Topic: Still not satisfied with crypto games (Read 1145 times)

There is nothing stopping game-client developers from making a client that runs on a console.

I am not sure which of the many "Artificial Intelligence" systems currently being showcased as the bleeding edge of AI development can do quite what just yet, but seeing some showcase fantasy and sci-fi illustrations purported to have been created using an AI, and hearing hearsay about how "conversational" some AIs have already become, how long does it today seem likely to be before a client can be built that can basically turn any random novel into a movie, and how much easier would it be for an AI of such power to turn a text-mode MUD game into a real-time eyecandy experience akin to a news broadcast showing what is happening as you type to the character whose orders you are typing... Or hey why type, cannot it understand speech?

Thus I have always been aiming not at "twitch gaming" where someone else's client, or the game server, seeing the live video of what your character is doing would have to do image recognition to figure out even that you are firing a weapon at something, and extrapolate the line from your weapon to figure out what if anything your projectile might hit if it travels fast enough and the target stays still enough, but, rather, text mode games, using character's reaction speed and dexterity and aiming skill and so on, with any and all "illustrating" being a "client-side problem"...

So hey, I currently work more on the text mode gameserver side than on creating a newer MUD (text mode Multi User Dungeon) client smart enough to log into any MUD and create live video display of what is happening there and maybe allow speech commands rather than requiring user to type...

Also, accessibility is a big factor here too, deaf dumb blind or palsied ought not be locked out if they can be enabled to get in...

-MarkM-

It's just like memes in the last sentence, but with a different premise - it all boils down to the credibility and trust you put into the project.
Usually, crypto games are not that good to get into them, gameplay-wise especially.

As I write this post, the Galactic Milieu still has one "rabbit hole" into it that is still "free as in beer": you can right now use a Crossfire RPG client to enter the Milieu free.

How long that can remain the case is unknown, because at any time some griefer(s) could abuse the ability to do that, which could eventually lead to having to close new player registration entirely or put it behind some kind of abuse-discouragement "wall".

Note that for unknown reasons the Crossfire RPG metaserver the clients contact to get a list of currently-online servers available to connect to often fails to list the Milieu's server(s); so you might need to manually tell your client to connect to CrossCiv.knotwork.com

Even the Crossfire RPG interface to the Milieu has the game-economy problem of creating something out of nothing; the characters themselves spring into existence without any parents having been "bred", their starting gear has no provenance other than being a "gift of the gods" given to them out of nothing and so on.

Thus obviously larger scale interfaces, such as FreeCiv or even CoffeeMUD (in which a player account can run five 24/7 scripted artisans producing stuff by mining, farming, foraging, smithing, shipbuilding etc etc etc) would be even more problematic to the game economy if people could just create them free on demand.

Even as you read this post, ,some griefer could also be reading it and jump on over to trash this last remaining opportunity to get in for free, so act accordingly, which of course if you happen yourself to be the griefer in question kind of makes me wonder whether posting this is even a good idea...

-MarkM-

I don't know, but I think that PS in its latest version will allow the induction of being able to earn BTC or crypto in its games, of course this is for the latest version of PS. All those who have PS less than this version will not be able to enjoy the benefits, but if this is carried out, BTC would be entering a highly valued community such as Gamers, and I feel that it is possible that there will be an increase in demand of the same, because when entering here many will want to win money playing.

The very life of most crypto games is when players start to invest,

but if they are just P2E and they won't release any amount, the progress is slow and the chance of earning money is not that

interesting. While those who will take the risk, they are the ones who have potential, but again, the risk is also high knowing
the game will collapse as what's been done to scam crypt games.

That is the same thing with me, I used to play cryptogames but as time goes on I was bored out. So, I had to quit playing the games and look for something else to do with my time instead of spending my time on very boring games. The annoying part is that most of these crypto games are even a cash grab, if you are not going to invest much money then your chances of earning anything by playing the game is zero at best.

So, you will have to invest more money for you to upgrade your armor before you will be able to win anything at all, and even at that you still have to keep investing for you to be able to maintain your win. So, it’s really not my thing, and to make it worse they are not really entertaining.

Completely agree.

Most of the games out there that involve crypto is merely there for the reason of getting investor money or whatnot.

There are very little actual playable projects in the space, and none of them compete with the major titles that have already been released. That is one of the main detriments to the crypto gaming model imho.

I used to play battle royale, was a really interesting strategy game. Same thing with the other game that’s called Clash of Kings, they were all really interesting. I think that would be a good concept for Crypto games to follow. If it’s going to be like that, a lot of people would really be attracted to it and would love to play them, lots of people these days are fans of strategy games.

Apart from that, it’s also good like the op has said for them to up the quality of the graphics of their games, that would also push crypto games forward. When it comes to graphics and contents , these crypto games are lacking much and lots of players along the line gets bored asf, and quit.

I think that serious games on platforms such as ixbox or playstation with a cryptocurrency theme will not appear soon.While you need to look for such games on the Internet and play only there.It's a matter of monopoly corporations earn serious money about the players themselves, they don't think.

I've tried connecting MEW to the sandbox and some crypto games, I've played games and the results weren't good, there are many things that need to be improved such as the display speed graph and so on, but I think this is normal because crypto games are new things and need experience like games conventional.

I think its mostly because crypto games are just way too new and underdeveloped to be able to compete with the traditional gaming market. Once we start making better/more complex smart contracts that can really integrate into good games, we will only see some better stuff.

But then again, I think the only reason they are "boring" is because we compare them to traditional games that are way more developed over the years.

Blockchain as it currently is, might just be not complex enough. Or perhaps we haven't thought of a good way to make a good, new, never before seen game with blockchain technology.

Yes, that's why not everyone who likes to play games just because they make a profit, but because talking about hobbies doesn't always talk about money, typical people are different in doing what they like, but when talking about opportunities, everyone should be able to take advantage of them, especially availability. games that can currently be used to increase income, so it's not wrong to try to do it.

I don't have hobbies with playing game but exactly want to earn profit trough get play to earn game and want to purchase how much need for getting NFT hero card depend still earn profit more than my fund. I know some one looks happy with play to earn game although give little reward like AXIE game right now, with SLP price drop they keep play AXIE game because have hobbies with playing game without care how much earning getting.

Then do what you want. If you think playing XBOX is more good and fun than blockchain games, it's your choice. You can't really compare the usual games on Console or any platforms and blockchain games in terms of graphics, gameplay, and fun.

The fun part of blockchain games is obviously you will earn from them. But if you think that's boring, then we have nothing to do with it.

Blockchain that can be added to the games, composing on Blockchain or adding it to next impede is costly and costly and subsequently will be futile in light of the fact that the games require a millisecond update. We simply need to sit tight for major game organizations enter on Blockchain innovation to make an ideal chain that can deal with fast tx for handling games.

There are many purposes for people to play games, both for profit and for creating content to be shared on paid social media, the development of the times opens up space for anyone who is able to take advantage, not only making money from playing games, but also being able to use it to create content, that's why I say the current game will continue to be developed better, as long as we can take the opportunity, then take advantage of it.

At the moment it is very difficult to find a good project that has to do with NFT games, honestly I do not dare to recommend any because the few NFT game projects do not meet my expectations of security and trust, and I would not be able to recommend a project for someone to lose money, it would be something that goes against who I am and also my conscience would not leave me alone, so for now I do not recommend any NFT game until it is well studied.

We are now seeing the games evolving and the play 2 earn game agenda is now spreading so for sure in future we can see big companies will adopt this concept since as what Axie achieve for 4 years of running for sure this will be the basis of other game developer to adopt this system. And maybe in future we can see this made by means of living by other people especially when top companies are already create their own p2e systems with sustainable economy inserted.

For a crypto game to survive along the years the financial factor can't be the only incentive for players to keep active, otherwise it will last some months maximum and die right after due to the temporary hype. Players must feel inspired to keep playing because the game is fun and addicting. So, those people who don't need to earn money will keep playing for entertaining, while the rest will play for money. Then we have a perfect in-game balance or sustainability.

That is what actually happens inside most popular online games. People who can't spend too much time on it go through the easy route of buying items and gold from farmers, who are playing only for profit. That is RWT (real world trading), although it's forbidden by all these games.

Crypto games' developers just need to bring that reality to crypto universe, where RTW would be allowed, so everyone wins without breaking any rules.

Conceptualizing the game that will be fit for crypto, not just all because of the possible benefits

but it should be more focus of players' engagements. Axie is one of the examples where players are more into the money that they will
collect and about the game itself.

Crypto games still have lots of room to grow. We never know how the market will adopt and make new ideas to attached
each player who will paly he game.