Topic: Stop fuckin' around, fork the son-of-a-bitch already. - page 13. (Read 9367 times)
i think there will some scammers make a new coin called bitcoin classic like etc to eth, unhealthy to the community.
Remember ETH hard fork? The community and it's price after hard fork?
Maybe better learn from past experience and wait a bit longer.
Maybe better learn from past experience and wait a bit longer.
Who cares about the price? Why is it an objective to 'get the price up'? Very stupid. Let's get the functionality up.
Let's fork it two times - or three times. Everyone will have the same tokens on each chain to start with. Then, one chain will prove to be more reliable and higher performing that the others. Then Greg Maxwell can go take his Blockstream shitchain with Lightning Liquid side crap to hell where it belongs. Blockstream wants to own Bitcoin. I say fork it and let them have their silly side chain project. The 'other' chain with 8MB will take off and on chain scaling will live forever after.
Only Blockstream gets hurt by a fork. Fork it!
I never say to 'get the price up', but to prevent from massive dump or crash. I'm sure some people cares about the price (and sometimes don't care about hard fork at all).
Maybe by fork few times could hurt blockstream or other hardfork bullshit, but it will be hard time for many bitcoin and i'm sure there's people who left bitcoin, share FUD or another exchange hack.
Also, it would be hard if there's more blockstream supporter, even i think it won't happen.
Hard forks are good. Stop crying. They allow two discrete paths to flourish and see which works best. Too freaking bad if some of your juice gets stuck on the 'bad' chain. On fork day, you've got equal action on both chains. Make good decisions thereafter. No harm, no foul.
Let's do it NOW!!!!
Fork it already.
What is kinds of coins who will be hard fork? Do you mean will be hard fork for bitcoin? Should you write the coin, it will make nice understanding for every users who has read your statement. Let's do it NOW!!!!
Fork it already.
If I were to make a crap post like this, it would be moved to the Bitcointalk graveyard (The off-topic section) no doubt. Rank privilege is a real thing here unfortunately.
Remember ETH hard fork? The community and it's price after hard fork?
Maybe better learn from past experience and wait a bit longer.
Maybe better learn from past experience and wait a bit longer.
Who cares about the price? Why is it an objective to 'get the price up'? Very stupid. Let's get the functionality up.
Let's fork it two times - or three times. Everyone will have the same tokens on each chain to start with. Then, one chain will prove to be more reliable and higher performing that the others. Then Greg Maxwell can go take his Blockstream shitchain with Lightning Liquid side crap to hell where it belongs. Blockstream wants to own Bitcoin. I say fork it and let them have their silly side chain project. The 'other' chain with 8MB will take off and on chain scaling will live forever after.
Only Blockstream gets hurt by a fork. Fork it!
Core's conservative view on hard forks is what has made Bitcoin survive for 7+ years. Look at the ETH/ETC disaster. We must not hard fork unless we have like 99% of support.
the reason people say no to a hard fork is because of the requirement of a high amount of people running the hard fork to ensure miners block solutions dont orphan..
guess what.. cores softfork wants a high acceptance rate too before they activate.. soo.. logically..
pt the hardfork code in with the softfork stuff and then when the magical acceptance level is reached we can have actual real capacity (not the smidgen of core softfork) along with the other features the softfork meant to offer too..
inshort: 2 birds-one stone
here.. ill do it using numbers
HF=2mb for 2x capacity
SF=4mb for 1.8x capacity
HF+SF= 4mb for (4x but probably end up) ~3x capacity
it just makes logical sense.
oh and dont forget to keep the activation mechanism to allow the amounts to increase simple by users independently desiring it in their settings(flag), as oppose to waiting and praying to devs to lead and control decisions
guess what.. cores softfork wants a high acceptance rate too before they activate.. soo.. logically..
pt the hardfork code in with the softfork stuff and then when the magical acceptance level is reached we can have actual real capacity (not the smidgen of core softfork) along with the other features the softfork meant to offer too..
inshort: 2 birds-one stone
here.. ill do it using numbers
HF=2mb for 2x capacity
SF=4mb for 1.8x capacity
HF+SF= 4mb for (4x but probably end up) ~3x capacity
it just makes logical sense.
oh and dont forget to keep the activation mechanism to allow the amounts to increase simple by users independently desiring it in their settings(flag), as oppose to waiting and praying to devs to lead and control decisions
Remember ETH hard fork? The community and it's price after hard fork?
Maybe better learn from past experience and wait a bit longer.
Maybe better learn from past experience and wait a bit longer.
it would be unfair for those devs actually, imagine the very thing you worked all your life and all of a sudden being copied by someone just because we have the rights and we all call it opensource. like they said there's always a fine line to distinguish them whatever we call it these days whether hackers and idiots.
Rawdog... you're right.
I am always right. I thought I made a mistake once, but it turned out to be correct. 
Rawdog, you are soo raw!
I see your point though. Explore all the options and pick the best... you're right.
I see your point though. Explore all the options and pick the best... you're right.
Hard forks are good. Stop crying. They allow two discrete paths to flourish and see which works best. Too freaking bad if some of your juice gets stuck on the 'bad' chain. On fork day, you've got equal action on both chains. Make good decisions thereafter. No harm, no foul.
Let's do it NOW!!!!
Fork it already.
Let's do it NOW!!!!
Fork it already.
Jump to: