Topic: SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL - page 6. (Read 115687 times)

Yeah I agree 100%. First lets begin with new clean and attractive ANN without revival word. We also gonna need all types of wallet to be included within new ANN for wider range of usability.

The wallet works fine but it's a memory hog. I'm not sure if it's loading the entire blockchain into memory or something but it eats 1.5gb of RAM when it's open. Ideally, that should be fixed.


Possibly, possibly not. Rebranding can sometimes damage an existing reputation, other times it can be a breathe of fresh air and a new lease of life. Personally, I'm not bothered about rebranding it.


All good ideas. I'm happy for the Super I'd kick in to go towards any of these - it doesn't have to be given straight to a dev. If people think it's better used paying a listing fee for an exchange (for example) then go for it.

Great to some action on Supercoin.

I willing to donate some supercoins myself to contribute to the development of supercoin.

Before targetting exhanges like bittrex we first have to build a stronger foundation. I think with input from the community we can make Supercoin great again.

Before doing marketing, i think it is best to lay the ground work first. Then we have something to show for.

I prefer discord over slack 100%. A lot of coins are jumping from slack to discord because you can manage it much better. Also, have a telegram group to discuss supercoins future too

Hi guys ! I think a new ANN , clean with all the new data in it , and a donation from all of us to get Supercoin back on Bittrex is the best start ! It will grow , it will atract new people to our comunity and possible a new developer to get the project further ! For example , i am new to this coin , and i try to enter the website posted in the beggining of the Ann ! What will be my first reaction ? Trust =0 , no investment !  ANN s name scares me ! Bittrex gives me a bit of confidence and so on .. ( i am a shareholder anyway , it s been years and it s lovely to see tou guys still care ; let s make it big. )

I'm working on the linux one, I'll post a status update on Sunday.
My weekend is pretty booked so I might need another week to dig into it.

But other reviews(requested by fuze0000 to other coder) suggests everything works flawlessly.Although Griffith said that in past he couldn't give a valid reason for that.So there is no problem there in fact.So leave that part instead we can add other functions in addition.

Right now we gonna need variety of wallets for users having different OS to make SUPER usable in wider range.Then we gonna need it listed in other big exchanges like bittrex as we're getting good amount of volume too.
Well said thirstygerry  

Hi guys

Let me just say how great it is to see everyone here putting their head together!
It really feels like a community already!

Good job everyone!

Now, don't shoot me, I'm just posting my thoughts here
Why do we need to overhaul the wallet?
It works the way it is.

If we change the logo (the brand) wouldn't this hurt the coin?
I'm not sure that our community is strong enough to survive a makeover.
Because if we do, we'll just become one of those coins who struggled and then decided to try again under a different brand.

One of SuperCoin's strength is the fact that IT'S STILL ACTIVE.
Even through years without fancy support or constant wallet updates.
We are known for our consistency.
Our stability.

There's nothing wrong with the logo, or the brand.

So why go out and throw thousands of dollars/euros at a developer to change those things?
Hiring a dev to work on something that already functions, is just a waste of money imho.
Also, even if we find something for him to work on other than cosmetic changes there IS NO GUARANTEE AT ALL that the value will of the coin will go up.
Yet here we are already talking about a five-fold increase in value

I do believe we should use that effort, team-spirit and, if necessary, that money to spread the word of SuperCoin
To focus more on marketing and getting mainstream by:
- contacting exchanges
- creating videos for the youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCefOoTEbTeVCGXE93TZ1e6A
- twittering more https://twitter.com/_SuperCoin_
- make people aware of our website https://supercoin.nl/
- Bstappleton has some other great ideas
- Open a slack channel, which was already requested several times here on the board (your message was received Recharged )

Why change a winning team instead of making it even better?
Dressing up a horse won't make it run faster

I suggest we put our energy in moving on with what we've got now.
If in the future the need arises to make changes to the code and thus possibly lose a part of our userbase, then so be it.
But for now, there's still so much we can, nay MUST do before changing the fundamentals that make our beloved coin what it is.

you hire a dev, pay him/her in super and lock the super away until deliverables are received.

A legit dev who signs on will understand the value proposition. 400k Super is $52,000. After dev completes that should be worth in excess of $250,000. Not a bad payday for a couple months work.

Hmm i liked this part.
It would be good to hire freelance dev only for implementing what would make SUPEr even super.

Yeah but I do believe they'll contribute what they can for the development of SUPER.

Well, thirstygerry has set up BTC and ETH wallets for development donations but we could do with a Super one too. I like the idea of paying a dev in Super for the reasons outlined by that poster you quoted - it makes the dev a stakeholder and provides a personal incentive to work on the coin. That said, I've got no problem paying set fees for a freelance developer to implement specific things the community decides on. There are pros and cons to both ways of working.

If the others who offered to donate Super to a development fund are still interested then it would be good to hear from them. I wouldn't expect them to offer the same amount, though - 6 months is a long time in crypto and the recent prices rises mean that 25k Super is now worth quite a few pennies.

I'll match that. At current prices, 20k Super is about $2500. That should get the ball rolling.

Actually there are others too who want to help out including myself.Also there will be more who will donate.So we can make a dev fund which can be managed by a community.

I wish I did. Everybody is working and the only devs I know are the ones that I hold the largest bags of. :-)

update: I pm'd you a possible.

How about someone put together a google doc with donation commitments to pay for a dev to turn this around.
I'd commit 10K super without a second thought.

It really is. That's what attracted me to this coin in the first place.


You seem to have been around a while. Can you recommend anyone who'd take a fistful of Super to overhaul the wallet?

I can't help with the marketing, but I do have a team of designers that I could ask to produce new logo and branding ideas. The community could vote on which they preferred and the wallet / website updated accordingly. If anyone thinks this is worthwhile, let me know.

Alright thanks. I will wait until its fully synced

In my understanding, it can't stake when it's not synched anyway - it can't insert anything into a blockchain that's not up to date. I'd just completely ignore those ghost transactions and wait until it's finished. Then it should start staking fine.

Well at this time it doesnt stake anymore. I have like 40 unverified transactions from the last 4 hours alone

This doesnt seem ok

I'd let it finish synching first and then see what shakes out.

Guys need your help:

I am running a full resync from the beginning. Its day 2 now. About 60% done now.

But the last 4 hours or so, i see incoming transactions from staking but the are not getting verified all of a sudden.

It says: generated but not accepted Mined

What is the problem? Will they be verified afterwords?