Topic: SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL - page 22. (Read 115687 times)

I will donate 25k SUPER and if i understand correctly @pro-investor & @apojii will also donate 25k each.
That is 75k SUPER so far.
I.m.o. paying a dev in SUPER to develop Supercoin is recommended.
When a dev holds SUPER too he's more connected (and hopefully loyal) to the project and every positive move Supercoin will
made, the dev will also have advantage of.

If it is needed i can donate some more than 25k SUPER.

When we reach 400k SUPER that would be about 1% of the available SUPER supply right now (which will grow thanks to PoS).
That's a nice amount for a new dev to step in... and he also get's lots of thanks and love from SUPER holders 

 

I doubt you will found developer who is willing to invest his precious time without few BTCs in escrow funds. Try to collect some funds, 50k Super coins won't help, believe me, if you are looking for something serious. Else this project will continue to deteriorate.

me too

@pro-investor

A real dev who can prove he's a real dev.

@JosNekoKopa

The Supercoin network & Supersend are working great.
Supercoin is listed at CoinExchange, NovaExchange and Cointopay.
Webshops & webservices can use Cointopay to accept Supercoin payments.
There's still a loyal group of Supercoin supporters.

For now Supercoin needs a wallet that uses less memory.

How do you planning to fund devs work and expenses?

That's why i want to donate SUPER to a new dev.
When a supercoin dev is holding a nice amount of SUPER himself, i'm sure he will
be more motivated to develop Supercoin.
Every positive move he made with Supercoin, will be in his benefit too.

Still hoping that Griffith & Barry decide to stay active as developers for Supercoin.
Barry even finished the new Supercoin+ wallet but because of all the negative talk
from some people he gave up his work for Supercoin  

Don't forget, most coin dev's are just people that develop in their free time,
they have a job, a family, other real-life issues, they don't get rich by doing this,
sometimes it will even cost them money and it will cost them even more free time!

For all trolls: Show some respect and gratitude to dev's, if you think you can do it
better, don't talk shit, DO IT BETTER or shut the f-word up!

And what do you expecting from new dev? How do you planning to fund devs work and expenses? Nobody will work for free, and if work he will abandon project sooner or later. So consensus about those important things is necessary.
In what condition is blockchain? Wallet? Everything working? Who is in charge here?

To a real dev, me too.

I will donate 25k SUPER to a new dev.

i hear they're trying to revive the Wooly Mamoth by combining Mammoth DNA with that from an Aisain Elephant, thereby creating the first MamEphant. maybe we can make a SUPER-MAM  

I remember Supercoin and MAM, am i good? which means MAM is going to revive also?

No. It's not over with Supercoin. This coin has solid code and works superbly.
But yeah, a new dev was willing to help but many here have shot him down...

https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin

Super is working fine. The code is very robust, network good.

Does this coin has ANON solution finished? Once i tested super coin and transactions are extremely fast, this is big plus. But this is not enough for staying in this game. Where can i find source code, to inspect little bit?

The Coin itself is still syncing and stacking, I have 8 connections, it's fast and SuperSend is working..
Everything about the coin is still great, we just need an enthusiast developer to take over..
Anyone?

Does that mean that it's official over with Supercoin?

BarryStyle has moved on as a core developer for another coin.
So I'm not sure if anyone is working on Supercoin currently.

How is the revival from supercoin going on is fuze0000 still letting everybody know how good he is in the IT business or as Fuze0000 (community manager)? Any news? Did Barry deliver the new blockchain or still working on it.

Would be good to come up with some forward resolution to this coin as I always considered it a unique method of transaction which could still be refined and developed.
I was even wondering if it could be piggie backed onto ethereum somehow.

I have followed this coin for a long time and after watching what happened early on I could see that without a doubt that it got other more established coins that was worth alot more so worried that they made a conserted effort to try to put this coin down as much as possible, which spoke volumes of its potential, and as it turns out they have succeded at least up untill now.

If anyone out there has the skills and can have a fair understanding of the possiblities that could be put forward and has a feasible reality of any potential that the underlying method of transaction could bring about the future use of this coin I think it should be brought forward now before this is forgotten forever. Which would be a great pitty.
Alot of advancements have occured since which has to be ballanced against any futher development. Probably only a skilled developer with the relevent understanding could decide if its worth the effort, or just let it be.

Would be good to here some fair analysis.

thats a pretty big claim man. honestly.

sending from supercoin to supercoin+ occurs as such:
supercoin address is 34 bytes long, this is split into two halves; which is encoded using b58encode into two supercoin+ addresses (using padding where necessary).
the private key of either of these supercoin+ keys is unknown, as we've only calculated a valid public address.

however; we can test each send that we see to two addresses on the supercoin chain (i wrote a miniature block explorer in python specifically for this); that only allows a send from supercoin to supercoin+ if:
a) it detects a send to two addresses (sendtomany)
b) once the 17 bytes encoded in each have been recombined, and both addresses match b58enc checksum encoding (this would be impossible to 'cheat').
    since we do not know the private keys given for either key; they are essentially burn addresses.

if a send is detected as valid, the total value of the send is sent from the pool of new coins, to the address that has been decoded.

the entire purpose of this was so people could move to a new, quicker chain (not the existing 4mil block one) and the performance benefits that go with it.
the code has been done and completed for some time. once there is confirmation that an exchange will list it, im more than happy to release the coin's source onto github (this prevents someone from mining the genesis block before it is launched properly and claiming the entire coin supply).

i had previously paid cryptojohn for some new logo designs, but he promptly disappeared afterwards.
reiterating, if someone would like this new 'lighter' version listed - please feel free to pay the listing fee for the exchange and i'd be more than happy to directly send them the source code.

it would be impossible to reduce the existing coins chain from its current near 4 million blocks.
there is no existing method to allow this, so i improvised and came up with a solution.

james

We can try refork a new coin, and can use the SUPER for ICO.