Topic: Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh - page 5. (Read 13396 times)

Letters are cool bro!

Did you see the letter to Senators from 650 and counting Law Professors (including 12 from Bart's Alma Mater)?

While Barts little temper tantrum and Trumps ignorance last night in Mississippi may play really well to the republican base it surely can't be helping Bart's chances of getting 50 votes!

The arrogance, ignorance, hypocrisy, and delusion in this thread, as well as in the left in general is why people are fleeing your ideology enmass, and why everything you say ends up being meaningless. The left doesn't follow any rules, even their own. Who knew the productive debate over the subject would degrade into this? Oh right that was always the plan. Who needs facts when you can just lie until everyone is confused. Have fun with your circle jerk. See you at the midterms dipshits.

Why, this is shocking. SHOCKING.

We would not want his kind in our highest court.

Now let's see those Obama high school and college records.

What gangs did he say he hung out with?

It seems that it wasn't very uncommon stuff in their yearbook.. In their day..


Bottom left guy above founded the name devils triangle?



Yearbook - https://archive.org/details/cupola-1983

We should indeed look at those. This one -

Renate Alumni Club: "she was just a friend"

What do you think it REALLY MEANS? Come on, you KNOW he's lying.

Uhhh... I guess due process is "ridiculous and silly" now. I mean, if we just ignore the laws of the land and stop following them, anyone that follows them would be "ridiculous and silly".

If the guy can't tell the truth to congress, there's no way in hell I'm going to trust him as a judge telling the truth.

Not to mention those cases I highlighted the other day. Kinda tells me he's a corrupt, shit tier judge. I think we need to open a few more investigations into this guy just based on those cases alone.

It MIGHT BE TRUE that what I'm saying is I'm giving you this one. I'm allowing you the possibility that "Have you BOOFED yet? 'Flatulence.' " ....

Might be a BALD FACED LIE. And (whisper-whisper) it was really about was whether he'd engaged in sexual act XYZ.

However what are the CONSEQUENCES of my giving you that one. Suppose the consequence was for you (or other Democrats) to continue arguing an insanely  ridiculous and silly point. Suppose the consequence was to make you/them look totally stupid.

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a total fool of himself."

Sworn statement from Ford's ex-boyfriend..



https://www.foxnews.com/politics/christine-blasey-ford-ex-boyfriend-says-she-helped-friend-prep-for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm

Edit to add - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=PSrTdxipS5A

Wasn't the prosecutors GOP appointed? Why did he lie to congress / senate? If he answered truthfully and honestly, we wouldn't be discussing this.

Overall, the shitbag nominee is a shitbag.

Thank you for your concern over my possible constitutional well being.

Unfortunately, though, the "process" I refer to is not the "due process" you would like to get on a high stool and lecture sagely about.

Rather it's a process of entrapment, used by unethical prosecutors when they know they are unlikely to find evidence on the subject that a person was brought in for questioning for.

I am really not interested in process nonsense.

Wow. Due process isn't your interest? Just supreme and totalitarian control? Sounds pretty fascist bypassing the checks and balances this nation was founded on.

Maybe you should read up on the constitution before you continue posting here...

http://constitutionus.com/

inb4 "Constitution is fake news"

I checked your "collusion-timeline" link and didn't see any collusion.



There's a prosecutorial tactic that's summarized as Trapping a person into Process Violations.

It doesn't matter who it is or what it is, you get them under oath answering questions, and with a bit of skill at how the questions are phrased pretty soon you have CRIMES!

That's what happened with Flynn. That's why Trump doesn't want to talk with Mueller. That's .... what you are talking about here.

This is different from guilt or innocence on the matter for which the person was brought in and put under oath, eg for Kavanaugh  various Rape Smears.

I am really not interested in process nonsense. Now you can call that stupid if you want, but that's actually my opinion on it. Anyway I hear there's a new charge on Kavanaugh that should be vigorously investigated.

During college one night ....

HE THREW ICE AT SOMEONE!

Because you're so fucking stuck on the Russian collusion, yall should probably check out the Mueller investigation:

https://themoscowproject.org/collusion-timeline

Just because the corrupt GOP fucks refuse to act on clearly presented evidence doesn't mean he's innocent.

There's been multiple reports from individuals (and sworn testimony) that says Brett perjured himself. If you take a step outside your echo chamber, you'd see these bits of news and evidence (sworn testimony under oath = evidence, who'd thunk?)

Anyone is welcome to cough up their 1982 calendar and their yearbooks and refute him. But nobody is doing that.

There shouldn't be any need for speculation. Doesn't matter anyway. We're going to see pretty quickly whether the guy gets confirmed or not.

And then we're going to see whether the bigger motivator of the base voters is the smears and lies of the lying liars bringing out to vote outraged Democrats who got cheated once again of what they think they deserved...

Or outraged Republicans and independents sick and tired of this juvenile horseshit.

Where's that Russian Collusion?

Someone who's nomination is only still being held in place because of his popularity with Evangelicals?

Ironically enough the Evangelicals are cool with hypocrites as long as they are happy to push the evangelical agenda!!!!  He could have done the bush thing and just say I was an irresponsible KID, but he took the Trump and Clinton way of deny deny deny, in spite of irrefutable evidence!

I don't think there is any public evidence that shows any of this is a lie. What you say is nothing more than speculation.

Exactly if none of the allegations where true he should of asked Trump and the senators for a FBI investigation to clear it up but refused to, also at the hearing all he had to say was look when I was in high school and college we had parties just like every other kid's in america do but I didn't do what I'm accused of but instead he sat there and lied about it and if anyone believes his bullshit lies than they are stupid and gullible  

Brett lied about too many things... he has proven himself to be a compulsive liar... no wonder Trump loves him


Beach Week Ralph Club Biggest Contributor: "I'm known to have a weak stomach... catsup on spaghetti..."
Have You Boofed Yet?: "flatulence"
Renate Alumni Club: "she was just a friend"
Devil's Triangle:  "a drinking game"
FFFFFFFourth of July: "my friend stutters"


Sure man... sure...

Who lies about such silly nonsense anyway?  Why not just be honest that you liked to drink and have sex?

I'm not a democrat or republican I believe both side have great idea's and could accomplish so much if they worked together but it seems like Trump has brought a whole new hate to our country and I actually thought at one point he would be good and help but I now more than ever believe he ran for president and bullshitted people into believing he wanted to make america great again only to line is own pocket. Now as far as Brett Kavanaugh if anyone can actually say that hearing was fair why didn't the republicans let the female prosecutor question him because this guy is a liar every question that was asked he either lied or cried I worked my butt off lets face it he was a rich kid who's mommy and daddy cleaned up everything he did wrong

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/new-sworn-statement-alleges-ford-lied-under-oath-about-prepping-someone-for-a-polygraph

The Senate Judiciary Committee received a sworn statement from someone described as a longtime boyfriend of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser Christine Blasey Ford stating that she coached someone on taking a polygraph examination.

Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, requested any audio and video recording of Ford’s polygraph test from Ford's legal team in a letter Tuesday, since she used the examination results to support her allegations when testifying before the panel Friday.

“The full details of Dr. Ford’s polygraph are particularly important because the Senate Judiciary Committee has received a sworn statement from a longtime boyfriend of Dr. Ford’s stating that he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coaching a friend on polygraph examinations,” Grassley says in his request for the materials.

During her testimony before the committee last week, Ford said under oath that she had never given any tips or advice to anyone who was planning on taking or preparing for a polygraph test.

If Ford’s former boyfriend is telling the truth in his statement, which he submitted under penalty of felony, it could implicate her in perjury.

Grassley says it is not only concerning that Ford may have lied under oath, but also brings into question the reliability of the results of her polygraph.


https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1047293294567456770