original investments or the current value?

2) Why does the weight percentage (0.005% in my case) seem to reflect the current value (0.005 / 107 rounded to 3 decimal places) if the invested amount is stuck at the original investment? I invested when the total pool amount was much lower, so my % should be higher?

3) If I decide to withdraw would I be able to withdraw the original investment or the current value? In other words, in regards to dooglus' points in the following thread, what does StakeMiners consider as its liabilities?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12374284

There is actually a lot more I'd like to know but let's see if @cyberpinoy will consider it worthwhile responding before I consider it worthwhile digging further.



legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
In case you're wondering about the security of your account on StakeMiners.com please keep in mind that the website will send your password in clear text via e-mail when you create your account or when you need to reset your password. There is no 2FA and cyberpinoy will personally handle support requests, identifying accounts by their e-mail address. In a nutshell, it is prone to fairly basic social engineering attacks just by spoofing the "From" address.

Here is how cyberpinoy explains his choice of this security model:

https://forum.gethashing.com/t/pos-mining-stakeminers/3925/1076
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/pos-mining-stakeminers/3925/1090

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Here is how cyberpinoy explained why some withdrawals are not shown in the list of transactions on the StakeMiners.com website:

https://forum.gethashing.com/t/pos-mining-stakeminers/3925/1185



It appears though that cyberpinoy still wants your deposits. It's just the transparency hassle that he doesn't want.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
People.... Stop sending others your money!

Work for it yourself - don't believe anyone that says you can profit.... But wants you to pay them first. Earn it and keep it!
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Found your next community outreach project, did you?

Not much of a project, more of a monologue at this time.

There are two possibilities here I think:

1) Nobody cares, StakeMiners fades into oblivion.
2) StakeMiners becomes huge and this thread blows up into 2000 pages. j/k.
legendary
Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005
Found your next community outreach project, did you?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I highlighted another word/term. One entity's a company, whereas the other is just a notch above being ONLY a thread on some forum. BTW, you'll be in big, big, big trouble if you steal the latter's trademark thingies, perhaps registered in Taured.

I was going to ask cyberpinoy what exactly is StakeMiners, i.e. is it a business incorporated in Philippines? Vietnam? Kind of important for investors to understand who it is that they're are dealing with. My understanding so far is that StakeMiners is synonymous with Leroy Fodor as a person as I couldn't find any mention of any other legal entity. There is the BOI but it seems to be some kind of an advisory committee.

I hope cyberpinoy will answer this question.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
For some reason cyberpinoy doesn't seem to be interested in responding so I'll just go ahead and post what I can figure out myself.

StakeMiners Terms seem to have been copied from CEX.

To see this you can use a webpage comparison tool such as this http://www.copyscape.com/compare.php

Put https://cex.io/terms and https://stakeminers.com/terms.php in. Result:

Quote
   Compare Two Web Pages or Articles

    3,918 matching words were found:

    Item 2
    4,961 words total, 79% matched

So that's 79% of words copied from CEX, many parts verbatim except "CEX.IO" has been replaced with "STAKEMINERS.COM" etc. The parts that are specific to StakeMiners - e.g.  sections 8 and 9 - are poorly written and are inconsistent with the rest of the document. The parts that have been copied have not been reviewed to make sure they match StakeMiners structure and business model.

One example. CEX defines itself like this:

Quote
As used herein, “CEX.IO” refers to the company CEX.IO LTD., including but not limited to, its owners, directors, investors, employees or other related parties. Depending upon context, “CEX.IO” may also refer to the services, products, site, content or other materials provided by CEX.IO.

StakeMiners version:

Quote
As used herein, “Stakeminers.com” refers to the website Stakeminers.com including but not limited to, its owners, directors, investors, employees or other related parties. Depending upon context, “Stakeminers.com” may also refer to the services, products, site, content, equipment or other materials provided by Stakeminers.com.

I highlighted "investors" because this word means something else in StakeMiners context - it means the users depositing their coins, not the actual owners of the business. This undermines the whole premise of the terms as an agreement between two parties if the parties are not even defined correctly.

It is quite clear that StakeMiners terms have not been subject to any kind of proof-reading, let alone a review by a person with legal knowledge.



