Topic: #SuperStraight - page 2. (Read 1013 times)

This topic brought a widest grin on my face I have had in a week. Thanks op, that was very, very entertaining. Keep posting more.

Whoever it is that finds these things normal, I hope your kids grow up watching gay porn in their youths. Good luck everybody. Make sure they all watch netflix 24/7 and it will turn out just fine.

I mean, I don't watch a huge amount of TV, but if your favorite show is putting 10 minutes of gay porn in every ~22 minute long episode, I think there's a high chance you are just watching gay porn.

I'm not sure. I'm mean, I was rewatching some Fresh Prince on VH1 when all of a sudden something called "RuPaul's Drag Race" came on, and within minutes I had spent $300 on lingerie and makeup. Explain that!?

I suggest you stop watching, then.

Nope. I am homophobic. I feel disgusted when I watch 2 men fucking each other.


I didn't say you can. I said I don't like seeing it.


Nope.


Maybe not, it is just not my thing.

Yeah that is probably the case. I don't think you can become gay from watching TV, you must have such feelings before. Nothing wrong with that. But I am definitely super straight and there shouldn't be anything wrong with it either. To be honest I don't mind if some feminist get angry about it, it's kind of funny, because I need to keep up with all their nonsense as well.

The blame isn't directed to us as individuals, but to us a part of a collective identity of 'white', or 'straight', or 'male'. Oppression isn't merely historic. It is better now than it used to be, but it has not disappeared. Black people are still being murdered by white police kneeling on their necks. Ethnic Chinese in western countries are being assaulted because of an imagined link to Covid19.
And it's not so much 'blame' as a caution to be vigilant against racism. Similar to how an uprising of nationalism is more troubling if it comes from Germany... historical context informs the present. Doesn't mean that you, as a random person in Germany, wants to bring back the Third Reich.


Positive discrimination is a clumsy and flawed method, but with a laudable aim. There are much better approaches used in certain industries, for example some orchestras are conducting _(sorry) blind auditions. It is better not to specifically hire the black/female candidate because they are black/female, but to have a process in place whereby gender and ethnicity are removed from the interviewer's consideration. Orchestras is obviously a limited example, but it shows it can be done.

That's not really how this works. If a TV show can make you gay I'm gonna guess that you were never straight to begin with.

Putting a giant 10 minute gay porn scene in the middle of my favorite show is disgusting and that's exactly what they are doing, telling me to become a gay person. I do skip these scenes though doing it almost every episode becomes, tiring.

I am not telling other people how to live their lives, I want them to not tell me how to live mine.

Fuck netflix

I wouldn't say oppressed, rather blamed.

If you are a straight white male, there is a discourse that blames you for the oppression that historically blacks, women, homosexuals, etc. have suffered, even if you have never discriminated against anyone and you are against it. This is done from political positions from the left.


Positive discrimination is discrimination at the end of the day, because you end up choosing a less prepared candidate not because of his merits but for those reasons I mentioned before, that I have to pay today for what some morons with whom I do not identify did in the past. I don't agree with that being a greater cause.

[/quote]

Perks are needed to ccompensate man-made inequality, within reason. Trans people are as sick as everyone. Do you think you do not have any mental issue? Then, that is your first mental issue. You have your views, that is fine, just do not try to impose those views on others. Is the same  for those who think that everyone is in some way gay or that gender identity should define your life.

The bottom problem is the same with football, religion, politics,... This is about people who can learn to live with others that are different and those who can´t. And this also goes for Lesbians who hate man, gays who hate women, Muslims that hate Christians, Christians that hate everything that is not them and such a long etc...

Your first mistake is to label yourself to prove a point, which is the only reason I can think for being "super straight". Why don´t you try with "Straight Maximalist", it sounds even better.

I'm a straight, white male. Show me the data.
Unless you mean less than 50% of the population is white male? Which, given the approximately equal gender split, means you'd only need say a 1% non-white element for white males to drop below 50% of the population. But still by far the most powerful ethnicity and gender.

Have a look at current senators, and then tell me that white males are oppressed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_senators
And here's a breakdown of supreme court judges by ethnicity and gender: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/25/politics/supreme-court-justice-minorities-history-trnd/index.html
Yes, I would have a problem with 'rights for whites'. Come back to me when whites are forced to sit at the back of the bus or work the plantation, and I'll join the resistance.

Positive discrimination is a different issue. It's an attempt to right systemic wrongs, but obviously has consequences for individuals. If I went up for a job, scored the same on the assessment as a black candidate, and lost the job because the employer wants to address their ethnic balance, then would I feel aggrieved? Yes, probably. But if we are balancing an individual against the whole society, then society should win. My loss would be a win for the greater cause.

