SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL - page 25. | Bitcointalksearch.org

pro-investor

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: jakiman on December 11, 2016, 06:42:47 AM

Eagerly waiting for the new client. Appreciate all your hard work barrysty1e.

Keep waiting.... it takes a few minutes to make the client from the source code...barrystyle is just an other wannabe developer.

My wish for the new year....let the original developer take back SUPER and make it SUPER again

jakiman

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1011

jakiman is back!

Eagerly waiting for the new client. Appreciate all your hard work barrysty1e.

TvZ

sr. member

Activity: 315

Merit: 251

Thanks, would be nice

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Quote from: TvZ on December 09, 2016, 05:44:48 AM

@barrysty1e

Looks nice, thank you very much!

Will there also be a pre-compiled Linux (32bit) version available?

Ps. Don't forget to open port 19390 at your router/firewall for more
connections and to help the Supercoin network!

i wasn't planning on it, but i do have a debian box sitting idle; so yes can do.

TvZ

sr. member

Activity: 315

Merit: 251

@barrysty1e

Looks nice, thank you very much!

Will there also be a pre-compiled Linux (32bit) version available?

Ps. Don't forget to open port 19390 at your router/firewall for more
connections and to help the Supercoin network!

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Quote from: Galahad111 on December 09, 2016, 01:06:13 AM

When will The old SuperCoin qt stop staking new coins?
Good Job and thank you for all your effort.

cheers.. it will keep going as long as there are nodes about; i run one permanently on amazon, so should be for a while yet. ideally though, i'd like to transition majority of the funds between chains and then let supercoinplus run on its new lighter chain (initial goal with my involvement), but there is no end date in sight.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Looks good :-)

cheers. will look much nicer once i get CryptoJohn's new graphics in there.
additionally, when i get some time i want to sort out the unimplemented multisig scenarios too, mentioned earlier in the thread.

to all:
just letting the base node accumulate some more blocks before i add a few base checkpoints, then i will release the code, binaries etc to all.

Galahad111

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 122

Quote from: barrysty1e on December 08, 2016, 07:34:25 PM

Completed Win32-qt client

Crosschain address conversion utility

Crosschain detection backend/homebuilt block explorer

The funds seen in the first picture, form the 'pool' of funds that the Crosssend occurs from.
Sending 1000 SUPER from the old wallet to the new chain is as simple as converting the destination address (of SuperCoinPlus), to a SuperCoin compatible format using the tool, then creating a special send from SuperCoin itself.

Then once committed to a block, your funds will show up in SuperCoinPlus.

Im going to.. go do something else for a while, been on here for a bit too long,
baz.

When will The old SuperCoin qt stop staking new coins?

Good Job and thank you for all your effort.

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Completed Win32-qt client

Crosschain address conversion utility

Crosschain detection backend/homebuilt block explorer

The funds seen in the first picture, form the 'pool' of funds that the Crosssend occurs from.
Sending 1000 SUPER from the old wallet to the new chain is as simple as converting the destination address (of SuperCoinPlus), to a SuperCoin compatible format using the tool, then creating a special send from SuperCoin itself.

Then once committed to a block, your funds will show up in SuperCoinPlus.

Im going to.. go do something else for a while, been on here for a bit too long,
baz.

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Hi all,

I'll be releasing SuperCoin+ this Saturday (or possibly later tonight).

Everything is ready to roll.
There are a few things I haven't added yet (new improved graphics from CryptoJohn); but the 90 second PoS, crosschain sends and gui update is complete.

I lost my original 'Crosschain' RPC bolton with my disk drive crash; however, i've nearly finished a standalone win32 app which will assist in sending funds from SuperCoin to a SuperCoin+ address.

james

KickAzzDude

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

Can probably get it listed on Alcurex

Coinmin

sr. member

Activity: 483

Merit: 250

Quote from: apojii on December 04, 2016, 03:43:11 AM

all die

Supercoin as a Superman, will never die.

apojii

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

all die

marseille

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 500

Quote from: barrysty1e on November 16, 2016, 05:17:26 AM

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 02:13:09 PM

Supercoindev implemented the "normal" scenario for supersend, but there are 3-4 exception conditions he did not implement. When we tested it, about 10% cases there are some exception conditions (such as mixer unexpectedly quit), in which case the supersend may be stuck (that guarantor should sign off the transaction depends on the cases). He was planning to implement them, but unfortunately he was too busy with his work so he decided to quit. Also he was pissed by the fact that many inferior coins put a lot of people to promote, such that these coins have much more people despite have nothing new. The supercoin has some truly new technologies.

Anyway, if you are good, fix these problems and make Supercoin better

I hear what you're saying, if you know of (or find posts from the past) any variables/conditions that the behaviour has been noted to occur under; i'd be more than happy to investigate.

From everyone's point of view so far, they just see revised front end design.. theres a bit more going on now, not just a nip and tuck, and this will be shown once I upload the codebase to gihub (hats off to CryptoJohn though, simply awesome designs).

Quote from: pro-investor on November 13, 2016, 02:48:44 PM

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 02:13:09 PM

Anyway, if you are good, fix these problems and make Supercoin better

I have to admit I laughed at that, good one man.

Well, take a look at the workflow, in the first post of this thread. In case the erroneous conditions occur, look at the flow diagram with red arrows, when sender does not satisfy with mixer's tx, he can request guarantor to cancel the transaction. This is shown in diagram in red arrows as 7b, 7c etc. These flows are not implemented in the code if I remember it correct. Check the code and fix them (there are many other exception conditions need to be fixed). Have fun.

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 02:13:09 PM

Supercoindev implemented the "normal" scenario for supersend, but there are 3-4 exception conditions he did not implement. When we tested it, about 10% cases there are some exception conditions (such as mixer unexpectedly quit), in which case the supersend may be stuck (that guarantor should sign off the transaction depends on the cases). He was planning to implement them, but unfortunately he was too busy with his work so he decided to quit. Also he was pissed by the fact that many inferior coins put a lot of people to promote, such that these coins have much more people despite have nothing new. The supercoin has some truly new technologies.

Anyway, if you are good, fix these problems and make Supercoin better

I hear what you're saying, if you know of (or find posts from the past) any variables/conditions that the behaviour has been noted to occur under; i'd be more than happy to investigate.

From everyone's point of view so far, they just see revised front end design.. theres a bit more going on now, not just a nip and tuck, and this will be shown once I upload the codebase to gihub (hats off to CryptoJohn though, simply awesome designs).

Quote from: pro-investor on November 13, 2016, 02:48:44 PM

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 02:13:09 PM

Anyway, if you are good, fix these problems and make Supercoin better

I have to admit I laughed at that, good one man.

pro-investor

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 02:13:09 PM

Anyway, if you are good, fix these problems and make Supercoin better

marseille

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 500

Quote from: barrysty1e on November 12, 2016, 03:05:18 AM

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 02:47:13 AM

No it's not a bought account, I am what I am

I was referring to the other chap there.. marseille.

lmao, when I tested the supersend with supercoindev and others, I don't know where you were. So apparently you are SUPER dev now, do you understand the code? do you know what are not implemented?

Supercoindev implemented the "normal" scenario for supersend, but there are 3-4 exception conditions he did not implement. When we tested it, about 10% cases there are some exception conditions (such as mixer unexpectedly quit), in which case the supersend may be stuck (that guarantor should sign off the transaction depends on the cases). He was planning to implement them, but unfortunately he was too busy with his work so he decided to quit. Also he was pissed by the fact that many inferior coins put a lot of people to promote, such that these coins have much more people despite have nothing new. The supercoin has some truly new technologies.

Anyway, if you are good, fix these problems and make Supercoin better

valley365

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1003

Quote from: barrysty1e on November 12, 2016, 03:05:18 AM

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 02:47:13 AM

No it's not a bought account, I am what I am

I was referring to the other chap there.. marseille.

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 02:47:13 AM

The PoW/PoS coin never fully sync'd with Bitcoin or Litecoin. All PoS coins are based on novacoin, the latest I think is with protocol version = 70049 and database version = 80609. The current SUPER codebase is way old, it has protocol version 60013 (I think) and database version 70508. As I said, numerous bugs are fixed there.

All PoS coins are actually based around Peercoin (which has been updated to 0.6 codebase); with Novacoin being an older clone which is still late 0.5 codebase. Novacoins latest protocol being 60018 and database 70507.

Supercoin is currently at protocol 60013 and database 70508.

Seeing as you're quite insightful, with an eye for detail, i'd be more than happy to merge some newer code in there; provided the bugs that the code fixes are deemed a serious-enough issue.

You are right, novacoin is old, got that mixedup

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 02:47:13 AM

No it's not a bought account, I am what I am

I was referring to the other chap there.. marseille.

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 02:47:13 AM

The PoW/PoS coin never fully sync'd with Bitcoin or Litecoin. All PoS coins are based on novacoin, the latest I think is with protocol version = 70049 and database version = 80609. The current SUPER codebase is way old, it has protocol version 60013 (I think) and database version 70508. As I said, numerous bugs are fixed there.

All PoS coins are actually based around Peercoin (which has been updated to 0.6 codebase); with Novacoin being an older clone which is still late 0.5 codebase. Novacoins latest protocol being 60018 and database 70507.

Supercoin is currently at protocol 60013 and database 70508.

Seeing as you're quite insightful, with an eye for detail, i'd be more than happy to merge some newer code in there; provided the bugs that the code fixes are deemed a serious-enough issue.

valley365

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1003

Quote from: barrysty1e on November 12, 2016, 02:30:52 AM

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 12:40:49 AM

Great to see SuperCoin still there alive. I looked at the codebase, it is pretty old, the dev should upgrade it to the newer codebase, where there are many bugs fixed.

Also it seems to me that the SuperSend code, many exceptions are not handled, which need to be fixed.

Which codebase are you referring to in particular? Bitcoin 0.9/0.10/0.11/0.12/0.13?
Feel free to tackle this if you like - which bugs are you running into, in particular?

Please feel free to list any exceptions (with screenshots) that you've experienced.

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 01:28:09 AM

Not sure the current dev if any understands fully the code, looks to me SUPER is in maintenance mode instead of actively developed now.

If you'd like to see some quicker developments, feel free to contribute towards Super/Super+'s future (contact Griffith or myself directly).

Oh - you're a bought account, my bad Cool

No it's not a bought account, I am what I am

The PoW/PoS coin never fully sync'd with Bitcoin or Litecoin. All PoS coins are based on novacoin, the latest I think is with protocol version = 70049 and database version = 80609. The current SUPER codebase is way old, it has protocol version 60013 (I think) and database version 70508. As I said, numerous bugs are fixed there.

barrysty1e

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 516

Quote from: valley365 on November 12, 2016, 12:40:49 AM

Great to see SuperCoin still there alive. I looked at the codebase, it is pretty old, the dev should upgrade it to the newer codebase, where there are many bugs fixed.

Also it seems to me that the SuperSend code, many exceptions are not handled, which need to be fixed.

Which codebase are you referring to in particular? Bitcoin 0.9/0.10/0.11/0.12/0.13?
Feel free to tackle this if you like - which bugs are you running into, in particular?

Please feel free to list any exceptions (with screenshots) that you've experienced.

Quote from: marseille on November 12, 2016, 01:28:09 AM

Not sure the current dev if any understands fully the code, looks to me SUPER is in maintenance mode instead of actively developed now.

If you'd like to see some quicker developments, feel free to contribute towards Super/Super+'s future (contact Griffith or myself directly).

Oh - you're a bought account, my bad Cool

Topic: SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL - page 25. (Read 115687 times)