I highlighted another word/term. One entity's a company, whereas the other is just a notch above being ONLY a thread on some forum. BTW, you'll be in big, big, big trouble if you steal the latter's trademark thingies, perhaps registered in Taured.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I don't like it how he put the 'pinoy' word in his name because it tends to give us Filipinos a negative impression.
Cultural appropriation is all the rage these days  Undecided

Nah, suchmoon sent me a link on how disgusted this man (cyberpinoy) is to my fellow countrymen. I kind of like to punch him in his face for being so racist and acting so superior.



For some reason cyberpinoy doesn't seem to be interested in responding so I'll just go ahead and post what I can figure out myself.

StakeMiners Terms seem to have been copied from CEX.

To see this you can use a webpage comparison tool such as this http://www.copyscape.com/compare.php

Put https://cex.io/terms and https://stakeminers.com/terms.php in. Result:

Quote
   Compare Two Web Pages or Articles

    3,918 matching words were found:

    Item 2
    4,961 words total, 79% matched

So that's 79% of words copied from CEX, many parts verbatim except "CEX.IO" has been replaced with "STAKEMINERS.COM" etc. The parts that are specific to StakeMiners - e.g.  sections 8 and 9 - are poorly written and are inconsistent with the rest of the document. The parts that have been copied have not been reviewed to make sure they match StakeMiners structure and business model.

One example. CEX defines itself like this:

Quote
As used herein, “CEX.IO” refers to the company CEX.IO LTD., including but not limited to, its owners, directors, investors, employees or other related parties. Depending upon context, “CEX.IO” may also refer to the services, products, site, content or other materials provided by CEX.IO.

StakeMiners version:

Quote
As used herein, “Stakeminers.com” refers to the website Stakeminers.com including but not limited to, its owners, directors, investors, employees or other related parties. Depending upon context, “Stakeminers.com” may also refer to the services, products, site, content, equipment or other materials provided by Stakeminers.com.

I highlighted "investors" because this word means something else in StakeMiners context - it means the users depositing their coins, not the actual owners of the business. This undermines the whole premise of the terms as an agreement between two parties if the parties are not even defined correctly.

It is quite clear that StakeMiners terms have not been subject to any kind of proof-reading, let alone a review by a person with legal knowledge.



Wouldn't he be liable on plagiarism in this case? Because most of the words he used were only copy and pasted on his site. I doubt if cex.io would even bother to look at it though. A copy-pasted ToS is already a red flag, let alone the silence of this man who isn't responding to any queries targeted on him.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
I don't like it how he put the 'pinoy' word in his name because it tends to give us Filipinos a negative impression.
Cultural appropriation is all the rage these days  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Just a bit more context for my interest in StakeMiners TOS.

The site has been advertising itself as having "no fees". When I confronted cyberpinoy and one of his BOI members about "withdrawal fees" listed in the TOS I was told that these are not "fees" but withdrawal penalties, and the TOS has been since updated to say "penalties" instead of "fees". The structure of the fees has not changed though and it is impossible to avoid them, except perhaps with reinvestments - which is what I'm trying to clarify here.

Here is the fee penalty structure:

Quote
8.4. A Withdraw Penalty will be imposed for investors wishing to withdraw their investment with StakeMiners. The schedule for such a withdraw is as follows. Investments Withdrawn Within 30 days 30% Penalty, Investments Withdrawn Within 60 days 20% Penalty, Investments Withdrawn Within 90 days 10% Penalty, Investments Withdrawn Within 120 to 364 1/4 days 5% Penalty. Investments withdrawn after 365 days will receive a 2% Penalty. Penalties are Imposed because every person is penalized when a withdraw of the Principal must be made. In order to deter this we have imposed hefty penalties.

https://stakeminers.com/terms.php
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
For some reason cyberpinoy doesn't seem to be interested in responding so I'll just go ahead and post what I can figure out myself.

StakeMiners Terms seem to have been copied from CEX.

To see this you can use a webpage comparison tool such as this http://www.copyscape.com/compare.php

Put https://cex.io/terms and https://stakeminers.com/terms.php in. Result:

Quote
    Compare Two Web Pages or Articles

    3,918 matching words were found:

    Item 2
    4,961 words total, 79% matched

So that's 79% of words copied from CEX, many parts verbatim except "CEX.IO" has been replaced with "STAKEMINERS.COM" etc. The parts that are specific to StakeMiners - e.g.  sections 8 and 9 - are poorly written and are inconsistent with the rest of the document. The parts that have been copied have not been reviewed to make sure they match StakeMiners structure and business model.

One example. CEX defines itself like this:

Quote
As used herein, “CEX.IO” refers to the company CEX.IO LTD., including but not limited to, its owners, directors, investors, employees or other related parties. Depending upon context, “CEX.IO” may also refer to the services, products, site, content or other materials provided by CEX.IO.

StakeMiners version:

Quote
As used herein, “Stakeminers.com” refers to the website Stakeminers.com including but not limited to, its owners, directors, investors, employees or other related parties. Depending upon context, “Stakeminers.com” may also refer to the services, products, site, content, equipment or other materials provided by Stakeminers.com.

I highlighted "investors" because this word means something else in StakeMiners context - it means the users depositing their coins, not the actual owners of the business. This undermines the whole premise of the terms as an agreement between two parties if the parties are not even defined correctly.

It is quite clear that StakeMiners terms have not been subject to any kind of proof-reading, let alone a review by a person with legal knowledge.

legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I see that you are also having problems with Stake Miners. I've also been following that thread for long now. Gleb Gamow also tagged cyberpinoy as a scammer and a fraud. Idk why you guys still use Stake Miners.

I have sent you a pm just in case.
just take a look through this thread, i havent read through a good part of it myself, but gleb gamow seems to post in that thread he started quite frequently. now, i have no personal experience with stakeminers so i cant say anything, but if theres some fishy stuff going on (enough to warrant a post every hour in that scam accusation thread) i would suspect stakeminers isnt legitimate.

The mere fact that that thread is updated frequently (though I assume some of them are not about cyberpinoy) is enough to raise a red flag on StakeMiners and the owner itself. And as you can see in Gleb's thread, he points out the inconsistency on cyberpinoy's posts, and that alone is also very untrustworthy for me. I don't like it how he put the 'pinoy' word in his name because it tends to give us Filipinos a negative impression.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
I see that you are also having problems with Stake Miners. I've also been following that thread for long now. Gleb Gamow also tagged cyberpinoy as a scammer and a fraud. Idk why you guys still use Stake Miners.

I have sent you a pm just in case.
just take a look through this thread, i havent read through a good part of it myself, but gleb gamow seems to post in that thread he started quite frequently. now, i have no personal experience with stakeminers so i cant say anything, but if theres some fishy stuff going on (enough to warrant a post every hour in that scam accusation thread) i would suspect stakeminers isnt legitimate.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I see that you are also having problems with Stake Miners. I've also been following that thread for long now. Gleb Gamow also tagged cyberpinoy as a scammer and a fraud. Idk why you guys still use Stake Miners.

I have sent you a pm just in case.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
cyberpinoy, can we continue the discussion here as adults? I promise I won't be deleting anything from this thread (not self-moderated as you can see).
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Payouts are earnings paid to a bitcoin payout address

Withdraws are investment withdraws

Reinvestments are calculated earning which you have requested to be added to your deposited amount.

Investment withdraws have a penalty

Weekly payouts do not have a penalty or a fee.

Suchmoon you were asked not to post in this thread and as such all posts from you will be deleted. Respect is earned Suchmoon not freely given, i do apologize if you do not like this outcome, but you are involved in a huge Smear campaign against StakeMiners and myself and your motives are unclear so until we do know and understand what it is you are trying to accomplish I have no choice but to delete your posts and assume they have some hidden agenda of furthering your smear campaign you have against us. I do apologize sir.

TOS changes can only be made after approval of the BOI. We are addressing the TOS in the next BOI meeting.

I still don't see how that answers my question. Let me clarify. Does the withdrawal penalty apply to the reinvested amounts when those amounts are withdrawn at a later date? Could you please simply state:

"The withdrawal penalty DOES apply to all withdrawals, including withdrawals of reinvested amounts".

or

"The withdrawal penalty DOES NOT apply to withdrawals of reinvested amounts, it applies only to withdrawals of the original investment".

or something like that. Then I can ask a few follow-up questions and we can move on.

As for you deleting my posts - can you please specify which rule did I break now. This wasn't a cross-post or spam. It's not smearing you or StakeMiners in any way, just asking about your own TOS.

Please use this thread as a reference and give me the number of the rule that I violated:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657

The closest I could see is

Quote
26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.[e]

However you have not specified any particular rules when you started the thread. Can you do that now at least?
Pages:
Jump to: