Pages:
Author

Topic: StonerStanley Retarded Attempt At Extortion - page 2. (Read 1183 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Frankly this idiot is inconsequential to me. Highlighting Nutilduuh's emotional use of the trust system to excuse sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers is more of the issue.

You haven't red-trusted StonerStanley yourself. Why is it an issue that nutildah removed the feedback? Or are you excusing the abuser too?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.

And how exactly does this affect you? It sounds quite silly even by your own standards to get upset about every action that involves somebody who doesn't like you.

Frankly this idiot is inconsequential to me. Highlighting Nutilduuh's emotional use of the trust system to excuse sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers is more of the issue.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.

And how exactly does this affect you? It sounds quite silly even by your own standards to get upset about every action that involves somebody who doesn't like you.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Can someone please ELI5. Usually I'm pretty good at deciphering TECSHARE's conspiracy theories but I can't figure out how this (nutildah removing neg trust) is supposed to be harming him?

Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Can someone please ELI5. Usually I'm pretty good at deciphering TECSHARE's conspiracy theories but I can't figure out how this (nutildah removing neg trust) is supposed to be harming him?
sr. member
Activity: 535
Merit: 267
My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.

Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?

A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.


I see, so your defense is your rating was invalid to begin with.

Conceded? What did I concede exactly? StonerStanely is a manipulative cunt just like you are, and he played you like a fiddle jumping in while you were all riled up and got you to wipe his rating clean because you were so pissed off at me. This is funny because he is also pretty retarded, but he managed to manipulate you anyway. Lets break this down...

-You left a rating you say was invalid to begin with

-This sock puppeting extortionist trust abuser manipulated you into removing it because you were so emotional and thought it was a way to "get" me because you know he, much like you has an obsession with me

-Here you are once again trying to make this into some kind of crime I perpetrated to distract from your own irrational and emotion based actions

In summary, you are ok with a person who is a known sockpuppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser as long as it serves your personal vendettas. Is that about right?

No, as you can read there i talked about the fact that you insulted him. Everything is clearly explained. " i harrassed someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you"


Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.

And this private message from you before you started to disrespect me, show clearly what you think about Vod and other members that were on the thread and how you talked about them. All that because i was peacefully talking with them. Peacefully.
It was far before i started to disrespect you.

Anyway i do not have time to waste in such conversation.



Do me a favor please. Don't respond to those asshats. Let me deal with them. No one takes them seriously and I know how to make a joke out of them. You have nothing to gain by engaging them.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.

Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?

A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.


I see, so your defense is your rating was invalid to begin with.

Conceded? What did I concede exactly? StonerStanely is a manipulative cunt just like you are, and he played you like a fiddle jumping in while you were all riled up and got you to wipe his rating clean because you were so pissed off at me. This is funny because he is also pretty retarded, but he managed to manipulate you anyway. Lets break this down...

-You left a rating you say was invalid to begin with

-This sock puppeting extortionist trust abuser manipulated you into removing it because you were so emotional and thought it was a way to "get" me because you know he, much like you has an obsession with me

-Here you are once again trying to make this into some kind of crime I perpetrated to distract from your own irrational and emotion based actions

In summary, you are ok with a person who is a known sockpuppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser as long as it serves your personal vendettas. Is that about right?
sr. member
Activity: 535
Merit: 267
The extortionist pops up again, this time manipulating Nutilduhh into trading for an exchange of trust rating removal based on their mutual disdain for me off topic in the Politics and Society section.

Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.


I see, so you asking me for help, then me going out of my way to help you just for you to talk shit and post my PMs is me disrespecting you first huh? Interesting. BTW why the fuck are you even posting this in Politics & Society? Oh that's right, because you know it is a convenient place to manipulate that retard Nutilduh using the fact that they confuse emotion with logic to trade a mutual removal of trust ratings based on the fact that you both don't like me. What a couple of dopes.



Seems kind of dishonest leveraging baseless negative ratings to try to get others to remove theirs doesn't it?

I agree with this statement.  If you believe someone deserves negative feed back, and you remove it simply to get them to remove theirs, users in the future will be unaware and more likely to be scammed.

I wonder if TwitchySeal still holds this opinion. I would love to hear some more of his usual mental gymnastics when he contradicts himself.

I was on the nutildah's blacklist so i finally posted a message on the forum to reach him.... (no, it's not as complicated as you pretend)

Since everything i said on my message is a part of truth and a part of my thought, you shouldn't call it a manipulation.

I also removed my negative feedback from your profil at the same time, you probably didn't even see it because i didn't tell you anything about it.... So i'm far from being a manipulator.

I don't want more problem and i'm aware of my mistakes, you should also think about it. I'm a person not a puppet.

Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.

Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?

A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
The extortionist pops up again, this time manipulating Nutilduhh into trading for an exchange of trust rating removal based on their mutual disdain for me off topic in the Politics and Society section.

Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.


I see, so you asking me for help, then me going out of my way to help you just for you to talk shit and post my PMs is me disrespecting you first huh? Interesting. BTW why the fuck are you even posting this in Politics & Society? Oh that's right, because you know it is a convenient place to manipulate that retard Nutilduh using the fact that they confuse emotion with logic to trade a mutual removal of trust ratings based on the fact that you both don't like me. What a couple of dopes.



