Topic: Successful ICO With No Buyback Mechanism - page 2. (Read 18513 times)
I'm not really sure about what really the cause of the drop on the coin price when it got listed in the market, but what i think, that would be because there are people who sell their coins in a lower price compared to the price when it firstly introduced during the ICO or something like that. because those people wanted to have quick money from the coins that they had. That is what i'm thinking of.
There should be a demand for the product as that is the proof that it is useful. Beyond that, buyback mechanisms could
boost the price as they are reducing the supply and the supporting the price. Many successful projects using that model.
The buyback is indeed a good way to ensure investors and bounty hunters get decent coins, because at least they will not suffer heavy losses
but I think there are only a few developers who agree to do that because their initial purpose of holding an ICO is because they need money so they will not be able to buyback especially for ICOs who only get softcap
but I think there are only a few developers who agree to do that because their initial purpose of holding an ICO is because they need money so they will not be able to buyback especially for ICOs who only get softcap
full member
Activity: 510
Merit: 100
BBOD fast, non-custodial & transparent Exchange
It is a good idea if all successful ICO has a buyback program to avoid the price dumping although they still need to have a working product to realize the true value of their coin. Buyback + Burning program will be great if all project has it.
Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..
Your thoughts on this.?
Your thoughts on this.?
That is right, the ICO should using some of their raised funds to support their token price in the market.
Im afraid if they don't prevent dump on their token price, it won't be able to recover the value of their token in the future.
i know that even a strong buyback mechanism will have a hard time keeping their coin from dumpers
Cryptocurrency tokens are created to have a fixed supply and had been released on a decentralized ledger, which ensures that value is assigned accordingly based on how the market speculates on the price of the token.
However, the existence of tokens don’t always benefit blockchain companies and can work to undermine the progress of the business if the tokens have no proper utility, or the market chooses not to associate the business achievements with the price of the token.
However, the existence of tokens don’t always benefit blockchain companies and can work to undermine the progress of the business if the tokens have no proper utility, or the market chooses not to associate the business achievements with the price of the token.
very agree if an ico is successful and for ico developers to have to buy back tokens sold by investors and bounty hunters,
chances are that the upcoming ico will definitely succeed again, because investors' trust will definitely be obtained in the future.
chances are that the upcoming ico will definitely succeed again, because investors' trust will definitely be obtained in the future.
Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..
Your thoughts on this.?
Your thoughts on this.?
That is right, the ICO should using some of their raised funds to support their token price in the market.
Im afraid if they don't prevent dump on their token price, it won't be able to recover the value of their token in the future.
I think that buyback mechanism should be prevalent in most ICOs. However, this is not the case. I saw Helbiz announcing a buyback and Dropil I think was the other one project.
This shows the team is engaged and believe in the project.
This shows the team is engaged and believe in the project.
Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..
Your thoughts on this.?
Your thoughts on this.?
its hard to find an ICO project with buy back mechanism,,
because as i know all money that collected during the crowdsale was used for the development and marketing my friend
but who knows, in the near time, a project with buy back mechanism will be born in this industry
Why to search ICOs with buy back mechanizm if you can sell bounty stakes immediately when they earned (appear on the spreadsheet) for ETHEREUM on Tokpie exchange.
The problem of falling prices after the ICO is the main reason for the collapse of the bounty community. Since very often projects want to benefit and leave the market and then reopen the project which will be similar to the same. Here the question is the honesty of the organizers and developers of the project. If there is a constant technical support of the product as well as competent marketing, the price will decrease minimally and will grow in the future. Quality project and this is different. You have to choose wisely.
you are right every project should have a final product that can provide its investors and not just blow the air away .
I think that projects that collect millions of dollars can easily afford to support their own coins by buying some of the coins from holders, at least in a bear market, this will help to avoid total prices and keep the cost.
Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..
Your thoughts on this.?
They were all gonna die anyway, that's how they were supposed to be because developers just never thought of continuing to develop a project after they have got what they want. It just sucks on most part of bounty hunters and also the investors that ICO these days are not like the same as before. I think it is dying already because of this kind of developers and their team. Your thoughts on this.?
In this situation it depends to demand in the market even the ICO is successful. If the project have a good product and marketing it will have maintain good value in the market even its bearish season. We all know that what is the success of the project the investor and bounty hunter will be benefit to it.
Well, true after all investors and bounty users would get the most benefit a lot about the success of an Ico. A lot of Ico’s failed because of cannot sustain the needs for the project. So, by having this buyback mechanism can also help to attract and ensure the needs of an investors when investing into the project. 
I feel like investors lose more
Before as a bounty hunter, you have so so little to lose if a project fails
You took the risk to join the bounty
Remember, all bounty have a rules regarding payment that can be altered
Before as a bounty hunter, you have so so little to lose if a project fails
You took the risk to join the bounty
Remember, all bounty have a rules regarding payment that can be altered
There you go, someone else willing to use a little bit of logic and rational thinking.
Investors by definition risk something the moment they make a choice. Hard cash just sitting there. Bounty hunters, in fact have nothing to lose but time itself. And in 2017 people were just spending 5 minutes and seeing, wow I could make hundreds of dollars doing this. Well that greed and expectation of easy money was so appealing to people.
So they came. Investors lost and bounty hunters whined.
In this situation it depends to demand in the market even the ICO is successful. If the project have a good product and marketing it will have maintain good value in the market even its bearish season. We all know that what is the success of the project the investor and bounty hunter will be benefit to it.
with unfavorable market conditions, it will be very difficult for ICO projects to control the price of their tokens when registered at an exchange and I think if an ICO project dares to buy back will be able to help maintain the price of their coins at prices that don't fall too much. although the possibility is very small, they do remember that they need a lot of money to do this.
They can allocate funds for this even a small percentage is a good start and if they believe in their project the coins that they buy back will have good value in the long run and they are the one that will make profit and as long as they develop their project, the coins that they buy back will have good value
with unfavorable market conditions, it will be very difficult for ICO projects to control the price of their tokens when registered at an exchange and I think if an ICO project dares to buy back will be able to help maintain the price of their coins at prices that don't fall too much. although the possibility is very small, they do remember that they need a lot of money to do this.
I feel like investors lose more
Before as a bounty hunter, you have so so little to lose if a project fails
You took the risk to join the bounty
Remember, all bounty have a rules regarding payment that can be altered
But they can't have a big change for bounty, If they have big changes for it, such as reducing the amount of bonuses many times, or delaying payment for several months. Those are unacceptable actions and it is scam Before as a bounty hunter, you have so so little to lose if a project fails
You took the risk to join the bounty
Remember, all bounty have a rules regarding payment that can be altered
Jump to: