If the new owner or existing partners wish to stay in Antigua, fine but why not say so? If the site has new ownership and Brandon is the new owner but lives solely in Antigua and is out of the jurisdiction of the US and will never return, why not say so? (If he is that is, so is
[email protected] Brandon Casten?) The fact you cannot answer thiis simple question throws up flags.
Copsucking informants like yourself can go over to another poker site. You needn't play on ours. Stop spamming our thread and go play on Full Tilt. Our record is better than our competition and we're proud of that. We're staying anon, just like Satoshi. Don't like it? See yourself to the door.
Informant? Not me sir, I enjoyed your site and wish you the best but what is best for you is not best for everyone's security or piece of mind. You may get a handful of cheerleaders here who support you but as long as the avoidance continues, numbers will stay very low.
I put a lot more stake in reputation than personally identifying information. SWC/Seals always maintained fairness and security and to be honest, if they weren't anonymous the recent situation with Micon shows that that would actually make security worse, not better. As long as they are anonymous they have less risk of being arrested and jailed, which means that our funds on the site are in less jeopardy. You can say the numbers will stay low, but as soon as they get a proper client that is non-windows, I'm sure you'll se many player there again. It has long been the go-to for bitcoin poker and is suffering now mainly because of not having a proper client.
Still no denial of ownership/partnership, your avoidance answers my questions in a way, if Brandon Casten doesn't own seals why not just say so?
There is a really go reason not to, which is that you don't want to get caught up in a game of "okay, then are you person1?" No. "okay then are you person2?" No. "okay then are you person3?" No. ...
They clearly said they want to remain anonymous so obviously that means "no comment on who we are". No comment means no coment. It doesn't mean "no comment unless you say the wrong guy then we'll comment and say no were're not that guy". I hope you understand what I'm trying to say. If you ask me who I am and I say I'm not going to tell you and then you follow up with "Are you Barrack Obama?" then I'm not going to answer that latter question, refusing to answer it doesn't mean that I
am Barrack Obama, it means I'm not answering questions about who I am.
I read the satoshipoker threads and it did not paint him well until the very end when apparently people were paid so maybe he made it right. Just like to know if that is the same person in control now.
There is a thread on twoplustwo.com right now where a guy says he felt cheated and support gave odd answers. The ownership of seals whoever that is should take more care.
Good day