Agreed.

As for the last paragraph, don't know how to respond and not particularly keen to quote it.

Every time I hear about how "the gays" are turning more people gay or in this case, "the trannies" are recruiting more people, I am reminded of these data:



See if you can guess roughly where we stopped forcing left handed people to write with their right hands. There have always been ~12% of people who are left hand dominant. All that changed is society's attitude towards them.

Straight white males are now the systemically oppressed, the most so in 50 years..
All else have all sorts of advantages, and it’s ridiculous..

You would have a problem with a movement labeled “rights for whites” wouldn’t you?
How about a United white college fund? How about universities and companies openly stating that they should hire less of everything other than whites?


The KKK?
The KKK is a pathetic and weak organization compared to BLM and antifa who are currently destroying cities..
I can hardly believe the KKK is even worthy of consideration..


Trannies are to be pitied the same as most any other debilitating condition/disability..
They are obviously the least attractive to most.. Some traps may draw some attention, but only for a small percentage of their life while their still very young.. Will likely suicide once some age catches up to them..
I feel sorry for them all, but angered at the attempted normalization and recruitment of it..

Bigots and oppression, yes, this is the root of it. 'Super straight' isn't about an oppressed minority group seeking a voice and recognition. 'Super straight' is a response to those seeking a voice. It's an attempt at oppression. Exactly the same as 'all lives matter'. And exactly the same as if the Klan rebranded themselves as 'rights for whites'.

It's a negative dressed up as a positive, that's all this is.
It's 'we don't like lesbian/gay/trans/etc' dressed up as 'straights are people too!'
And this is revealed by the need to differentiate 'super straight' from 'straight'... it's 'straight' but with an added element of 'we don't like people who aren't straight'.

I'm saying something about bigots being so prejudiced that the very people they are trying to oppress are unlikely to want much to do with them.

Also, "even trannies"? Are "trannies" somehow a lower class of person? They should be grateful for any attention us normal people give them?

Perks??
How about not..

Trans are mentally ill with very real and dangerous mental health and physical health risks..
Suicide rates off the charts often due to regret, body mutilating surgeries, hormone therapies with terrible life long side effects often being used on children, and worse..

This is not something that should be celebrated and promoted as cool and popular..

In no way should those who dare to speak of these consequences be harassed and labeled as bigots, much less those who refuse to engage in relationships with them..

The propaganda is pushing this to kids as a cool and popular thing to do for attention creating an incredibly dangerous fad with often severe consequences..

Whoever protects, promotes, encourages, or enables this vary from spineless to downright sick, encouraging the destruction of lives..



Lesbians are overwhelmed with “trans men” larping as lesbians..

Your trying to say something about traditionalists being so unattractive that even trannies would want nothing to do with them? Lol ok

Are you aware that that eye-opening supernew and supercool narrative was the Middle Age narrative in a twitter feed? Nobody is telling you how to live your life, so just stop telling others how to live theirs.


The rule of law is not a concession from the men to the women and equality before the law is not the rule of Darwinism.


I think that there is no need whatsoever to classify, that sexual identities are not a thing and that everyone should be free to do whatever they feel as long as there is mutual consent among all the parties involved.

The whole debates makes little sense. I am tired of being fed with news about women doing stuff because I already know they do and can do stuff. Yes, everyone should be equal before the law, have the same opportunities and perhaps some gender discriminatory legal protection and perks if that is needed for their safety and progress. I do not need to hear about it, I do not need to hear "superstraights" crap on how superior they feel nor how gays like to do stuff on different holes or play scissors.

On a modern society, this should not even be a debate. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Oh, and yes I know, in half of Latin-America, large bits of Russia, many Muslim countries and the best part of Africa and in the US Bible belt they still live in the middle ages on this aspect, so all I ask is for them to keep their shit to themselves.

The perpetually offended are simply mirroring the hidden offence that they carry within themselves.

And that's what I've been saying. Thank you. Super straight is a straight to the point insult for those people with preference not liking same gender and thinking already that they're transphobic or something.

And referring to this generations line of thinking with regards to being offended. Yes they're really sensitive and want social validation for anything they does. But not all of this generations people are like that, most of them comes from social media people who had been growing with that kind of environment.

Isn't it the culutre these days to be offended? I think for many people the internet is just here to have arguments with complete strangers. So many people are getting triggered these days online and invest a lot of time just to try and convince others of their opinion. The problem is that we will never listen to complete strangers online. Honestly, we should be bigger than that and just try to be positive. There is no reason to fight over sexualities. Everbody has the right to be happy and identify as what he wants, so calling someone out as transphobic is not right.