Whoever is renting hashpower right now to mine bca and dumping on exrates. You need to understand, when you drive up the difficulty 5x and you sell for whatever buy offer you see, you are dramatically destroying profitability. In just three days of renters mining bca 250terahashes went from earning over 200bca a day to just 50, and the price has been driven down from over .003 to .002. This means you just reduced profitability of mining this coin 5x in just three days time. The volume is low enough on exrates where if you are mining hundreds of coins a day you can dictate which way the market will go. Be smart with your renting/mining/trading.
The most unfortunate fork, without further development. The students decided to just try to con investors ' money, 18 million coins for 3 months. Atomic swaps this command will never provide at least themselves, if only copy someone's work in the network.
Hmm, if you studied the source of BCA, you could see the substantial changes made to original Bitcoin protocol. Regarding the amount of coins, if you knew what the fork is, you would understand that given BCA's nature as Bitcoin fork, almost 17m coins have been distributed to Bitcoin owners, that is why such amount of coins is already allocated. Regarding the further development, after the fork the wallets have been released and numerously updated, last update was from 5 days back. If you studied the commits on github, you would have seen the huge amount of work being done. If that is no further development, well then please tell us what is further development. Something tells me you're here only to fud, not to lead reasonable conversation.
[/quote]
Why doesn't the output input work on Yobit of your coin ? If you say that you do a great job where the listing on the big exchanges ? The question of 18 million coins is still open...You want to say that all holders of bitcoin transferred their coins to ESP, COINOMI, YObit, EXTRATES, OEX for the fork ? It can't be !!! Also why in this connection mining of a coin didn't become complicated ?