Seems kind of dishonest leveraging baseless negative ratings to try to get others to remove theirs doesn't it?

I agree with this statement.  If you believe someone deserves negative feed back, and you remove it simply to get them to remove theirs, users in the future will be unaware and more likely to be scammed.

I wonder if TwitchySeal still holds this opinion. I would love to hear some more of his usual mental gymnastics when he contradicts himself.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
Normally I don't publish peoples' PMs if I suspect they are being anything less than a total dick, but:

A PM like that ought to be made public IMO, so you'll get zero criticism from me for quoting it here.

I tagged this guy for harassing DT members, which I consider to be a tag-able offense.
I have to admit that I don't know the entire situation, since I can't seem to muster up the patience to read this thread from start to finish, but I'd say you're right to tag him.  The dude seems hostile, volatile, and ultimately untrustworthy--and that's what the trust system is for.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Normally I don't publish peoples' PMs if I suspect they are being anything less than a total dick, but:

give up this account
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
Public Service Announcement: Trust lists are supposed to be decentralized. That means if people are excluding whoever they want from their lists, the trust system is working as designed.

Exclusions means someone doesn't trust your judgement of decisionmaking. It would be insane to force someone to trust your judgement, and will only keep you excluded from their list.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
You the fraud and dishonest person are talking about a fraud ? 



(when i read this forum i'm forced to come back because you are so fun. I'm still watching at you... for a very long time, very very.... for about what you did to my account. don't make any public business over internet)

More retarded threats. I didn't do anything to you. You did this all to yourself.
brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
Users face the problem with Brother Printer offline, such as they are not able to print the document to your install Brother Printer offline windows 10. Because show the printer offline. You will some setting adjust and you can able to print. So, I have explained some setting you can follow the step by step and resolve the issue.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Following the example given by his pal Timelord, TECSHARE started 7 weeks ago to distrust me.

On March 27th, 2020 I PMed him, kindly asking to le me know what led to this decision. I stated that I'm not interested in changing his decision, just to tell me why.

He never replied.

However, I didn't distrust him back, nor gave him any feedback.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
You had a chance to not get a negative feedback from me, but you blew it.

https://youtu.be/Y9KyBdPeKHg?t=25
sr. member
Activity: 535
Merit: 267
I'll remove it when he will remove ABitNut from the trust list because ABitNut is not a trustable person since he gave me a negative feedback for no reason and that i don't deserve a negative feedback. That is the TECshare fault if ABitNut is in this list.

You had a chance to help yourself out earlier when you PM'd ABitNut, but you blew it:

I've not been active on this forum for long. But I got a notification that I had a private message so I checked it out:

Few years ago you gave me a wrong feedback "untrust" saying that i'm an altcoin which is false. Now i gave you one negative feedback too saying that you are a scammer.

Delete your sh*t.

I checked the feedback I left. Yes, I called you out for being an alt account years ago. And that's exactly what my feedback means. I (as an individual) was convinced that the person that controlled your account had multiple accounts.

Now I'd be open to reasonable arguments but:

1) Your message to me is rude
2) You're abusing the trust system by leaving false feedback
3) You're accusing me of being a scammer

So I'm disinclined to oblige your request.

Have a nice weekend.

You can't talk to people that way if you want them to do something nice for you.

He's the one that referenced his rating to try and get an action from me.  I blocked him PMs and moved on.

You did not "move on." You left him a negative trust and called him a scammer. So much for anybody attempting to be the bigger man.

So he can disrespect me but i can't disrespect him ? You are a very dishonest person.
You had a chance to not get a negative feedback from me, but you blew it. According to the fact you are not a trustable person because you have a sens of the morality that is very wrong by defending someone who disrespect me.

(since i give up this account you can do what you want Smiley )
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
You are moderator?
No, it doesn't say so under my name.

Quote
Check my private messages, and check how he talked to me.
As far as I know, Moderators can't read other user's PMs. Only Admin can, and I'm pretty sure they won't bother to read it.

Quote
I already read your link.
Great! Now act on it Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
I'll remove it when he will remove ABitNut from the trust list because ABitNut is not a trustable person since he gave me a negative feedback for no reason and that i don't deserve a negative feedback. That is the TECshare fault if ABitNut is in this list.

You had a chance to help yourself out earlier when you PM'd ABitNut, but you blew it:

I've not been active on this forum for long. But I got a notification that I had a private message so I checked it out:

Few years ago you gave me a wrong feedback "untrust" saying that i'm an altcoin which is false. Now i gave you one negative feedback too saying that you are a scammer.

Delete your sh*t.

I checked the feedback I left. Yes, I called you out for being an alt account years ago. And that's exactly what my feedback means. I (as an individual) was convinced that the person that controlled your account had multiple accounts.

Now I'd be open to reasonable arguments but:

1) Your message to me is rude
2) You're abusing the trust system by leaving false feedback
3) You're accusing me of being a scammer

So I'm disinclined to oblige your request.

Have a nice weekend.

You can't talk to people that way if you want them to do something nice for you.

He's the one that referenced his rating to try and get an action from me.  I blocked him PMs and moved on.

You did not "move on." You left him a negative trust and called him a scammer. So much for anybody attempting to be the bigger man.
Pages:
Jump to: