Starting preliminary 0.94 testing - "Headless fullnode" - page 3.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote

Is there an option to increase the polling interval to, let's say, 10 second?

There is no command line argument for this purpose afaik. The current stance on this piece of code is that it works enough that we completely ignored it for the past few versions update. As such, I am completely unfamiliar with it.

There is also no plan to fix it or overhaul it, as blocks over P2P would require a C++ implementation of the Bitcoin P2P protocol, in which case all communications with Core would be handled straight from the backend and the Python code dropped entirely, which is another reason I've made a point of ignoring it for so long.

At any rate, if you feel adventurous, you can modify the Python hardcoded value. I think this line should do it:

https://github.com/etotheipi/BitcoinArmory/blob/ffreeze/ArmoryQt.py#L6391

Change nextBeatSec=1 to what you see fit. You can use decimal values to signify smaller time increments (i.e. 1.2 translates to 1200ms)

Quote

Or better still, could Armory open a single tcp connection to bitcoind and keep it open for
the duration of the session?

I don't think that's the default reactor behavior. Dropping the socket after every iteration is indeed expensive compared to a keep-alive model, but still marginal in the scope of a localhost connection. The issue isn't so much the amount of sockets opened than the less than stellar Python GC and the implication that no one in Python bothers with explicit clean ups.

Carlton Banks

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 3080

Quote from: trev on August 17, 2015, 08:22:49 PM

I like having Armory start bitcoind as a child process, and would prefer to not have to start it
myself, which is the work-around I have seen given in previous posts.

The code Armory uses to launch bitcoind as a child process is already flagged by the devs as starting to look a little stale and old. I'm not sure that they're planning to overhaul it for this particular release ("ffreeze" means "feature freeze" I think), but it will happen eventually. I also get unstable and/or buggy behaviour when Armory manages bitcoind, although not quite the same issues you're getting.

trev

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

I built the ffreeze version of Armory under Linux and am running it with bitcoind 0.11.0.
So far everything is working fine.

A minor issue happened when I restored a wallet from 0.92 and then
tried "Addresses->View Address Book". Armory threw the following exception:
File "ArmoryQt.py", line 3902, in execAddressBook
DlgAddressBook(self, self, None, None, None).exec_()
File "/home/userid/BitcoinArmory-ffreeze/qtdialogs.py", line 8133, in __init__
rowHeight = tightSizeStr(self.font, 'XygjpHI')[1]
File "/home/userid/BitcoinArmory-ffreeze/qtdefines.py", line 215, in tightSizeStr
fm = QFontMetricsF(QFont(obj))
TypeError: QFont(): argument 1 has unexpected type 'builtin_function_or_method'

However, I keep on getting popups about Armory losing it's connection to bitcoind.
(ERROR) Networking.py:359 - ***Connection to Satoshi client LOST! Attempting to reconnect...

In ~/.bitcoin/debug.log there are bezillions of lines like this...
....
2015-08-18 00:54:43 keypool reserve 1
2015-08-18 00:54:43 keypool return 1
....
It looks like Armory is polling bitcoind on 127.0.0.1:8332 once a second to get the chain state.
Each poll is a tcp connection; open and close.
The problem is that I get a bucket load of tcp TIME_WAIT entries. Eventually the system runs
out of socket resources, and then I think Armory thows the cannot connect popup.

Is there an option to increase the polling interval to, let's say, 10 second?
Or better still, could Armory open a single tcp connection to bitcoind and keep it open for
the duration of the session?

I like having Armory start bitcoind as a child process, and would prefer to not have to start it
myself, which is the work-around I have seen given in previous posts.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

bad_alloc means the process failed to allocate new memory. Most likely the code is trying to allocate a ridiculous amount of RAM (possibly some badly derserialized varInt).

Download the testnet chain and try to build that. Also, could you give me your first block file? (blk00000.dat)

m.fridge

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

I did a rebuild and rescan and now end up with "std::bad_alloc". I thought that my harddrive might have problems and used a usb drive for the armory datadir, where I got the same error. Any ideas what's wrong here?

Code:

[New Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 24368)]
[Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 24368) exited]
[New Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 24369)]
[Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 24369) exited]
-INFO  - 1439844030: (BlockUtils.cpp:1691) Loading block data... file 0 offset 0
[New Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 24370)]
-INFO  - 1439844030: (BlockUtils.cpp:395) reading blocks from file 0
[Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 24370) exited]
-ERROR - 1439844030: (BDM_mainthread.cpp:430) BDM thread failed: std::bad_alloc

"std::bad_alloc" is shown as a popup. After okay-ing it, armory exits normally according to gdb.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

This looks severe. Do a Help -> Rescan and see if it you get the same output.

m.fridge

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Quote from: goatpig on August 14, 2015, 06:17:33 PM

I fixed this issue in the last commit a couple days ago. Pull again and give it a spin.

The problem still exists with the latest version. Here is the log, where the crash seems to have another cause than before. I also got a popup saying "Cannot find block with hash".

Code:

-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:711) error grabbing block 0|0 in file #0, offset: 8, with a size of 285 bytes
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:715) error: std::bad_alloc
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:403) No block in DB at height 0
[Thread 0xaad70b40 (LWP 24086) exited]
[New Thread 0x93e6eb40 (LWP 24087)]
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:711) error grabbing block 1|0 in file #0, offset: 301, with a size of 215 bytes
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:715) error: std::bad_alloc
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:403) No block in DB at height 1
[Thread 0x93e6eb40 (LWP 24087) exited]
[Thread 0x94ff0b40 (LWP 24084) exited]
[New Thread 0x94ff0b40 (LWP 24088)]
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:2175) hit interruption marker from pull threads
[New Thread 0x934ffb40 (LWP 24089)]
[Thread 0x934ffb40 (LWP 24089) exited]
[Thread 0x94ff0b40 (LWP 24088) exited]
[Thread 0x959ffb40 (LWP 24085) exited]
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:602) --- feedSleep: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:605) --- workers: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:608) --- writeStxo: 0.000131 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:610) --- writeStxo_grabMutex: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:613) --- waitingOnSerThread: 0.004589 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:615) --- waitForDataToWrite: 0.872389 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:619) --- checkForCollisions: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:621) --- getExistingKeys: 0.023769 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:623) --- getNewKeys: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:625) --- getSSHHeadersLock: 1.7e-05 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:627) --- computeDBKeys: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:629) --- getSshHeaders: 5.6e-05 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:631) --- finalizeSerialization: 0.004755 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:636) --- serializeBatch: 0.007962 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:638) --- serializeSubSsh: 3.6e-05 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:640) --- waitOnSSHser: 0.004153 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:644) --- waitOnWriteThread: 1.9e-05 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:647) --- putSSH: 0.000573 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:649) --- putSTX: 0.000375 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:652) --- getnextfeed: 0.814203 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:654) --- inControlThread: 1.09172 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:658) --- cleanup: 0 s
-WARN  - 1439730764: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:660) --- finishCleanup: 0 s
-INFO  - 1439730764: (BDM_supportClasses.cpp:259) Done with side scan of wallet 
[Thread 0x947efb40 (LWP 24081) exited]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24083) exited]
-ERROR - 1439730764: (BDM_mainthread.cpp:430) BDM thread failed: Cannot find block with hash 
[Thread 0xabe84b40 (LWP 20427) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24090)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24090) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24091)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24091) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24092)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24092) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24093)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24093) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24094)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24094) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24095)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24095) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24096)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24096) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24097)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24097) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24098)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24098) exited]
[New Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24099)]
[Thread 0xacabfb40 (LWP 24099) exited]
[Thread 0xb7c0a940 (LWP 20123) exited]
[Inferior 1 (process 20123) exited normally]
(gdb) backtrace
No stack.
(gdb)

Searinox

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 100

Do you like fire? I'm full of it.

Yet another reason to anticipate 0.94. If I had the knowledge, I'd compile the source for Windows myself.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: Searinox on August 16, 2015, 03:39:39 AM

Although I am running on 0.93.2 I can report as much. My desktop has been running Armory for more than a year now and I've had no issues or crashes at all. Zero. My laptop however, is a different issue. Whenever I wake it up from days of inactivity, Armory quickly throws a "missing headers" error and quits, only to return with full functionality on next launch. At first I didn't know if it was an issue with sleep or just it not being able to keep up with bitcoind but today for the first time it happened on the desktop.

We had a power failure yesterday and after restoration there was no internet until just about now. During all this time Armory had been running uninterrupted. When the internet came back, bitcoind began catching up with a day's worth of blocks, and Armory threw the "missing headers" error.

Could you please investigate if there are issues with Armory keeping up with bitcoind when it's behind by say 2-3 days and suddenly it gets a chance to catch up?

I am re-reporting this in the ongoing bigger Armory thread to keep a 0.93 error off the 0.94 post but since you are investigating this now, I figured I'd mention it here as well.

That's a 0.93 specific issue that has been fixed in 0.94

0.93 can't tell the difference between a mangled block and a block in the process of being written to disk (which appears mangled when Armory reads it). 0.94 side steps the issue by rereading partial blocks at each iteration until the partials either fill up or a valid block further in the file extends the chain.

The true solution would be to listen on the new block P2P notification and grab data over the socket, but that's a whole new effort.

Searinox

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 100

Do you like fire? I'm full of it.

Quote from: goatpig on August 10, 2015, 05:11:12 AM

Quote from: qertoip2 on August 10, 2015, 03:10:43 AM

On the first run I got another error about missing headers, a suggestion to do a factory reset, and a forced close. I choose to not do a factory reset

This error marker is very aggressive, you shouldn't do a factory reset unless you run into it a few times in a row. I should do something about it really, at least not let it trigger on missing headers only.

Although I am running on 0.93.2 I can report as much. My desktop has been running Armory for more than a year now and I've had no issues or crashes at all. Zero. My laptop however, is a different issue. Whenever I wake it up from days of inactivity, Armory quickly throws a "missing headers" error and quits, only to return with full functionality on next launch. At first I didn't know if it was an issue with sleep or just it not being able to keep up with bitcoind but today for the first time it happened on the desktop.

We had a power failure yesterday and after restoration there was no internet until just about now. During all this time Armory had been running uninterrupted. When the internet came back, bitcoind began catching up with a day's worth of blocks, and Armory threw the "missing headers" error.

Could you please investigate if there are issues with Armory keeping up with bitcoind when it's behind by say 2-3 days and suddenly it gets a chance to catch up?

I am re-reporting this in the ongoing bigger Armory thread to keep a 0.93 error off the 0.94 post but since you are investigating this now, I figured I'd mention it here as well.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

I fixed this issue in the last commit a couple days ago. Pull again and give it a spin.

m.fridge

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Hi,

my previously reported bug (post #156 in this thread) has been fixed. Thanks for that! However, I've got new issues here:

When I first import a wallet before the database is built, then armory seems to stuck in an endless loop when beginning to scan transactions. The program consumes CPU and has high I/O, but it keeps staying at 4% scanning progress (even when running for one night).

When I first build the database and import the wallet afterwards, armory crashes when it comes to transaction scanning. Here is backtrace of such a crash:

Code:

[Thread 0xabcf0b40 (LWP 15657) exited]
[New Thread 0xabcf0b40 (LWP 15658)]
[Thread 0xabcf0b40 (LWP 15658) exited]
[Thread 0xab2ffb40 (LWP 15283) exited]
[New Thread 0xab2ffb40 (LWP 15659)]
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'LMDBException'
  what():  Failed to insert: need transaction

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 0xab2ffb40 (LWP 15659)]
0xb7fdda0c in ?? ()
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0xb7fdda0c in ?? ()
#1  0x65637845 in ?? ()
(gdb)

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: qertoip2 on August 10, 2015, 03:10:43 AM

On the first run I got another error about missing headers, a suggestion to do a factory reset, and a forced close. I choose to not do a factory reset

This error marker is very aggressive, you shouldn't do a factory reset unless you run into it a few times in a row. I should do something about it really, at least not let it trigger on missing headers only.

qertoip2

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: goatpig on August 09, 2015, 03:53:08 PM

Try the latest commit with your damaged DB.

