Topic: #SuperStraight - page 3. (Read 1013 times)

I think the root of this is fear of the Other. Homophobia, racism, any sort of bigotry, have the same underlying basis.

Human society is often Us vs Them. 'Them' is a threat, and has been back to the time of paleolithic hunter-gatherer tribes, and I'd imagine early than that, back through our hominin ancestry. And of course it has served rulers throughout history, from tribal chiefs and kings and warlords right through to modern governments, to deflect attention/blame from their own shortcomings onto the convenient scapegoat of the outsider who doesn't have a voice to defend themselves. 'They' are always to blame. Brexit. Mexicans. Black people. Gay people. etc. etc.

And any exposure to this Other serves to peel away a part of the illusion. Which is why the most racist communities are those in 100% white rural areas, why the most ardent homophobes are those who have never met an openly gay person, etc.

They maybe thinking about the possible outcomes in future events. What this may cause and how will it affect them. As they think about it, they started to have somehow concern related to the topic thus start the conversation.

And I don't think that this male gender they referred as the "SuperStraight" to be the one to recommend and add it to the LGBTQ. As a matter of fact, based on the description, it is like a tease to those straight men to be called superstraight.

Shhh! We don't want people to figure out that you sent me some deadly mist, and shortly afterwards a deadly virus spread by aerosols (i.e. mist) encompassed the entire globe. Otherwise they'll figure out that we are in cahoots to put the 5Gates microchip in the entire world!

And now you want to send me a radioactive bobcat? Hope everyone has got their tinfoil hats bodysuits ready.

---

Somewhat back on topic, but I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

I'll bet one of the unclaimed mystery boxes I still have lying around from the Vulpine Order of Merit. This one contains a live bobcat (as mystery boxes sometimes do), as well as an experimental apparatus containing a caesium-137 radiation source and an untested Monsanto product. This a new experimental design intended to remove sampling bias from controlled trials, developed by Monsanto and later abandoned when they realised that scientific studies don't hold up in court, which is how I got this box so cheap. I'm sure it'll go nice with the other Monsanto box I gave you. As always, open with care.

No bet. It's probably already happening on one of the chans.

EDIT: Typo

This is going to fly like a lead balloon.

Deal. I'll bet the schematics for the secret microchip that we've actually been smuggling in to all the COVID vaccines. I expect an equally juicy stake from you.

How about a bet on how long it will take someone to declare themselves "super white"?

Super Straight: The New "Transphobic" Sexuality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENADjeOXYcA

Probably all incels right?

You're on. I give it six months, a year at the most, before a moderately-sized scandal erupts involving a semi-famous "super straight" person being caught having a secret sexual relationship with a trans person (assuming this "super straight" fad even lasts that long). It's as inevitable as ardent homophobes turning out to be secretly gay. (Never underestimate the ability of hateful bigots to somehow manage to score dates with people they openly claim to hate.)

I would also wager that anyone who would label themselves "super straight" in real life will never find themselves in a situation where a trans person might want to sleep with them.

I don't think those people are even ready to understand just a bit of what "super straight" means and trash it immediately. I don't think you can even start a conversation regarding this topic with them.

Though I would like to see if there is a significant relationship with those two variables. I wonder.

That is true for those who support this extremist movement that has polluted public discourse.If they want the full brunt of what it truly means to be equal they must face the same survival of the fittest brutal nature of what it means to survive in the most hostile places.Weak men who are disadvantaged by a lack of physical strength or other characteristics are being discriminated against when they have to face other stronger men on the battlefield,prison yard,boxing ring,rugby pitch etc so if the sluice gates are to be opened then they should will be opened fully and these extremists will reap what they sow but unfortunately they will bring forth the misery they release upon the heads of all decent women also.

It is only because of the merciful nature of men towards the weaker sex that this does not happen but if the extremists brainwash all women eventually then mercy will no longer show its face and women will reap what they sow.This is the unfortunate scenario men and women are faced with as the provocateurs are left go unchecked and unchallenged.

They want to be equals when it benefits them and not when it doesn't. Classic SJW hypocrisy.

If women are deemed equal to men then the real argument regarding quotas to be filled should start at the bottom.There should be equal representation of bodies on the front line in any future conflicts.Similiar quotas should be met down coal mines etc.Women should no longer get special treatment when the ship is sinking as it is now discriminatory to men to have women and children be placed in the life boats first (you see where this is going).

There should no longer be any female prisons and all genders should be accommodated in the same manner as it is discriminatory and apartheid to have separate facilities.There should no longer be male or female only sports,dressing/changing rooms,lavatories/toilets etc as this is aparteid and discriminatory.


....you see,as you reap you should expect to sow.Hypocrisy and not vanity is the greatest sin as partial and selective truths are but a lie.I cannot lie

~infinite wisdom V humanity's infantile brains  

I wonder if there's a correlation between people who identify as 'super straight', and people whose response to BLM is 'all lives matter'.
I would assume there's pretty much a 100% match. Probably a bit difficult to acquire data on this, but perhaps if someone is willing to go to Washington and stand outside the Capitol with a clipboard, ready to question 'passers by' the next time it's stormed, we might get some interesting information.

It does seem a bit of a 'What about me? I'm not a minority but I'm important too! Stop focusing on oppressed people/groups!' kind of thing.

Yeah imagine that, how to turn your coworkers and boss against you in 3 seconds. I mean he couldn't really fire you for it, because you are protected by law. But still I wouldn't want to see how the performance talks are going to look like and you will probably not getting any bonus for that year. This is just creating such a huge mess.

And now it seems that super straight is already banned from TikTok. Probably only a matter of weeks until Twitter and Facebook will do the same.

Say what you want about Trump, but I am forever grateful the leader of one of the largest countries did not legitimize transgender delusion like suggesting that transwomen are women and that they should be allowed into real women's locker rooms, or into women's sports.

This is the bit I find weird. If I find someone attractive I'm going with that.
Do people of the 36+ sexes out there that have always existed have to declare that on the first date (as soon as you meet them)? (eg it's possible for the dna for testes to be added to the end of an X chromsome.

---

I'm glad the topic was made here by someone tbh. Most of the people arguing about this on tiktok are likely minors who haven't fully developed much of an understanding. And tbh I felt the same about 6 months ago in case someone wanted to have kids or something (but that's kinda been turned into something that's ableism by some parts of the community).


This looks like sexual assault at the very least it feels iffy.


That isn't socialism or the American definition of liberalism either. A socialist ideology seeks to level everyone and is so far functioning well enough to have only one country still using it (North Korea).
I'd like to say we're making progress in equality in this world but we're really not... Taking a different name and gender on paper might be a great way to reduce the pay gap (7% of ceos of the top 100 companies are women, in the S&P500 it's about 14%). I think people have also been hammering into people for too long that they're being discriminated against to a point where they're beginning to accept nothing will ever change...

the patriarchy is and was the worst thing to happen to capitalism the idea of men inheriting everything gives them as little to hope for as it does women being told they don't have a place in business. I don't want inefficiency when I can have innovation.

Does this mean that when your (hypothetical) daughter tells you that there's a boy in her school who always follows girls into the ladies room because he thinks he's one of them, you'll say it's all fine because he should be allowed to be who he wants to be?

try that in the workplace
boss: "good morning ladies and gentlemen"
jeff: "boss dont call me a gentleman. im an aggressive trans using pronouns 'them'"
boss: "well dont call me boss either. call me 'the person that pays your wage if you get on with your work'"
jeff: "dont tell me what to do.. im not a slave"
boss: "well 'them' is not listed on my payroll, so your right. so as a free person you can go home and find another job"