It fixed the issue, thank you so much!

Although there was a minor glitch during the recovery.

On the first run I got another error about missing headers, a suggestion to do a factory reset, and a forced close. I choose to not do a factory reset.

On the second run it fully recovered (very quickly).

The logs:

Code:

git pull origin ffreeze
make clean
make

Code:

➜  BitcoinArmory git:(ffreeze) python ArmoryQt.py 
********************************************************************************
Loading Armory Engine:
   Armory Version:       0.93.99.1
   Armory Build:         a840b70352
   PyBtcWallet  Version: 1.35
Detected Operating system: Linux
   OS Variant            : ('LinuxMint', '17.1', 'rebecca')
   User home-directory   : /home/qertoip
   Satoshi BTC directory : /home/qertoip/.bitcoin/
   Armory home dir       : /home/qertoip/.armory/
   ArmoryDB directory     : /home/qertoip/.armory/databases
   Armory settings file  : /home/qertoip/.armory/ArmorySettings.txt
   Armory log file       : /home/qertoip/.armory/armorylog.txt
   Do wallet checking    : True
/home/qertoip/Projects/BitcoinArmory/armoryengine/Transaction.py:2675: SyntaxWarning: import * only allowed at module level
  def PyCreateAndSignTx_old(srcTxOuts, dstAddrsVals):
-INFO  - 1439193620: (BlockUtils.cpp:874) blkfile dir: /home/qertoip/.bitcoin/blocks
-INFO  - 1439193620: (BlockUtils.cpp:875) lmdb dir: /home/qertoip/.armory/databases
-INFO  - 1439193620: (lmdb_wrapper.cpp:446) Opening databases...
"sni-qt/19177" WARN  10:00:20.523 void StatusNotifierItemFactory::connectToSnw() Invalid interface to SNW_SERVICE 
-INFO  - 1439193620: (BlockUtils.cpp:1231) Executing: doInitialSyncOnLoad
-INFO  - 1439193620: (BlockUtils.cpp:1315) Total number of blk*.dat files: 318
-INFO  - 1439193620: (BlockUtils.cpp:1316) Total blockchain bytes: 42,500,991,204
-INFO  - 1439193620: (BlockUtils.cpp:1837) Reading headers from db
(ERROR) announcefetch.py:312 - Could not verify data in signed message block
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/qertoip/Projects/BitcoinArmory/announcefetch.py", line 304, in __runFetchSequence
    sig, msg = readSigBlock(digestData)
  File "/home/qertoip/Projects/BitcoinArmory/jasvet.py", line 589, in readSigBlock
    name = r.split(BEGIN_MARKER)[1].split(DASHX5)[0]
IndexError: list index out of range
-INFO  - 1439193626: (BlockUtils.cpp:1863) Found 369156 headers in db
-DEBUG - 1439193626: (Blockchain.cpp:214) Organizing chain w/ rebuild
-WARN  - 1439193627: (BlockUtils.cpp:1344) --- Fetching SSH summaries for 346 registered addresses
-INFO  - 1439193628: (BlockUtils.cpp:1357) Left off at file 316, offset 126056295
-INFO  - 1439193628: (BlockUtils.cpp:1360) Reading headers and building chain...
-INFO  - 1439193628: (BlockUtils.cpp:1361) Starting at block file 316 offset 126056295
-INFO  - 1439193628: (BlockUtils.cpp:1363) Block height 369133
-INFO  - 1439193628: (BlockUtils.cpp:345) parsing headers in file 316
-INFO  - 1439193628: (BlockUtils.cpp:345) parsing headers in file 317
-DEBUG - 1439193628: (Blockchain.cpp:214) Organizing chain w/ rebuild
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1400) Looking for first unrecognized block
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1404) Updating Headers in DB
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1691) Loading block data... file 316 offset 126056295
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:395) reading blocks from file 316
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:395) reading blocks from file 317
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1418) Wrote blocks to DB in 0.100643s
-WARN  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1114) Scanning from 368991 to 369213
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368993, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368991, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368992, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368994, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193629: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:2175) hit interruption marker from pull threads
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1458) checking scan integrity
-WARN  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1463) Top scanned block does not match top block header
-WARN  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1567) Issue is significant, attempting repairs
-INFO  - 1439193629: (BlockUtils.cpp:1579) Checking dupIDs from block 368992 onward

(python:19177): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_progress_configure: assertion 'value >= min && value <= max' failed
-ERROR - 1439193631: (lmdb_wrapper.cpp:1585) Block height exceeds DupID lookup table
-ERROR - 1439193631: (BlockUtils.cpp:1618) missing 1 block headers
-ERROR - 1439193631: (BDM_mainthread.cpp:430) BDM thread failed: Missing headers! This is unexpected, Armory will have to close. If the error persists, do a factory reset.

(python:19177): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_get_direction: assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed

(python:19177): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_get_direction: assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed


➜  BitcoinArmory git:(ffreeze) python ArmoryQt.py 
********************************************************************************
Loading Armory Engine:
   Armory Version:       0.93.99.1
   Armory Build:         a840b70352
   PyBtcWallet  Version: 1.35
Detected Operating system: Linux
   OS Variant            : ('LinuxMint', '17.1', 'rebecca')
   User home-directory   : /home/qertoip
   Satoshi BTC directory : /home/qertoip/.bitcoin/
   Armory home dir       : /home/qertoip/.armory/
   ArmoryDB directory     : /home/qertoip/.armory/databases
   Armory settings file  : /home/qertoip/.armory/ArmorySettings.txt
   Armory log file       : /home/qertoip/.armory/armorylog.txt
   Do wallet checking    : True
-INFO  - 1439193687: (BlockUtils.cpp:874) blkfile dir: /home/qertoip/.bitcoin/blocks
-INFO  - 1439193687: (BlockUtils.cpp:875) lmdb dir: /home/qertoip/.armory/databases
-INFO  - 1439193687: (lmdb_wrapper.cpp:446) Opening databases...
-INFO  - 1439193687: (BlockUtils.cpp:1231) Executing: doInitialSyncOnLoad
"sni-qt/19238" WARN  10:01:27.265 void StatusNotifierItemFactory::connectToSnw() Invalid interface to SNW_SERVICE 
-INFO  - 1439193687: (BlockUtils.cpp:1315) Total number of blk*.dat files: 318
-INFO  - 1439193687: (BlockUtils.cpp:1316) Total blockchain bytes: 42,500,991,204
-INFO  - 1439193687: (BlockUtils.cpp:1837) Reading headers from db
(ERROR) announcefetch.py:312 - Could not verify data in signed message block
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/qertoip/Projects/BitcoinArmory/announcefetch.py", line 304, in __runFetchSequence
    sig, msg = readSigBlock(digestData)
  File "/home/qertoip/Projects/BitcoinArmory/jasvet.py", line 589, in readSigBlock
    name = r.split(BEGIN_MARKER)[1].split(DASHX5)[0]
IndexError: list index out of range
-INFO  - 1439193689: (BlockUtils.cpp:1863) Found 369235 headers in db
-DEBUG - 1439193689: (Blockchain.cpp:214) Organizing chain w/ rebuild
-WARN  - 1439193691: (BlockUtils.cpp:1344) --- Fetching SSH summaries for 346 registered addresses
-INFO  - 1439193691: (BlockUtils.cpp:1357) Left off at file 317, offset 15768567
-INFO  - 1439193691: (BlockUtils.cpp:1360) Reading headers and building chain...
-INFO  - 1439193691: (BlockUtils.cpp:1361) Starting at block file 317 offset 15768567
-INFO  - 1439193691: (BlockUtils.cpp:1363) Block height 369213
-INFO  - 1439193691: (BlockUtils.cpp:345) parsing headers in file 317
-DEBUG - 1439193691: (Blockchain.cpp:214) Organizing chain w/ rebuild
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1400) Looking for first unrecognized block
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1404) Updating Headers in DB
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1691) Loading block data... file 317 offset 15768567
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:395) reading blocks from file 317
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1418) Wrote blocks to DB in 0.000427s
-WARN  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1114) Scanning from 368991 to 369213
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368992, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368993, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368994, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:359) Header heigh&dup is not in BLKDATA DB
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:360) (368991, 0)
-ERROR - 1439193692: (BlockWriteBatcher.cpp:2175) hit interruption marker from pull threads
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1458) checking scan integrity
-WARN  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1463) Top scanned block does not match top block header
-WARN  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1567) Issue is significant, attempting repairs
-INFO  - 1439193692: (BlockUtils.cpp:1579) Checking dupIDs from block 368992 onward

(python:19238): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_progress_configure: assertion 'value >= min && value <= max' failed
-ERROR - 1439193694: (BlockUtils.cpp:1626) Missing block data, attempting to repair the DB
-INFO  - 1439193694: (BlockUtils.cpp:421) reading block file 317
-INFO  - 1439193694: (BlockUtils.cpp:421) reading block file 316
-INFO  - 1439193698: (BlockUtils.cpp:2298) BLKDATA DB was repaired successfully
-WARN  - 1439193698: (BlockUtils.cpp:1114) Scanning from 368992 to 369213
-INFO  - 1439193699: (BlockUtils.cpp:1458) checking scan integrity
-INFO  - 1439193699: (BlockUtils.cpp:1646) --- bwbDtor: 0s
-INFO  - 1439193699: (BlockUtils.cpp:1647) Scanned Block range in 9.09197s
-INFO  - 1439193699: (BlockUtils.cpp:1653) Finished loading at file 317, offset 15768567
-INFO  - 1439193699: (BlockDataViewer.cpp:157) Enabling zero-conf tracking

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Try the latest commit with your damaged DB.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Thanks, that will help a lot.

Quote from: qertoip2 on August 09, 2015, 08:10:08 AM

Please find the ZIP password PM-ed. I've encrypted the ZIP just in case it has some privacy implications.

It does, encrypting it is proper practice.

qertoip2

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: goatpig on August 09, 2015, 06:40:26 AM

I would like that very much. If I can experience the issue first hand I can improve the DB repair code to catch that one too.

Armory 0.94 databases.zip with the issue:

https://mega.co.nz/#!ws0w3ZiK!T0wpFyeHV8yJ9f-BASgsHqsJ3g48IZp4pwUJfbN-AQo

Please find the ZIP password PM-ed. I've encrypted the ZIP just in case it has some privacy implications.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: qertoip2 on August 09, 2015, 06:22:18 AM

This happens every time I run Armory. I could probably reset this to working by removing ~/.armory/databases and starting over.

Yes, you will have to rebuild & rescan or delete the DB folder

Quote

Perhaps my "databases" would be useful for you? I can put it online if you need.

I would like that very much. If I can experience the issue first hand I can improve the DB repair code to catch that one too.

qertoip2

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: goatpig on August 08, 2015, 03:30:57 PM

Does it fix itself after a restart?

This happens every time I run Armory. I could probably reset this to working by removing ~/.armory/databases and starting over.

In the GUI a popup shows "bad block meta value". Once OK-ed the Armory shuts down.

This is 100% reproducible. Perhaps my "databases" would be useful for you? I can put it online if you need.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Does it fix itself after a restart?

Topic: Starting preliminary 0.94 testing - "Headless fullnode" - page 3. (Read 15232 times)